Copy of appeal and notice sent to CPIO High court of judicature at Allahabad.

To
                                               
Chief Justice
                          
High court of judicature at Allahabad
                          
District -Allahabad , Uttar Pradesh ,India
Subject-To made available the copy of appeal submitted under
subsection 3 of section 19 of Right to Information Act 2005 to central public
information officer as notice has been served to parties of appeal to appeal on
the fixed date of hearing 24-May-2016 at 10:30 AM.
Hon’ble Sir-With due respect your
applicant/petitioner wants to draw the kind attention of the Hon’ble Sir to the
following submissions as follows.
1-Matter is concerned with R.T.I. Communique
submitted under subsection 1 of section 6 
of Right to Information Act 2005 before CPIO ,High court of judicature
at Allahabad dated-05/06/2014 .
2-Copy of notice of Hon’ble CIC dated
03/05/2016 is annexed with this communication for the kind perusal of Hon’ble
Sir. File No. CIC/CC/A/2014/002533/RK .
3-Index of the appeal in two pages is attached
with this communication.
4-Copy of aforementioned second appeal is
annexed with this communication in 10 pages which kindly be forwarded to
individual staff who will be nominated by the Hon’ble Sir to represent the
case.
                          Please take
appropriate action in accordance with the law .For this your applicant shall
ever pray you Hon’ble Sir.
   
Date-11/05/2016                                                       
Yours sincerely
                                                                 
Yogi M. P. Singh Mobile
number-7379105911
Mohalla-Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road
District-Mirzapur , Uttar Pradesh ,India
What action
was taken still a mystery.?
जज ने सीना छुआ और सलवार उतारने को कहा…  गोंडा ज़िले मेंदो लड़कियों
ने पुलिस में शिकायत दर्ज कराई है कि एक जज ने अपने चैंबर में उनके साथ
छेड़छाड़ की.
पीड़ित लड़कियों में से एक की उम्र तेरह साल है, और दूसरीकी इक्कीस साल.
दोनों अलगअलग परिवारों से हैं और दोनों के साथ यह घटना एक ही दिन पर अलग
समय पर हुई.           
                   
एक लड़की का आरोप है कि जज
ने उससे शॉल हटाकर कपड़े उतारने को कहा, जिससे वह उसकीउम्र का पता लगा
सके.
लड़की ने अपने बयान में कहा है कि इसके बाद जज ने उसका सीना छुआ और सलवार
उतारने को कहा. इस पर लड़की रोने लगीऔर कहा कि यह सब मुझसे नही होगा.
                 
                     
दूसरी लड़की ने भी इसी तरह
काबयान दिया है. उसका कहना है कि जज ने कपड़े उतारने पर गलत बयान लिखने
की धमकी भी दी.   
                     
         
अतिरिक्त पुलिस महा
निदेशक अरुण कुमार का कहना है कि चूँकि यहशिकायत जज के अपनी अदालत के
कार्य से सम्बन्धित है. इसलिए पुलिस ने मुकदमा सीधे मुकदमा दर्ज करने के
बजाय जिलाजज के अलावा हाईकोर्ट के रजिस्ट्रार जनरल को भी शिकायत भेज दी
है.
पता चला है कि गृह विभाग ने इलाहाबाद हाईकोर्ट के चीफ जस्टिस के कार्यालय
को भी पूरी जानकारी भेज दी है और उनके रुख काइन्तजार किया जा रहा है.
Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh
<yogimpsingh@gmail.com>
CPIO High court may be directed to provide sought information.
1
message
Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>
Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 3:03 AM
To:
supremecourt <supremecourt@nic.in>, urgent-action
<urgent-action@ohchr.org>, pmosb <pmosb@pmo.nic.in>, secypg
<secypg@nic.in>, ddpg2-arpg <ddpg2-arpg@nic.in>,
“hgovup@up.nic.in” <hgovup@up.nic.in>, cmup <cmup@up.nic.in>,
csup <csup@up.nic.in>, “ak.dash” <ak.dash@nic.in>,
secy-cic <secy-cic@nic.in>
To
 
    Chief Information Commissioner/Information Commissioners
,Government
of India.
Appellant-Mahesh
Pratap Singh (Yogi M. P. Singh)
Mohalla-Surekapuram
,Jabalpur Road
District-Mirzapur
,State-Uttar Pradesh , Country-India
 
                     
      Versus
Respondents-
1-Registrar
(A/C & Exam)/I/C Central Public Information Officer , High
court
of judicature at Allahabad , Allahabad .
2-Registrar
General /First Appellate Authority under Right to
Information
Act 2005 ,High court of judicature at Allahabad ,
Allahabad
.
Prayer-To
direct concerned to entertain my appeal in accordance with
the
law. Registrar (A/C & Exam)/I/C Central Public Information Officer
be
directed to provide information as sought by information seeker.
Short
submissions .
1-It
is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that your applicant sought
following
information from CPIO High court-
Prayer-Please
made available information in regard to aforesaid letter
no. 18
C.M./two-4-2014-16-J/2011 dated-28-April-2014 as –
1-notings
2-any action taken 3-if no action taken ,cause of sparing
the
wrongdoer. Aforesaid sought information kindly be made available
within
specified time as specified under subsection 1 of section 7 of
Right
to Information Act 2005.
Note-Postal
orders from 75 G  239467 to 75 G 239476 ,each of Rs. 50.00
thus
total Rs.500.00 payable to Registrar General High Court is
enclosed
with this RTI communique as RTI fee in accordance with the
High
Court rules 2006.
2-It
is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that  why CPIO didn’t return
the
Postal orders submitted by your appellant and sought additional
fee
which was illegal? CPIO returned the postal order when Registrar
general
directed him to do so. Your appellant had already submitted
the
postal orders in district court two times   which was accepted and
even
earlier CPIO itself didn’t raise the issue of postal orders .
Here
behaviour of CPIO is cryptic which must be checked.
This
is humble request of your applicant to you Hon’ble Sir that
Hon’ble
Sir may take appropriate action in accordance with the law so
that
coterie of wrongdoers who wants their supremacy at the cost of
anarchy
may be subjected to penal proceedings of law of land. For this
your
applicant shall ever pray you Hon’ble Sir.
 
                     
                     
    Yours sincerely
 
                     
         Yogi M. P. Singh
Mohalla-Surekapuram
, Jabalpur Road, District-Mirzapur, State-Uttar
Pradesh,
Country- India
UN
15
CPIO
High court at Allahabad denied the sought information concerned
with
allegation of moral turpitude.
An
appeal under subsection 1 of section 19 of Right to information Act 2005.
To
 
       Registrar General /First Appellate Authority under
Right to
Information
Act 2005 ,High court of judicature at Allahabad ,
Allahabad
.
Subject-The
denial of information by CPIO High court  at Allahabad is
violations
of provisions of Right to Information Act 2005 as well as
High
court rules 2006 (RTI) so must be directed to provide sought
information.
Hon’ble
Sir,
 
                     
 With due respect your applicant wants to draw
the
attention of the Hon’ble Sir to the following points.
1-Here
information sought for one particular item-Letter no.18
CM/two-4-2014-16-J/2011
dated 28-April-2014 (Page 4 of RTI communique)
2-Sought
information in regard to aforesaid correspondence ,
1-Notings
,2- Any action taken
3-If
no action taken , cause of sparing the wrongdoer.
3-Here
information concerned with the item sought in three points so
total
chargeable fee is Rs.Rs.150 and your appellant have paid
Rs.500.00
payable to you Hon’ble Sir. As mentioned in the note at page
4 of
RTI communique postal orders from 75 G 239467 to 75 G 239476
,each
of Rs.50 .00 thus total-Rs.500.00 payable to Registrar General ,
High
court Allahabad.
4-Herein
this appeal RTI communique dated-5.6.2014 in four pages
,letter
no.18 CM /two-4-2014-16-J/2011 dated-28-April-2014 i.e. letter
of
Government of Uttar Pradesh through its under secretary to
Registrar
General ,High court at Allahabad and the letter of denial of
information
by CPIO High court dated-11.06.2014 received today are as
annexures.
 
                   Please
be instrumental in providing the sought
information.
For which appellant shall ever pray you Hon’ble Sir.
 
                     
                  Yours
sincerely
 date-14-6-2014 
              Yogi M. P. Singh
 Hon’ble
Sir that Registrar general never made any correspondence with
your
applicant in regard to aforesaid letter dated-28-April-2014
bearing
letter no.18 C.M./two-4-2014-16-J/2011. The copy of letter is
annexed
with this RTI communique.
Prayer-Please
made available information in regard to aforesaid letter
no. 18
C.M./two-4-2014-16-J/2011 dated-28-April-2014 as –
1-notings
2-any action taken 3-if no action taken ,cause of sparing
the
wrongdoer. Aforesaid sought information kindly be made available
within
specified time as specified under subsection 1 of section 7 of
Right
to Information Act 2005.
Note-Postal
orders from 75 G  239467 to 75 G 239476 ,each of Rs. 50.00
thus
total Rs.500.00 payable to Registrar General High Court is
enclosed
with this RTI communique as RTI fee in accordance with the
High
Court rules 2006.
JUN
7
Whether
information sought from CPIO High court would be made
available
as concerned with attack on dignity of women.
Whether
this time ,sought information would be made available as
matter
is not concerned with the pending litigation of the court.
Registered
Post Dated-05.06.2014
To,
 
      Registrar (A/C & Exam)/
 
    Central Public Information Officer ,
 
    High Court , Allahabad
 
       Allahabad
An
application under subsection 1 of section 6 of Right to Information Act 2005.
 
                     
       Short submissions.
1-It
is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that Hon’ble Sir may take the
perusal
of following e-mail representation
Mahesh
Pratap Singh Yogi M. P. Singh
 Schedule
cleanup
 02:56AM
With
due respect your applicant wants to draw the kind attention of
the
Hon’ble Sir to the following submissions as follows-
 
1-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that Hon’ble Sir may be
pleased
to take a glance of following link showing naked dance of
moral
turpitude of a judicial member which is lowering the dignity of
2-It
is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that  (h) to develop the
scientific
temper, humanism and the spirit of inquiry and reform;(j)
to
strive towards excellence in all spheres of individual and
collective
activity so that the nation constantly rises to higher
levels
of endeavour and achievement.]Hon’ble Sir may be pleased to
take a
glance of following
3-It
is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that whether fair trial can
be
expected from such judicial member who have no regard with the
dignity
of women.
 
                     
 4-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that
when
entire world has been apprised with the fact of the case , then
it
should know the action taken by our accountable constitutional
functionaries
against erring judicial member as this act ashamed us
before
world community.
 
                     
                   5-It is
submitted before
the
Hon’ble Sir that on one side of screen we are talking of
transparency
and accountability by passing Right to Information Act
2005
but on other side of screen we concealing the action taken
against
erring judicial member whose act shook the not only country
men
but entire world. In order to establish the faith of citizens in
the
judiciary , action taken must be made public.
 
                     
                     
                    This
is
humble request of your applicant to you Hon’ble Sir that Hon’ble
Sir
,  please  take action in the aforesaid matter as matter concerned
with
the dignity of judiciary of this vast democracy of world . For
this
your applicant shall ever pray you Hon’ble Sir. Yours sincerely.
 
                  Yogi M. P.
Singh Mohalla-Surekapuram,  Jabalpur
Road ,
Dist-Mirzapur (U.P.), India .
2-It
is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that Hon’ble Sir may take the
perusal
of letter dated 28-April-2014 of Government of Uttar Pradesh
through
its under secretary to Registrar General ,Hon’ble High Court
at
Allahabad having subject -To take action against judicial officer
on the
complaint received from PMO .
3-It
is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that Registrar general never
made
any correspondence with your applicant in regard to aforesaid
letter
dated-28-April-2014 bearing letter no.18
C.M./two-4-2014-16-J/2011.
The copy of letter is annexed with this RTI
communique.
Prayer-Please
made available information in regard to aforesaid letter
no. 18
C.M./two-4-2014-16-J/2011 dated-28-April-2014 as –
1-notings
2-any action taken 3-if no action taken ,cause of sparing
the
wrongdoer. Aforesaid sought information kindly be made available
within
specified time as specified under subsection 1 of section 7 of
Right
to Information Act 2005.
Note-Postal
orders from 75 G  239467 to 75 G 239476 ,each of Rs. 50.00
thus
total Rs.500.00 payable to Registrar General High Court is
enclosed
with this RTI communique as RTI fee in accordance with the
High
Court rules 2006.
This
is humble request to you Hon’ble Sir that aforesaid sought
information
be made available to
 
                     
             Yogi M. P. Singh
 
                Mohalla-Surekapuram
,Jabalpur Road
District-Mirzapur
,State-Uttar Pradesh , India
Whether
apex court will entertain this public interest litigation or
its
registry will reject it by taking the recourse procedural lacunae.
Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>
 
      8:23 PM (0 minutes ago)
to
supremecourt, hgovup, cmup, bcc: urgent-action, bcc: pmosb
 
      High court of judicature denied to accept R.T.I. Fee
submitted
through
Indian Postal Orders.
 
      An application under article 32 of the constitution of
India before
the
apex court of India .
 
      To
 
                 Hon’ble chief
justice of India/companion judges of the
apex
court of India , Supreme court of India, New Delhi , India
 
      Prayer-To direct High court of judicature at
Allahabad/Registrar
General
to accept Indian Postal Orders as fee under Right to
Information
Act 2005 as it deprives your applicant and other
information
seekers from right to public services and against the
spirit
of Right to Information Act 2005 and quash the unconstitutional
order
passed Registrar General on 13.7.2014.
 
      Petitioner-Mahesh Pratap Singh (Yogi M. P. Singh)
 
      Mohalla-Surekapuram , Jabalpur Road ,District-Mirzapur
,State-Uttar
Pradesh
,India
 
      Respondent-1-High court of judicature at Allahabad
through its
registrar
general
 
      2-Registrar general/First appellate authority ,High
court of
Judicature
at Allahabad
 
                     
    Short submissions.
 
      1-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that
 
      Constitution]
 
      Central Government Act
 
      Article 51A in The Constitution Of India 1949
 
      51A. Fundamental duties It shall be the duty of every
citizen of
India
(a) to abide by the Constitution and respect its ideals and
institutions,
the national Flag and the National Anthem;
 
      (h) to develop the scientific temper, humanism and the
spirit of
inquiry
and reform;
 
      (i) to safeguard public property and to abjure violence;
 
      Constitution]
 
      Your petitioner is law abiding citizen and advocates
rule of law in
the
system in order to betterment of society.
 
      2-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that
 
      Central Government Act
 
      Article 32 in The Constitution Of India 1949
 
      32. Remedies for enforcement of rights conferred by this
Part
 
      (1) The right to move the Supreme Court by appropriate
proceedings
for
the enforcement of the rights conferred by this Part is guaranteed
 
      Hon’ble Sir your applicant has paid commission to postal
department
which
is government operated system and Registrar General of High
court
at Allahabad quotes in its order as-
 
      I have gone through the entire material on record and
found that
appellant
had not furnished the requisite fee in accordance with the
rule 3
and 4 of the Allahabad High court (Right to Information) Rules
2006
,as amended ,even after the request of CPIO made vide letter
dated
11.06.2014 .The rule 4 of the Allahabad High court (Right to
Information)
Rules 2006 ,as amended stipulates that each application
shall
be accompanied by cash or draft or pay order in favour of the
registrar
general ,High court ,Allahabad and applicant has furnished
the
fee in the form of Indian Postal Order and the same is not valid
instrument
for the submission of fee in this public authority.
 
      The CPIO was also required to return the Indian Postal
Order of Rs.
500.00
annexed with the application dated 05.06.2014 under RTI Act
2005
read with Allahabad High court (Right to Information) Rules 2006.
The
CPIO is also directed to return the Indian Postal Order of
Rs.500.00
annexed with the application dated 5.6.2014 . Here this
question
also arises that why CPIO demanded additional amount through
its
cryptic letter dated 11.6.2014 ? Please take a glance of
attachment
with this e-mail representation.
 
      3-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that Indian
postal service
is the
government operated postal system in India. The general public
refers
to the Indian postal service as ‘the post office’.The Indian
postal
service is the largest postal network in world with 155,000
post
offices spread across all over the country. With post offices in
almost
every corner of the country, it helps people stay in touch
irrespective
of the length and breadth of the country.Indian postal
service
provide many facilities like- general or registered mail,
parcel
post, speed post, greeting post, express post, media post, e
post
and special courier service known as EMS-speed post. It also
provides
us with various financial services like international money
transfer,
instant money order service, money order, mutual funds.
Various
post office savings schemes like National Savings Certificate,
Kisan
Vikas Patra, Recurring Deposits and Term Deposits are also
available.
– See more at:
 
      Hon’ble Sir whether High court of judicature is not
creating hurdle
in
entertaining this public service provided by government of India to
its
citizens by making own draconian rule which is neither legal nor
in
public interest. We information seekers/public spirited are facing
too
much troublesome from such tyranny prevailed in the High court of
judicature
at Allahabad.
 
      4-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that
 
      Jump to: navigation, search
 
      A public service is a service which is provided by
government to
people
living within its jurisdiction, either directly (through the
public
sector) or by financing provision of services. The term is
associated
with a social consensus (usually expressed
throughdemocratic
elections) that certain services should be available
to
all, regardless ofincome. Even where public services are neither
publicly
provided nor publicly financed, for social and political
reasons
they are usually subject to regulation going beyond that
applying
to most economic sectors. Public service is also a course
that
can be studied at a college and/or university. The public
services
is an agency provided by the government that work to help and
provide
the public, examples of public services are fire brigade,
police,
army, paramedics, they all have a role in protecting the
public
in a different way.
 
      Whether right to public service is not being infringed
by the High
court
of judicature at Allahabad. Whether it is not ultravires to the
provisions
of constitution to deprive citizenry from government
services
by making own arbitrary rules by a public authority whose job
is to
protect the rights of the citizens. Whether this income of
government
doesn’t form the part of consolidated fund of government
through
which salary of Hon’ble judges is paid.
 
      5-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that
 
      Indian Postal Order 2
 
      how to government forms
 
       A service for remitting small amount of money from
one place to
another
through Post Offices. Indian Postal Orders provide a
convenient
means of transmitting small sums of money by post. The
Indian
Postal Orders are available in all the Post Offices across
India.
 
      UPDATE 13.02.2014: Department of Posts has launched the
eIPO facility
for
paying RTI application fees. eIPO or Electronic Indian Postal
Order
(launched by the Department of Posts, Ministry of Communications
&
IT, Government of India on 13th Feb 2014), is a facility to purchase
an
Indian Postal Order electronically by paying a fee on-line through
e-Post Office Portal https://www.epostoffice.gov.in or India Post
web-sitewww.indiapost.gov.in. eIPO
has now been extended to Indian
Citizens
living in India for paying online fee for seeking information
under
the RTI Act, 2005. Both Debit and Credit cards of any Bank
powered
by Visa/Master can be used for this purpose.
 
      Read the full article on our blog section here:
http://www.nationalc...n-postal-order/
 
      The new circular of the validity of postal order is
copied from our
sister website here:http://www.rtiindia.…or-2-years-246/
 
      What’s New in Version 2 (See full changelog)
                Included the details of eIPO launched by
Department of Posts for
filing
RTI on 13.02.2014
 
      Whether such efforts of Government would bring up any
fruitful
result
if its own organs itself will create obstacle in the path
reaching
to needy. I don’t think such public spirited approach of
government
will achieve its goal in such tyranny where own made rule
is
preferred even when that may not be in public interest.
 
                     
              This is humble request to
Registrar of
Supreme
court of India not to decide the fate of this public interest
litigation
in the name of technical lacunae and procedural lapse as
law of
land is supreme which violations must be curbed at any cost.
For
this your applicant shall ever pray you Hon’ble Sir.
 
                     
                 Yours sincerely
 
                     
                 Yogi M. P.
Singh
 
      Mohalla-Surekapuram , Jabalpur Road ,District-Mirzapur
,State-Uttar
Pradesh
,India

2 comments on Copy of appeal and notice sent to CPIO High court of judicature at Allahabad.

  1. जज ने सीना छुआ और सलवार उतारने को कहा… गोंडा ज़िले मेंदो लड़कियों
    ने पुलिस में शिकायत दर्ज कराई है कि एक जज ने अपने चैंबर में उनके साथ
    छेड़छाड़ की.
    पीड़ित लड़कियों में से एक की उम्र तेरह साल है, और दूसरीकी इक्कीस साल.
    दोनों अलग-अलग परिवारों से हैं और दोनों के साथ यह घटना एक ही दिन पर अलग
    समय पर हुई. एक लड़की का आरोप है कि जज
    ने उससे शॉल हटाकर कपड़े उतारने को कहा, जिससे वह उसकीउम्र का पता लगा
    सके.
    लड़की ने अपने बयान में कहा है कि इसके बाद जज ने उसका सीना छुआ और सलवार
    उतारने को कहा. इस पर लड़की रोने लगीऔर कहा कि यह सब मुझसे नही होगा.
    दूसरी लड़की ने भी इसी तरह
    काबयान दिया है. उसका कहना है कि जज ने कपड़े न उतारने पर गलत बयान लिखने
    की धमकी भी दी. अतिरिक्त पुलिस महा
    निदेशक अरुण कुमार का कहना है कि चूँकि यहशिकायत जज के अपनी अदालत के
    कार्य से सम्बन्धित है. इसलिए पुलिस ने मुकदमा सीधे मुकदमा दर्ज करने के
    बजाय जिलाजज के अलावा हाईकोर्ट के रजिस्ट्रार जनरल को भी शिकायत भेज दी
    है.
    पता चला है कि गृह विभाग ने इलाहाबाद हाईकोर्ट के चीफ जस्टिस के कार्यालय
    को भी पूरी जानकारी भेज दी है और उनके रुख काइन्तजार किया जा रहा है.

  2. Undoubtedly moral turpitude of judicial members are quite common in our country but such incidences must be curbed. These tragic incidences causing great damage to our images abroad. We can't tolerate moral turpitude of judicial members in the name of independence of judiciary.

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: