Complaint submitted on 21-April-2014 is under consideration of administrative judge ,Mirzapur as X-39/15/2014

Add star 

Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh

<yogimpsingh@gmail.com>

Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 7:04 PM

To: supremecourt <supremecourt@nic.in>, cj <cj@allahabadhighcourt.in>, pmosb <pmosb@pmo.nic.in>, cmup <cmup@up.nic.in>, csup <csup@up.nic.in>, “hgovup@up.nic.in” <hgovup@up.nic.in>, secypg <secypg@nic.in>, uphrclko <uphrclko@yahoo.co.in>, urgent-action <urgent-action@ohchr.org>, ddpg2-arpg <ddpg2-arpg@nic.in>

Whether the order passed by A.C.J.M. court on 12.06.2008 when Ratnesh Mani Tripathi as A.C.J.M. is premature order as quoted by A.C.J.M. Subedar Singh in the open court on 10-April-2014 which compliance should be made at latter stage during the argument lasted 30 minutes as A.C.J.M. had no time so he assured that after taking deep study of the case ,court proceedings will move forward. http://yogimpsingh.blogspot.com/2013/09/why-district-judge-mirzapur-refused-to.html

Short submissions.
1-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that when judicial member summoned me, he (Ratnesh Mani Tripathi ) was not aware with the facts that forged records have been submitted before the courts but when your applicant drew the attention of court ,he took strong exception of it that he was misled by petitioner in order to summon your applicant and petitioner achieved its ulterior motive. 
2-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that aforesaid judicial member in order to punish the offenders who forged the public documents in order to mislead the court so that court may pass the favourable order , summoned the original copy of nomination of Enquiry Officer and enquiry report submitted by Enquiry Officer through order dated  12.06.2008 . This is common accepted truth that no court can be misled by plaintiff in order to get favourable order and no proceedings can move forward on the basis of forged and cryptic documents when the instituted case is based on the merit of documents. Consequently the order of the judicial member was excellent and in accordance with the principle of natural justice even if not supported by Criminal penal code as as advised by A.C.J.M. Subedar Singh during the argument. 
3-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that if court will not take action against those who made the forgery of records which was to be submitted before the court in order to achieve their ulterior motive  ,then such wrongdoings will be quite common in the courts. 
This is humble request of your applicant to you Hon’ble Sir that courts are temples where wrongdoers are punished instead of protecting them but here a whistle blower spent entire life in facing false charges and illegal proceedings in cumbersome process of courts even when raised the voice for betterment of society and against the wrongdoings of corrupt public functionaries. Please do justice with me for this your applicant shall ever pray you Hon’ble Sir. 
                                              Yours sincerely 
                                              Yogi M. P. Singh
Mohalla-Surekapuram , Jabalpur Road , District-Mirzapur, 

2 comments on Complaint submitted on 21-April-2014 is under consideration of administrative judge ,Mirzapur as X-39/15/2014

  1. It is submitted before the Hon'ble Sir that if court will not take action against those who made the forgery of records which was to be submitted before the court in order to achieve their ulterior motive ,then such wrongdoings will be quite common in the courts.

  2. Aforesaid judicial member in order to punish the offenders who forged the public documents in order to mislead the court so that court may pass the favourable order , summoned the original copy of nomination of Enquiry Officer and enquiry report submitted by Enquiry Officer through order dated 12.06.2008 . This is common accepted truth that no court can be misled by plaintiff in order to get favourable order and no proceedings can move forward on the basis of forged and cryptic documents when the instituted case is based on the merit of documents. Consequently the order of the judicial member was excellent and in accordance with the principle of natural justice even if not supported by Criminal penal code as as advised by A.C.J.M. Subedar Singh during the argument. There is too much tyranny in the judiciary which must be curbed.

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: