Complaint No 202021011010419 dated 14-Oct-2020 accepted for admission as informed through autogenerated email dated 22-Oct-2020

 

Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>

Complaint No 202021011010419
1 message

RBI CMS Team <rbiteamcms@rbi.org.in> 22 October 2020 at 00:39
Reply-To: rbiteamcms@rbi.org.in
To: “yogimpsingh@gmail.com” <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>

 
भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक

RESERVE BANK OF INDIA

 

www.rbi.org.in

                                                                 

BO Kanpur                                                                                                                                    21-10-2020

 

 

Anjali Kumari

Village Adampur Post Nibi Gaharwar District Mirzapur PIN Code 231303 

  

  

Phone/Cell: 7379105911

yogimpsingh@gmail.com

Madam /Dear Sir,

Subject:  Banking  Ombudsman Scheme, 2006 – Complaint No: 202021011010419

Please refer to the captioned complaint lodged with this Office, against, STATE BANK OF INDIA by Anjali Kumari.

We, acknowledge the receipt of your complaint registered with this office.

However, the admissibility or otherwise of your complaint under the Banking Ombudsman Scheme, 2006 will be examined and advised to you in due course.

 

For future communication, please refer to your complaint with the following Complaint No: 202021011010419

 

 

Yours faithfully,

p. Banking Ombudsman

BO Kanpur

 

THIS IS AN AUTOGENERATED EMAIL – PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL

Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>

Complaint no – 201920011032606 submitted on 22-June-2020 by Anjali Kumari before Kanpur Banking Ombudsman be taken into account.

Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com> 28 September 2020 at 19:31
To: bokanpur@rbi.org.in, pmosb <pmosb@pmo.nic.in>, presidentofindia@rb.nic.in, urgent-action <urgent-action@ohchr.org>, supremecourt <supremecourt@nic.in>, hgovup@up.nic.in, cmup <cmup@up.nic.in>, agmpne.lholuc@sbi.co.in, customer care <agmcustomer.lholuc@sbi.co.in>, agmgad.lholuc@sbi.co.in
श्री मान जी इस प्रत्यावेदन के साथ बिना तिथि की हस्तलिखित शाखा प्रबंधक का रिपोर्ट संलग्न है जिसके साथ पोस्टल रिसीप्ट  नहीं है अर्थात दिनांक ०२/०७/२०१९ के पश्चात ही अंजली कुमारी को पास बुक पंजीकृत डाक से उपलब्ध कराया गया है | 
Current Status Case closed Date of Action 03/07/2019

Remarks Report Number 1, From SBI LHO LUCKNOW on 02/07/2019 approved by NA Report remarks complainant has been advised that her passbook has been dispatched on her residential address as required. reply attached

Ref. No. /RTI/20-21/34 dated 20/08/2020

आप के खाता संख्या -37200461494 जिसका वर्णन आप के पत्र में है से रुपये 12900 .00 की कोई विवरणी दिनांक 28/03/2018 से 25 /12/2018 के बीच उपस्थित नही है |

उपरोक्त उत्तर सिर्फ सूचना के प्रयोजनार्थ है | यदि आप हमारे उत्तर से संतुष्ट नही है तो कृपया उक्त पत्र की प्राप्ति की ३० दिनों के अन्दर आप   अपीलीय अधिकारी से अपील कर सकते है |

श्री मान जी कितनी चालाकी से भारतीय स्टेट बैंक का कर्मचारी गुमराह कर रहा है श्री मान जी आज तक कोई भी ट्रांज़ैक्शन अंजली कुमारी द्वारा किया ही नहीं गया सरकार  का पैसा आया और बड़ी चालाकी से शाखा प्रबंधक द्वारा उसे किसी गुमनाम व्यक्ति की मदद से निकाला गया | कई ट्रांज़ैक्शन हुए है १२९०० रुपये

इन लोगो को बुरा यह लग रहा है की क्यों समाज कल्याण अधिकारी यह लिख रहे है की मामला भारतीय स्टेट बैंक से संबंधित है क्यों उत्तर प्रदेश सरकार के अधिनस्थ  बैंकिंग ओम्बड्समैन के समक्ष शिकायत की बात कर रहे हमे फसा कर सब काई काट लिए |

श्री मान जी रिज़र्व बैंक ऑफ़ इंडिया और भारतीय स्टेट बैंक चाचा भतीजा हो गए  है जैसा की ओम्बड्समैन की कार्यशैली से स्पस्ट है चाचा कह रहा है भतीजा जितना घोटाला करना हो करो हम है ना कुछ नहीं होगा | सोचिये अंजली कुमारी का मामला मात्र एक नमूना है |

Grievance Status for registration number: DEABD/E/2019/18912

Grievance Concerns To

Name Of Complainant

Yogi M. P. Singh

Date of Receipt

20/06/2019

Received By Ministry/Department

Financial Services (Banking Division)

Grievance Description

Prayer of the grievance is to provide passbook to the aggrieved girl which was neither made available nor branch manager made concrete efforts in this regard which shows that brach manager made an only cunning trick to manage the grievance to get disposed of otherwise two days passed but he did nothing in this direction.

You managed to get the grievance disposed of on the ground that applicant was properly responded by the branch and reply is attached as a report to the grievance. According to the sent e-mail of the branch concerned, Dear sir This is with reference to your complaint about passbook not provided to the customer Ms Anjani Kumari

Pl acknowledge the attachment for the same Regards Branch Manager SBI SIRSA which was sent by the branch on 18-Jun-2019. Because of some technical lacuna, he could not provide the passbook to the aggrieved student but assured to provide within two days. Point to be noted that now two days passed since the date of sent of e-mail of the branch manager but branch manager could not keep its promise.

Grievance Document

Current Status

Case closed

Date of Action

03/07/2019

Remarks

Report Number 1, From SBI LHO LUCKNOW on 02/07/2019 approved by NA Report remarks complainant, has been advised that her passbook has been dispatched on her residential address as required. reply attached

Reply Document

Rating

Poor

Rating Remarks

Complaint No. 201920011032606 Sir ground of rejection of complaint by the Banking ombudsman Kanpur is flimsy and not consistent with the matter raised by the applicant. Aforementioned regulation is for those banking frauds, which takes place under the cognizance of the account holder and entire information concerned with the cheating happens before the account holder. Here the account holder was seeking the passbook from the branch manager so vigilance of the account holder can not be questioned here. Sir, it is a proven fact that Rs.12900 drawn from the account of an oppressed girl student belonging to scheduled caste so this amount must be refunded by the state bank of India. More than forty representations have been submitted in the matter to seek justice for the oppressed girl student so to deprive her of Rs.12900 provided her by the government of India as scholarship reflects only lawlessness and anarchy full of corruption in the government machinery. Corruption is rampant.

Officer Concerns To

Officer Name

Smt. Saloni Narayan

Officer Designation

Chief General Manager

Contact Address

Email Address

sbihelp@sancharnet.in

Contact Number

05222201492

[Quoted text hidden]


2 attachments
Report of SBI in the matter of Anjali.pdf
701K
grievanceDocument Anjali Kumari.pdf
1386K
Gmail Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>
Complaint no – 201920011032606 submitted on 22-June-2020 by Anjali Kumari before Kanpur Banking Ombudsman be taken into account.
3 messages
Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com> 5 August 2020 at 15:11
To: bokanpur@rbi.org.in, pmosb <pmosb@pmo.nic.in>, presidentofindia@rb.nic.in, urgent-action <urgent-action@ohchr.org>, supremecourt <supremecourt@nic.in>, hgovup@up.nic.in, cmup <cmup@up.nic.in>, agmpne.lholuc@sbi.co.in, customer care <agmcustomer.lholuc@sbi.co.in>, agmgad.lholuc@sbi.co.in
The reminder of the complaint submitted online by the Anjali Kumari which detail is as follows.

Complaint number-201920011032606, Complainant-Anjali Kumari, Date of complaint-22-JUN-2020 and name entity against whom the complaint is made- State Bank of India. For more information, vide attached document to the representation.

Matter of fact is concerned with Anjali Kumari D/O Harishchandra belonging to the scheduled caste category.

Honourable Sir account number and other details not only provided to concerned branch manager but also provided on the public grievance portal of government of India repeatedly but because of rampant corruption in the office of state bank of India, they are overlooking the matter concerned with the deep rooted corruption on the false and flimsy ground. They are well apprised with the fact that the account was operated by an anonymous person by colluding with the concerned branch staffs of the state bank of India to shield their staffs they offering various excuses which only promote corruption in the government. machinery. Sir how can it be justified that accounts may be opened and operated by anonymous persons and all the public aids in the form of scholarship provided to scheduled caste girls may have been drawn by wrongdoers. Such practice can never be justified and must be curbed by the accountable public functionaries of the government of India in the wide public interest. Please curb the rampant corruption in the government.

Most revered Sir –Your applicant invites the kind attention of Hon’ble Sir with due respect to the following submissions as follows.

1-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that  51A. Fundamental duties It shall be the duty of every citizen of India (a) to abide by the Constitution and respect its ideals and institutions, the National Flag and the National Anthem;(h) to develop the scientific temper, humanism and the spirit of inquiry and reform;

(i) to safeguard public property and to abjure violence;

(j) to strive towards excellence in all spheres of individual and collective activity so that the nation constantly rises to higher levels of endeavour and achievement.

2-It is to be submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that

Respected Sir,

According to you, aggrieved Anjali Kumari had to apply to the branch concerned regarding cheating committed by frauds by taking the branch staffs in good faith resulting in loss of Rs.12900 to Anjali Kumari belonging to scheduled caste category. By taking the recourse of a false viewpoint of branch manager you did goodby with the matter concerned with the serious allegations of corruption. Whether in this way rampant corruption will be curbed from the government machinery?

Please take a glance at the application made by the aggrieved before the branch manager concerned attached to the representation.

3-It is to be submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that

If you think that anything is wrong in this application submitted on behalf of aggrieved applicant Anjali Kumari and her father, then I invite you to lodge an F.I.R. against me. I gladly accept your constructive steps in this regard. Who opened this account? Who operated this account? Who withdrew money from this account? Here Anjali Kumari knew the details of the account when Passbook was made available by the branch manager concerned aggrieved girl student Anjali Kumari. Whether it is not the obligatory duty of the public authority State Bank of India to provide responses to the aforementioned queries?

4It is to be submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that

The matter is concerned with the deep-rooted corruption and instead of taking action in the matter, S.B.I. is only making a failed attempt to put carpet on the matter through its staffs and  dilly-dallying approach and procrastination in the matter from the beginning. Such cryptic activities only prove that your integrity is also under a cloud as a competent authority instead of seeking enquiry through an appropriate process as the matter is concerned corrupt practices of the staff concerned but you are sending the poor gullible citizens to those public staffs who are alleged guilty of cheating and fraud. You tell me who made available the passbook and after getting that passbook, she and her father Harishchand knew the fact that in this passbook Transaction of Rs.12900 made by someone colluding with the bank staffs concerned. The Ipso facto account was operated by an anonymous person in caucus with the branch of S.B.I.

खुदा भी आसमाँ से जब जमी पे देखता होगा |

इस मेरे प्यारे देश को क्या हुआ सोचता होगा||

This is a humble request of your applicant to you Hon’ble Sir that how can it be justified to withhold public services arbitrarily and promote anarchy, lawlessness and chaos arbitrarily by making the mockery of law of land? There is need of the hour to take harsh steps against the wrongdoer to win the confidence of citizenry and strengthen the democratic values for healthy and prosperous democracy. For this, your applicant shall ever pray for you, Hon’ble Sir.

Date-05/08/2020           Yours sincerely

Yogi M. P. Singh, Mobile number-7379105911, Mohalla- Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road, District-Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh, Pin code-231001.

3 attachments
Report Anjali.pdf
5K
Anjali Kumari.pdf
162K
Anjali Kumari (1).pdf
575K
Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com> 26 September 2020 at 00:44
To: bokanpur@rbi.org.in, pmosb <pmosb@pmo.nic.in>, presidentofindia@rb.nic.in, urgent-action <urgent-action@ohchr.org>, supremecourt <supremecourt@nic.in>, hgovup@up.nic.in, cmup <cmup@up.nic.in>, agmpne.lholuc@sbi.co.in, customer care <agmcustomer.lholuc@sbi.co.in>, agmgad.lholuc@sbi.co.in
An application under Article 32 of the constitution of India to direct the concerned to return the money drawn from the account of Anjali Kumari and an F.I.R. may be lodged against those found guilty of not taking appropriate action in the matter. 

To

                                         Chief Justice of India/ Companion Judges of the apex court

                                            Supreme Court of India, New Delhi

Subject-This representation is on behalf of Anjali Kumari, Mobile number- 7054703028,  Village Adampur, Post Neebi Gaharwar, Police station- Vindhyachal, District-Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh, Pin code-231303.

The ground of rejection of the complaint by the banking ombudsman Kanpur-Complaint No. 201920011032606 was forwarded to State Bank of India for resolution/ comments. The bank has informed that the transactions dated back to November 2018. However, the complainant did not act diligently and did not pursue the matter with the bank within 7 working days of the disputed transactions as per the rule laid down in limited liability circular of RBI (RBI/2017-18/15 DBR.No.Leg.BC.78/09.07.005/2017-18 dated July 6, 2017) in respect of fraudulent transactions. Hence, the complaint was rejected under clause 13.1(a) of Banking Ombudsman Scheme, 2006.

Sir ground of rejection of complaint by the Banking ombudsman Kanpur is flimsy and not consistent with the matter raised by the applicant.

Aforementioned regulation is for those banking frauds, which takes place under the cognizance of account holder and entire information concerned with the cheating happens before the account holder. Here the account holder was seeking the passbook from the branch manager so vigilance of the account holder can not be questioned here.

Sir it is a proven fact that Rs.12900 drawn from the account of an oppressed girl student belonging to scheduled caste so this amount must be refunded by the state bank of India.

More than forty representations have been submitted in the matter to seek justice for the oppressed girl student so to deprive her of Rs.12900 provided her by the government of India as scholarship reflects only lawlessness and anarchy full of corruption in the government machinery.

Following is the third submission of attached email representation sent to banking ombudsman Kanpur which means that he instead of adopting logistic approach and reasoned conclusions to the submitted complaints only prefers arbitrary and tyrannical orders which crush the rule of law.

If you think that anything is wrong in this application submitted on behalf of aggrieved applicant Anjali Kumari and her father, then I invite you to lodge an F.I.R. against me. I gladly accept your constructive steps in this regard. Who opened this account? Who operated this account? Who withdrew money from this account? Here Anjali Kumari knew the details of the account when Passbook was made available by the branch manager concerned aggrieved girl student Anjali Kumari. Whether it is not obligatory duty of the public authority State Bank of India to provide responses to the aforementioned queries?

The aforementioned picture is the communication dated 18/06/2019 Ref No. S.B.I. /2018-19 of the Branch manager Sirsa Allahabad of the state bank of India addressed to your applicant.

According to aforementioned communication, the branch manager requested the applicant that the passbook printer is not working because of this technical issue. Passbook can not be printed but it will be resolved soon and the passbook will be printed and you will be informed soon within two days.

This request was done by the branch manager to manage the disposal of grievances submitted by the applicant on the CPGRAM.

The passbook was made available by the branch manager after one and half month later through the registered post to Anjali Kumari at her address.

This shows that Anjali Kumari did not know that there is any account in the name Anjali Kumari opened in the Sirsa Bank Allahabad and she apprised with the account when the communication of state Bank of India reached her regarding ATM. Mr. Banking Ombudsman Kanpur, how will she know that someone drew money from her account through multiple transactions?

Every representation is sent before the apex court of India by the applicant in the same way following representation  is also emailed to the apex court.

Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>

Thu, 20 Jun 2019, 16:53 Reply to all
to pmosb, presidentofindia, supremecourt, urgent-action, cmup, hgovup, csup, uphrclko

You managed to get the grievance disposed of on the ground that the applicant was properly responded by the branch and reply is attached as a report to the grievance. According to the sent e-mail of the branch concerned,  Dear sir This is with reference to your complaint about passbook not provided  to customer Ms Anjani Kumari

Pl acknowledge the attachment for the same Regards Branch Manager SBI SIRSA which was sent by the branch on 18-Jun-2019. Because of some technical lacuna, he could not provide the passbook to the aggrieved student but assured to provide within two days. It Should be noted that now two days have passed since the date of sending the e-mail of the branch manager but the branch manager could not keep its promise.

जो यहां पर महत्वपूर्ण विन्दु है यदि स्टेट बैंक ऑफ़ इंडिया के शाखा प्रबंधक यह दावा करते है की उन्होंने ब्यथा निवारण कर दिया तो बताये कैसे क्योकि ब्यथा निवारण के लिए पीड़िता अंजली कुमारी पिता हरिश्चंद्र को पास बुक मिलनी चाहिए थी किन्तु शाखा प्रबंधक द्वारा कही भी इस बात बात का दावा नहीं किया गया की पासबुक तैयार है इसका मतलब साफ है की इस रिपोर्ट के शब्द सिर्फ ब्यथा को निस्तारित कराने की एक कुटिल चाल है | श्री मान जी प्रार्थी द्वारा इस बात का अनुरोध किया गया था की ब्यथा निवारण नहीं होना चाहिए जब तक दलित लड़की को उसका पासबुक न मिल जाय किन्तु वे अपनी सोची समझी रणनीति पर ही चले | सभी जानते है की इस तरह के खातों का संचालन महाविद्यालय के स्टाफ और बैंक कर्मी मिल जुल कर करते है इसलिए लड़कियों द्वारा बार मांग किये जाने पर यह कह कर टाल दिया गया की कॉलेज के अध्यापक को लिवा के आइये | श्री मान पास बुक कॉलेज के अध्यापक का क्या रोल है | दाल में कुछ तो काला है या पूरी पूरी दाल काली है किसी ईमानदार लोकसेवक के जांच के पश्चात ही सामने आएगा | 

Grievance Status for registration number: DEABD/E/2019/17109

Grievance Concerns To

Name Of Complainant –Yogi M. P. Singh Date of Receipt –05/06/2019

Received By Ministry/Department –Financial Services (Banking Division)

Grievance Description

Matter is concerned with the providing passbook of a girl student belonging to weaker and downtrodden section by the branch concerned of state bank of India as staff of the bank arbitrarily kept the passbook under its possession illegally which promotes corruption. Details of the grievance with documentary evidence are attached.

Grievance Document  Current Status –Case closed

Date of Action –20/06/2019  Remarks –Report Number 1, From SBI LHO LUCKNOW on 18/06/2019 approved by NA Report remarks complainant has been replied suitably by the branch. branch reply attached Grievance status

Reply Document  Rating  Rating Remarks

You managed to get the grievance disposed of on the ground that the applicant was properly responded by the branch and reply is attached as a report to the grievance. According to the sent e-mail of the branch concerned, Dear sir This is with reference to your complaint about passbook not provided to the customer Ms Anjani Kumari Pl acknowledges the attachment for the same Regards Branch Manager SBI SIRSA which was sent by the branch on 18-Jun-2019. Because of some technical lacuna, he could not provide the passbook to the aggrieved student but assured to provide within two days. Point to be noted that now two days passed since the date of sending the e-mail of the branch manager but branch manager could not keep its promise.

Officer Concerns To

Officer Name –Sri Gautam Sengupta Officer Designation –Chief General Manager

Contact Address –State Bank of India,New Administrative Bldg. , Motimahal Marg , Hazratganj , Lucknow (UP)

Email Address –sbihelp@sancharnet.in Contact Number –05222201492

महोदय क्या आप जानते है की रिज़र्व बैंक ऑफ़ इंडिया के बैंकिंग ओम्बुड्स मान कानपुर मामले को चोरी से रफा दफा कर देना चाहते थे अन्यथा प्रार्थी को क्यों अपने निर्णय से वंचित रखते श्री मान जी क्या ऐसा ब्यक्ति  बैंकिंग सेक्टर में होने वाली अनिमितता को रोक सकते है जिन्हे विनियमन और परिपत्र तक समझ में नहीं आते है |

Complaint No. 201920011032606 was forwarded to State Bank of India for resolution/ comments.

श्री मान जी क्या बैंकिंग ओम्बुड्स मान कानपुर की नियुक्ति इसलिए की गयी है की पहले वे शिकायतों पर चुप्पी मारकर बैठ जाते है और शिकायत कर्ता  मामले में पूछ ताछ किया तो दूसरी पक्ष का कमेंट मगा  कर निर्णय के रूप में पहले पक्ष को उपलब्ध करा देते है |

Whether the applicant had submitted the complaint before the banking ombudsman to seek the resolution of state bank of India or resolution of Banking Ombudsman Kanpur? What is the need of this authority acting like a post office only and causing heavy burden on the public exchequer?

Grievance Status for registration number : DEABD/E/2020/47052

Grievance Concerns To

Name Of Complainant

Yogi M. P. Singh

Date of Receipt

30/08/2020

Received By Ministry/Department

Financial Services (Banking Division)

Grievance Description

Financial Services (Banking Division) >> Miscellaneous/Others

 

Department/Bank/Financial Institute : Reserve Bank of India

Branch / Name of Bank and Branch : Banking Ombudsman Kanpur Uttar Pradesh

———————–

Complaint no – 201920011032606 submitted on 22-June-2020 by Anjali Kumari before Kanpur Banking Ombudsman be taken into account.

The aforementioned subject was sent to Kanpur Banking Ombudsman on his executive email as a reminder on 05-Aug-2020 quite obvious from the attached document to the representation. Think about the gravity of the situation that matter is concerned with deep-rooted corruption and irregularity but concerned the aforementioned banking ombudsman is not serious to the compla

Grievance Document

Current Status

Case closed

Date of Action

21/09/2020

Remarks

Complaint No. 201920011032606 was forwarded to State Bank of India for resolution/ comments. The bank has informed that the transactions dated back to November 2018. However, the complainant did not act diligently and did not pursue the matter with the bank within 7 working days of the disputed transactions as per the ruled laid down in limited liability circular of RBI (RBI/2017-18/15 DBR.No.Leg.BC.78/09.07.005/2017-18 dated July 6, 2017) in respect of fraudulent transactions. Hence, the complaint was rejected under clause 13.1(a) of Banking Ombudsman Scheme, 2006.

Rating

Poor

Rating Remarks

Banking Ombudsman Kanpur is well informed with the fact that the account was operated by the anonymous person, not by Anjali Kumari. When the concerned branch manager made available the passbook to Anjali Kumari, then the Anjali Kumari knew about it. First concerned branch manager procrastinated in providing the passbook to the applicant but after repeated representations, he provided it. Instead of inviting the transparent and accountable enquiry in the matter concerned with the deep-rooted corruption, concerned accountable public functionaries only trying to put carpet in the matter. It seems that the Banking ombudsman has no reasoned approach to the matter and lack of common sense of understanding otherwise matters concerned with serious irregularity may not be overlooked by him. Here integrity in this matter of deep corruption ipso facto involvement of staff of state bank of India itself of the banking ombudsman is not impeccable. The ground of rejection of the complaint is mysterious so

Officer Concerns To

Officer Name

Pankaj Kumar Nayak

Officer Designation

Banking Ombudsman_Kanpur

Contact Address

Email Address

obo.kanpur@rbi.org.in

Contact Number

05122305174

Sought information by the applicant Anjali Kumari is as follows.

CPIO may provide the following point-wise information as sought.
1-Notings and action taken by the branch manager State Bank of India Branch: Sirsa Allahabad, Uttar Pradesh on the representation dated-03/02/2020 attached to the communique.
2- Grievance Status for registration number: DEABD/E/2020/12437 Name Of Complainant-Yogi M. P. Singh Date of Receipt-19/03/2020
Provide the reason for not forwarding the aforementioned grievance submitted on behalf of the applicant to the aforementioned branch manager concerned as the matter is closely connected with his working.

Provided information by the CPIO after the appeal submitted online registered as SBILW/A/E/20/00072 on the RTI online portal of the government of India.

Ref. No. /RTI/20-21/41 dated 18/07/2020

इस संदर्भ में हम आप के द्वारा मांगी गयी कोई भी सूचना देने में असमर्थ है क्योंकि सूचना के अधिकार अधिनियम २००५ के तहत आप को रुपये १० की धन राशि का भुगतान अनिवार्य है जो की आप के द्वारा नही किया गया है या प्रतीत नही होता अगर आप की वित्तीय स्थिति गरीबी रेखा से नीचे की है तो कृपया इस सम्बन्ध में कोई साक्ष्य प्रस्तुत करे जिससे की आप के आवेदन में मागी गयी सूचना अगर आप उपलब्ध हो तो आप को बताया जा सके |

For more detail, vide attached document to the representation.

Ref. No. /RTI/20-21/34 dated 20/08/2020

आप के खाता संख्या -37200461494 जिसका वर्णन आप के पत्र में है से रुपये 12900 .00 की कोई विवरणी दिनांक 28/03/2018 से 25 /12/2018 के बीच उपस्थित नही है |

उपरोक्त उत्तर सिर्फ सूचना के प्रयोजनार्थ है | यदि आप हमारे उत्तर से संतुष्ट नही है तो कृपया उक्त पत्र की प्राप्ति की ३० दिनों के अन्दर आप   अपीलीय अधिकारी से अपील कर सकते है |

For more detail vide attached document to the representation.

Whether CPIO has not misled your appellant ipso facto obvious?

The matter is concerned with the deep-rooted corruption and instead of taking action in the matter, S.B.I. is only making a failed attempt to put carpet on the matter through its staffs and  dilly-dallying approach and procrastination in the matter from the beginning.

महोदय अंजली  कुमारी द्वारा शाखा प्रबंधक को शाखा पर जा कर शिकायत  दिया गया और उस पत्र / शिकायत का स्कैन कॉपी लखनऊ मुख्यालय भेजा गया किंतु १२९०० रुपये का तो हिस्सा लग गया तो फिर कौन अपनी जेब से देगा | 

खुदा भी आसमाँ से जब जमी पे देखता होगा |

             इस मेरे प्यारे देश को क्या हुआ सोचता होगा||

This is a humble request of your applicant to you Hon’ble Sir that how can it be justified to withhold public services arbitrarily and promote anarchy, lawlessness and chaos arbitrarily by making the mockery of law of land? There is need of the hour to take harsh steps against the wrongdoer to win the confidence of citizenry and strengthen the democratic values for healthy and prosperous democracy. For this, your applicant shall ever pray for you, Hon’ble Sir.

Date-21/09/2020           Yours sincerely

                              Yogi M. P. Singh, Mobile number-7379105911, Mohalla- Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road, District-Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh, Pin code-231001.

[Quoted text hidden]

2 attachments
document.pdf
413K
Misleading information to Anjali Kumari.pdf
1032K
5 2 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
7 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Arun Pratap Singh
1 month ago

This case is a model only as such forgery is quite common in the State Bank of India. It is factual position that from the account Rs.12900 was withdrawn of the scheduled caste girl Anjali Kumari which is proved anarchy in the government machinery.जब समाज कल्याण अधिकारी ने कह दिया की मामला भारतीय स्टेट बैंक से सम्बंधित है तो स्टेट बैंक अंजली कुमारी का १२९०० रुपये वापस करे यह तो निश्चित है की १२९०० रूपये या तो कोई भारतीय स्टेट बैंक का कर्मचारी खुद निकाल लिया या किसी के माध्यम से निकलवा दिया | खुले आम डकैती है और कानपुर बैंकिंग ओम्बुड्समान पर्दा डाल रहे है मामले में |

Preeti Singh
1 month ago

Thu, 20 Jun 2019, 16:53
Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh yogimpsingh@gmail.com
to pmosb, presidentofindia, supremecourt, urgent-action, cmup, hgovup, csup, uphrclko
जो यहां पर महत्वपूर्ण विन्दु है यदि स्टेट बैंक ऑफ़ इंडिया के शाखा प्रबंधक यह दावा करते है की उन्होंने ब्यथा निवारण कर दिया तो बताये कैसे क्योकि ब्यथा निवारण के लिए पीड़िता अंजली कुमारी पिता हरिश्चंद्र को पास बुक मिलनी चाहिए थी किन्तु शाखा प्रबंधक द्वारा कही भी इस बात बात का दावा नहीं किया गया की पासबुक तैयार है इसका मतलब साफ है की इस रिपोर्ट के शब्द सिर्फ ब्यथा को निस्तारित कराने की एक कुटिल चाल है |
This implies that passbook was made available to the aggrieved applicant Anjali Kumari after Thu, 20 Jun 2019, 16:53 .

God Man
1 month ago

Banking ombudsman is appointed to curb the corruption in the banks but it seems that banking ombudsman is colluding with the corrupt staff of the banks and promoting the corruption quite obvious from the working style. Submitted grievances by the citizens are closed by the banking ombudsman arbitrarily and no action is taken against her/ his arbitrariness.

Bhoomika Singh
Bhoomika Singh
1 month ago

More than one week passed when the public spirited person Yogi M P Singh submitted the complaint before the banking ombudsman Kanpur and Auto reply must have to be sent by them immediately but it was sent by them after one week which is the reflection of the the lawlessness and Anarchy of the department as well as incredibility of the department. It seems that they will not return the money of the poor aggrieved girl Anjali Kumari belonging to the weaker and downtrodden section.

Pratima Parihar
Pratima Parihar
1 month ago

यह मामला गहरी जड़ें वाले भ्रष्टाचार से जुड़ा है और मामले में कार्रवाई करने के बजाय, एसबीआई शुरू से ही इस मामले में अपने कर्मचारियों और सुस्त-डैलिंग दृष्टिकोण और शिथिलता के माध्यम से इस मामले पर कारपेट लगाने का असफल प्रयास कर रहा है। इस तरह की गूढ़ गतिविधियाँ केवल यह साबित करती हैं कि एक उपयुक्त प्रक्रिया के माध्यम से जांच की मांग करने के बजाय एक सक्षम अधिकारी के रूप में आपकी अखंडता एक बादल के नीचे है क्योंकि यह मामला संबंधित कर्मचारियों की भ्रष्ट प्रथाओं से संबंधित है,

Pratima Parihar
Pratima Parihar
19 days ago

श्री मान जी कितनी चालाकी से भारतीय स्टेट बैंक का कर्मचारी गुमराह कर रहा है श्री मान जी आज तक कोई भी ट्रांज़ैक्शन अंजली कुमारी द्वारा किया ही नहीं गया सरकार का पैसा आया और बड़ी चालाकी से शाखा प्रबंधक द्वारा उसे किसी गुमनाम व्यक्ति द्वारा निकाला गया | कई ट्रांज़ैक्शन हुए है १२९०० रुपये