Since the beginning days of India as republic ,there were demands from all corners to provide transparent and accountable government but our accountable functionaries only misled us. All the funds meant to poor and downtrodden was smoothly flowed to the pockets of corrupt public functionaries. Bribe is taken openly but no one takes care of it. Even in judiciary ,peshi from Rs.10 to Rs.20 on each listing of case is taken from each party of litigation in subordinate courts. This amount extorted forcibly. If any one don’t want to give this illegal gratification ,then he is illegally troubled on flimsy ground.Hon’ble friends-Plese take a glance of order of High Court at Allahabad dated 13.4.2006 in writ no.20121 of 2006 delivered by justice Tarun Agrawala as follows- Apparently , the impugned order dated. 1.2.2006 is against the teeth of the direction given by this court in its judgement dated 16.5.2005 . Standing Counsel appearing for respondent no.1 to 4 will file counter affidavit within three weeks explaining as to what the respondent mean by the words “Sadharan Vetanman”. List immediately thereafter. Sd/-Tarun Agarwala J. 13.4.2006 Respondents-1-Director secondary education Arth-1 Allahabad 2-Assistant deputy director secondary education working in the of director of secondary education .Allahabad. 3-D.D.R. Mirzapur.4-DIOS Mirzapur. 5-Committee of management R.I.C. Naugaon ,Mirzapur. Here counter affidavit was submitted on behalf of DIOS Mirzapur on behalf of respondent no.2,3,4. But main accused ie respondent no.1 who superseded the judgement of court still did not abide by the order of High Court. Hon’ble friends- Even a common man can understand that order passed in the writ no.20121 of year 2006 is against the impugned order dated 1.2.2006 passed by director education Arth Allahabad. Here this question arises that when counter affidavit was not submitted by director ,then how court will ascertain the role of director if he is found guilty of noncomplying the order whether that will require one more writ so that his accountability may be decided. Why director secondary education Arth Allahabad did not comply the direction of High court at Allahabad? DIOS Mirzapur can submit its own submissions not on behalf of respondent 2 and 3. Respondent 2 and 3 still did not submit any counter submissions. Here petioner is aggrieved with the director as he superseded the direction of High court.
If director superseded the order of court ,then why counter affidavit only by most junior officer DIOS.
पहला शिकार बना असिस्टेंट को-ऑपरेटिव रजिस्ट्रार
दिल्ली के हल्लाबोल का पहला शिकार असिस्टेंट को-ऑपरेटिव रजिस्ट्रार बना है। असिस्टेंट रजिस्ट्रार के नाम पर पैसा लेने वाले चतुर्थ श्रेणी कर्मचारी को स्टिंग के आधार पर एंटी करप्शन की टीम ने गिरफ्तार कर लिया है।
हेल्पलाइन नंबर बिजी होने के चलते अब दिल्ली सरकार ने 1031 चार अंको का आसान नंबर जारी कर दिया है। वहीं, 16 अन्य शिकायतकर्ताओं ने स्टिंग कर लिया, जल्द रंगे हाथ पकड़ने की तैयारी टीम ने कर ली है। इसके अलावा 85 शिकायतें स्टिंग के लायक पाई गई हैं।