Commissioner Prayagraj is only falsely justifying its stand instead of ensuring the access of sought information.

Registration Number COPRG/A/2020/60004
Name Vivek Singh
Date of Filing 31/07/2020
Status FIRST APPEAL APPLICATION RETURNED TO APPLICANT as on 05/08/2020
Remarks :- Your RTI Request dt.03-06-2020 has been transfered to DM Prayagraj from letter no. 2800/43-128-2020 dt.14-07-2020.
2- Your Appeal is that NO Response within the Time Limit. Answer is that Due to inactiveness of Online RTI. DM Prayagraj is not active in RTI portal. AT last your RTI request is physically transfered.
  Nodal Officer Details  
Telephone Number 9454417212
Email-ID comm.alld4218@gmail.com

Online RTI Appeal Form Details

Public Authority Details :-
* Public Authority COMMISSIONER OFFICE PRAYAGRAJ
Personal Details of Appellant:-
Request Registration Number COPRG/R/2020/60003
Request Registration Date 03/06/2020
* Name Vivek Singh
Gender Male
* Address S/O Nagendra Bahadur Singh , Village Jaysinghpur, Post Gheenpur
Pincode 212507
Country India
State Uttar Pradesh
Status Details not provided
Pincode Literate
Phone Number Details not provided
Mobile Number +91-9935426309
Email-ID arunpratapsingh904[at]gmail[dot]com
Appeal Details :-
Citizenship Indian
* Is the Applicant Below Poverty Line ? No
* Ground For Appeal No Response Within the Time Limit
* PIO of Public Authority approached Nodal Officer
PIO Order/Decision Number Details not provided
* PIO Order/Decision Date
((Description of Information sought (upto 500 characters) )
* Prayer or Relief Sought Commissioner concerned did not provide the proper intimation about the public authority to whom the matter was transferred. Cryptic dealings are not allowed under the transparency act. Sir, you have physically transferred the matter under subsection 3 of section 6 of the Right to Information Act 2005 quite obvious from the available status which states as to where an application is made to a public authority requesting for an information-1-which is held by another public authority; or 2- the subject matter of which is more closely connected with the functions of another public authority, the public authority, to which such application is made, shall transfer the application or such part of it as may be appropriate to other public authority and inform the applicant immediately about such transfer: Request for obtaining information. Provided that the transfer of an application according to this subsection shall be made as soon as practicable but in no case later than five days from the date of receipt of the application. Sir, you transferred the matter to other public authority on 15 July 2020 and application received in the office of PIO which means commissioner concerned on 03 June 2020 which is a violation of subsection 3 of section 6 of Right to Information Act 2005.
Supporting document ((only pdf upto 1 MB))
Registration Number COPRG/R/2020/60003
Name Vivek Singh
Date of Filing 03/06/2020
Status REQUEST PHYSICALLY TRANSFERRED TO OTHER PUBLIC AUTHORITY as on 15/07/2020
  Nodal Officer Details  
Telephone Number 9454417212
Email-ID comm.alld4218@gmail.com

Online RTI Request Form Details

Public Authority Details :-
* Public Authority COMMISSIONER OFFICE PRAYAGRAJ
Personal Details of RTI Applicant:-
Registration Number COPRG/R/2020/60003
Date of Filing 03/06/2020
* Name Vivek Singh
Gender Male
* Address S/O Nagendra Bahadur Singh , Village Jaysinghpur, Post Gheenpur
Pincode 212507
Country India
State Uttar Pradesh
Status Details not provided
Pincode Details not provided
Phone Number Details not provided
Mobile Number +91-9935426309
Email-ID arunpratapsingh904[at]gmail[dot]com
Request Details :-
Citizenship Indian
* Is the Applicant Below Poverty Line ? No
((Description of Information sought (up to 500 characters) )
* Description of Information Sought SPIO denied information and suggested to submit hard copy to concerned.Matter is concerned with village panchayat-Saraijeet Ray Urf Purebhawa, Development Block-Baharia, District-Allahabad.

1-Provide estimates of every work of the current five-year term in Village Panchayat.

2-Provide work booklet of five years of the aforementioned panchayat.

3-Provide total invoices of the current five-year term.

4-Provide detail of Avases made in aforementioned Panchayat. 5-Provide detail of toilets made under SBM and fund spent,

* Concerned PIO Nodal Officer
Supporting document ((only pdf upto 1 MB))

6 comments on Commissioner Prayagraj is only falsely justifying its stand instead of ensuring the access of sought information.

  1. Disposal of request. Provided that the transfer of an application according to this subsection shall be made as soon as practicable but in no case later than five days from the date of receipt of the application. 7. (1) Subject to the proviso to sub-section (2) of section 5 or the proviso to subsection (3) of section 6, the Central Public Information Officer or State Public Information Officer, as the case may be, on receipt of a request under section 6 shall, as expeditiously as possible, and in any case within thirty days of the receipt of the request, either provide the information on payment of such fee as may be prescribed or reject the request for any of the reasons specified in sections 8 and 9: Provided that where the information sought for concerns the life or liberty of a person, the same shall be provided within forty-eight hours of the receipt of the request.

  2. Commissioner Prayagraj is the senior rank officer of the district magistrate Allahabad and this application has been submitted on 3rd June 2020 and more than two months passed and information what ever sought by the information seeker has not been provided by the district magistrate Allahabad which is a mockery of the provisions of the The Right to Information act 2005 but how much embarrassing situation is commissioner Prayagraj is only falsely justifying its a stand here.

    1. कमिश्नर प्रयागराज जिला मजिस्ट्रेट इलाहाबाद के वरिष्ठ रैंक अधिकारी हैं और यह आवेदन 3 जून 2020 को प्रस्तुत किया गया है और दो महीने से अधिक समय बीत चुका है और जो जानकारी मांगी गई है वह जिला मजिस्ट्रेट इलाहाबाद द्वारा प्रदान नहीं की गई है अभी तक जो एक मजाक है सूचना का अधिकार अधिनियम 2005 के प्रावधानों के अनुसार ३० दिन के भीतर सूचना उपलब्ध कराना था , लेकिन कमिश्नर प्रयागराज की स्थिति कितनी शर्मनाक है, यह केवल यहीं अपना पक्ष रखते हुए गलत साबित हो रहे है।

  3. Section 6(3) in The Right To Information Act, 2005
    (3) Where an application is made to a public authority requesting for an information,—
    (i) which is held by another public authority; or
    (ii) the subject matter of which is more closely connected with the functions of another public authority, the public authority, to which such application is made, shall transfer the application or such part of it as may be appropriate to that other public authority and inform the applicant immediately about such transfer: Provided that the transfer of an application pursuant to this sub‑section shall be made as soon as practicable but in no case later than five days from the date of receipt of the application.

  4. Sir, you transferred the matter to other public authority on 15 July 2020 and application received in the office of PIO which means commissioner concerned on 03 June 2020 which is a violation of subsection 3 of section 6 of Right to Information Act 2005.

  5. If there is violation of the subsection 3 of section 6 of the Right to Information act 2005 then concerned may be subjected to the interrogation under the provisions of Right to Information act 2005 so that next time they may not commit mistake again and again but it seems that when government of Uttar Pradesh is not recovering the penalties imposed by the Uttar Pradesh state information commission then such practices will continue as it is. Because panel proceedings create fear in the mind of wrongdoers if panel proceedings may culminate into the act of punishment to the wrongdoers.

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: