CIC is seeking reply of CPIO and FAA from information seeker even when both didn’t reply and returned

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>
How can Deputy Registrar central registry return the second appeal in order to seek the copy of the reply of CPIO and FAA when no such communication was made with the information seeker?
Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com> 9 March 2018 at 09:20
To: Anjali Anand Srivastava <secy-cic@nic.in>, registrar-cic@nic.in, pmosb <pmosb@pmo.nic.in>, presidentofindia@rb.nic.in, supremecourt <supremecourt@nic.in>, urgent-action <urgent-action@ohchr.org>
Sir, whatever documents available to the information seeker would be attached to the second appeal.
Whether reply of CPIO can be attached to the second appeal if CPIO didn’t reply?
Whether reply of FAA can be attached to the second appeal if FAA didn’t reply? 
Whether central information commission can’t meditate on it that deteriorating state of Right to Information Act 2005 is due to lackadaisical approach and cryptic dealings of the staffs of the registry?
Whether it is a justified practice that central registry is returning back most of the second appeal in the name of removing deficiencies?
Following appeal concerned with the widow, Ekta Singh has been returned two times, once earlier ipso facto obvious from the earlier representation and now as obvious from the following e-mail exchanged.  
यत्र नार्यस्तु पूज्यन्ते रमन्ते तत्र देवताः 
लगता है इस देश में विधवाओं के प्रति कोई सहानुभूति नही है |
Return of your Second Appeal for removal of deficiencies.
Inbox
x

Central Information Commission (CIC) no-reply@nic.in via nic.in 
14:27 (18 hours ago)
to me

 

Dear Madam/Sir,
Your request details are given below :

 

1
Appellant Name
Ekta Singh
2
Address
Husband-Late Mr. Shyam Narayan Singh, Village-Patevar, Village Panchayat-Patevar, Block-Pateharaa, Police station – Marihan,Post office-Marihan
3
Diary Number
612096
4
Diary Date
13-02-2018
5
Letter Date
01-01-1970
Your Dak (Diary No. 612096) has been returned vide Facilitation Memo date 08/03/2018. Please click here to view Facilitation Memo.

 

Regards,
Central Information Commission (CIC)

 

DAK Entry Details
DAK Entry Details
DAK recieved Date : 13-02-2018
Letter Dated : NA
Letter Number : NA
Diary Number : 612096
DAK Classification
Appeal/Complaint No. : NA
Choose Category : NA
Sender Details
Sender Belongs to : NA
Mode Of Communication : NA
Name : Ekta Singh
Gender : Female
Country : India
Address : Husband-Late Mr. Shyam Narayan Singh, Village-Patevar, Village Panchayat-Patevar, Block-Pateharaa, Police station – Marihan,Post office-Marihan
State/Ut : Uttar Pradesh
District : Mirzapur
City/Village : Patevar
Pincode : 231310
Telephone : NA
Mobile No. : 8381898108
Dealing Officer/Registry : Central Registration
Remarks : NA
 
श्री मान जी आप लोग RTI प्रार्थना पत्र के आज की स्थिति से अवगत हो |
Enter Registration Number PNBNK/R/2017/50842
Name Ekta Singh
Date of filing 14/09/2017
Public Authority Punjab National Bank
Status REQUEST FORWARDED TO CPIO
Date of action 15/09/2017
Details of CPIO :- Telephone Number:- 0542-2506576, Email Id:- Cpio.vara@pnb.co.in
Nodal Officer Details :-
Telephone Number 01125747448
Email Id sanjay.sharma@pnb.co.in

 

श्री मान जी आप लोग RTI प्रथम अपीली प्रार्थना पत्र के आज की स्थिति से अवगत हो |
Enter Registration Number PNBNK/A/2017/60180
Name Ekta Singh
Date of filing 30/10/2017
Public Authority Punjab National Bank
Status APPEAL FORWARDED TO CONCERNED FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY
Date of action 30/10/2017
Appellate Authority Details :- Telephone Number:- 0542-2500424, Email Id:- akchabra@pnb.co.in
Nodal Officer Details :-
Telephone Number 01125747448
Email Id sanjay.sharma@pnb.co.in

 

श्री मान जी क्या भ्रस्टाचार का कोई दूसरा रूप है |दोनों जन सूचना अधिकारी व प्रथम अपीली अधिकारी जन सूचना अधिकार के प्रावधानों का मखौल उड़ा दिए और केन्द्रीय सूचना आयोग की रजिस्ट्री द्वितीय अपील को लगातार वापस कर रहा है | क्या यह विधवा के साथ अन्याय नही है |क्या एक विधवा को सूचना पाने का हक नही है इस महान लोकतंत्र में |

 

 

On 14 February 2018 at 01:10, Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com> wrote:

To
                                  Chief Information Commissioner of India
                                The Central Information Commission,
                                                       August Kranti Bhawan,
                                                               Bhikaji Cama Place,
                                                          New Delhi – 110066
An application under article 51 A of the constitution of India seeking the attention of the accountable public functionaries of the government of India.
Subject-Deputy Registrar central registry of central information commission returned the second appeal of Ekta Singh aggrieved lady sought information under subsection 1 of section 6 of Right to Information Act 2005 on flimsy ground as follows.
Ground of rejection -1-Copy of R.T.I. Application submitting to CPIO is not enclosed.
2-Copy of reply if received any from the CPIO, is not enclosed.
3-Copy of reply if received any from the FAA, is not enclosed.
Here role of Deputy Registrar central registry is sheer negative and unproductive as well as causing great damage to the spirit of the august act.
Reply of the applicant is as follows-
1-Since the RTI Application submitted online ipso facto obvious from the registration numbers of the application and the appeal, and online portal allow application in PDF form attached with the application so entire records available to the applicant was attached with the second appeal submitted online under subsection 3 of the section 19 of the Right to Information Act 2005. Information sought was attached with the second appeal as supportive document and Deputy Registrar without thoroughly examining the submitted document reached on wrong conclusion which is reflection of his insolence and dereliction to the public duty.
2-When no reply was made by CPIO, then how the copy of reply, may be submitted by the appellant?
3-When no reply was made by FAA, then how the copy of reply, may be submitted by the appellant?
The act of Deputy Registrar central registry is ultravires to Right to Information Act 2005 as he is forcibly seeking those copies which were not exchanged by the CPIO and FAA with the information seeker.
With due respect, applicant invites the kind attention of the Hon’ble Sir to the following submissions as follows.
1-It is to be submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that matter is concerned with the communication dated 30-Jan-2018,
Return of your Second Appeal/Complaint for removal of deficiencies.
 Central Information Commission (CIC) no-reply@nic.in via nic.in
30 Jan
to me
Dear Madam/Sir,
Your request details are given below:
1              Appellant Name               Ekta Singh
2              Address Village-Patevar, Village Panchayat-Patevar, Block-Pateharaa, Police station – Marihan, District-Mirzapur, Post office-Marihan
3              Diary Number   610514
4              Diary Date           24-01-2018
5              Letter Date         01-01-1970
Your Dak (Diary No. 610514) has been returned vide Facilitation Memo date 30/01/2018. Please click here to view Facilitation Memo.
Regards,
Central Information Commission (CIC)
2-It is to be submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that please take a glance of communication exchanged between aggrieved lady Ekta Singh and deputy registrar
3-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that Hon‘ble Sir may be pleased to take a glance at attached document with the representation.  
This is a humble request of your applicant to you Hon’ble Sir that how can it be justified to withhold public services arbitrarily and promote anarchy, lawlessness, and chaos in an arbitrary manner by making the mockery of law of land. This is need of the hour to take harsh steps against the wrongdoer in order to win the confidence of citizenry and strengthen the democratic values for healthy and prosperous democracy. For this, your applicant shall ever pray you, Hon’ble Sir.                                                                   Yours sincerely
                                              Yogi M. P. Singh, Mobile number-7379105911, Mohalla-Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road District- Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh, Pin code-231001.

 

 

 

Second appeal of Ekta Singh.pdf
715K
4 1 vote
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
3 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh

Sir, whatever documents available to the information seeker would be attached to the second appeal.
Whether reply of CPIO can be attached to the second appeal if CPIO didn't reply?
Whether reply of FAA can be attached to the second appeal if FAA didn't reply?
Whether central information commission can't meditate on it that deteriorating state of Right to Information Act 2005 is due to lackadaisical approach and cryptic dealings of the staffs of the registry?
Whether it is a justified practice that central registry is returning back most of the second appeal in the name of removing deficiencies?
Following appeal concerned with the widow, Ekta Singh has been returned two times, once earlier ipso facto obvious from the earlier representation and now as obvious from the following e-mail exchanged.

Arun Pratap Singh
2 years ago

2-When no reply was made by CPIO, then how the copy of reply, may be submitted by the appellant?
3-When no reply was made by FAA, then how the copy of reply, may be submitted by the appellant?
The act of Deputy Registrar central registry is ultravires to Right to Information Act 2005 as he is forcibly seeking those copies which were not exchanged by the CPIO and FAA with the information seeker.

Pratima Parihar
Pratima Parihar
3 months ago

क्या यह उचित व्यवहार है कि केंद्रीय रजिस्ट्री कमियों को दूर करने के नाम पर दूसरी अपील वापस कर रही है?
विधवा से संबंधित अपील के बाद, एकता सिंह को दो बार लौटाया गया है, एक बार पहले के प्रतिनिधित्व से स्पष्ट रूप से और अब ई-मेल एक्सचेंज किए गए अच्छे से स्पष्ट है ।
यत्र नार्यस्तु पूज्यन्ते रमन्ते तत्र देवताः
लगता है कि इस देश में विधवाओं के प्रति कोई सहानुभूति नहीं है