CIC changed the date of hearing from 24/05/2016 to 31/05/2016 in the appeal against CPIO High court.

List of Hearings in r/o Complaints & Appeals scheduled
IC    :- Radha
Krishna Mathur
Period : 31-05-2016 to 31-05-2016
Sl.
No.
File Number.
Unique ID.
Received Date
Name & Address of 
Appellant / Complaint
PA/CPIO 
Details
Date of Hearing
Time of Hearing
Venue of Hearing
Bench Details
1.
CIC/CC/A/2014/002533
SA/UG/14/f27343qmwu
20-11-2014
  YOGI M P SINGH 
MOHALA-SUREKAPURAM, JABALPUR,DISTT-MIRZAPUR
High
Court
PIOHigh Court Allahabad.  
 31-05-2016
10.30
Venue
for Appellant NIC District Centre, Collectorate Complex, Mirzapur-231001, Mr.
Ravindra Nath Singh, Scientist-C, 05442-253178 / 257942. Venue for PIO N.I.C,
Colllectorate, Allahabad, Mr. Praveen Singh, Technical Director, 0532-2640657
/ 2640691. 
(VC)
Single
Bench
Single
Bench

Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh
<yogimpsingh@gmail.com>
Flimsy pretexts always keep us away from achieving the truth
consequently we remain in bitter dark of ignorance.
1
message
Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>
Fri, May 20, 2016 at 1:52 PM
To:
presidentofindia@rb.nic.in, pmosb <pmosb@pmo.nic.in>, supremecourt
<supremecourt@nic.in>, urgent-action <urgent-action@ohchr.org>,
cmup <cmup@up.nic.in>, csup <csup@up.nic.in>,
“hgovup@up.nic.in” <hgovup@up.nic.in>, secy-cic
<secy-cic@nic.in>, dhirendra.k@nic.in, “sec.sic”
<sec.sic@up.nic.in>
Hon’ble
Sir after two years appeal has been listed for hearing by the central
information commission on 24-May-2016 at 10:30 A.M. consequently humble
request to state functionaries not to create impediments in the hearing on
aforesaid specific time so that your applicant may pursue the appeal
effectively in order to seek justice for the vulnerable ladies.
20
May 2016
12:03
With due respect your applicant/petitioner
wants to draw the kind attention of the Hon’ble Sir to the following
submissions as follows.
1-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that
Hon’ble Sir may be pleased to take a glance of following extract of the
notice dated 3-May-2016 sent by C.I.C. to both the parties of the appeal.
Take notice that the above appeal/complaint
in respect of RTI dated
05/06/2014 filed by the appellant/complainant
has been Listed for hearing before
Shri
Radha Krishna 
Mathur. Chief
lnformation Commissioner, 
at August Kranti
Bhavan, Bhikaji
cama Place -Room No. S-340. 
2nd  Floor
New Delhi 
– 110066, on 24-may-2016. 10:30
A.M.
For detail please take a glance of attached
documents with this representation.
 2-It is
submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that Hon’ble Sir may be pleased to take the
perusal of order passed by Hon’ble chief information commissioner of India –
Appeal
No. CIC/CC/A/2014/001147/VS
Appellant: Shri Yogi M.P. Singh,
Mohalla-Surekapuram,
Jabalpur Road,
Distt. Mirzapur, U.P.
Respondent: Central Public Information Officer,
Allahabad High Court,
Allahabad.
Date of Hearing: 26.10.2015
Date of Decision: 4.11.2015
ORDER
RTI application:
Hearing:
2. The appellant participated in the hearing through audio. The
respondent did not participate in the hearing.
This hearing was to take place through Video conference but at
the last moment messages conveyed in the district units from chief
secretary  office that from the  time such and such chief secretary
will hold the meeting of district officials through video conference which
time of commencement coincided with the hearing of aforesaid appeal and most
regretting that hearing completed at 11 A.M. but chief secretary addressed
the conference since 2 P.M. . Manager of computer centre told his trouble and
advised your applicant to return back but your applicant reminded him his
promise so he informed the CIC about his trouble and then Hon’ble chief
information commissioner of India carried  out the process of appeal and
reached on logical conclusion.
 3-It is
submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that motive of this application is to ensure
the completion of process of appeal without impediments so that frequent
listings which waste the precious time of commission may be avoided .
Disposal of appeal may not take longer time, consequently your applicant have
sent the copy of second appeal submitted before the commission under
subsection 3 of section 19 to the chief justice of High court of judicature
at Allahabad. Which was received by public authority on next date of dispatch
. Hon’ble Sir may be pleased to take a perusal of attached documents .
Mahesh Pratap Singh
Yogi M P Singh <
yogimpsingh@gmail.com>
CPIO High court may be directed to provide sought information.
1
message
Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi
M P Singh 
<yogimpsingh@gmail.com>
Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 3:03 AM
To: supremecourt <supremecourt@nic.in>, urgent-action <urgent-action@ohchr.org>, pmosb <pmosb@pmo.nic.in>, secypg <secypg@nic.in>, ddpg2-arpg <ddpg2-arpg@nic.in>, “hgovup@up.nic.in” <hgovup@up.nic.in>, cmup <cmup@up.nic.in>, csup <csup@up.nic.in>, “ak.dash” <ak.dash@nic.in>, secy-cic <secy-cic@nic.in>
To
 
    Chief Information Commissioner/Information Commissioners
,Government
of India.
Appellant-Mahesh
Pratap Singh (Yogi M. P. Singh)
Mohalla-Surekapuram
,Jabalpur Road
District-Mirzapur
,State-Uttar Pradesh , Country-India
 
                   
        Versus
Respondents-
1-Registrar
(A/C & Exam)/I/C Central Public Information Officer , High
court
of judicature at Allahabad , Allahabad .
2-Registrar
General /First Appellate Authority under Right to
Information
Act 2005 ,High court of judicature at Allahabad ,
Allahabad
.
Prayer-To
direct concerned to entertain my appeal in accordance with
the
law. Registrar (A/C & Exam)/I/C Central Public Information Officer
be
directed to provide information as sought by information seeker.
Short
submissions .
What action was taken still a mystery.?
जज ने सीना छुआ और सलवार उतारने को कहा…  गोंडा ज़िले मेंदो लड़कियों
ने पुलिस में शिकायत दर्ज कराई है कि एक जज ने अपने चैंबर में उनके साथ
छेड़छाड़ की.
पीड़ित लड़कियों में से एक की उम्र तेरह साल हैऔर दूसरीकी इक्कीस साल.
दोनों अलगअलग परिवारों से हैं और दोनों के साथ यह घटना एक ही दिन पर अलग
समय पर हुई.                                एक लड़की का आरोप है कि जज
ने उससे शॉल हटाकर कपड़े उतारने को कहाजिससे वह उसकीउम्र का पता लगा
सके.
लड़की ने अपने बयान में कहा है कि इसके बाद जज ने उसका सीना छुआ और सलवार
उतारने को कहाइस पर लड़की रोने लगीऔर कहा कि यह सब मुझसे नही होगा.
                                       दूसरी लड़की ने भी इसी तरह
काबयान दिया हैउसका कहना है कि जज ने कपड़े  उतारने पर गलत बयान लिखने
की धमकी भी दी.                                   अतिरिक्त पुलिस महा
निदेशक अरुण कुमार का कहना है कि चूँकि यहशिकायत जज के अपनी अदालत के
कार्य से सम्बन्धित हैइसलिए पुलिस ने मुकदमा सीधे मुकदमा दर्ज करने के
बजाय जिलाजज के अलावा हाईकोर्ट के रजिस्ट्रार जनरल को भी शिकायत भेज दी
है.
पता चला है कि गृह विभाग ने इलाहाबाद हाईकोर्ट के चीफ जस्टिस के कार्यालय
को भी पूरी जानकारी भेज दी है और उनके रुख काइन्तजार किया जा रहा है.http://yogimpsingh.blogspot.com/2016/05/copy-of-appeal-and-notice-sent-to-cpio.html

2 comments on CIC changed the date of hearing from 24/05/2016 to 31/05/2016 in the appeal against CPIO High court.

  1. जज ने सीना छुआ और सलवार उतारने को कहा… गोंडा ज़िले मेंदो लड़कियों
    ने पुलिस में शिकायत दर्ज कराई है कि एक जज ने अपने चैंबर में उनके साथ
    छेड़छाड़ की.
    पीड़ित लड़कियों में से एक की उम्र तेरह साल है, और दूसरीकी इक्कीस साल.
    दोनों अलग-अलग परिवारों से हैं और दोनों के साथ यह घटना एक ही दिन पर अलग
    समय पर हुई. एक लड़की का आरोप है कि जज
    ने उससे शॉल हटाकर कपड़े उतारने को कहा, जिससे वह उसकीउम्र का पता लगा
    सके.
    लड़की ने अपने बयान में कहा है कि इसके बाद जज ने उसका सीना छुआ और सलवार
    उतारने को कहा. इस पर लड़की रोने लगीऔर कहा कि यह सब मुझसे नही होगा.
    दूसरी लड़की ने भी इसी तरह
    काबयान दिया है. उसका कहना है कि जज ने कपड़े न उतारने पर गलत बयान लिखने
    की धमकी भी दी. अतिरिक्त पुलिस महा
    निदेशक अरुण कुमार का कहना है कि चूँकि यहशिकायत जज के अपनी अदालत के
    कार्य से सम्बन्धित है. इसलिए पुलिस ने मुकदमा सीधे मुकदमा दर्ज करने के
    बजाय जिलाजज के अलावा हाईकोर्ट के रजिस्ट्रार जनरल को भी शिकायत भेज दी
    है.
    पता चला है कि गृह विभाग ने इलाहाबाद हाईकोर्ट के चीफ जस्टिस के कार्यालय
    को भी पूरी जानकारी भेज दी है और उनके रुख काइन्तजार किया जा रहा है

  2. Matter is concerned with the working of high court of judicature at Allahabad. Every one knows about the quantum of corruption in our judiciary. Judges are honest because bribe or peshi is taken by peshkaar means clerk seated on side chair of judges in order to assist them. This is root cause no videography was allowed of court functions. Here is sheer anarchy.

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: