Case of Rajendra Pratap Singh listed on 02/08/2017 for hearing but outcome uncertain and cryptic.

Case Status – Allahabad
Pending
Writ – A / 20121 /
2006 [Mirzapur]
Petitioner:
RAJENDRA PRATAP
SINGH
Respondent:
STATE OF U.P. AND
OTHERS
Counsel (Pet.):
P.C. CHAUHAN
Counsel (Res.):
C.S.C.
Category:
Service-Writ
Petitions Relating To Secondary Education (non Teaching Staff) (single
Bench)-Salary And Allowances
Date of Filing:
10/04/2006
Last Listed on:
25/11/2016 in
Court No. 1
Next Listing Date:
To be listed on
02/08/2017
This is not an authentic/certified copy of the information
regarding status of a case. Authentic/certified information may be obtained
under Chapter VIII Rule 30 of Allahabad High Court Rules. Mistake, if any, may
be brought to the notice of OSD(Judicial)(Computer).

Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>
Most surprising is that High court of judicature itself through its CPIO procrastinating on the direction of CIC on flimsy ground.
Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com> 7 May 2017 at 23:03
To: supremecourt <supremecourt@nic.in>, cj <cj@allahabadhighcourt.in>, dhirendra.k@nic.in, secy-cic <secy-cic@nic.in>

Subject-Diary Number-601348, Diary date-08-03-2017 communication dated-28-03-2017 by central information commission through its Deputy Registrar, central registry.  
With great respect to revered Sir , your applicant invites the kind attention of the Hon’ble Sir to the following submissions as follows.
1-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that please take a glance of first page of attached PDF documents with this representation. Through this communication, registry of R.T.I. ombudsman raised certain objections and expected to get removed through your applicant. 
2-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that second and third page of these attached PDF documents explicitly showing that complaint copy in 15 pages served to CPIO ,High court of judicature at Allahabad which was delivered in the office of High court of judicature on 17-12-2015 ipso facto obvious. 
3-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that fourth and fifth page of these attached PDF documents explicitly showing that complaint in 14 pages sent to Sh Dhirendra Kumar , Deputy Registrar, Central Information Commission, second floor B-wing , August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji cama Place , New Delhi 110066 which was delivered in the office of central information commission on  07-12-2015ipso facto obvious. 
4-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that Deputy Registrar must know that appeal before commission is submitted under subsection 3 of section 19 of Right to Information Act 2005 which requires the obligation obligation of so many as sought but this communication is complaint under section 18 of Right to Information Act 2005 in order to get compliance of order passed by central information commission on 04-11-2015 which is still awaiting compliance by the CPIO High court of judicature at Allahabad.  
5-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that complaint received by the registry through Deputy Registrar, Dhirendra Kumar on 07-12-2015 contains each pages well signed and complaint is well indexed. Since the case has passed through the stage of second appeal so need not conform to set up norms of second appeal.   


On 5 December 2015 at 21:14, Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com> wrote:
To,
                                                          Sh. Dhirendra Kumar
                                                            Deputy Registrar,
                                             The Central Information Commission.
                                                       Second Floor. ‘B Wing,
                                                       August Kranti Bhawan,
                                                               Bhikaji Cama Place,
                                                          New Delhi – 110066
Subject- CPIO High court of judicature at Allahabad is seeking to fix another date for the hearing enabling him to submit his side in the matter disposed by central information commission on 04/11/2015 by passing the order in favour of appellant. .
Prayer-Before passing order of rehearing in the aforesaid disposed matter, as required by law your applicant be provided appropriate opportunity to be heard.
Date, events and pages of the submission is as follows.
1-Hard copy of submission made to you Hon’ble Sir on 02-Dec-2015 at 9:41 PM through e-mail from page2 to page5.
2-Hard copy of submission made to Hon’ble chief justice of High court judicature at Allahabad by addressing its CPIO on 10-Oct-2010 at 12:34 AM through e-mail is page-6.
3-Copy of order passed by Hon’ble central information commission on 04-Nov-2015 and consequently disposed the appeal No.CIC/CC/A/2014/001147/VS from page-7 to page-8.
4-Letter of CPIO dated-27/11/2015 seeking rehearing after disposal of case No.CIC/CC/A/2014/001147/VS by CIC on flimsy/false/clinching forged ground received by your applicant on 02-Dec-2015 at 2:30-PM  page-9.
5-Letter of office of postmaster general ,Allahabad 211001 revealing your applicant’s registered letter no. RU115570899IN delivered on 21-Oct-2015 to CPIO page-10.
6-Submission of your applicant in order to get compliance of order of CIC dated-04/11/2015 before chief justice ,High court of judicature at Allahabad through e-mail on 15-Nov-2015 and its hard copy was sent on 20/11/2015 through speed registered post page-11 to page-12.
7-Aforesaid speed post received by public authority on 26/11/2015 page-13.
8-Order of High court of judicature at Allahabad passed on 13/04/2006 in the writ No.20121 of year 2006 still awaiting compliance on the part of Director secondary education arth-1 Allahabad (necessary party in the writ) page-14.
9- Order of High court of judicature at Allahabad passed on 16/04/2004 in the writ No.1980 of year 1991 ,in order to get compliance of this order three successive writs were filed including aforesaid one,page-15.
                   This is humble request of your applicant that raised matter needs due attention in order to curb miscarriage of justice as in disposed matter, CPIO is seeking rehearing which is against principle of natural justice. Here this question arises that if a case is disposed and verdict is delivered whether same authority who delivered judgement can recall its order and revive the case? Hon’ble Sir be pleased to scrutinize the matter raised by CPIO on the ground of law that whether jurisprudence allow it instead of touching the disposed matter. For this your applicant shall ever pray you Hon’ble Sir. Your applicant expects that he will be provided appropriate opportunity to be heard in the matter concerned.
Date-5-Dec-2015                                                                     Yours sincerely
                                                                                               Yogi M. P. Singh 
Mohalla-Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road District-Mirzapur , Uttar Pradesh ,India Mobile no.7379105911


Ensure compliance of order of Hon’ble C.I.C..pdf
1271K

2 comments on Case of Rajendra Pratap Singh listed on 02/08/2017 for hearing but outcome uncertain and cryptic.

  1. Pending

    Writ – A / 20121 / 2006 [Mirzapur]

    Petitioner:
    RAJENDRA PRATAP SINGH
    Respondent:
    STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS
    Counsel (Pet.):
    P.C. CHAUHAN
    Counsel (Res.):
    C.S.C.
    Category:
    Service-Writ Petitions Relating To Secondary Education (non Teaching Staff) (single Bench)-Salary And Allowances
    Date of Filing:
    10/04/2006
    Last Listed on:
    25/11/2016 in Court No. 1
    Next Listing Date:
    To be listed on 02/08/2017

  2. 6-Submission of your applicant in order to get compliance of order of CIC dated-04/11/2015 before chief justice ,High court of judicature at Allahabad through e-mail on 15-Nov-2015 and its hard copy was sent on 20/11/2015 through speed registered post page-11 to page-12.
    7-Aforesaid speed post received by public authority on 26/11/2015 page-13.
    8-Order of High court of judicature at Allahabad passed on 13/04/2006 in the writ No.20121 of year 2006 still awaiting compliance on the part of Director secondary education arth-1 Allahabad (necessary party in the writ) page-14.
    9- Order of High court of judicature at Allahabad passed on 16/04/2004 in the writ No.1980 of year 1991 ,in order to get compliance of this order three successive writs were filed including aforesaid one,page-15.

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: