Appeal submitted against CPIO /FAA reserve bank of India under subsection 3 of section 19 received in CIC

EU212673089IN  
Booked at Booked On Destination
Pincode
Tariff Article
Category
Delivered at Delivered on
Not Available Not Available Not Availa Not availa Not Available R K Puram (Main) S.O (110066) 25/05/2016
 

Detailed Track Events For EU212673089IN 

Date Time Office Event
21/05/2016 05:36:33 ICH MIRZAPUR Bag Despatched to Lalganj (Mirzapur) S.O
22/05/2016 20:08:39 MIRZAPUR RMS Item bagged for ICH MIRZAPUR
22/05/2016 20:17:31 ICH MIRZAPUR Item Received
23/05/2016 02:24:22 ICH MIRZAPUR Item bagged for NSH ALLAHABAD
23/05/2016 02:52:18 ICH MIRZAPUR Bag Despatched to NSH ALLAHABAD
23/05/2016 10:38:56 NSH ALLAHABAD Bag Received
23/05/2016 10:39:56 NSH ALLAHABAD Bag Opened
23/05/2016 10:39:57 NSH ALLAHABAD Item Received
23/05/2016 14:45:37 NSH ALLAHABAD Item bagged for NSH NEW DELHI
23/05/2016 14:45:51 NSH ALLAHABAD Bag Despatched to NSH NEW DELHI
25/05/2016 00:53:51 NSH NEW DELHI Bag Received
25/05/2016 04:11:37 NSH NEW DELHI Bag Received
25/05/2016 05:41:58 NSH NEW DELHI Item Received
25/05/2016 05:42:58 NSH NEW DELHI Item bagged for R K Puram (Main) S.O
25/05/2016 05:42:58 NSH NEW DELHI Bag Despatched to R K Puram (Main) S.O
25/05/2016 08:27:13 R K Puram (Main) S.O Bag Received
25/05/2016 08:35:18 R K Puram (Main) S.O Item Received
25/05/2016 08:35:18 R K Puram (Main) S.O Bag Opened
26/05/2016 11:43:43 Lalganj (Mirzapur) S.O Bag Received
26/05/2016 11:47:36 Lalganj (Mirzapur) S.O Bag Opened
25/05/2016 13:25:00 R K Puram (Main) S.O Item Delivered
Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>
Whether it is justified that First Appellate authority of Reserve Bank of India may not entertain first appeal.
1 message
Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com> Sun, May 22, 2016 at 12:17 AM

To: secy-cic <secy-cic@nic.in>, dhirendra.k@nic.in, “ak.dash” <ak.dash@nic.in>
Cc: presidentofindia@rb.nic.in, pmosb <pmosb@pmo.nic.in>
Bcc: supremecourt <supremecourt@nic.in>, urgent-action <urgent-action@ohchr.org>, cenvigil@nic.in

An appeal under subsection 3 of section 19 of Right to Information Act 2005 .
To
                       Hon’ble chief information commissioner of India
                             
                                           The Central Information Commission.
                             Second Floor. ‘B Wing,
                                August Kranti Bhawan,
                                 Bhikaji Cama Place,
                                  New Delhi .110066
Prayer-Hon’ble sir if deems fit ,may pass the following order in accordance with the law.
1-C.P.I.O. Reserve bank may be directed to provide the sought information.
2-Pecuniary penalty may be imposed on the aforesaid CPIO for wilfully violating the provisions of right to information Act 2005 .
3-Disciplinary action may taken against the first appellate authority for not entertaining the first appeal submitted by the appellant under subsection 1 of section 19 of Right to Information Act 2005.
  Appellant-Yogi M. P. Singh
Mohalla-Surekapuram ,Jabalpur Road
District-Mirzapur (Uttar Pradesh)      
Versus
Respondent-1-Central public information officer
 in short CPIO
Reserve Bank of India
Respondent-2-First appellate authority
Reserve Bank of India .     
   With due respect your appellant/petitioner wants to draw the kind attention of the Hon’ble Sir to the following submissions as follows.
1-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that your appellant submitted R.T.I. Communique on 07/02/2016 to Shri.R.LDas ,Chief General Manager in-Charge ,Human Resources Management Department ,Reserve Bank of India, Central Office ,Central Office Building (20th Floor)
Shahid Bhagat Singh Marg, Fort ,Mumbai 400001
Telephone:- 22610301,through speed registered post which was received by the office of public authority on 11/02/2016 .Hon’ble Sir may be pleased to take a glance of attached documents with this representation.
2-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that R.B.I. intimated your appellant through its letter dated 15-Feb-2016 that your R.T.I. Communique dated -07/02/2016 was forwarded to DBR in order to provide the sought information. Hon’ble Sir may be pleased to take a glance of attached documents with this representation.
3-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that CPIO through its dispatch dated-10-March-2016 which was received by your appellant on 17-March -2016 denied to made available sought information as information sought is reason to be formulated by them which is not the information under Right to Information Act 2005. Hon’ble Sir may be pleased to take the perusal of attachments with this representation.
 4-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that your appellant submitted first appeal under subsection 1 of section 19 of Right to Information Act 2005 on 18-March -2016 against the denial of sought information by the CPIO which was received by his office on 28-March-2016 . It is unfortunate that no action was taken by him on the aforesaid appeal . This is mockery of Right to Information Act 2005. Hon’ble Sir may be pleased to take the perusal of attachments with this representation.
 5-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that
Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>
Why appellate authority of reserve bank of India is in state of dilemma in taking decision as matter is concerned with massive corruption in the banking sector.
1 message
Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>
Sat, May 7, 2016 at 6:39 PM
Why reserve bank of India is silent on massive corruption in the banking sector is not signal of failure of government. To be silent on the sought information by the first appellate authority of reserve bank of India is the reflection that there is no transparency and accountability in the working of public authority  reserve bank of India.
07 May 2016
17:15
With due respect your applicant/petitioner wants to draw the kind attention of the Hon’ble Sir to the following submissions as follows.
1-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that Hon’ble Prime Minister Sir when application is submitted under subsection 1 of section 19 of Right to Information Act 2005 ,then first appellate authority take appropriate decision on submitted appeal within 30 days from date it receives the application and made available that decision to the appellant. But it seems that in order to shield wrongdoers ,appellate authority of regulatory body/reserve bank of India  of banking institutions has forgotten this provision of Right to Information Act 2005.
2-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that position of central government is worse than state government because on jansunwai portal of state government ,all type of grievances are redressed but on PG portal of central government ,no grievances are entertained if concerned with non availability of information to information seeker. Consequently it is not feasible to make complaint against wrongdoers who are making mockery of Right to Information Act 2005 .
3-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that your applicant submitted the first appeal under subsection 1 of section 19 of Right to Information Act 2005 through registered post on 18/03/2016 which was delivered in the office of First Appellate Authority, reserve bank of India on 28/03/2016 . It is unfortunate that reserve bank of India still didn’t make available the decision of its first appellate authority. Hon’ble Sir may be pleased to take a glance of attached documents with this representation.
R.T.I. Communique to CPIO Reserve bank of India..pdf
1537K
This is humble request of your appellant to you Hon’ble Sir that It can never be justified to overlook  the rights of citizenry by delivering services in arbitrary manner by floating all set up norms. This is sheer mismanagement which is encouraging wrongdoers to reap benefit of loopholes in system and depriving poor citizens from right to justice. Therefore it is need of hour to take concrete steps in order to curb grown anarchy in the system. For this your appellant shall ever pray you Hon’ble Sir.
                                      ‘Yours  sincerely
                            Yogi M. P. Singh Mobile number-7379105911
Mohalla-Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road District-Mirzapur , Uttar Pradesh ,India


R.T.I. Communique to CPIO Reserve bank of India..pdf
1537K

2 comments on Appeal submitted against CPIO /FAA reserve bank of India under subsection 3 of section 19 received in CIC

  1. Hon'ble sir if deems fit ,may pass the following order in accordance with the law.
    1-C.P.I.O. Reserve bank may be directed to provide the sought information.
    2-Pecuniary penalty may be imposed on the aforesaid CPIO for wilfully violating the provisions of right to information Act 2005 .
    3-Disciplinary action may taken against the first appellate authority for not entertaining the first appeal submitted by the appellant under subsection 1 of section 19 of Right to Information Act 2005.

  2. On one side of screen our Hon'ble prime minister claim of good governance but on the other side of screen his subordinates are not providing sought information to information seekers . O God grant our public functionaries just and honest mind.

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: