Apex court of India takes up matter concerned with violations of provisions of Right to Information Act 2005

Diary No. 14649/SCI/PIL(E)/2018
Application Date 25-03-2018
Received On 07-04-2018
Applicant Name MAHESH PRATAP SINGH YOGI M P SINGH
Address MOHALLA SUREKAPURAM JABALPUR ROAD DISTRICT MIRZAPUR
State UTTAR PRADESH
Action Taken UNDER PROCESS

Get PDF

Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>
Lawlessness, anarchy and arbitrariness originates from uncontrolled powers given to public servants.There must be a proper mechanism to control it.
1 message
Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com> 25 March 2018 at 17:11
To: pmosb <pmosb@pmo.nic.in>, presidentofindia@rb.nic.in, supremecourt <supremecourt@nic.in>, urgent-action <urgent-action@ohchr.org>, cmup <cmup@up.nic.in>, hgovup@up.nic.in, csup@up.nic.in, uphrclko <uphrclko@yahoo.co.in>, lokayukta@hotmail.com, Anjali Anand Srivastava <secy-cic@nic.in>, “sec. sic” <sec.sic@up.nic.in>

Subject-Whether violations of provisions of Right to Information Act 2005 can be allowed by chief information commissioner of India only because of the matter was concerned with the public authority High court of Judicature at Allahabad and overlooked the prayer of information seeker in this regard?
With due respect, your applicant wants to draw the kind attention of the Hon’ble Sir to the following submissions as follows.
1-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that please take a glance at the first and second page of attachment with this representation. CPIO made available the denial of sought information dated 27/11/2016 on 22-March-2018 ipso facto obvious from his own communication. At the place of 30 days, CPIO High court of Judicature at Allahabad took 1 year 3 months 25 days in denying a sought information. Moreover, First Appellate Authority/ Registrar general High court of Judicature at Allahabad didn’t deem it fit to consider the appeal submitted under subsection 1 of section 19 of Right to Information Act 2005. The hearing took place before CIC on 23-March-2018 and aforementioned lacunae on the part of public authority High court of Judicature at Allahabad was brought up by the applicant before chief information commissioner of India but it seems that result will be null.
Booked At
Booked On
Destination Pincode
Tariff
Article Type
Delivered At
Delivered On
MIRZAPUR H.O
24/03/2018
Event Details For : EU304043089IN Current Status : Item delivered [To: .. ]
Date
Time
Office
Event
24/03/2018
16:55:00
MIRZAPUR H.O
Item delivered [To: .. ]
24/03/2018
08:29:09
MIRZAPUR H.O
Item Received
23/03/2018
20:17:20
ICH MIRZAPUR
Item Received
23/03/2018
20:17:20
ICH MIRZAPUR
Bag Opened
23/03/2018
20:08:39
ICH MIRZAPUR
Bag Received
23/03/2018
03:43:56
NSH ALLAHABAD
Bag Despatched to ICH MIRZAPUR
23/03/2018
01:13:10
NSH ALLAHABAD
Item Bagged for ICH MIRZAPUR
22/03/2018
18:50:54
NSH ALLAHABAD
Item Received
2-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that 
SEARCH RESULTS
RESULTS FOR FILE NUMBER: CIC/HCOST/A/2017/128589
PARTICULARS
DESCRIPTION
Name
YOGI M P SINGH
Address
MOHALLA SUREKAPURAM, JABALPUR ROAD, DISTT. MIRZAPUR.
File No.
CIC/HCOST/A/2017/128589
File Admitted date
05-05-2017
DAK Status
Pertaining CIC/IC
Radha Krishna Mathur
Public Authority
High Court of Other States
CPIO Address
The CPIO High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Speed Post number
Hearing notice issued — Hearing is scheduled and date and venue conveyed.
SEARCH RESULTS
RESULTS FOR FILE NUMBER: CIC/HCOST/A/2017/143530
PARTICULARS
DESCRIPTION
Name
M P SINGH
Address
MOHALLA SUREKAPURAM, JABALPUR ROAD, DISTRICT MIRZAPUR 231001.
File No.
CIC/HCOST/A/2017/143530
File Admitted date
04-07-2017
DAK Status
Pertaining CIC/IC
Radha Krishna Mathur
Public Authority
High Court of Other States
CPIO Address
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
Speed Post number
Hearing notice issued — Hearing is scheduled and date and venue conveyed.
Hearing Schedule
Sl.No.
File No.
Name Of Appellant/Complainant
IC Name
Public Authority
Date of Hearing
Time of Hearing
Bench Details
Action
1
CIC/HCOST/A/2017/143530
M P SINGH
Radha Krishna Mathur
High Court of Other States
23/03/2018
12:00 PM
Single Bench
Hearing Schedule
Sl.No.
File No.
Name Of Appellant/Complainant
IC Name
Public Authority
Date of Hearing
Time of Hearing
Bench Details
Action
1
CIC/HCOST/A/2017/128589
YOGI M P SINGH
Radha Krishna Mathur
High Court of Other States
23/03/2018
12:00 PM
Single Bench
3-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that following order was passed by Hon’ble chief information commissioner of India but it is unfortunate that CPIO, High court of Judicature at Allahabad still not complied the order. 
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION 2nd Floor, ‘B’ Wing, August Kranti Bhavan,  Bhikaji Cama Place, NEW DELHI­110 066 TEL: 011­26717355  Appeal No. CIC/CC/A/2014/001147/VS
Appellant: Shri Yogi M.P. Singh,           Mohalla­Surekapuram,     Jabalpur Road,         Distt. Mirzapur, U.P.   Respondent:                    Central Public Information Officer, Allahabad High Court,           Allahabad.                     Date of Hearing:      26.10.2015      
Date of Decision:   4.11.2015
                                 O R D E R
RTI application:
1. The appellant filed an   RTI application dated 18.3.2014 seeking information regarding a copy of counter affidavit submitted by Director Secondary Education Arth­1 Allahabad.   The PIO responded on 27.3.2014.     The appellant filed the first appeal dated 31.3.2014 with the first appellate authority.  The FAA responded on 5.5.2014. The appellant filed the second appeal on  24.9.2014 with the Commission.
Hearing:
2.The appellant participated in the hearing through audio.   The respondent did not participate in the hearing. 
3.The appellant referred his RTI application dated 18.3.2014 and reiterated the points mentioned in the RTI  application.  The appellant stated that he wanted to know whether the Director Secondary Education has filed a counter affidavit in writ petition No. 20121 of 2006 or not.  The appellant further stated that if the Director Secondary Education has filed the counter affidavit, then a copy of counter affidavit should be provided 
Decision:
4.The respondent is directed to provide the appellant, within 30 days of this order, the information sought in the  RTI application.  The appeal is disposed of.  Copy of decision be given free of cost to the parties.
                           (Vijai Sharma)                        Chief Information Commissioner   
Authenticated true copy   
                                 (Dhirendra Kumar)             Deputy Secretary and Deputy Registrar  
The copy of the aforementioned decision is annexed with this representation as page 3 and 4.
4-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that Greek philosophers such as Plato and Aristotle around 350 BC. Plato wrote: “Where the law is subject to some other authority and has none of its own, the collapse of the state, in my view, is not far off; but if law is the master of the government and the government is its slave, then the situation is full of promise and men enjoy all the blessings that the gods shower on a state”. Likewise, Aristotle also endorsed the concept of Rule of law by writing that “law should govern and those in power should be servants of the laws.”
Where is the rule of law in this country? Whether Judges are not public servants and they are not accountable to be governed? On one side of the screen, we term them as public servants but on another side of the screen, they are more tyrant than a monarch.
5-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that whether the motive of independence of the judiciary is to promote transparency and accountability in the working of a member or increase tyranny and arbitrariness in the system. Whether the power of contempt is to establish the rule of law or suppress the voice seeking transparency and accountability as the applicant was deprived of sought information in the name of contempt of court? Where is the supremacy of law if really there is supremacy of law, then what is the cause of repeated violations of provisions of Right to Information Act 2005?  Dicey asserted that wherever there is discretion there is room for arbitrariness.
                                    This is a humble request of your applicant to you Hon’ble Sir that It can never be justified to overlook the rights of the citizenry by delivering services in an arbitrary manner by floating all set up norms. This is sheer mismanagement which is encouraging wrongdoers to reap the benefit of loopholes in the system and depriving poor citizens of the right to justice. Therefore it is need of the hour to take concrete steps in order to curb grown anarchy in the system. For this, your applicant shall ever pray you, Hon’ble Sir.
                                             Yours sincerely
                                    Yogi M. P. Singh Mobile number-7379105911
Mohalla-Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road, District-Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh, India.


Mockery of Right to Information Act and tyranny in Highcourt.pdf
1827K
0 0 vote
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
2 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh

Whether violations of provisions of Right to Information Act 2005 can be allowed by chief information commissioner of India only because of the matter was concerned with the public authority High court of Judicature at Allahabad and overlooked the prayer of information seeker in this regard?

Arun Pratap Singh
2 years ago

Hon'ble Sir that please take a glance at the first and second page of attachment with this representation. CPIO made available the denial of sought information dated 27/11/2016 on 22-March-2018 ipso facto obvious from his own communication. At the place of 30 days, CPIO High court of Judicature at Allahabad took 1 year 3 months 25 days in denying a sought information. Moreover, First Appellate Authority/ Registrar general High court of Judicature at Allahabad didn’t deem it fit to consider the appeal submitted under subsection 1 of section 19 of Right to Information Act 2005. The hearing took place before CIC on 23-March-2018 and aforementioned lacunae on the part of public authority High court of Judicature at Allahabad was brought up by the applicant before chief information commissioner of India but it seems that result will be null.