Anjali Kumari poor girl student belonging to oppressed section is crushing in this era of corruption deprived of justice

Grievance Status for registration number : DEABD/E/2020/54805

Grievance Concerns To
Name Of Complainant
Yogi M. P. Singh
Date of Receipt
28/09/2020
Received By Ministry/Department
Financial Services (Banking Division)
Grievance Description

Financial Services (Banking Division) >> Fraud

Department/Bank/Financial Institute : Other / Private Sector Bank.
———————–
Officer Name Pankaj Kumar Nayak Officer Designation Banking Ombudsman Kanpur Grievance Status for registration number : DEABD/E/2020/47052

Grievance Concerns To Name Of Complainant Yogi M. P. Singh Date of Receipt 30/08/2020 Detail of the grievance is attached to this representation.
Complaint no – 201920011032606 submitted on 22-June-2020 by Anjali Kumari before Kanpur Banking Ombudsman be taken into account. Ombudsman may be just and fair in its action and its own reasoned order in the ma

Grievance Document
Current Status
Under process
Date of Action
28/09/2020
Remarks
Auto Forwarded
Officer Concerns To
Officer Name
Betsy Rajagopal
Officer Designation
General Manager
Contact Address
Email Address
cms.cepdco@rbi.org.in
Contact Number
02222631447
Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>

Complaint no – 201920011032606 submitted on 22-June-2020 by Anjali Kumari before Kanpur Banking Ombudsman be taken into account.

Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com> 28 September 2020 at 19:31
To: bokanpur@rbi.org.in, pmosb <pmosb@pmo.nic.in>, presidentofindia@rb.nic.in, urgent-action <urgent-action@ohchr.org>, supremecourt <supremecourt@nic.in>, hgovup@up.nic.in, cmup <cmup@up.nic.in>, agmpne.lholuc@sbi.co.in, customer care <agmcustomer.lholuc@sbi.co.in>, agmgad.lholuc@sbi.co.in
श्री मान जी इस प्रत्यावेदन के साथ बिना तिथि की हस्तलिखित शाखा प्रबंधक का रिपोर्ट संलग्न है जिसके साथ पोस्टल रिसीप्ट  नहीं है अर्थात दिनांक ०२/०७/२०१९ के पश्चात ही अंजली कुमारी को पास बुक पंजीकृत डाक से उपलब्ध कराया गया है | 
Current Status Case closed Date of Action 03/07/2019

Remarks Report Number 1, From SBI LHO LUCKNOW on 02/07/2019 approved by NA Report remarks complainant has been advised that her passbook has been dispatched on her residential address as required. reply attached

Ref. No. /RTI/20-21/34 dated 20/08/2020

आप के खाता संख्या -37200461494 जिसका वर्णन आप के पत्र में है से रुपये 12900 .00 की कोई विवरणी दिनांक 28/03/2018 से 25 /12/2018 के बीच उपस्थित नही है |

उपरोक्त उत्तर सिर्फ सूचना के प्रयोजनार्थ है | यदि आप हमारे उत्तर से संतुष्ट नही है तो कृपया उक्त पत्र की प्राप्ति की ३० दिनों के अन्दर आप   अपीलीय अधिकारी से अपील कर सकते है |

श्री मान जी कितनी चालाकी से भारतीय स्टेट बैंक का कर्मचारी गुमराह कर रहा है श्री मान जी आज तक कोई भी ट्रांज़ैक्शन अंजली कुमारी द्वारा किया ही नहीं गया सरकार  का पैसा आया और बड़ी चालाकी से शाखा प्रबंधक द्वारा उसे किसी गुमनाम व्यक्ति की मदद से निकाला गया | कई ट्रांज़ैक्शन हुए है १२९०० रुपये

इन लोगो को बुरा यह लग रहा है की क्यों समाज कल्याण अधिकारी यह लिख रहे है की मामला भारतीय स्टेट बैंक से संबंधित है क्यों उत्तर प्रदेश सरकार के अधिनस्थ  बैंकिंग ओम्बड्समैन के समक्ष शिकायत की बात कर रहे हमे फसा कर सब काई काट लिए |

श्री मान जी रिज़र्व बैंक ऑफ़ इंडिया और भारतीय स्टेट बैंक चाचा भतीजा हो गए  है जैसा की ओम्बड्समैन की कार्यशैली से स्पस्ट है चाचा कह रहा है भतीजा जितना घोटाला करना हो करो हम है ना कुछ नहीं होगा | सोचिये अंजली कुमारी का मामला मात्र एक नमूना है |

Grievance Status for registration number : DEABD/E/2019/18912

Grievance Concerns To

Name Of Complainant

Yogi M. P. Singh

Date of Receipt

20/06/2019

Received By Ministry/Department

Financial Services (Banking Division)

Grievance Description

Prayer of the grievance is to provide passbook to the aggrieved girl which was neither made available nor branch manager made concrete efforts in this regard which shows that brach manager made only cunning trick to manage the grievance to get disposed of otherwise two days passed but he did nothing in this direction.

You managed to get the grievance disposed of on the ground that applicant was properly responded by the branch and reply is attached as a report to the grievance. According to sent e-mail of the branch concerned, Dear sir This is with reference to your complaint for passbook not provided to customer .Ms Anjani Kumari

Pl acknowledge the attachment for the same Regards Branch Manager SBI SIRSA which was sent by the branch on 18-Jun-2019. Because of some technical lacuna, he could not provide the passbook to the aggrieved student but assured to provide within two days. Point to be noted that now two days passed since the date of sent of e-mail of the branch manager but branch manager could not keep its promise.

Grievance Document

Current Status

Case closed

Date of Action

03/07/2019

Remarks

Report Number 1, From SBI LHO LUCKNOW on 02/07/2019 approved by NA Report remarks complainant has been advised that her passbook has been dispatched on her residential address as required. reply attached

Reply Document

Rating

Poor

Rating Remarks

Complaint No. 201920011032606 Sir ground of rejection of complaint by the Banking ombudsman Kanpur is flimsy and not consistent with the matter raised by the applicant. Aforementioned regulation is for those banking frauds, which takes place under the cognizance of account holder and entire information concerned with the cheating happens before the account holder. Here the account holder was seeking the passbook from the branch manager so vigilance of the account holder can not be questioned here. Sir it is a proven fact that Rs.12900 drawn from the account of an oppressed girl student belonging to scheduled caste so this amount must be refunded by the state bank of India. More than forty representations have been submitted in the matter to seek justice for the oppressed girl student so to deprive her of Rs.12900 provided her by the government of India as scholarship reflects only lawlessness and anarchy full of corruption in the government machinery. Corruption is rampant.

Officer Concerns To

Officer Name

Smt. Saloni Narayan

Officer Designation

Chief General Manager

Contact Address

Email Address

sbihelp@sancharnet.in

Contact Number

05222201492

 

On Sat, 26 Sep 2020 at 00:44, Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com> wrote:

An application under article 32 of the constitution or India to direct the concerned to return the money drawn from the account of Anjali Kumari and an F.I.R. may be lodged against those found guilty of not taking appropriate action in the matter.

To

           Chief Justice of India/ Companion Judges of the apex court

              Supreme Court of India, New Delhi

Subject-This representation is on behalf of Anjali Kumari, Mobile number- 7054703028 ,  Village Adampur , Post Neebi Gaharwar, Police station- Vindhyachal, District-Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh, Pin code-231303.

Ground of rejection of the complaint by the banking ombudsman Kanpur-Complaint No. 201920011032606 was forwarded to State Bank of India for resolution/ comments. The bank has informed that the transactions dated back to November, 2018. However the complainant did not act diligently and did not pursue the matter with the bank within 7 working days of the disputed transactions as per the ruled laid down in limited liability circular of RBI (RBI/2017-18/15 DBR.No.Leg.BC.78/09.07.005/2017-18 dated July 6, 2017) in respect of fraudulent transactions. Hence, the complaint was rejected under clause 13.1(a) of Banking Ombudsman Scheme, 2006.

Sir ground of rejection of complaint by the Banking ombudsman Kanpur is flimsy and not consistent with the matter raised by the applicant.

Aforementioned regulation is for those banking frauds, which takes place under the cognizance of account holder and entire information concerned with the cheating happens before the account holder. Here the account holder was seeking the passbook from the branch manager so vigilance of the account holder can not be questioned here. 

Sir it is a proven fact that Rs.12900 drawn from the account of an oppressed girl student belonging to scheduled caste so this amount must be refunded by the state bank of India. 

More than forty representations have been submitted in the matter to seek justice for the oppressed girl student so to deprive her of Rs.12900 provided her by the government of India as scholarship reflects only lawlessness and anarchy full of corruption in the government machinery. 

Following is the third submission of attached email representation sent to banking ombudsman Kanpur which means that he instead of adopting logistic approach and reasoned conclusions to the submitted complaints only prefers arbitrary and tyrannical orders which crush the rule of law.  

If you think that anything is wrong in this application submitted on behalf of aggrieved applicant Anjali Kumari and her father, then I invite you to lodge an F.I.R. against me. I gladly accept your constructive steps in this regard. Who opened this account? Who operated this account? Who withdrew money from this account? Here Anjali Kumari knew the details of the account when Passbook was made available by the branch manager concerned aggrieved girl student Anjali Kumari. Whether it is not obligatory duty of the public authority State Bank of India to provide responses to the aforementioned queries?

5 comments on Anjali Kumari poor girl student belonging to oppressed section is crushing in this era of corruption deprived of justice

  1. श्री मान जी रिज़र्व बैंक ऑफ़ इंडिया और भारतीय स्टेट बैंक चाचा भतीजा हो गए है जैसा की ओम्बड्समैन की कार्यशैली से स्पस्ट है चाचा कह रहा है भतीजा जितना घोटाला करना हो करो हम है ना कुछ नहीं होगा | सोचिये अंजली कुमारी का मामला मात्र एक नमूना है |
    If you think that anything is wrong in this application submitted on behalf of aggrieved applicant Anjali Kumari and her father, then I invite you to lodge an F.I.R. against me. I

  2. Whether it is not the reflection of Anarchy in the government machinery that from the account of the aggrieved girl Anjali Kumari belonging to the weaker and downtrodden section rupees 12900 was drawn from the account and on the representations of the aggrieved girl no action was taken by the accountable public functionaries of the Government of India quite obvious from the post.

  3. Undoubtedly reserve bank of India and state bank of India are suffering with the uncle-nephew syndrome which unhealthy practice and must not be allowed in this largest democracy in the world. निश्चित रूप से १२९०० रुपये निकालना शाखा प्रबंधक भारतीय स्टेट बैंक के साथ कूट रचना करके सिर्फ भ्रष्टाचार ही नहीं महाभ्रष्टाचार है | अनुसूचित जाति की लड़की के खाते सीधे पैसा निकाल लेना सिर्फ आराजकता है |

  4. श्री मान जी इस प्रत्यावेदन के साथ बिना तिथि की हस्तलिखित शाखा प्रबंधक का रिपोर्ट संलग्न है जिसके साथ पोस्टल रिसीप्ट नहीं है अर्थात दिनांक ०२/०७/२०१९ के पश्चात ही अंजली कुमारी को पास बुक पंजीकृत डाक से उपलब्ध कराया गया है |
    Here rule of one week delay is not binding in this case because this case is not fraudulent deduction from the account but fraudulent operation of account by anonymous person by colluding with the branch manager concerned.

  5. Here the account holder was seeking the passbook from the branch manager so vigilance of the account holder can not be questioned here. Sir it is a proven fact that Rs.12900 drawn from the account of an oppressed girl student belonging to scheduled caste so this amount must be refunded by the state bank of India.

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: