Aggrieved Satyjeet is seeking Answer-sheet from the CPIO as not satisfied with the valuation Air Force

Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>
Aggrieved Satyjeet is seeking Answer-sheet from the CPIO as not satisfied with the valuation of the recruiting agency.
1 message
Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com> 31 May 2019 at 21:42

To: aoaweb@iaf.nic.in, pmosb <pmosb@pmo.nic.in>, presidentofindia@rb.nic.in, supremecourt <supremecourt@nic.in>, urgent-action <urgent-action@ohchr.org>

An application under subsection 1 of section 19 of Right to Information Act 2005 for seeking action against central public information officer who arbitrarily denied sought information concerned with the disclosure of Answer-sheet of Satyjeet.
To 
                                   First Appellate Authority 
                                    Air Marshal PP Bapat VSM 
                                   Air Officer in-charge Administration 
                                     Air Headquarters (Vayu Bhawan)
                                      Rafi Marg, New Delhi -110106 
Sir, in this case, subsection 1 J section 8 is not applicable as the information
sought on behalf of aggrieved aspirant Satyjeet whose affidavit and CPIO denial
of sought information is attached to this appeal under subsection 1 of section
19 of Right to Information Act 2005.

Most revered Sir –Your applicant invites the kind attention of Hon’ble Sir with due respect to the following submissions as follows.
1-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that  51A. Fundamental duties It shall be the duty of every citizen of India (a) to abide by the Constitution and respect its ideals and institutions, the National Flag and the National Anthem;(h) to develop the scientific temper, humanism and the spirit of inquiry and reform;

(i) to safeguard public property and to abjure violence;
(j) to strive towards excellence in all spheres of individual and collective activity so that the nation constantly rises to higher levels of endeavour and achievement.

2-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that according to CPIO reply
Air
HQ/23401//204/4/16879/E/PS dated 24-May-2019
– Sought information under Right to Information Act 2005 is personal which disclosure has no relationship to any public activity or interest and it would cause unwarranted invasion on the privacy of the individual. Therefore sought information is denied under subsection 1 J section 8 of Right to Information Act 2005.

3-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that 
A
SCHEDULED TEST FOR AIRMEN RECRUITMENT: Mar 2019, On behalf of Satyjeet,
applicant invites the following information from respected CPIO in regard to
the aforementioned recruitment.
A
1-Answer sheet of physics of Satyjeet whose Registration No: 19030019135 of
group X.
A
2-Answer sheet of the math of Satyjeet whose Registration No: 19030019135 of
group X
Mark
sheet is herewith attached.
Here it is crystal clear that aforementioned information is sought by the appellant on behalf of the aggrieved aspirant Satyjeet so how the information is personal if individual itself is seeking information as not satisfied with the cryptic dealings of the recruiting agency? Hon’ble Sir affidavit of the Satyjeet addressed to appellate authority and others is attached to this appeal.
4-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that according to CPIO sought information is not concerned with the any public activity or public interest. Whether to conduct “A
SCHEDULED TEST FOR AIRMEN RECRUITMENT: Mar 2019″ this exam by recruiting agency is not public activity and in the wide public interest it must be carried out in transparent and accountable manner? Here activity of the recruiting agency is the pure public work consequently sought information is not exempted from the disclosure under section 8 of the transparency act 2005.

5-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that THE RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT, 2005 No. 22 of 2005
[15th June, 2005.] An Act to provide for setting out the practical regime of right to information for citizens to secure access to information under the control of public authorities, in order to promote transparency and accountability in the working of every public authority. Whether denial of the sought information would be plausible by misinterpreting the provisions of the Right to Information Act 2005? Undoubtedly act of CPIO is ultra vires to august act i.e, Right to Information Act 2005 and reflection of the sheer insolence.

                     This is a humble request of the applicant to you Hon’ble Sir that how can it be justified to withhold public services arbitrarily and promote anarchy, lawlessness, and chaos in an arbitrary manner by making the mockery of law of land? This is need of the hour to take harsh steps against the wrongdoer in order to win the confidence of citizenry and strengthen the democratic values for healthy and prosperous democracy. For this, your applicant shall ever pray you, Hon’ble Sir.                                                         

                                                                                                                             Yours sincerely



Date-31-05-2019              Yogi M. P. Singh, Mobile number-7379105911, Mohalla- Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road, District-Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh, Pin code-231001.


2 attachments
First appeal Satyjeet.pdf
1478K
First appeal Satyjeet.docx
2626K

5 1 vote
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
4 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Yogi
1 year ago

Hon’ble Sir according to CPIO sought information is not concerned with the any public activity or public interest. Whether to conduct "A SCHEDULED TEST FOR AIRMEN RECRUITMENT: Mar 2019" this exam by recruiting agency is not public activity and in the wide public interest it must be carried out in transparent and accountable manner? Here activity of the recruiting agency is the pure public work consequently sought information is not exempted from the disclosure under section 8 of the transparency act 2005.

Preeti Singh
1 year ago

Think about the gravity of corruption, last year those made complaints regarding the mismanagement were sent group e-mails by inviting suggestions' in order to reform the system and today when they are exposed are not providing information even when sought under Right to Information Act 2005.Now applicant has paid the fee in accordance with the law. Out show is the part of practice of our accountable public functionaries.

Beerbhadra Singh
1 year ago

If they are really honest then why they are not providing the answer sheet to the student as the information seeker is seeking answer sheet on behalf of student which is quite obvious from the perusal of the contents of the post. Honesty is not to speak but it must be reflected in the working of the concerned public functionary but herein honesty is not reflecting in the working of the public authority and its recruiting agencies.

Bhoomika Singh
Bhoomika Singh
6 months ago

No information was made available by the concerned public authority which is mockery of The Right to Information act 2005 but it is unfortunate transparency ombudsman Central information commission did not entertain the appeal of the appellant is the reflection of rampant corruption in the government machinery.’