Aggrieved Dinesh Pratap Singh is seeking investigation by premier agency C.B.I. against the atrocity of U.P. Police

Gmail Beerbhadra Singh <myogimpsingh@gmail.com>
To demand C.B.I. investigation in the matter as police in the state of Uttar Pradesh has been incredible because of its mysterious corrupt dealings.
1 message
Beerbhadra Singh <myogimpsingh@gmail.com> Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 11:58 AM
To: pmosb <pmosb@pmo.nic.in>, presidentofindia@rb.nic.in, urgent-action <urgent-action@ohchr.org>, supremecourt <supremecourt@nic.in>, cmup@up.nic.in, csup@up.nic.in, hgovup@up.nic.in, uphrclko@yahoo.co.in, sec.sic@up.nic.in
An application on behalf of Dinesh Pratap Singh under Article 32 of the constitution of India to seek investigation in the matter by the central bureau of investigation as Lucknow police by colluding with land grabbers made the mockery of the law of land through its inconsistent and incredible reports and repeated insensitivity to the information sought under the Right to Information Act 2005.

To

Hon’ble Chief Justice of India/companion judges

Supreme court of India, New Delhi

Prayer-Hon’ble Sir may be pleased to pass the order of investigation by central bureau of investigation under monitoring of Hon’ble court as police in the state not only superseded the order passed by the Lucknow bench of the High court of Judicature at Allahabad but also challenging the supremacy of the law of land. Both the D.G.P. office Lucknow and office of home secretary openly crushing the rule of law by violating the provisions of the existing laws of land and acting against the set up norms and traditions.

Sir here we are not bypassing the High court of judicature at Allahabad but it is unfortunate that they are not taking seriously our representations which were made before them through the ministry of law. Sir, Dinesh Pratap Singh already being persecuted through multiple fabricated false cases in Uttar Pradesh and Uttarakhand by the land grabbers by colluding with police.

Registrar general, High court of Judicature at Allahabad may provide the feedback regarding the communication Department of Justice 10 January 2020 at 12:09.

Sir following E-Mail communication was sent by the ministry of law and justice as follows.

Department of Justice 10 January 2020 at 12:09 To: rg allahabad High Court Cc: yogimpsingh@gmail.com

Most revered Sir –Your applicant invites the kind attention of Hon’ble Sir with due respect to the following submissions as follows.

1-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that  51A. Fundamental duties It shall be the duty of every citizen of India (a) to abide by the Constitution and respect its ideals and institutions, the National Flag and the National Anthem;(h) to develop the scientific temper, humanism and the spirit of inquiry and reform;

(i) to safeguard public property and to abjure violence;

(j) to strive towards excellence in all spheres of individual and collective activity so that the nation constantly rises to higher levels of endeavour and achievement.

2-It is to be submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that प्रार्थी दिनेश प्रताप सिंह की ओर से कार्यवाही हेतु अधिकृत है |

श्री मान जी सिर्फ दो विन्दुओं पर सूचना मागी गयी थे व्यथित दिनेश प्रताप सिंह द्वारा

१-वह सूचनाएँ उपलब्ध कराए जो लखनऊ पुलिस को सिविल न्यायालय की शक्तियों से आच्छादित करती है और लखनऊ पुलिस सक्षम सिविल न्यायालय की तरह आर्डर पास कर रही है |

२-माननीय उच्च न्यायालय की लखनऊ बेंच द्वारा अनुराधा सिंह उर्फ़ आराधना सिंह उर्फ़ गुड्डी को सक्षम न्यायालय से सिविल रेमेडी लेने को कहा था फिर लखनऊ पुलिस ने कैसे उस सिविल मामले में क्रिमिनल रेमेडी प्रदान की और निचली अदालत को गुमराह किया और उच्च न्यायालय की अवमानना किया | उन शक्तियों के बारे में सूचना उपलब्ध कराई जाय जो लखनऊ पुलिस को माननीय उच्च न्यायालय और उसके अधीनस्थ न्यायालय से ज्यादा शक्ति संपन्न बना रहे है |

Who will fix accountability? Grievances are redressed by the public functionaries by submitting arbitrary reports inconsistent with the submissions of the grievances and information sought under Right to Information Act 2005 is not provided by them arbitrarily by making a mockery of the provisions of Right to Information Act 2005.

उपरोक्त सूचनाएँ न तो उत्तर प्रदेश सरकार का बिधि विभाग ही देना चाहता है और न ही और न ही गृह सचिव कार्यालय ही देना चाहता है | व्यथा निवारण तो ऐसा करते है जैसे जीवन में कभी बुक छूया ही न हो |

PIO may provide the following information pointwise as sought.

1-Provide feedback if in the context of attached reference how Lucknow police have the power of a competent court to provide a civil remedy.

2-If High court decided for civil remedy subsequently the police can provide a criminal remedy in the reference matter by misleading the court. Provide feedback if any in support of police.   

3-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that Hon’ble Sir may be pleased to take the perusal of the following submissions.

Most respected Superintendent of police, District Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, the applicant aggrieved Dinesh Pratap Singh, wants to draw the kind attention of the revered Sir to the order passed by the Lucknow bench of the High court of Judicature at Allahabad in the Writ Petition Number-135 H/C Year 2006 as follows-

It is simply ordered that the respondent number 4 to7 shall open the lock of the staircase so that Smt Anuradha Singh the petitioner may come out of the house and take the proper and appropriate remedy in the competent court and after that, she may have the liberty to go anywhere. Since it is not a case in the strict sense of illegal detention, therefore, no direction can be issued to the respondent to produce the detenu in the court and allow her to live free at her home but since she can not take necessary steps for taking the remedy in the competent court, therefore it is simply ordered that the alleged detenue Smt Anuradha Singh shall be allowed to go out of the house and respondent number 4 to 7 shall open the lock of the door and open the door so that Smt Anuradha Singh may come out and take an appropriate remedy. Dated-07/03/2006 Signed by the concerned Honourable Justices of Division bench of Lucknow. It would be better to take perusal by Sir itself.

Respondent-1-State of U.P. through the Secretary of home.

2-S.S.P. Lucknow 3-S.H.O. Ashiana Police station.

Whether competent court means police as defined by the aforementioned respondents?

To open the lock of the door and open the door for seeking appropriate remedy means to open the door for always and hatching a conspiracy against the applicant and his family.

Consequently, a fabricated First Information Report by colluding with the police was lodged in the police station Ashiyana on 11 July 2009 after 3 years 4 months 4 days of Judgement Dated-07/03/2006 -under sections of I.P.C. as case number-269/2009 Indian Penal Code- sections 448,406,420,467,468,471,394 of India Penal Code.

All these documents were submitted by the police before the Lucknow bench of High court of judicature at Allahabad and the court took the cognizance and passed the order per the law but later on police found the records forged and aforementioned fabricated charges not only framed on the applicant but his wife and daughter as well. Thus terrorised the entire family so they fled by putting locks in the rooms later locks were broken and the entire house was grabbed even valuables were looted. Which means Lucknow police had submitted forged records before the High court along with the affidavit.

Thus a competent and appropriate court delivered the Judgement in the matter in compliance of the High court order Dated-07/03/2006.

4-It is to be submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that Department of Justice 10 January 2020 at 12:09 To: rg allahabad High Court Cc: yogimpsingh@gmail.com

 

Sir/Madam,

Please see the attachments on the above subject for action as appropriate, under intimation to the petitioner.

 

 

 

 

                     Hemendra Singh

             Section Officer (Justice-I) 

                  Department of Justice

https://pgportal.gov.in

Why is registrar general High court of Judicature is adopting a lackadaisical approach in taking appropriate action in the matter as the matter is concerned with the blatant abuse of the process of the court by the Lucknow police and Lucknow police itself not only made the mockery of the law of land but also committed contempt of court?

5-It is to be submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that neither D.G.P. office nor Home secretary office is providing any information under the Right to Information Act 2005 and poor economy of Dinesh Pratap Singh does not allow to hire expensive advocates to seek justice therefore as priority to delivery of justice and to ensure its reach to needy, Hon’ble Sir may be pleased to order an investigation by premier investigating agency central bureau of investigation.

श्री मान जी माननीय राष्ट्रपति महोदय के कार्यालय द्वारा अग्रसारित प्रार्थी का पत्र मुख्य मंत्री उत्तर प्रदेश कार्यालय द्वारा पुलिस महानिदेशक लखनऊ को पृष्ठांकित किया गया और सूचनार्थ प्रार्थी को भी प्रतिलिपि प्रेषित की गयी सत्य है | पत्र संलग्न है जिसके अनुसार प्रार्थी को कृत कार्यवाही से अवगत कराया जाना था |

उत्तर प्रदेश पुलिस की अराजकता से कौन नही परिचित है और प्रार्थी जो खुद भ्रष्टाचार विरोधी के रूप में सक्रिय है तो वह पूर्व में ही परिचित है पुलिस की कार्यशैली से | मुख्य मंत्री कार्यालय के कहने से पुलिस महानिदेशक लखनऊ कार्यालय प्रार्थी को सूचना उपलब्ध कराएगा असंभव |

इसलिए प्रार्थी द्वारा जन सूचना अधिकार २००५ का सहारा लिया गया | किंतु प्रार्थी इस बात से भी भली भाति परिचित है की किस तरह से प्रदेश का गृह सचिव कार्यालय जनसूचना अधिकार २००५ को धूल चटा चुका है | कुछ साथी हमारे प्रत्यावेदन को समझना चाहते है इसलिए आंग्ल भाषा के स्थान पर मात्रि भाषा पर भी जोर दे रहा हूँ |

The matter is concerned with the president secretariat reference number-P2-A/0908190127/2019 dated-09/08/2019 which was forwarded by Sunil Kumar Chaudhary, Deputy Secretary, Chief Minister Office, Government of Uttar Pradesh through a communication dated-13/12/2019 addressed to D.G.P. Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh attached as the first page to document. Please provide the information as sought,

1-Notings and minutes of proceedings.

2-Cause of delay in providing action taken report.

3-Name and designation of the staffs processing the matter.

4-If more time will be taken, then provide duration.

श्री मान जी शिकायत का निस्तारण तो उसी समय हो जाता है जब मुख्य मंत्री कार्यालय जब मुख्य मंत्री कार्यालय राष्ट्रपति कार्यालय को पत्र भेज देता है क्योंकि उसके पश्चात तो कोई कार्यवाही होती नही अन्यथा सूचना नही उपलब्ध नही करा देते |

खुदा भी आसमाँ से जब जमी पे देखता होगा |

इस मेरे प्यारे देश को क्या हुआ सोचता होगा||

This is a humble request of your applicant to you Hon’ble Sir that how can it be justified to withhold public services arbitrarily and promote anarchy, lawlessness and chaos arbitrarily by making the mockery of law of land? There is need of the hour to take harsh steps against the wrongdoer to win the confidence of citizenry and strengthen the democratic values for healthy and prosperous democracy. For this, your applicant shall ever pray for you

, Hon’ble Sir.

Date-09/09/2020           Yours sincerely

Yogi M. P. Singh, Mobile number-7379105911, Mohalla- Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road, District-Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh, Pin code-231001.

 Demand CBI enquiry from concerned.mp4

Second appeal Dinesh Pratap Singh.pdf
4172K
5 1 vote
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
6 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Arun Pratap Singh
2 months ago

Smt Anuradha Singh the petitioner may come out of the house and take the proper and appropriate remedy in the competent court and after that, she may have the liberty to go anywhere.Later on Anuradha Singh in the name of Aradhana Singh alias Guddi managed Lucknow police which superseded the order of court by replacing civil remedy by criminal remedy and competent court by police station Ashiana.
In this matter of cheating, police is adopting lackadaisical approach which is promoting law breakers and criminal elements in the society. Such promoting stand of police to wrongdoers will only promote anarchy in our society.

Preeti Singh
2 months ago

श्री मान जी शिकायत का निस्तारण तो उसी समय हो जाता है जब मुख्य मंत्री कार्यालय जब मुख्य मंत्री कार्यालय राष्ट्रपति कार्यालय को पत्र भेज देता है क्योंकि उसके पश्चात तो कोई कार्यवाही होती नही अन्यथा सूचना नही उपलब्ध नही करा देते |
As far as my view point is concerned they ought to provide information regarding the action taken on the representation of the applicant which was forwarded with the reference communication of the president secretariat.

Bhoomika Singh
Bhoomika Singh
2 months ago

Undoubtedly demand of the aggrieved Dinesh Pratap Singh of the CBI enquiry into the matter concerned with the atrocity of the police is justified and lawful and must be accepted by the accountable public functionaries if they are really honest. Think about the arbitrary reports submitted by the circle officers and the concerned Sub Inspector is the mockery of the rule of law. Order passed by the high court of judicature Lucknow bench was crushed under teeth by the Lucknow police and Director General of Police and home secretary are mute spectators of it and silent on this issue.

Yogi
Admin
2 months ago

Aggrieved Dinesh Pratap Singh is seeking investigation by premier agency C.B.I. against the atrocity of U.P. Police. I think that no justice is available to poor people because path has made so tough that path of justice can be travelled by only rich people and justice delivery system has be slave of rich people in this country because of rampant corruption in the system. Every where bribe is taken if some one can not pay bribe his case can not proceed.

Vandana Singh
Vandana Singh
2 months ago

सीबीआई जांच होना ही चाहिए इस तरह से यूपी सरकार में भ्रष्ट पुलिस वालों के खिलाफ सीबीआई जांच की जरूरी है