After the order of CIC, central ministry is serious in the matter of Kajal concerned with deep irregularity

Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>

Order of Hon’ble Central Information Commission in the Second Appeal filed by Sh. Yogi M P Singh, Mohalla – Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road, Dist.-Mirzapur – 231001, Uttar Pradesh – reg

Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com> 22 October 2020 at 17:53
To: Rohtas Singh Meena Section Officer <rohtas.meena13@nic.in>, edu-tribal@gov.in
With due respect, I want to apprise you, Hon’ble Sir, that to accelerate the processing to comply with the order passed by central information commission, the applicant conveyed the message of the Hon’ble Sir to the aggrieved poor girl student Kajal and she happily provided the consent as well as authorized the applicant to reach a conclusive end of the ongoing struggle  Vide the attached affidavit of the Kajal. Moreover, if any assistance needed on the part of the applicant, then your approach will be welcomed by the applicant. Thanks, Sir
Gmail Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>
Whether it is justified to conceal sought information concerned with the deep-rooted corruption on the flimsy ground?
1 message
Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com> 31 October 2019 at 01:51
To: Anjali Anand Srivastava <secy-cic@nic.in>, manojb12365-cgo@gov.in, pmosb <pmosb@pmo.nic.in>, “sec. sic” <sec.sic@up.nic.in>, presidentofindia@rb.nic.in, supremecourt <supremecourt@nic.in>, urgent-action <urgent-action@ohchr.org>, hgovup@up.nic.in, cmup <cmup@up.nic.in>, csup@up.nic.in
An appeal under subsection 3 of section 19 of the Right to Information Act 2005 as CPIO did not provide the sought information on flimsy ground and FAA blindly supported the withheld of sought information by the CPIO cryptically without taking the perusal of contents of First appeal attached to online submissions/appeal through portal.

To

Chief Information Commissioner of India

The Central Information Commission,

 Baba Gangnath Marg, Munirka,

                              New Delhi – 110 067

Appellant –Yogi M. P. Singh, Mohalla-Surekapuram

Jabalpur Road, District-Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh, Pin code -231001

Mobile number-7379105911

Versus

1-Central Public Information Officer, Shri S. Padmanabha (SO, Schl. DBT)

More detail is not available on the portal

2-First Appellate Authority

No detail is available on the R.T. I. Portal //portal  of government of India

Cryptic denial of sought Information was made available by CPIO but no violation of provision for F.A.A. & F.A.A. blindly overlooked the arbitrary denial of sought information.

With due respect, your appellant wants to draw the kind attention of the Hon’ble Sir to the following submissions as follows.
1-It is to be submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that following is the R.T.I. communique and its status and its supportive document is also attached.

Online RTI Request Form Details

 

RTI Request Details :-

RTI Request Registration number MOTLA/R/2019/80066
Public Authority Ministry of Tribal Affairs

Personal Details of RTI Applicant:-

Name Yogi M P Singh
Gender Male
Address Mohalla Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road, District Mirzapur
Pincode 231001
Country India
State Uttar Pradesh
Status Urban
Educational Status Literate
  Above Graduate
Phone Number Details not provided
Mobile Number +91-7379105911
Email-ID yogimpsingh[at]gmail[dot]com

Request Details :-

Citizenship Indian
Is the Requester Below Poverty Line ? No
(Description of Information sought (upto 500 characters)  
Description of Information Sought  
Provide 1-feedback in regard to measures taken by the central government to curb irregularities in disbursement of scholarship to students to ensure proper utilisation of central fund.

2-Hard copy of the online submitted application for a scholarship and subsequent correction as attached. Make available reason of not accepting Scheduled tribe as corrected by the aggrieved student.

3- provisions which empower staffs of the social welfare department to change the filled entries of the aggrieved.

 
Concerned CPIO Shri S. Padmanabha (SO, Schl. DBT)
Supporting document (only pdf upto 1 MB)  

 

Pasted from <https://rtionline.gov.in/request/regdetails.php?regId=ttbPrbeYWR7C30QvAHRqx7T2HRGJ0n%2BudZgTlQEEvB8%3D>

Online RTI Status Form

Note:Fields marked with * are Mandatory.

Enter Registration Number MOTLA/R/2019/80066
Name Yogi M P Singh
Date of filing 17/05/2019
Public Authority Ministry of Tribal Affairs
Status REQUEST DISPOSED OF
Date of action 22/06/2019
Reply :- reply has been sent by speed post  
View Document
Nodal Officer Details :-  
Telephone Number 23070508
Email Id manojb12365-cgo@gov.in

 

2-It is to be submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that following is the R.T.I. first appeal under subsection 1 of section 19 of Right to Information Act 2005 and its status and its supportive document is also attached.

Online RTI Appeal Form Details

 

RTI Appeal Details :-

RTI Appeal Registration number MOTLA/A/2019/60027
Public Authority Ministry of Tribal Affairs

Personal Details of Appellant:-

Request Registration Number MOTLA/R/2019/80066
Request Registration Date 17/05/2019
Name Yogi M P Singh
Gender Male
Address Mohalla Surekapuram , Jabalpur Road, District Mirzapur
Pincode 231001
Country India
State Uttar Pradesh
Status Urban
Educational Status Literate
  Above Graduate
Phone Number Details not provided
Mobile Number +91-7379105911
Email-ID yogimpsingh[at]gmail[dot]com

Appeal Details :-

Citizenship Indian
Is the Requester Below Poverty Line ? No
Ground For Appeal Refused access to Information Requested
CPIO of Public Authority approached Shri S. Padmanabha (SO, Schl. DBT)
CPIO’s Order/Decision Number Details not provided
CPIO’s Order/Decision Date  
(Description of Information sought (upto 500 characters)  
Prayer or Relief Sought  
Sought information is concerned with the working of the government staff not aggrieved girl student for whom applicant itself is seeking justice under article 51 A of the constitution. Direct CPIO to provide sought information available and rest of may be provided Govt of U.P. under subsection 3 of section 6 of R.T.I. Act 2005. Vide attached appeal in detail.  
Supporting document (only pdf upto 1 MB)

Online RTI First Appeal Status Form

Note:Fields marked with * are Mandatory.

Enter Registration Number MOTLA/A/2019/60027
Name Yogi M P Singh
Date of filing 07/07/2019
Public Authority Ministry of Tribal Affairs
Status APPEAL DISPOSED OF
Date of action 28/08/2019
Reply :- CPIO has already sent reply on 22.6.2019 to the applicant by post. No further action required. Appeal dispose off.  
Nodal Officer Details :-  
Telephone Number 23070508
Email Id manojb12365-cgo@gov.in

3-It is to be submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that following is the supportive submissions of R.T.I. first appeal under subsection 1 of section 19 of Right to Information Act 2005.

The applicant sought information under subsection 1 of section 6 of the Right to Information Act 2005 from the CPIO concerned and CPIO denied sought information as aforementioned.

 

Description of Information Sought information-

Provide 1-feedback in regard to measures taken by the central government to curb irregularities in disbursement of scholarship to students to ensure proper utilisation of central fund.2-Hard copy of the online submitted application for a scholarship and subsequent correction as attached. Make available reason of not accepting Scheduled tribe as corrected by the aggrieved student. 3- provisions which empower staffs of the social welfare department to change the filled entries of the aggrieved.

The appellant is not seeking information concerned with the aggrieved girl student for whom he is seeking justice by making an enquiry under Article 51 A of the constitution of India but in regard to consequential development, feedback obtained during aforementioned enquiry. Here girl student is not a third party but information seeker through the appellant and will remain beneficiary if the outcome will remain positive. CPIO conceals the information because of his cryptic approach and acting in caucus with the wrongdoer staffs of the government of Uttar Pradesh. There is huge siphoning of the public fund concerned with the weaker and downtrodden section and chief minister office is colluding with the wrongdoers by overlooking wrongdoings in order to protect them.

Short submissions of the first appeal under subsection 1 of section 19 of the Right to Information  Act 2005 of the appellant.

Matter of fact is concerned with the deep-rooted corruption in the disbursement of scholarship especially concerned with a girl belonging to the scheduled tribe which is concerned to the ministry of tribal affairs which means directly to CPIO even when Government of Uttar Pradesh is the implementing agency. To ensure the proper implementation of the central fund is not the obligatory duty of the central government staffs or once the fund released its duty is over. Section 4 (1) (b) it is obligatory duty of every public authority to publish within one hundred and twenty days from the enactment of this Act (xi) the budget allocated to each of its agency, indicating the particulars of all plans, proposed expenditures and reports on disbursements made; Sought information is concerned with the working of the government staff not aggrieved girl student for whom applicant itself is seeking justice under article 51 A of the constitution. Direct CPIO to provide sought information available and rest of may be provided Govt of U.P. under subsection 3 of section 6 of R.T.I. Act of 2005.

 

Hon’ble First Appellate Authority may take the perusal subsection 3 of section 6 Right to Information Act 2005. Request for obtaining information

(3) Where an application is made to a public authority requesting for an information,—

(i) which is held by another public authority; or (ii) the subject matter of which is more closely connected with the functions of another public authority,

the public authority, to which such application is made, shall transfer the application or such part of it as may be appropriate to that other public authority and inform the applicant immediately about such transfer:

Provided that the transfer of an application pursuant to this subsection shall be made as soon as practicable but in no case later than five days from the date of receipt of the application.

This is a humble request of your applicant to you Hon’ble Sir that how can it be justified to withhold public services arbitrarily and promote anarchy, lawlessness and chaos in an arbitrary manner by making the mockery of law of land? There is need of the hour to take harsh steps against the wrongdoer in order to win the confidence of citizenry and strengthen the democratic values for healthy and prosperous democracy. For this, your applicant shall ever pray you, Hon’ble Sir.

Please direct to provide the aforementioned sought information point-wise as sought by the information seeker. As well as initiate departmental proceeding against the aforementioned PIO for concealing the sought information in order to conceal the wrongdoings of the staffs of the public authority. For this applicant shall ever pray you, Hon’ble Sir.

Date-31/10/2019                                            Yours sincerely

Yogi M. P. Singh, Mobile number-7379105911, Mohalla- Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road, Lakshmi Narayan Baikunth Mahadev Mandir District-Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh, Pin code-231001.

2 attachments
document Kajal.pdf
522K
document Kajal RTI.pdf
633K
0 0 vote
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
5 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Preeti Singh
1 month ago

They had to provide the following information as directed by the central ministry but they will not provide because they provide commission to the central ministry as told by them to the public spirited individual Yogi M. P. Singh also raised before commission.
2-Hard copy of the online submitted application for a scholarship and subsequent correction as attached. Make available reason of not accepting Scheduled tribe as corrected by the aggrieved student.
3- provisions which empower staffs of the social welfare department to change the filled entries of the aggrieved.

Arun Pratap Singh
1 month ago

CPIO conceals the information because of his cryptic approach and acting in caucus with the wrongdoer staffs of the government of Uttar Pradesh. There is huge siphoning of the public fund concerned with the weaker and downtrodden section and chief minister office is colluding with the wrongdoers by overlooking wrongdoings in order to protect them.
Finally they will not provide any information to the information seeker because of deep-rooted corruption in the government machinery.

God Man
1 month ago

If the Predators will be protectors then who will shield and here this thing is quite relevant in the reference of banking ombudsman. It is quite obvious that rupees 12900 from the account of Anjali Kumari which was opened by anonymous person and operated by anonymous person and when the dozen representations were submitted then passbook was not available by the branch manager concerned of the State Bank of India.

Bhoomika Singh
Bhoomika Singh
1 month ago

They did not provide the information to the information seeker in the name of third party information but when the aggrieved girl student Kajal have provided them its affidavit and also authorised the public spirited person Yogi MP Singh to struggle in the matter then they must provide the information because that information is no more third party information.