After intense struggle, D.D. could be made available to public authority High court of judicature at Allahabad.

Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>
FW: PENDING CPGRAM COMPLAINT OF YOGI M P SINGH
Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com> 30 December 2016 at 20:33
To: “CM (A) R2 VNS” <cmadminr2.zovns@sbi.co.in>, pmosb <pmosb@pmo.nic.in>, supremecourt <supremecourt@nic.in>
Mr. chief manager please focus on the quote –We also request you to please not use such a disrespectful language for the Bank and the staff members, as we are a public organization, working hard for the public only, providing the best possible services to the customers and the language used by you amounts to defamation of such a reputed Bank. A respectable person, such as you, should not put allegations without any proof/evidence or without even verifying the facts which are readily available with you.

Please take the perusal of communication addressed  to Registrar and conclude it ,what is cause of undue delay.  You are well aprised with the fact that what is the duration/stipulated time  of delivery of D.D. TO its seeker. D.D. was delivered after one month and two days whether  reflection of reputed and glorified banking institution. I always speak the truth and striver of truth. You speak few words but causes deeper wounds and expressing resentment over the few remarks made on the basis of documentary evidences. 
To
                             Registrar (Accounts)
                          I/C  Central Public Information Officer

                            High court of judicature at Allahabad


                                  Allahabad,   Uttar Pradesh
Subject –Regarding the compliance of Rule 3 and 4 of Allahabad High Court (Right to Information ) Rules , 2006 as amended. 
Most revered Sir –
                                             Be acknowledged in regard to communication dated 20-12-2016 reference as-No.2363/RTI/1216/2016/AHC .
1-Your applicant sought D.D. Rs.250 on 27-Nov-2016 to pay  R.T.I. Fee caused to debit Rs. 336.25 from my account ipso facto obvious from attachment.
2-After aforesaid communication of most respected Sir ,your applicant submitted several representations to various accountable public functionaries of government of India .
3-Branch manager S.B.I. CITY branch Mirzapur despatched the D.D. on 29-Dec-2016 which was delivered by the post man on the same date .
4-Today your applicant routed the aforesaid D.D. TO you revered Sir after completion of requisite formalities, through this communication by speed registered post.
5-D.D. of Rs.250 payable to Registrar General, High Court, Allahabad,  CPIO communication dated 20-Dec-2016 ,Transaction detail dated 27-Nov-2016 in regard to aforesaid D.D. AND track record of despatched D.D. by branch office of S.B.I.

                            This is humble request of your applicant to you Hon’ble Sir that It can never be justified to overlook  the rights of citizenry by delivering services in arbitrary manner by floating all set up norms. This is sheer mismanagement which is encouraging wrongdoers to reap benefit of loopholes in system and depriving poor citizens from right to justice. Therefore it is need of hour to take concrete steps in order to curb grown anarchy in the system. For this your applicant shall ever pray you Hon’ble Sir.


     Date-30-12-2016                                                                               Yours sincerely
                                                    Mahesh Pratap Singh / Yogi M. P. Singh Mobile number-7379105911

Mohalla-Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road District-Mirzapur , Uttar Pradesh ,India


[Quoted text hidden]

6 attachments
img260.jpg
917K
img267.jpg
590K
img268.jpg
518K
img269.jpg
246K
img270.jpg
342K
img272.jpg
1273K

2 comments on After intense struggle, D.D. could be made available to public authority High court of judicature at Allahabad.

  1. Please take the perusal of communication addressed to Registrar and conclude it ,what is cause of undue delay. You are well aprised with the fact that what is the duration/stipulated time of delivery of D.D. TO its seeker. D.D. was delivered after one month and two days whether reflection of reputed and glorified banking institution. I always speak the truth and striver of truth. You speak few words but causes deeper wounds and expressing resentment over the few remarks made on the basis of documentary evidences.

  2. Now whether public functionaries of judiciary will provide the sought information when the corruption is rampant in our public system.
    1-Your applicant sought D.D. Rs.250 on 27-Nov-2016 to pay R.T.I. Fee caused to debit Rs. 336.25 from my account ipso facto obvious from attachment.
    2-After aforesaid communication of most respected Sir ,your applicant submitted several representations to various accountable public functionaries of government of India .
    3-Branch manager S.B.I. CITY branch Mirzapur despatched the D.D. on 29-Dec-2016 which was delivered by the post man on the same date .
    4-Today your applicant routed the aforesaid D.D. TO you revered Sir after completion of requisite formalities, through this communication by speed registered post.
    5-D.D. of Rs.250 payable to Registrar General, High Court, Allahabad, CPIO communication dated 20-Dec-2016 ,Transaction detail dated 27-Nov-2016 in regard to aforesaid D.D. AND track record of despatched D.D. by branch office of S.B.I.

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: