A petition under article 32 of constitution of India in order to curb growing corruption in the system.

To
                 Chief Justice of India
/Companion Judges
                       Supreme court of India
,New Delhi
Hon’ble  Sir- index
and pages of this petition submitted under article 32 of the constitution of India
is as follows .
ID   of the petitioner
is annexed as cover page of the petition.
1-Hon’ble Sir from page-1 to page-18 is the memorandum of
the petition .
2-page-19 is the letter of villagers of Neebi  Gaharwar gram panchayat .
3-Page-19 and 20 contain the letter number and direction of
government of Uttar Pradesh so which directed director, Panchayati Raj and Commissioner
rural development .
4-Page-21,  22 and 23
is the enquiry report ,carried out by inquiry officers P.D. Mirzapur and Deputy
Commissioner MGNAREGA Mirzapur .
5-Page-24 is the letter of Commissioner rural development
Uttar Pradesh.
6-Page-25 and 26 is the news story published in Amar Ujala
daily.
7-Page-27 and 28 is the letter of DPRO Mirzapur.
8-Page-29 is the letter of the Ministry of rural development
Government of India.
9-Page-30 and 31 contains conduct rules which were floated
by concerned.
10-Page-32 and 33,34 and 35,36 and 37 are the beneficiary
detail of Indira Awaas Yojana of the financial years 2012-2013,2013-2014
2014-2015 respectively .
11-Page-38 and 39 is the beneficiary details of Mata Prasad
of first Indira Awaas .                                  12-Page-40 and 41 is the beneficiary details
of Mata Prasad of second Indira Awaas .
13-Page-42 and 43 is the beneficiary details of Shivraj  of first Indira Awaas .
 14-Page-44 and 45 is
the beneficiary details of Shivraj  of
second Indira Awaas .
 15-Page-46 and 47 is
the beneficiary details of Summari  of
first Indira Awaas .
16-Page-48 and 49 is the beneficiary details of Summari  of second Indira Awaas .
17-Page-50 and 51 is the beneficiary details of Summari  of third Indira Awaas .
18-Page-52 and 53 is the beneficiary details of
Rajmumari  of  Indira Awaas .
19-Page-54 and 55 is the beneficiary details of Sharada Devi  of 
Indira Awaas .
 20- Page-56 and 57 is
the beneficiary details of Ganga Ram 
of  Indira Awaas.
21- Page-58 and 59 is the beneficiary details of Sohan  of 
Indira Awaas.
22- Page-60 and 61 is the beneficiary details of Seeta
Devi  of 
Indira Awaas.
23- Page-62 and 63 is the beneficiary details of
Chanarai  of  Indira Awaas.
24-Here are three additional sets of petition to serve
respondent 1,respondent2 and respondent3 respectively.
                                                                        
       Your sincerely
                                                                            
 Yogi M.P. Singh
RU115569255IN  Track More
Booked
at    Booked on  Destination Tariff Article Type            Delivered
at            Delivered on
Not
Available         Not Available         Not Available                                             
Detailed
Track Events for :  RU115569255IN
Date   Time  Office Event
21/10/2015          14:26:34     ALLAHABAD RMS (CRC)          Article
Bagged to CRC DELHI
21/10/2015          10:51:59     ALLAHABAD RMS (CRC)          Bag
is Opened
21/10/2015          10:51:59     ALLAHABAD RMS (CRC)          Article
RU115569255IN is Received
21/10/2015          10:42:53     ALLAHABAD RMS (CRC)          Bag
is Received
21/10/2015          04:41:05     MIRZAPUR RMS (CRC)  Bag
Despatched to ALLAHABAD RMS (CRC)
21/10/2015          01:22:33     MIRZAPUR RMS (CRC)  Article
Bagged to ALLAHABAD RMS (CRC)
         To
                 Chief Justice of India
/Companion Judges
                       Supreme court of India ,
New Delhi ,India
Petitioner-Mahesh Pratap Singh (Yogi M. P. Singh)
Mohalla-Surekapuram , Jabalpur Road
District-Mirzapur (Uttar Pradesh)
                 Versus
Respondents-1-Chief secretary
         Government of Uttar
Pradesh ,Lucknow
2-Pricipal secretary
Chief minister secretariat , Government of
Uttar Pradesh ,Lucknow
3-District Magistrate
District-Mirzapur (Uttar Pradesh)
Prayer-No
action is being taken against the wrongdoers who siphoned the public fund meant
to poor and downtrodden section as well as development of village so Hon’ble
Sir may be pleased to direct aforesaid public functionaries to ensure action
according to reports of Enquiry Officers.
With due respect your
applicant wants to draw the kind attention of the Hon’ble Sir to the following
submissions as follows.
1-It is submitted
before the Hon’ble Sir that
Article 51A in The Constitution Of
India 1949

51A.
Fundamental duties It shall be the duty of every citizen of India (a) to abide
by the Constitution and respect its ideals and institutions, the national Flag
and the National Anthem;
(b) to cherish and follow the noble
ideals which inspired our national struggle for freedom;
(c) to uphold and protect the
sovereignty, unity and integrity of India;
(d) to defend the country and
render national service when called upon to do so;
(e) to promote harmony and the
spirit of common brotherhood amongst all the people of India transcending
religious, linguistic and regional or sectional diversities; to renounce
practices derogatory to the dignity of women;
(f) to value and preserve the rich
heritage of our composite culture;
(g) to protect and improve
the natural environment including forests, lakes, rivers and wild life, and to
have compassion for living creatures;
(h) to develop the scientific
temper, humanism and the spirit of inquiry and reform;
(i) to safeguard public
property and to abjure violence;
(j) to strive towards
excellence in all spheres of individual and collective activity so that the
nation constantly rises to higher levels of endeavour and achievement PART V
THE UNION CHAPTER I THE EXECUTIVE The President and Vice President
2-It is submitted
before the Hon’ble Sir that
Article 32 in The Constitution Of
India 1949

32.
Remedies for enforcement of rights conferred by this Part
(1) The right to move the
Supreme Court by appropriate proceedings for the enforcement of the rights
conferred by this Part is guaranteed
(2) The Supreme Court shall
have power to issue directions or orders or writs, including writs in the
nature of habeas corpus, mandamus, prohibition, quo warranto and certiorari,
whichever may be appropriate, for the enforcement of any of the rights
conferred by this Part
(3) Without prejudice to the
powers conferred on the Supreme Court by clause ( 1 ) and ( 2 ), Parliament may
by law empower any other court to exercise within the local limits of its
jurisdiction all or any of the powers exercisable by the Supreme Court under
clause ( 2 )
(4) The right guaranteed by this
article shall not be suspended except as otherwise provided for by this
Constitution

3-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that
According to B.D.O. Chhanbey action against wrongdoers is
pending in the office of DPRO/D.M. Mirzapur.Hon’ble Sir-Whether it is justified
that concerned accountable public functionaries may procrastinate in the matter
concerned with taking action against wrongdoers. Whether this is not
lackadaisical approach that dozens of correspondences were made  and news concerned with the  action was published in leading Hindi dailies
but most surprising that no action was taken against wrongdoers still. Here is
the correspondence in which D. M./DPRO  
Mirzapur has to take action.

4-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that your applicant had
 talked with B.D.O. Chhanbey Mr. Sushil
Kumar Tripathi   who had the charge of
P.D. Mirzapur as well  . He told your
applicant that he has made available all the concerned documents to D.M. /DPRO
Mirzapur . He also told your applicant that now action would be taken by D.M.
/DPRO Mirzapur. Your applicant had sent the representation to D. M. Mirzapur in
this regard.

5-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that UP MGNREGA
forwarded the representation of your applicant to D.M. Mirzapur but it seems
that D.M. Mirzapur is treating this letter like previous letters of Government
of  Uttar Pradesh. Whether to adopt
lackadaisical approach in the letters concerned with the letters of chief
minister’s office reference is justified.

 6-It is submitted before
the Hon’ble Sir that whether it is not startling fact that more than seven
months passed but files concerned with taking action against wrongdoers is
moving with the pace of ants. When will it reach at its destination? Justice
delay is justice denied. Justice without force is impotent  and force without justice is tyranny.

7-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that
कम्प्यूटर सँख्या : PG05667153 , प्रेषित
तिथि
05/08/2015, पत्रांक : –PG05667153/लो.शि.-2/2015
विषय : प्रार्थी के पत्र का पूर्ण अवलोकन कर उचित कार्यवाही के
संबंध मे

प्रेषक : श्रीयोगी एम पी सिंह    ,
मु0 सुरेखापुरम जबलपुर रोड    , मिर्जापुर
, उत्तर प्रदेश
प्रेषित : आयुक्त, ग्राम्य
विकास
, उत्तर प्रदेश
संदर्भ प्रकार : अन्तरित
सन्दर्भ स्थिति – अन्तरित, अन्तरण
दिनांक :
05/08/2015
निस्तारण विवरण: अन्तरित । आपका प्रार्थना-पत्र निस्तारण हेतु
आयुक्त
, ग्राम्य विकास,
उत्तर प्रदेश को प्रेषित कर दिया गया है । कृपया सम्बंधित अधिकारी
से अपने कम्प्यूटर सन्दर्भ संख्या के साथ संपर्क करने का कष्ट करें ।

सम्बन्धित अधिकारी/विभाग द्वारा भरी गयी सूचना-
अध्यावधिक स्थिति : –
सम्बन्धित अनुभाग : –
सम्बन्धित जनपद : –
जवाब भेजे जाने की तिथि : –
अभियुक्ति : –

8-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that Hon’ble Sir may be
pleased to take perusal of following redressal of grievance by central
ministry.

Grievance Status

Print || Logout
Status as on 19 Aug 2015
Registration Number            :           DORLD/E/2015/00678
Name Of Complainant           :           Yogi M P Singh
Date of Receipt          :           02 Aug 2015
Received by   :           Department of Rural Development
Forwarded to :           DoRD UP Govt.
Contact Address         :           Deptt. of Rural Development State
Govt. of Uttar P

21 Vidhan Sabha Marg
Lucknow226001
Contact Number         :           05226713408
Grievance Description          :           Why Gram Pradhan and secretary were
not dismissed when they were found indulged in siphoning of fund concerned with
MGNREGA ? Hon’ble Sir- Drainage was constructed by the gram pradhan ,Santosh
Dhar Dubey Village panchayat-Neebi Gaharwar , Block-Chhanbey , police station
-Vindhyachal ,District-Mirzapur ,State-Uttar Pradesh on the paper and fund was
drawn from the account by colluding with the secretary ,Jitendra Kumar Singh of
same village panchayat. This was proved when the district level team consists
of Deputy commissioner MGNREGA (Enquiry officer nominated by District
Magistrate Mirzapur) , Project Director Rajeev Banikataa and incharge B.D.O.
Mr. Sushil Kumar Tripathi carried out enquiry on the allegations of villagers.
Most surprising that despite the proper intimation to Gram Pradhan , Secretary
and Rojgaar sevak ,they remained absent and enquiry was carried out on the
basis of internet feedings made available by complainants. With due respect
your applicant wants to draw the kind attention of the Hon’ble Sir to the
following submissions as follows. 1-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that
when it has been proved that Gram Pradhan and secretary siphoned the public
fund meant to development of village panchayat Neebi Gaharwar , why action was
not taken by the concerned against these wrongdoers. Whether Government of
Uttar Pradesh would provide plum posting to the secretary of village panchaayat
like wrongdoer I.A.S. In the state as it lacks village secretaries and vacancy
still to be filled up. Whether the fund siphoned will be recovered as directed
by Enquiry officer to concerned. 2-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that
Enquiry Officer ,Deputy commissioner MGNREGA directed B.D.O. Chhanbey Sushil
Kumar Tripathi to lodge F.I.R. Against Gram Pradhan ,Santosh Dhar Dubey and
Rojgaar sevak Jwala Singh as both were found to indulged in extorting money
from the beneficiaries of Lohiya Awas but still no F.I.R. Was lodged by B.D.O.
Chhanbey . Whether B.D.O. Chhanbey Mr. Sushil Kumar Tripathi is not shielding
the wrongdoers. 3-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that more that six
months passed but the fund meant to MGNREGA for poor and downtrodden section was
disbursed by Gram pradhan among his relatives in the name of meth is not
recovered still. The order of recovery was passed before six months but still
to be complied by B.D.O. Sushil Kumar Tripathi. Hon’ble Sir may be pleased to
take glance of attached PDF documents with this representation. Hon’ble Sir
this is mystery that why B.D.O. Chhanbey is shielding wrongdoers? It will take
time to solve the riddle . D.M. Mirzapur is acting like mute spectators and
trying to pacify both sides instead of providing justice to aggrieved. This is
humble request of your applicant to you Hon’ble Sir that It can never be
justified to overlook  the rights of
citizenry by delivering services in arbitrary manner by floating all set up norms.
This is sheer mismanagement which is encouraging wrongdoers to reap benefit of
loopholes in system and depriving poor citizens from right to justice.
Therefore it is need of hour to take concrete steps in order to curb grown
anarchy in the system. For this your applicant shall ever pray you Hon’ble
Sir.                           
‘Yours  sincerely                             Yogi M. P. Singh
Mohalla-Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road District-Mirzapur , Uttar Pradesh ,India

Current Status            :           CASE CLOSED
Your Feedback          :          
Poor
Date of Action            :           19 Aug 2015
Details :           The State Govt. is the Implementing
Agency of the MGNREG Scheme as per Para 18 of the MGNREG Act. So the grievance
has already transferred to the State Govt. of Uttar Pradesh vide CPGRAMS portal
on 3rd August, 2015. It is further requested that the complainant may directly
contact the State Govt. through Shri Praveen Srivastav, Grievance redress
Manager, MGNREGA Cell, Rural Development Department, Govt. of UP, 21 Vidhan
Sabha Marg Lucknow Mob:-9415408614 Email:- upmgnrega@gmail.com

9-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that Hon’ble Sir may be
pleased to take perusal of attached documents which will remind the Hon’ble Sir
about the earlier pending grievances .

   10-It is submitted
before the Hon’ble Sir that there is Sheer anomaly in the allocation of Indira
Houses but on public forum ,every one is honest. Ministry of rural development
is showing 19 newly constructed Indira Avases i.e. three in financial year
2012-13 ,13 in 2013-14 and three in 2014-15 but B.D.O. Chhanvey only 14 why?
House of Sommari Devi still to be  made .
Whether the picture feeding of Indira houses on the website of Government of
India is made arbitrarily by the staffs of Government.

Hon’ble Sir-Picture feeding of Indira house of Seeta Devi
(UP-62-001-022-001/9622) W/O Aadityanarayan 
, Sharada Devi (UP-62-001-022-001/9693) W/O Dinesh  , Summari (UP-62-001-022-001/352) W/O Ram
Charan ,Ganga Ram  (UP-62-001-022-001/9561)
S/O Kailash and Siv Raj (UP-62-001-022-001/1547)  is same.

Hon’ble Sir-Picture feeding of Indira house of Rajmumari
(UP-62-001-022-001/9527) W/O Lolarakh , Mata Prasad (UP-62-001-022-001/6587)
S/O Kashiram , Summari (UP-62-001-022-001/9777) W/O 0 husband and Mantora Devi
(UP-62-001-022-001/9519) is same.

Hon’ble Sir-Picture feeding of Indira house of Sohan  (UP-62-001-022-001/9791) S/O Bante   , Shivraj 
(UP-62-001-022-001/9542) S/O Jagannath and Chanarai  (UP-62-001-022-001/9554) W/O Raghunath  is same.

11-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that No logical
argument ,no supportive evidence ,there is sheer tyranny in the Government
machinery .Open day light siphoning of public fund meant to poor and
downtrodden section. These corrupt public functionaries even didn’t spare an
old lady who was granted five Indira Avases but still living under open sky/old
cottage.Revered old lady is 80 years old. Sommari was provided  five Indira 
houses , Mata Prasad was provided two Indira houses and Shivraj provided
two Indira houses.

12-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that Summari whose
identity is UP-62-001-022-001/352 is the beneficiary of Indira Avas whose
detail is – husband’s name is Ram Charan, account number-11800100001302 ,Bank
name-Allahabad Bank, administrative sanction number-2961/1,administrative
sanction date-25.9.2013 .

Amount transferred Rs.37500.00 through cheque Number 497196 in
financial year 2013-2014 on 25.9.2013 .

Amount transferred Rs.37500.00 through cheque Number 852741 in
financial year 2013-2014 on 6.12.2013 .

Inspection of site was made by Inspector officer Dharm Jeet
Singh on 15.11.2013 .Photo is  annexed as
Attachments.

13-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that Summari Devi
whose identity is UP-62-001-022-001/9777 is the beneficiary Indira Avas having
no father or husband’s name, Account number as aforesaid- 11800100001302 , Bank
Name-Allahabad bank, administrative sanction number-2961 ,administrative
sanction date-25.9.2013

Amount transferred Rs.35000.00 through cheque Number 018470 in
the financial year 2013-2014 on 3.2.2014

Amount transferred Rs.35000.00 through the cheque Number-994186
in the financial year 2013-2014 on 1.10.2013

The site was inspected  by
Inspector officer Dharm Jeet Singh on 15.11.2013 .

14- It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that Somari
modification of Summari whose identity is UP-62-001-022-001/9790 is Indira Avas
beneficiary whose detail is-husband’s name is Rancharn modification of Ram
Charan having account number -11960  Bank
Name-Allahabad Bank, administrative sanction number-1524 ,administrative
sanction date-10.5.2013 .

Amount transferred Rs.37500.00 through cheque Number-098765 in
the financial year 2013-2014 on 15.1.2014.

15 -It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that how Mata Prasad
S/O Kashi Ram and Mata Prasad S/O having no father have the same bank account
11800100015640 in Allahabad UP Gramin bank.

16-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that first installment
was transferred through cheque Number 497196 on 25.9.2013 and second
installment was transferred through cheque Number 852741 on 6.12.2013 for one
unique identity number. For the second unique identity number, first
installment was transferred through cheque Number 994186 on 1.10.2013 and
second installment was transferred through cheque Number 852741 on 6.12.2013.

17- It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that Shiva Raj S/O
Jagannath have unique identity number.-UP-62-001-022-001/9542 and have bank
account number-11800100015701 in Allahabad Bank.

18-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that Shiva Raj S/O
Jagannath have unique identity number- UP-62-001-022-001/1547 and have bank
account number-11800100015701 in the same Allahabad Bank.

19-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that whether there is
competition in Government offices to search various tricks in order to siphon
the Government fund meant to poor and downtrodden.

20-It is
submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that 80 years old Summari Devi W/O Ram Charan
was provided five Indira Avases and fund concerned with one Indira Avas was
returned back but still three avases have to be gotten back. The Indira Avas of
Summari Devi which has been made in the imaginary world of concerned Government
functionaries may be brought up into the real world so that this 80 years old
lady which is at her last stage of his life may depart from this mortal world
with contentment. Please take a glance of following attached documents with
this representation.
21-It is
submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that
After getting
five Indira Avases Summari Devi is still living in her old cottage (Mud
house).Letter of PMO proved ineffective in this anarchy . According to report
of P.D. Mirzapur ,her Avas has been made, as made available to D.M. Mirzapur.
Aforesaid lady is 80 years
old. After getting five Indira Avases Summari Devi is still living in her old
cottage (Mud house).Letter of PMO proved ineffective in this anarchy .
According to report of P.D. Mirzapur ,her Avas has been made, as made available
to D.M. Mirzapur.
22-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that
Ministry of rural development is showing 19 newly
constructed Indira Avases i.e. three in financial year 2012-13 ,13 in 2013-14
and three in 2014-15 but B.D.O. Chhanvey only 15 why?
23-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that how
it is possible that one beneficiary may have two or more than two unique
identities. According to website of ministry of rural development, there are
many beneficiaries of Indira Avases who are allotted  two or more than two
avases and this number may be four or five.
24-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that
there is too much lacunae in the feeding of data of websites of rural
development ministry of Government of India if believed in the reports of wrongdoer
bureaucrats at the district level. Since the concerned didn’t take any step in
order to take action against wrongdoers ipsofacto proving the caucus with
corrupts.
25-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that
there is no grievance redressal in the Government of Uttar Pradesh and most
surprising fact is that its staff instead of taking action on the forwarded
grievances by the chief minister office and chief secretary office prefers to
close them without taking any action.

Mahesh Pratap
Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>

Why subordinate offices in the government of Uttar
Pradesh adopt lackadaisical approach on the grievances forwarded by chief
minister office.

yogimpsingh@gmail.com <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>
Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 2:54 PM
To: pmosb <pmosb@pmo.nic.in>, supremecourt
<supremecourt@nic.in>, “cmup@up.nic.in”
<cmup@up.nic.in>, csup <csup@up.nic.in>, urgent-action
<urgent-action@ohchr.org>, “hgovup@up.nic.in”
<hgovup@up.nic.in>, “cmd@uppcl.org” <cmd@uppcl.org>,
“md@uppcl.org” <md@uppcl.org>
Whether it is justified that public functionaries in the Government of
Uttar Pradesh may procrastinate on the letters of chief minister office and
concerned accountable public functionaries may adopt lackadaisical approach
in taking action against these wrongdoers. Whether this is signal of good
governance in the state.
03 October 2015
14:00
Hon’ble Sir
-To redress the grievance of citizenry is excellent characteristic of
democratically elected government but in the state of Uttar Pradesh no
subordinate functionary cares about the forwarded letters of chief minister
office. It is most unfortunate that there is no effective control of key
office on the subordinate offices which is not only signal indiscipline but
also showing the incompetency of the bureaucrats posted in the key office.
What action is being taken on the grievances forwarded by the chief
minister office is not fed up on the website as required from the field
officers. This is an anarchy but it can be experienced by aggrieved not by
beneficiary of anarchy .Even R.T.I. Communiques are failed to provide
information in regard to action taken on the forwarded grievances of chief
minister office.
 With
due respect your applicant wants to draw the kind attention of the Hon’ble
Sir to the following submissions as follows.
1-It is
submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that
Direct
concerned to make available sought information as sought by your applicant.
Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>
Sep 30 (3 days ago)
to pmosb, supremecourt, urgent-action, hgovup, cmup, csup, uphrclko, lokayukta, cmd, md, directordist, MD
An application
under subsection 1 of section 6 of Right to Information Act 2005.
To
                    
Mr. Deepak Shrivastava III
                   
Under secretary (Public Information Officer section-15) ,Room No. 329
,Shakti Bhawan (Head quarter), 14-Ashok Marg , Lucknow ,Uttar Pradesh ,Mobile
No.9454468991.
Subject-To furnish access to information as sought by
your applicant under aforesaid subsection and section within time as
prescribed under subsection 1 of section 7 of Right to information act
2005.
 With
due respect your applicant wants to draw the kind attention of the Hon’ble
Sir to the following submissions as follows.
1-It is
submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that whether any action was taken by
managing director, Uttar Pradesh Power Corporation Limited on the following
submitted grievance forwarded by chief minister office to him.
कम्प्यूटर सँख्या : PG05669400 , प्रेषित तिथि 08/08/2015, पत्रांक : –PG05669400/लो.शि.-2/2015
विषय : प्रार्थना पत्र अण्‍डरं सेक्‍सन 142 का विद्युतिकरण नियम 2003
प्रेषक : श्रीएमपीसिहं , 2 तल किसान मण्‍डी भवन ,गोमती नगर , लखनऊ , उत्तर प्रदेश
प्रेषित : प्रबन्ध निदेशक.प्र.पावर कारपोरेशन लि., उत्तर प्रदेश
संदर्भ प्रकार : अन्तरित
सन्दर्भ स्थिति  अन्तरितअन्तरण दिनांक : 08/08/2015
1a-Please
provide the notings in regard to aforesaid correspondences.
1b-Please
provide Minutes of proceedings to your applicant.
1c-If any
correspondence was made with the concerned ,then made available the copy of
the letter.
1d-Please made
available the duration in which action is taken by managing director ,UPPCL
on the grievances forwarded by chief minister office.
 2-It is
submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that whether any action was taken by
managing director, Uttar Pradesh Power Corporation Limited on the following
submitted grievance forwarded by chief minister office to him.
कम्प्यूटर सँख्या : PG05671494 , प्रेषित तिथि 12/08/2015, पत्रांक : –PG05671494/लो.शि.-2/2015
विषय : प्रार्थी के पत्र का अवलोकन कर उचित कार्यवाही करने के सम्‍बंध में 
प्रेषक : श्रीएम0पीसिहं        , मोसुरेकापुरम जबलपुर रोड , मिर्जापुर , उत्तर प्रदेश
प्रेषित : प्रबन्ध निदेशक.प्र.पावर कारपोरेशन लि., उत्तर प्रदेश
संदर्भ प्रकार : अन्तरित
सन्दर्भ स्थिति  अन्तरितअन्तरण दिनांक : 12/08/2015
2a-Please
provide the notings in regard to aforesaid correspondences.
2b-Please
provide Minutes of proceedings to your applicant.
2c-If any
correspondence was made with the concerned ,then made available the copy of
the letter.
3-It is
submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that whether any action was taken by
managing director, Uttar Pradesh Power Corporation Limited on the following
submitted grievance forwarded by chief minister office to him.
कम्प्यूटर सँख्या : PG05688647 , प्रेषित तिथि 16/09/2015, पत्रांक : -PG05688647/लो.शि.-2/2015
विषय प्रार्थी के पत्र का अवलोकन कर उचित कार्यवाही करने के सम्‍बंध में 
प्रेषक श्रीमहेश प्रताप सिहं , 2 तल किसान मण्‍डी भवन गोमती नगर लखनऊ उत्तरप्रदेश
प्रेषित प्रबन्ध निदेशक.प्र.पावर कारपोरेशन लि., उत्तर प्रदेश
संदर्भ प्रकार अन्तरित
सन्दर्भ स्थिति – अन्तरितअन्तरण दिनांक : 16/09/2015
3a-Please
provide the notings in regard to aforesaid correspondences.
3b-Please
provide Minutes of proceedings to your applicant.
3c-If any
correspondence was made with the concerned ,then made available the copy of
the letter.
              
This is humble request of your applicant to provide the sought information
to your applicant at the earliest if not feasible within time as prescribed
under subsection 1 of section 7 of Right to Information Act 2005. For this
your applicant shall ever pray you Hon’ble Sir.
                                                                       
Yours sincerely
Date-30/09/2015                                 
           Yogi M.
P. Singh
Mohalla-Surekapuram
,Jabalpur Road ,District-Mirzapur ,State-Uttar Pradesh ,India
Mobile
number-7379105911 .
Note-Two
postal orders bearing serial number-34F   629680
&   34F   629679 of amount Rs.10.00 each are
attached with this R.T.I. Communique as R.T.I. Fee which are payable to
account officer ,UPPCL ,Lucknow.
Original
R.T.I. Communique in two pages with three pages annexures of supporting
e-mail sent to various public offices .
All the pages
are well signed by your applicant. 
Attachments area
2-It is
submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that
कम्प्यूटर सँख्या : PG05690975 , प्रेषित तिथि 22/09/2015, पत्रांक : -PG05690975/लो.शि.-2/2015
विषय प्रार्थना पत्र का पूर्ण अवलोकन कर कार्यवाही किये जाने के संबंध में।
प्रेषक श्रीएमपीसिंह मोहजबलपुर रोड पुलिस स्टेशन कटरा कोतवाली मिर्जापुर उत्तर प्रदेश
प्रेषित प्रमुख सचिव/सचिवन्याय एवं विधि परामर्शीउत्तर प्रदेश शासन
संदर्भ प्रकार अन्तरित
सन्दर्भ स्थिति – अन्तरितअन्तरण दिनांक : 22/09/2015
निस्तारण विवरणअन्तरित  आपका प्रार्थनापत्र निस्तारण हेतु प्रमुख सचिव/सचिवन्याय एवं विधि परामर्शीउत्तर प्रदेश शासन को प्रेषित कर दिया गया है  कृपया सम्बंधितअधिकारी से अपने कम्प्यूटर सन्दर्भ संख्या के साथ संपर्क करने का कष्ट करें 
सम्बन्धित अधिकारी/विभाग द्वारा भरी गयी सूचना
अध्यावधिक स्थिति : –
सम्बन्धित अनुभाग : –
सम्बन्धित जनपद : –
जवाब भेजे जाने की तिथि : –
अभियुक्ति : –
3-It is
submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that
कम्प्यूटर सँख्या : PG05691272 , प्रेषित तिथि 22/09/2015, पत्रांक : -PG05691272/लो.शि.-2/2015
विषय 0प्रसरकार द्वारा शोषण के विरूद्व कार्यवाही  करने के सम्‍बंध में 
प्रेषक श्रीएम0पीसिहं मोसुरेकापुरम जबलपूर रोड मिर्जापुर उत्तर प्रदेश
प्रेषित प्रमुख सचिव/सचिवपंचायती राजउत्तर प्रदेश शासन
संदर्भ प्रकार अन्तरित
सन्दर्भ स्थिति – अन्तरितअन्तरण दिनांक : 22/09/2015
निस्तारण विवरणअन्तरित  आपका प्रार्थनापत्र निस्तारण हेतु प्रमुख सचिव/सचिवपंचायती राजउत्तर प्रदेश शासन को प्रेषित कर दिया गया है  कृपया सम्बंधित अधिकारी से अपनेकम्प्यूटर सन्दर्भ संख्या के साथ संपर्क करने का कष्ट करें 
सम्बन्धित अधिकारी/विभाग द्वारा भरी गयी सूचना
अध्यावधिक स्थिति : –
सम्बन्धित अनुभाग : –
सम्बन्धित जनपद : –
जवाब भेजे जाने की तिथि : –
अभियुक्ति : –
4-It is
submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that
कम्प्यूटर सँख्या : PG05688914 , प्रेषित तिथि 18/09/2015, पत्रांक : -PG05688914/लो.शि.-2/2015
विषय ग्राम नीबी गहरवार ब्लाक छानबे के तैनात बी0एलश्री सुरेश दुबे के विरूद्व शिकायत के संबंध में।
प्रेषक श्रीयोगी एम0पीसिंह नि0-सुरेखपुरम मिर्जापुर उत्तर प्रदेश
प्रेषित जिलाधिकारीमिर्जापुरउत्तर प्रदेश
संदर्भ प्रकार आख्‍या
सन्दर्भ स्थिति – लम्बितअनिस्तारित
सम्बन्धित अधिकारी/विभाग द्वारा भरी गयी सूचना
अध्यावधिक स्थिति : –
सम्बन्धित अनुभाग : –
सम्बन्धित जनपद : –
जवाब भेजे जाने की तिथि : –
अभियुक्ति : –
5-It is
submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that
कम्प्यूटर सँख्या : PG05688647 , प्रेषित तिथि 16/09/2015, पत्रांक : -PG05688647/लो.शि.-2/2015
विषय प्रार्थी के पत्र का अवलोकन कर उचित कार्यवाही करने के सम्‍बंध में 
प्रेषक श्रीमहेश प्रताप सिहं , 2 तल किसान मण्‍डी भवन गोमती नगर लखनऊ उत्तर प्रदेश
प्रेषित प्रबन्ध निदेशक.प्र.पावर कारपोरेशन लि., उत्तर प्रदेश
संदर्भ प्रकार अन्तरित
सन्दर्भ स्थिति – अन्तरितअन्तरण दिनांक : 16/09/2015
निस्तारण विवरणअन्तरित  आपका प्रार्थनापत्र निस्तारण हेतु प्रबन्ध निदेशक.प्र.पावर कारपोरेशन लि., उत्तर प्रदेश को प्रेषित कर दिया गया है  कृपया सम्बंधित अधिकारी सेअपने कम्प्यूटर सन्दर्भ संख्या के साथ संपर्क करने का कष्ट करें 
सम्बन्धित अधिकारी/विभाग द्वारा भरी गयी सूचना
अध्यावधिक स्थिति : –
सम्बन्धित अनुभाग : –
सम्बन्धित जनपद : –
जवाब भेजे जाने की तिथि : –
अभियुक्ति : –
6-It is
submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that
कम्प्यूटर सँख्या : PG05686602 , प्रेषित तिथि 12/09/2015, पत्रांक : -PG05686602/लो.शि.-2/2015
विषय मिर्जापुर जिले में नागरिकों के अधिकार की सुरक्षा के संबंध में।
प्रेषक श्रीयोगी एम0पीसिंह        , सुरेखापुरजबलपुर रोड मिर्जापुर उत्तर प्रदेश
प्रेषित प्रमुख सचिव/सचिवपर्यावरणउत्तर प्रदेश शासन
संदर्भ प्रकार अन्तरित
सन्दर्भ स्थिति – अन्तरितअन्तरण दिनांक : 12/09/2015
निस्तारण विवरणअन्तरित  आपका प्रार्थनापत्र निस्तारण हेतु प्रमुख सचिव/सचिवपर्यावरणउत्तर प्रदेश शासन को प्रेषित कर दिया गया है  कृपया सम्बंधित अधिकारी से अपनेकम्प्यूटर सन्दर्भ संख्या के साथ संपर्क करने का कष्ट करें 
सम्बन्धित अधिकारी/विभाग द्वारा भरी गयी सूचना
अध्यावधिक स्थिति : –
सम्बन्धित अनुभाग : –
सम्बन्धित जनपद : –
जवाब भेजे जाने की तिथि : –
अभियुक्ति : –
7-It is
submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that
कम्प्यूटर सँख्या : PG05685566 , प्रेषित तिथि 10/09/2015, पत्रांक : -PG05685566/लो.शि.-2/2015
विषय प्रार्थी के पत्र का अवलोकन कर उचित कार्यवाही करने के सम्‍बंध में 
प्रेषक श्रीएमपीसिहं मोसुरेखुपरम ,जबलपुर रोड मिर्जापुर उत्तर प्रदेश
प्रेषित प्रमुख सचिव/सचिवपंचायती राजउत्तर प्रदेश शासन
संदर्भ प्रकार अन्तरित
सन्दर्भ स्थिति – अन्तरितअन्तरण दिनांक : 10/09/2015
निस्तारण विवरणअन्तरित  आपका प्रार्थनापत्र निस्तारण हेतु प्रमुख सचिव/सचिवपंचायती राजउत्तर प्रदेश शासन को प्रेषित कर दिया गया है  कृपया सम्बंधित अधिकारी से अपनेकम्प्यूटर सन्दर्भ संख्या के साथ संपर्क करने का कष्ट करें 
सम्बन्धित अधिकारी/विभाग द्वारा भरी गयी सूचना
अध्यावधिक स्थिति : –
सम्बन्धित अनुभाग : –
सम्बन्धित जनपद : –
जवाब भेजे जाने की तिथि : –
अभियुक्ति : –
8-It is
submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that
कम्प्यूटर सँख्या : PG05672659 , प्रेषित तिथि 14/08/2015, पत्रांक : -PG05672659/लो.शि.-2/2015
विषय प्रार्थना पत्र का अवलोकन कर कार्यवाही किये जाने के संबंध में।
प्रेषक श्रीयोगी प्रताप सिंह नीबि गहरवार ग्राम पंलोहिया ग्राम पो– नीबि ब्लाक छानवे पुलिस स्टेशन विन्ध्याचल मिर्जापुर उत्तर प्रदेश
प्रेषित निदेशकपंचायती राजउत्तर प्रदेश
संदर्भ प्रकार अन्तरित
सन्दर्भ स्थिति – अन्तरितअन्तरण दिनांक : 14/08/2015
निस्तारण विवरणअन्तरित  आपका प्रार्थनापत्र निस्तारण हेतु निदेशकपंचायती राजउत्तर प्रदेश को प्रेषित कर दिया गया है  कृपया सम्बंधित अधिकारी से अपने कम्प्यूटर सन्दर्भसंख्या के साथ संपर्क करने का कष्ट करें 
सम्बन्धित अधिकारी/विभाग द्वारा भरी गयी सूचना
अध्यावधिक स्थिति : –
सम्बन्धित अनुभाग : –
सम्बन्धित जनपद : –
जवाब भेजे जाने की तिथि : –
अभियुक्ति : –
9-It is
submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that
कम्प्यूटर सँख्या : PG05673702 , प्रेषित तिथि 17/08/2015, पत्रांक : -PG05673702/लो.शि.-2/2015
विषय प्रार्थना पत्र का अवलोकन कर उचित कार्यवाही कराने के संबंध में।
प्रेषक श्रीएम0पी0सिंह मोहल्ला सुरेखापुरजबलपुर रोड मिर्जापुर उत्तर प्रदेश
प्रेषित जिलाधिकारीमिर्जापुरउत्तर प्रदेश
संदर्भ प्रकार अन्तरित
सन्दर्भ स्थिति – अन्तरितअन्तरण दिनांक : 17/08/2015
निस्तारण विवरणअन्तरित  आपका प्रार्थनापत्र निस्तारण हेतु जिलाधिकारीमिर्जापुरउत्तर प्रदेश को प्रेषित कर दिया गया है  कृपया सम्बंधित अधिकारी से अपने कम्प्यूटर सन्दर्भसंख्या के साथ संपर्क करने का कष्ट करें 
सम्बन्धित अधिकारी/विभाग द्वारा भरी गयी सूचना
अध्यावधिक स्थिति निस्‍तारित प्रकरण में शिकायतकर्ता न्‍यायालय में वाद योजित कर अनुतोष प्राप्‍त कर सकता हैा (वैब साईट के माध्यम से अंकित)
सम्बन्धित अनुभाग जिलापूर्ति अधिकारी
सम्बन्धित जनपद मिर्जापुर
जवाब भेजे जाने की तिथि :
अभियुक्ति निस्‍तारित
Whether
these companies are less dangerous than East India company and ongoing
emperor is less weaker than last Mughal emperor.
Aug 9
to pmosb, supremecourt, urgent-action, hgovup, csup, cmup
Your
applicant bought the printer in Rs.9800 .00 was provided warranty of one
year now over EPSON company may decide its price and your applicant is
ready to return back on the decided price of company staff .
Information
displaying on the screen flashes  as  printers ink pad
is at the end of its service life ,please contact EPSON support. A printer
of approximately Rs.10000 .00 could’t print the 10000 copies whether it is
justified when market value of copy is Rs.1.00 per copy including the paper
price.  Five times it got defaulted in warranty period . Whether
a product is sold on the basis warranty but actually one year warranty
means product’s stability is more than one year. Please direct the company
it may decide the present price of the product and get back my printer if
it can’t provide the facility repairing to your applicant as no local
facility is available. In 12 month ,only 8 months printer was O.K. As rest
of time spent in requesting service centre when you are sending the
engineer to repair the printer. Hon’ble Sir think about the miserable
conditions of consumers in this country whether their rights are
safe. 
 
Hon’ble Sir
black ink is out flowing from the printer and concerned staff of company
overlooking my grievance in the name of warranty is expired. Hon’ble Sir
whether the two months can’t be included in the warranty during which
printer didn’t act because of staff of company as your applicant had
already submitted the application which was as follows and listed in your
complaints . Please direct the staff of company either redress my grievance
or take back their printer. What is the stability of product which delivers
function on the basis of warranty. How much surprising that after 8000
printing system automatically stops to function and consumer has to contact
the staff company who do bargaining after that.
Matter is
concerned with Mahesh Pratap Singh (Yogi M. P. Singh ) Mohalla-Surekapuram
, Jabalpur Road , Mirzapur city District-Mirzapur  (U.P.)
Your
applicant purchased a printer from shop digital world Dundhi Katra Mirzapur
which cost Rs.9800.00 was paid to shopkeeper ipsofacto obvious from the
annexure. According to cash memo -warranty is given by manufacturer not by
the firm. It means warranty is subjected to Manufacturer i.e. Epson
company.
Once printer
colour head was short circuited , then company staff took two months to
repair. They usually used to tell  me that they have sent the
order to Bangalore and in one order we seek numerous repairing parts so
this usually comes in one month. Consequently they had taken two months to
repair my printer.
Now again it
is not taking ink but after noting the complaint company staff is not
attending the phone which is being made by your applicant from phone number
7379105911 on Mobile numbers- 18004250011 , 9628372010 and 9628372009 .
Whether it is justified.
Their
lackadaisical approach in regard to redressing my grievances is on its
zenith. Hon’ble Sir if they don’t want to provide the services ,then they
take back their product and return back my paid amount. The dull approach
of company staff in regard to providing services causing mental trauma to
your applicant. Concerned company may be directed to provide compensation
to your applicant Rs.5000.00 as damages in the form of mental and physical
traumas .
EPSON INDIA PVT
LTD  , 12th Floor , The Millenia ,Tower A , No. 1 , Murphy Road ,
Ulsoor , M. G.
Bangalore -560008 ,Fax:080-30515005/30515078 ,Tel:080-30515000
This is
humble request of your applicant to you Hon’ble Sir that It can never be
justified to overlook  the rights of citizenry by delivering services
in arbitrary manner by floating all set up norms. This is sheer
mismanagement which is encouraging wrongdoers to reap benefit of loopholes
in system and depriving poor citizens from right to justice. Therefore it
is need of hour to take concrete steps in order to curb grown anarchy in
the system. For this your applicant shall ever pray you Hon’ble Sir.
 
                   
     ‘Yours  sincerely
 
                   
      Yogi M. P. Singh
Mohalla-Surekapuram,
Jabalpur Road District-Mirzapur , Uttar Pradesh ,India .
10-It is
submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that
Please
direct EPSON Company not to infringe consumer rights of your applicant.
Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>
Sep 25 (8 days ago)
to up-sforum, pmosb, cmup, csup, hgovup, supremecourt, urgent-action
Whether it
is justified that EPSON company sold the printer to your applicant but
software to delete the memory of the printer still in the possession of
company and company staff fixes the memory so it is filled after 2000
scan/prints and then printer’s function is automatically stopped . Now
purchaser requests the service centre staff times and again if printer is
under warranty ,then they delete the memory and printer functions as usual
but if the printer is not under warranty ,then they charge Rs.700 to delete
the memory.
25 September
2015
16:34
Direct the EPSON company to provide your applicant software which
deletes the memory of printer or if can’t provide then such services be
provided free of cost by the company through its service centres.
Hon’ble sir company once has sold the articles to its consumers ,then
to operate ,use and maintenace is subjected to ambit of consumer not
company but company by not providing software to delete the memory of
computer to the consumers is encroaching their consumer rights as well as
exploiting them through their greedy service centre staffs. Hon’ble Sir
whether such company may be allowed to do business in the country which are
acting like looters.
Whether these companies are less dangerous than East India company and
ongoing emperor is less weaker than last Mughal emperor.
If concerned public functionaries of Government of India can’t protect
the consumer rights of your applicant ,then be instrumental in returning
back my printer to company concerned.
Your
applicant bought the printer in Rs.9800 .00 was provided warranty of one
year now over EPSON company may decide its price and your applicant is
ready to return back on the decided price of company staff .
 Five
times it got defaulted in warranty period . Whether a product is sold on
the basis warranty but actually one year warranty means product’s stability
is more than one year. Please direct the company it may decide the present
price of the product and get back my printer if it can’t provide the
facility repairing to your applicant as no local facility is available. In
12 month ,only 8 months printer was O.K. As rest of time spent in
requesting service centre when you are sending the engineer to repair the
printer. Hon’ble Sir think about the miserable conditions of consumers in
this country whether their rights are safe. 
 
 What is
the stability of product which delivers function on the basis of warranty.
How much surprising that after 8000 printing system automatically stops to
function and consumer has to contact the staff company who do bargaining
after that.
Matter is
concerned with Mahesh Pratap Singh (Yogi M. P. Singh ) Mohalla-Surekapuram
, Jabalpur Road , Mirzapur city District-Mirzapur (U.P.)
Your
applicant purchased a printer from shop digital world Dundhi Katra Mirzapur
which cost Rs.9800.00 was paid to shopkeeper ipsofacto obvious from the
annexure. According to cash memo -warranty is given by manufacturer not by
the firm. It means warranty is subjected to Manufacturer i.e. Epson
company.
EPSON INDIA PVT
LTD  , 12th Floor , The Millenia ,Tower A , No. 1 , Murphy Road ,
Ulsoor , M. G.
Bangalore -560008 ,Fax:080-30515005/30515078 ,Tel:080-30515000
This is
humble request of your applicant to you Hon’ble Sir that It can never be
justified to overlook  the rights of citizenry by delivering services
in arbitrary manner by floating all set up norms. This is sheer
mismanagement which is encouraging wrongdoers to reap benefit of loopholes
in system and depriving poor citizens from right to justice. Therefore it
is need of hour to take concrete steps in order to curb grown anarchy in
the system. For this your applicant shall ever pray you Hon’ble Sir.
 
                   
     ‘Yours  sincerely
 
                   
      Yogi M. P. Singh
Mohalla-Surekapuram,
Jabalpur Road District-Mirzapur , Uttar Pradesh ,India .
This is humble
request of your applicant to you Hon’ble Sir that It can never be justified to
overlook  the rights of citizenry by delivering services in arbitrary
manner by floating all set up norms. This is sheer mismanagement which is
encouraging wrongdoers to reap benefit of loopholes in system and depriving
poor citizens from right to justice. Therefore it is need of hour to take
concrete steps in order to curb grown anarchy in the system. For this your
petitioner shall ever pray you Hon’ble Sir.
   
                     
 ‘Yours  sincerely
   
                     
  Yogi M. P. Singh (Mahesh Pratap Singh)
Mohalla-Surekapuram,
Jabalpur Road District-Mirzapur , Uttar Pradesh ,India .
                                                        
Affidavit
I
hereby swear in the name of God that all the aforesaid submissions are based on
documentary evidences if anything found incorrect , then Hon’ble may initiate
penal proceedings against your petitioner.
                                                                                                  
Yours sincerely
                                                                                                   Yogi
M. P. Singh

5 comments on A petition under article 32 of constitution of India in order to curb growing corruption in the system.

  1. Article 32 in The Constitution Of India 1949

    32. Remedies for enforcement of rights conferred by this Part
    (1) The right to move the Supreme Court by appropriate proceedings for the enforcement of the rights conferred by this Part is guaranteed
    (2) The Supreme Court shall have power to issue directions or orders or writs, including writs in the nature of habeas corpus, mandamus, prohibition, quo warranto and certiorari, whichever may be appropriate, for the enforcement of any of the rights conferred by this Part

  2. Every one knows that there is rampant corruption in the system so pray to God that the petition may reach in the Hand of honest public functionaries. Otherwise every One knows the outcome of grievances submitted by common people. After all efforts are praiseworthy if considered positively ,undoubtedly poor and downtrodden section will get justice.

  3. कम्प्यूटर सँख्या : PG05688647 , प्रेषित तिथि 16/09/2015, पत्रांक : -PG05688647/लो.शि.-2/2015
    विषय : प्रार्थी के पत्र का अवलोकन कर उचित कार्यवाही करने के सम्‍बंध में ।
    प्रेषक : श्रीमहेश प्रताप सिहं , 2 तल किसान मण्‍डी भवन गोमती नगर , लखनऊ , उत्तर प्रदेश
    प्रेषित : प्रबन्ध निदेशक, उ.प्र.पावर कारपोरेशन लि., उत्तर प्रदेश
    संदर्भ प्रकार : अन्तरित
    सन्दर्भ स्थिति – अन्तरित, अन्तरण दिनांक : 16/09/2015
    निस्तारण विवरण: अन्तरित । आपका प्रार्थना-पत्र निस्तारण हेतु प्रबन्ध निदेशक, उ.प्र.पावर कारपोरेशन लि., उत्तर प्रदेश को प्रेषित कर दिया गया है । कृपया सम्बंधित अधिकारी सेअपने कम्प्यूटर सन्दर्भ संख्या के साथ संपर्क करने का कष्ट करें ।
    सम्बन्धित अधिकारी/विभाग द्वारा भरी गयी सूचना-
    अध्यावधिक स्थिति : –
    सम्बन्धित अनुभाग : –
    सम्बन्धित जनपद : –
    जवाब भेजे जाने की तिथि : –
    अभियुक्ति : –

  4. How the rule of law will be established in this largest democracy in the world if there is rampant corruption in the public offices and when the representations are made to the accountable public functionaries they are reluctant to take any action on the matter? Whether it is not surprising that those are mute spectators of ongoing rampant corruption in the government machinery itself claiming to overcome the menace of corruption in the government machinery.

  5. In our country complaints are just floating only on papers. This complaint, against the corruption was lodged in 2015 . So why action was not taken on this submitted complaint even when matter was concerned with wide public interest. Our functional officer like.. D. M, S. D. M, as well as judges who are constitutional functionaries etc are also not taking action against corruption and overlooking the matters concerned with serious allegations of corruption. They only speak to much on public fora and doing nothing. There is need to take solid and strong action against corruption.

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: