and pages of this petition submitted under article 32 of the constitution of India
is as follows .
is annexed as cover page of the petition.
the petition .
government of Uttar Pradesh so which directed director, Panchayati Raj and Commissioner
rural development .
is the enquiry report ,carried out by inquiry officers P.D. Mirzapur and Deputy
Commissioner MGNAREGA Mirzapur .
Government of India.
detail of Indira Awaas Yojana of the financial years 2012-2013,2013-2014
2014-2015 respectively .
of first Indira Awaas . 12-Page-40 and 41 is the beneficiary details
of Mata Prasad of second Indira Awaas .
the beneficiary details of Shivraj of
second Indira Awaas .
the beneficiary details of Summari of
first Indira Awaas .
Rajmumari of Indira Awaas .
Indira Awaas .
the beneficiary details of Ganga Ram
of Indira Awaas.
Chanarai of Indira Awaas.
respondent 1,respondent2 and respondent3 respectively.
Yogi M.P. Singh
at Booked on Destination Tariff Article Type Delivered
at Delivered on
Available Not Available Not Available
Track Events for : RU115569255IN
Bagged to CRC DELHI
RU115569255IN is Received
Despatched to ALLAHABAD RMS (CRC)
Bagged to ALLAHABAD RMS (CRC)
New Delhi ,India
Uttar Pradesh ,Lucknow
action is being taken against the wrongdoers who siphoned the public fund meant
to poor and downtrodden section as well as development of village so Hon’ble
Sir may be pleased to direct aforesaid public functionaries to ensure action
according to reports of Enquiry Officers.
applicant wants to draw the kind attention of the Hon’ble Sir to the following
submissions as follows.
before the Hon’ble Sir that Article 51A in The Constitution Of
Fundamental duties It shall be the duty of every citizen of India (a) to abide
by the Constitution and respect its ideals and institutions, the national Flag
and the National Anthem;
ideals which inspired our national struggle for freedom;
sovereignty, unity and integrity of India;
render national service when called upon to do so;
spirit of common brotherhood amongst all the people of India transcending
religious, linguistic and regional or sectional diversities; to renounce
practices derogatory to the dignity of women;
heritage of our composite culture;
the natural environment including forests, lakes, rivers and wild life, and to
have compassion for living creatures;
temper, humanism and the spirit of inquiry and reform;
property and to abjure violence;
excellence in all spheres of individual and collective activity so that the
nation constantly rises to higher levels of endeavour and achievement PART V
THE UNION CHAPTER I THE EXECUTIVE The President and Vice President
before the Hon’ble Sir that Article 32 in The Constitution Of
Remedies for enforcement of rights conferred by this Part
Supreme Court by appropriate proceedings for the enforcement of the rights
conferred by this Part is guaranteed
have power to issue directions or orders or writs, including writs in the
nature of habeas corpus, mandamus, prohibition, quo warranto and certiorari,
whichever may be appropriate, for the enforcement of any of the rights
conferred by this Part
powers conferred on the Supreme Court by clause ( 1 ) and ( 2 ), Parliament may
by law empower any other court to exercise within the local limits of its
jurisdiction all or any of the powers exercisable by the Supreme Court under
clause ( 2 )
article shall not be suspended except as otherwise provided for by this
3-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that
According to B.D.O. Chhanbey action against wrongdoers is
pending in the office of DPRO/D.M. Mirzapur.Hon’ble Sir-Whether it is justified
that concerned accountable public functionaries may procrastinate in the matter
concerned with taking action against wrongdoers. Whether this is not
lackadaisical approach that dozens of correspondences were made and news concerned with the action was published in leading Hindi dailies
but most surprising that no action was taken against wrongdoers still. Here is
the correspondence in which D. M./DPRO
Mirzapur has to take action.
4-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that your applicant had
talked with B.D.O. Chhanbey Mr. Sushil
Kumar Tripathi who had the charge of
P.D. Mirzapur as well . He told your
applicant that he has made available all the concerned documents to D.M. /DPRO
Mirzapur . He also told your applicant that now action would be taken by D.M.
/DPRO Mirzapur. Your applicant had sent the representation to D. M. Mirzapur in
5-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that UP MGNREGA
forwarded the representation of your applicant to D.M. Mirzapur but it seems
that D.M. Mirzapur is treating this letter like previous letters of Government
of Uttar Pradesh. Whether to adopt
lackadaisical approach in the letters concerned with the letters of chief
minister’s office reference is justified.
6-It is submitted before
the Hon’ble Sir that whether it is not startling fact that more than seven
months passed but files concerned with taking action against wrongdoers is
moving with the pace of ants. When will it reach at its destination? Justice
delay is justice denied. Justice without force is impotent and force without justice is tyranny.
7-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that
कम्प्यूटर सँख्या : PG05667153 , प्रेषित
तिथि 05/08/2015, पत्रांक : –PG05667153/लो.शि.-2/2015
विषय : प्रार्थी के पत्र का पूर्ण अवलोकन कर उचित कार्यवाही के
प्रेषक : श्रीयोगी एम पी सिंह ,
मु0 सुरेखापुरम जबलपुर रोड , मिर्जापुर
, उत्तर प्रदेश
प्रेषित : आयुक्त, ग्राम्य
विकास, उत्तर प्रदेश
संदर्भ प्रकार : अन्तरित
सन्दर्भ स्थिति – अन्तरित, अन्तरण
दिनांक : 05/08/2015
निस्तारण विवरण: अन्तरित । आपका प्रार्थना-पत्र निस्तारण हेतु
आयुक्त, ग्राम्य विकास,
उत्तर प्रदेश को प्रेषित कर दिया गया है । कृपया सम्बंधित अधिकारी
से अपने कम्प्यूटर सन्दर्भ संख्या के साथ संपर्क करने का कष्ट करें ।
सम्बन्धित अधिकारी/विभाग द्वारा भरी गयी सूचना-
अध्यावधिक स्थिति : –
सम्बन्धित अनुभाग : –
सम्बन्धित जनपद : –
जवाब भेजे जाने की तिथि : –
अभियुक्ति : –
8-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that Hon’ble Sir may be
pleased to take perusal of following redressal of grievance by central
Print || Logout
Status as on 19 Aug 2015
Registration Number : DORLD/E/2015/00678
Name Of Complainant : Yogi M P Singh
Date of Receipt : 02 Aug 2015
Received by : Department of Rural Development
Forwarded to : DoRD UP Govt.
Contact Address : Deptt. of Rural Development State
Govt. of Uttar P
21 Vidhan Sabha Marg
Contact Number : 05226713408
Grievance Description : Why Gram Pradhan and secretary were
not dismissed when they were found indulged in siphoning of fund concerned with
MGNREGA ? Hon’ble Sir- Drainage was constructed by the gram pradhan ,Santosh
Dhar Dubey Village panchayat-Neebi Gaharwar , Block-Chhanbey , police station
-Vindhyachal ,District-Mirzapur ,State-Uttar Pradesh on the paper and fund was
drawn from the account by colluding with the secretary ,Jitendra Kumar Singh of
same village panchayat. This was proved when the district level team consists
of Deputy commissioner MGNREGA (Enquiry officer nominated by District
Magistrate Mirzapur) , Project Director Rajeev Banikataa and incharge B.D.O.
Mr. Sushil Kumar Tripathi carried out enquiry on the allegations of villagers.
Most surprising that despite the proper intimation to Gram Pradhan , Secretary
and Rojgaar sevak ,they remained absent and enquiry was carried out on the
basis of internet feedings made available by complainants. With due respect
your applicant wants to draw the kind attention of the Hon’ble Sir to the
following submissions as follows. 1-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that
when it has been proved that Gram Pradhan and secretary siphoned the public
fund meant to development of village panchayat Neebi Gaharwar , why action was
not taken by the concerned against these wrongdoers. Whether Government of
Uttar Pradesh would provide plum posting to the secretary of village panchaayat
like wrongdoer I.A.S. In the state as it lacks village secretaries and vacancy
still to be filled up. Whether the fund siphoned will be recovered as directed
by Enquiry officer to concerned. 2-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that
Enquiry Officer ,Deputy commissioner MGNREGA directed B.D.O. Chhanbey Sushil
Kumar Tripathi to lodge F.I.R. Against Gram Pradhan ,Santosh Dhar Dubey and
Rojgaar sevak Jwala Singh as both were found to indulged in extorting money
from the beneficiaries of Lohiya Awas but still no F.I.R. Was lodged by B.D.O.
Chhanbey . Whether B.D.O. Chhanbey Mr. Sushil Kumar Tripathi is not shielding
the wrongdoers. 3-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that more that six
months passed but the fund meant to MGNREGA for poor and downtrodden section was
disbursed by Gram pradhan among his relatives in the name of meth is not
recovered still. The order of recovery was passed before six months but still
to be complied by B.D.O. Sushil Kumar Tripathi. Hon’ble Sir may be pleased to
take glance of attached PDF documents with this representation. Hon’ble Sir
this is mystery that why B.D.O. Chhanbey is shielding wrongdoers? It will take
time to solve the riddle . D.M. Mirzapur is acting like mute spectators and
trying to pacify both sides instead of providing justice to aggrieved. This is
humble request of your applicant to you Hon’ble Sir that It can never be
justified to overlook the rights of
citizenry by delivering services in arbitrary manner by floating all set up norms.
This is sheer mismanagement which is encouraging wrongdoers to reap benefit of
loopholes in system and depriving poor citizens from right to justice.
Therefore it is need of hour to take concrete steps in order to curb grown
anarchy in the system. For this your applicant shall ever pray you Hon’ble
‘Yours sincerely Yogi M. P. Singh
Mohalla-Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road District-Mirzapur , Uttar Pradesh ,India
Current Status : CASE CLOSED
Your Feedback :
Date of Action : 19 Aug 2015
Details : The State Govt. is the Implementing
Agency of the MGNREG Scheme as per Para 18 of the MGNREG Act. So the grievance
has already transferred to the State Govt. of Uttar Pradesh vide CPGRAMS portal
on 3rd August, 2015. It is further requested that the complainant may directly
contact the State Govt. through Shri Praveen Srivastav, Grievance redress
Manager, MGNREGA Cell, Rural Development Department, Govt. of UP, 21 Vidhan
Sabha Marg Lucknow Mob:-9415408614 Email:- email@example.com
9-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that Hon’ble Sir may be
pleased to take perusal of attached documents which will remind the Hon’ble Sir
about the earlier pending grievances .
10-It is submitted
before the Hon’ble Sir that there is Sheer anomaly in the allocation of Indira
Houses but on public forum ,every one is honest. Ministry of rural development
is showing 19 newly constructed Indira Avases i.e. three in financial year
2012-13 ,13 in 2013-14 and three in 2014-15 but B.D.O. Chhanvey only 14 why?
House of Sommari Devi still to be made .
Whether the picture feeding of Indira houses on the website of Government of
India is made arbitrarily by the staffs of Government.
Hon’ble Sir-Picture feeding of Indira house of Seeta Devi
(UP-62-001-022-001/9622) W/O Aadityanarayan
, Sharada Devi (UP-62-001-022-001/9693) W/O Dinesh , Summari (UP-62-001-022-001/352) W/O Ram
Charan ,Ganga Ram (UP-62-001-022-001/9561)
S/O Kailash and Siv Raj (UP-62-001-022-001/1547) is same.
Hon’ble Sir-Picture feeding of Indira house of Rajmumari
(UP-62-001-022-001/9527) W/O Lolarakh , Mata Prasad (UP-62-001-022-001/6587)
S/O Kashiram , Summari (UP-62-001-022-001/9777) W/O 0 husband and Mantora Devi
(UP-62-001-022-001/9519) is same.
Hon’ble Sir-Picture feeding of Indira house of Sohan (UP-62-001-022-001/9791) S/O Bante , Shivraj
(UP-62-001-022-001/9542) S/O Jagannath and Chanarai (UP-62-001-022-001/9554) W/O Raghunath is same.
11-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that No logical
argument ,no supportive evidence ,there is sheer tyranny in the Government
machinery .Open day light siphoning of public fund meant to poor and
downtrodden section. These corrupt public functionaries even didn’t spare an
old lady who was granted five Indira Avases but still living under open sky/old
cottage.Revered old lady is 80 years old. Sommari was provided five Indira
houses , Mata Prasad was provided two Indira houses and Shivraj provided
two Indira houses.
12-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that Summari whose
identity is UP-62-001-022-001/352 is the beneficiary of Indira Avas whose
detail is – husband’s name is Ram Charan, account number-11800100001302 ,Bank
name-Allahabad Bank, administrative sanction number-2961/1,administrative
sanction date-25.9.2013 .
Amount transferred Rs.37500.00 through cheque Number 497196 in
financial year 2013-2014 on 25.9.2013 .
Amount transferred Rs.37500.00 through cheque Number 852741 in
financial year 2013-2014 on 6.12.2013 .
Inspection of site was made by Inspector officer Dharm Jeet
Singh on 15.11.2013 .Photo is annexed as
13-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that Summari Devi
whose identity is UP-62-001-022-001/9777 is the beneficiary Indira Avas having
no father or husband’s name, Account number as aforesaid- 11800100001302 , Bank
Name-Allahabad bank, administrative sanction number-2961 ,administrative
Amount transferred Rs.35000.00 through cheque Number 018470 in
the financial year 2013-2014 on 3.2.2014
Amount transferred Rs.35000.00 through the cheque Number-994186
in the financial year 2013-2014 on 1.10.2013
The site was inspected by
Inspector officer Dharm Jeet Singh on 15.11.2013 .
14- It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that Somari
modification of Summari whose identity is UP-62-001-022-001/9790 is Indira Avas
beneficiary whose detail is-husband’s name is Rancharn modification of Ram
Charan having account number -11960 Bank
Name-Allahabad Bank, administrative sanction number-1524 ,administrative
sanction date-10.5.2013 .
Amount transferred Rs.37500.00 through cheque Number-098765 in
the financial year 2013-2014 on 15.1.2014.
15 -It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that how Mata Prasad
S/O Kashi Ram and Mata Prasad S/O having no father have the same bank account
11800100015640 in Allahabad UP Gramin bank.
16-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that first installment
was transferred through cheque Number 497196 on 25.9.2013 and second
installment was transferred through cheque Number 852741 on 6.12.2013 for one
unique identity number. For the second unique identity number, first
installment was transferred through cheque Number 994186 on 1.10.2013 and
second installment was transferred through cheque Number 852741 on 6.12.2013.
17- It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that Shiva Raj S/O
Jagannath have unique identity number.-UP-62-001-022-001/9542 and have bank
account number-11800100015701 in Allahabad Bank.
18-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that Shiva Raj S/O
Jagannath have unique identity number- UP-62-001-022-001/1547 and have bank
account number-11800100015701 in the same Allahabad Bank.
19-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that whether there is
competition in Government offices to search various tricks in order to siphon
the Government fund meant to poor and downtrodden.
submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that 80 years old Summari Devi W/O Ram Charan
was provided five Indira Avases and fund concerned with one Indira Avas was
returned back but still three avases have to be gotten back. The Indira Avas of
Summari Devi which has been made in the imaginary world of concerned Government
functionaries may be brought up into the real world so that this 80 years old
lady which is at her last stage of his life may depart from this mortal world
with contentment. Please take a glance of following attached documents with
submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that
five Indira Avases Summari Devi is still living in her old cottage (Mud
house).Letter of PMO proved ineffective in this anarchy . According to report
of P.D. Mirzapur ,her Avas has been made, as made available to D.M. Mirzapur.
old. After getting five Indira Avases Summari Devi is still living in her old
cottage (Mud house).Letter of PMO proved ineffective in this anarchy .
According to report of P.D. Mirzapur ,her Avas has been made, as made available
to D.M. Mirzapur.
constructed Indira Avases i.e. three in financial year 2012-13 ,13 in 2013-14
and three in 2014-15 but B.D.O. Chhanvey only 15 why?
it is possible that one beneficiary may have two or more than two unique
identities. According to website of ministry of rural development, there are
many beneficiaries of Indira Avases who are allotted two or more than two
avases and this number may be four or five.
there is too much lacunae in the feeding of data of websites of rural
development ministry of Government of India if believed in the reports of wrongdoer
bureaucrats at the district level. Since the concerned didn’t take any step in
order to take action against wrongdoers ipsofacto proving the caucus with
there is no grievance redressal in the Government of Uttar Pradesh and most
surprising fact is that its staff instead of taking action on the forwarded
grievances by the chief minister office and chief secretary office prefers to
close them without taking any action.
Singh Yogi M P Singh <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Why subordinate offices in the government of Uttar
Pradesh adopt lackadaisical approach on the grievances forwarded by chief
Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 2:54 PM
To: pmosb <email@example.com>, supremecourt
<firstname.lastname@example.org>, csup <email@example.com>, urgent-action
<firstname.lastname@example.org>, “email@example.com” <firstname.lastname@example.org>,
request of your applicant to you Hon’ble Sir that It can never be justified to
overlook the rights of citizenry by delivering services in arbitrary
manner by floating all set up norms. This is sheer mismanagement which is
encouraging wrongdoers to reap benefit of loopholes in system and depriving
poor citizens from right to justice. Therefore it is need of hour to take
concrete steps in order to curb grown anarchy in the system. For this your
petitioner shall ever pray you Hon’ble Sir.
Yogi M. P. Singh (Mahesh Pratap Singh)
Jabalpur Road District-Mirzapur , Uttar Pradesh ,India .
hereby swear in the name of God that all the aforesaid submissions are based on
documentary evidences if anything found incorrect , then Hon’ble may initiate
penal proceedings against your petitioner.
M. P. Singh