If practically PMO itself violating provisions of R.T.I. Act 2005, then how not diluting it



PMO must synchronize its working with its claims otherwise credibility is declining sharply.


Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M. P. Singh


presidentofindia@rb.nic.in; pmosb; supremecourt; cmup; hgovup@up.nic.in; sec. sic; secy-cic@nic.in; ukcmhelpline@gmail.com; urgent-action@ohchr.org; uphrclko@yahoo.co.in


Saturday, January 4, 2020 7:30 PM



F.A.A. has to decide the First appeal within 30 days from the date of receipt of the appeal but who cares the provisions of August act.

An appeal under subsection 1 of section 19 was filed online on 02/12/2019 which was forwarded to concerned first appellate authority on 03/12/2019 and today is 04/01/2020 which means 34 days passed since the date the First appeal submitted online on the online R.T.I. Portal of the government of Uttar Pradesh. Hon’ble Modi Sir still government did not dilute the provisions of the Right to Information Act 2005.

Most revered Sir –Your applicant invites the kind attention of Hon’ble Sir with due respect to the following submissions as follows.

1-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that following is today’s status of the online submitted appeal.

Enter Registration Number



Yogi M P Singh

Date of filing


Public Authority

Prime Minister’s Office



Date of action


Appellate Authority Details:- Telephone Number:- 23074072, Email Id:- rti.appeal@gov.in

Nodal Officer Details:-

Telephone Number


Email Id


Pasted from <https://www.rtionline.gov.in/request/status.php>

Online RTI Appeal Form Details

RTI Appeal Details :-

RTI Appeal Registration number


Public Authority

Prime Minister’s Office

Personal Details of Appellant:-

Request Registration Number


Request Registration Date



Yogi M P Singh




Mohalla Surekapuram , Jabalpur Road, District Mirzapur






Uttar Pradesh



Educational Status


Above Graduate

Phone Number

Details not provided

Mobile Number




Appeal Details:-



Is the Requester Below Poverty Line?


Ground For Appeal

Refused access to Information Requested

CPIO of Public Authority approached


CPIO’s Order/Decision Number

Details not provided

CPIO’s Order/Decision Date

(Description of Information sought (upto 500 characters)

Prayer or Relief Sought

Affidavit of the aggrieved applicant Dinesh Pratap Singh is itself attached to the first appeal and denial of sough information is also attached as the third page. Denial of sought information is the mockery of provisions of Right to Information Act 2005.

Supporting document (only pdf up to 1 MB)

Pasted from <https://www.rtionline.gov.in/request/regdetails.php?regId=lKm28TGtPEIU54yRmGa%2FE%2B1%2BETI2Up5P7rnXbRz%2BT0s%3D

2-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that following is the affidavit of aggrieved Dinesh Pratap Singh attached to the first appeal made by the applicant.


 First appellate authority

    Prime Minister Office

     Government of India

Subject-Regarding illegal rejection of the sought information

by the CPIO in the Prime Minister Office.


Registration Number


Hon’ble Sir,

                             With due respect, the kind attention of the

great respected Sir is invited in regard to following serious points as CPIO

made the mockery of the provisions Right to Information Act.

1-Yogi M. P. Singh is authorized representative of the

applicant and closed relative of the applicant as well so how the sought information

concerned with the deep-rooted corruption can be withheld on the flimsy ground

by misinterpreting the provision of Right to Information Act 2005 by the CPIO,

PMO, Government of India.

2- Here Yogi M. P. Singh is pursuing the matter in the

the interest of the applicant with the sole motive to protect the rights of the

an applicant which is being breached by the concerned public functionaries through

procrastination and cryptic dealings so his attempts are not an unwarranted invasion

on the privacy but a generous and a public-spirited approach in order to be

instrumental in providing justice to the aggrieved applicant.

3-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir CPIO took the recourse of subsection 1 (J) of section 8 of the Right to Information Act 2005 which quotes as follows-information

which relates to personal information the disclosure of which has no

relationship to any public activity or interest, or which would cause

an unwarranted invasion of the privacy of the individual unless the Central Public

Information Officer or the State Public Information Officer or the appellate

authority, as the case may be, is satisfied that the larger public interest

justifies the disclosure of such information: Provided that the information

which cannot be denied to the Parliament or a State Legislature shall not be

denied to any person.

On the one side of the screen, a mockery of law of land is

taking place in which law of the land requires fixation of accountability

through transparent dealings which can be achieved only through august act i.e.

Right to Information Act 2005 but CPIO is acting like the inscrutable face of a


4-Hon’ble Sir these submissions are not the only affidavit in

regard to seeking information through Yogi M. P. Singh but also a critical viewpoint

against lawlessness and anarchy prevailed throughout the government machinery

in which legitimate proceedings are impeded through undue procrastination,

inconsistent reports based on il-logistic approaches and misinterpreting laws

of the land in an absurd way. Moreover, it is too much surprising that ipso

facto obvious that R.T.I. Communique is on behalf of the applicant by Yogi M.

P, Singh, then how can it violate the aforementioned provisions?


is a humble request to the F.A.A. to take action against CPIO for procrastinating

and overlooking the seriousness of the matter deliberately as from the contents

of the R.T.I. Communique, it is quite obvious that information is sought on behalf

of the pledger Dinesh Pratap Singh who is a victim of rampant corruption in

this largest democracy in the world and prime minister Mr, Narendra Modi Sir is

making efforts to curb this corruption through various platforms but not

serious about his own office. Please take the matter as urgent.

Date-02/12/2019                                    Yours

sincerely cum pledger

                   Dinesh Pratap Singh S/O Angad Prasad Singh Mobile

number- 9838919619 Lakshmi Narayan Baikunth

Mahadev Mandir, Mohalla-Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road District-Mirzapur, PIN


3-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that the following information was sought by the applicant-Details are also available on this public link.

Details for registration number: PMOPG/E/2019/0632349 is attached to the R.T.I. Communique. Information seeker Dinesh Pratap Singh seeks the following information through Yogi M. P. Singh as follows.

1-CPIO may provide noting made on aforementioned grievance and action taken by the concerned public authority.

2-Name and designation of concerned public staff processing aforementioned grievance with the current status.

3-Detail of staff who monitors quality and compliance of norms set up in processing PG grievances.

Following is today’s status of the grievance. Whether it is justified to shield wrongdoers public staffs by procrastinating on the grievance?

Grievance Status for registration number: PMOPG/E/2019/0632349

Grievance Concerns To

Name Of Complainant-Dinesh Pratap Singh

Date of Receipt-27/10/2019

Received By Ministry/Department-Prime Ministers Office

Grievance Description

Hon’ble Prime Minister Sir, as the matter, is closely connected with the municipal corporation, Dehradoon, Uttaranchal, therefore, the matter may be forwarded to Government of Uttaranchal so that mysterious death of Babu Singh son of R.P. Singh may be uncovered or screened out. Since the Lucknow police itself performed the duty by exercising the power of the civil court by floating entire set up norms and violating the directions issued by the Lucknow bench of the High court of judicature at Allahabad grabbed the land and house of the aggrieved applicant by colluding with the opposition so they are hatching a conspiracy to show that Babu Singh is dead, on the paper as they are not providing any clarification in the matter as well as supportive pieces of evidence in regard to the impugned claim. Which is quite obvious from the attached document to the grievance which must be perused by the Hon’ble Sir. Since public authority, municipal corporation, Dehradoon, Uttaranchal is having the record of cremation or burial whatever may be so in the interest of justice it would be expedient to seek the report of concerned public authority belonging the government of Uttaranchal.

According to the report of Manoj Kumar Sub-inspector Police station, Ashiyana District Lucknow dated 07 June 2019, Babu Singh Son of R. P. Singh died on 11 May 2019 at Dehradun in Uttarakhand but circle officer Cantt Mr Durgesh Kumar Singh making claims differently. According to the report submitted by the aforementioned circle officer dated 04 Sept 2019, Babu Singh Son Of R. P. Singh died on 12 April 2019 at Dehradun in Uttarakhand moreover according to circle officer aforementioned Registrar, death and birth, Municipal corporation, Dehradun issued death certificate on 24/06/2019. Whose claim is authenticated, can only be explained senior rank officers of the department by throwing more light on the issue? Whether it is not a cryptic style of the dealing and contrary viewpoints are not making the matter more mysterious and reports incredible as well Carelessness in the investigation of the police sub-inspector Manoj Kumar submitted to the concerned circle officer. Whether it is not ridiculous that police of the capital Lucknow wants to close the Pandora box concerned with the land and house grabbing of the aggrieved applicant by Land Mafia who perpetrated this crime by taking station officer posted at that time in the concerned police station not only under good faith but also colluding with him As the concerned police officer not only terrorised the applicant and his family but also implicated them under false cases which are reflection of lawlessness and anarchy in the department of the police. Sir, Ms Tanu Upadhyay, a predecessor of aforementioned circle officer, submitted in its report that Babu Singh died in the month of the May 2019 at Dehradun in Uttarakhand which is quite obvious from his attached report dated 20 June 2019 submitted on the Jansunwai portal of the government of Uttar Pradesh also attached to the grievance. Police sub-inspector Manoj Kumar subsequently in its report dated 13/07/2019 again accepted that Babu Singh died in the month of the May 2019. What is the credibility of the police reports submitted on the august portal Jansunwai portal of the government of Uttar Pradesh?

Grievance Document Current Status-Under process Date of Action-06/11/2019

Officer Concerns To Officer Name-Aarti Balodi

Officer Designation-Nodal Officer

Contact Address Email Address-ukcmhelpline@gmail.com

Contact Number-01353051503

This is a humble request of your applicant to you Hon’ble Sir that how can it be justified to withhold public services arbitrarily and promote anarchy, lawlessness and chaos in an arbitrary manner by making the mockery of law of land? There is need of the hour to take harsh steps against the wrongdoer in order to win the confidence of citizenry and strengthen the democratic values for healthy and prosperous democracy. For this, your applicant shall ever pray you, Hon’ble Sir.                                                                             

  Date-04-01-2020                           Yours sincerely

                                        Yogi M. P. Singh, Mobile number-7379105911,   Mohalla- Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road, District-Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh, Pin code-231001.

0 0 vote
Article Rating
Notify of
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Bhoomika Singh
Bhoomika Singh
1 year ago

Justice delayed is justice denied ” is a legal maxim meaning that if legal redress is available for a party that has suffered some injury , but is not forthcoming in a timely, it is effectively the same as having no redress at all. If the information would not be made available in the time bound manner then, then it is meaningless if its necessity ends because of undue delay.