Your RTI Appeal filed successfully.
Please note down the details of registration.
Registration Number: SPMZR/A/2024/60038
Name: Sadhana Tiwari
Date of Filing :23-10-2024
Request filed with: SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE OFFICE MIRZAPUR
FAA Details
FAA NAME: ABHINANDAN
Designation: MIRZAPUR
Phone No. :05442252578
Email Id :spmzr-up@nic.in
Contact Details
Telephone Number :9125608556
Email-ID :addlspopmzr@gmail.com
Online RTI Appeal Form Details
Public Authority Details:-
* Public Authority SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE OFFICE MIRZAPUR
Personal Details: -
* Name Sadhana Tiwari
Gender Male
* Address W/O Omkar Nath Tiwari , Surekapuram Colony, Riva Road, Post Sangmohal , Kotwali Katra
Districts Mirzapur
Pincode 231001
State Uttar Pradesh
Educational Status Literate
Phone Number Details not provided
Mobile Number +91-6387233091
Email-ID sadhanamishramzp[at]gmail[dot]com
Citizenship Indian
* Is the Applicant Below Poverty Line ? No
First Appeal Details u/s 19(1) :-
Registration Number SPMZR/A/2024/60038
Date of Filing 23/10/2024
Concerned Appellate Authority ABHINANDAN
Phone No 05442252578
Email Id spmzr-up@nic.in
* Ground For Appeal No Response Within the Time Limit
((Description of Information sought (upto 500 characters) )
* Prayer or Relief Sought From the following status of the submitted RTI application, it is quite obvious that the appellant submitted the RTI application on a 18th September 2024 which means one month 5 days passed but the concerned public information officer did not provide information to the information seeker which is violation of subsection one of section 7 of the right to information act 2005. According to subsection one of section 7 of the right to information act 2005, the public information officer has to provide information within stipulated 30 days from the date of the receipt RTI application in the office of Public Authority.Registration Number SPMZR/R/2024/60168
Name Sadhana Tiwari
Date of Filing 18/09/2024
Status RTI REQUEST RECEVED as on 18/09/2024
PIO Details
PIO NAME mahesh singh atri
Desinnation mirzapur
Phone No. 9125608556
Email Id addlspopmzr@gmail.com
Right to information actor 2005 was introduced by the government of India to promote transparency and accountability in the working of the public authorities so that growing corruption in the working of public authorities like jungle fire may be reduced but it seems that rampant corruption in the working of public authority has overshadowed the provisions of right to information act 2005.
Here this question arises whether the government of India will achieve its goal to promote transparency and accountability if it fails to ensure proper implementation of provisions of right to Information Act 2005.
At least public staff who are engaged in the promotion of the implementation of provisions of the right to information act 2005 must act honestly and there may be transparency and accountability in their workings. Whether there is fear in the mind of the public information officer who is withholding the information from the information seeker, if not how can provisions of the right to information act be implemented transparently?
Even in respect of administrative orders Lord Denning, M.R. in Breen v. Amalgamated Engg. Union (1971) 1 All ER 1148, observed: "The giving of reasons is one of the fundamentals of good administration." In Alexander Machinery (Dudley) Ltd. v. Crabtree 1974 ICR 120 (NIRC) it was observed: "Failure to give reasons amounts to denial of justice." "Reasons are live links between the mind of the decision-taker to the controversy in question and the decision or conclusion arrived at." Reasons substitute subjectivity by objectivity. The emphasis on recording reasons is that if the decision reveals the "inscrutable face of the sphinx", it can, by its silence, render it virtually impossible for the courts to perform their appellate function or exercise the power of judicial review in adjudging the validity of the decision. Right to reason is an indispensable part of a sound judicial system; reasons at least sufficient to indicate an application of mind to the matter before court. Another rationale is that the affected party can know why the decision has gone against him. One of the salutary requirements of natural justice is spelling out reasons for the order made; in other words, a speaking-out. The "inscrutable face of the sphinx" is ordinarily incongruous with a judicial or quasi-judicial performance.
Supporting document ((only pdf up to 1 MB)) Supporting document not provided
RTI Application Details u/s 6(1) :-
Registration Number SPMZR/R/2024/60168
Date of Filing 18/09/2024
PIO of Public Authority approached mahesh singh atri
Designation mirzapur
Phone No 9125608556
Email Id addlspopmzr@gmail.com
PIO Order/Decision Number Details not provided
* PIO Order/Decision Date