JD and director of medical and health directorate made mockery of RTI Act




Welcome UPICR20240000149

UTTAR PRADESH INFORMATION COMMISSION

Second Appeal under section 19(3) of the Right to Information Act, 2005

Appeal Registration Number - A-20241000147

Appeallent's Particulars

Applied Date : 03/10/2024 09:32:07 AM

Name Yogi M P Singh

Gender Male

State UTTAR PRADESH

District MIRZAPUR

Town/Village मिर्जापुर

Pincode 231001

Mobile Number 7379105911

Email yogimpsingh@gmail.com

Address सुरेकापुरम कॉलोनी जबलपुर रोड मिर्जापुर सिटी

Department

Department MEDICAL HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE DEPARTMENT (HeadQuarter Office)

Office Medical and Health Directorate

Details of Request for obtaining information under section 6(1) of RTI Act, 2005

Date of RTI application under section 6(1) 24-06-2024

Is the Applicant below piverty line? No

Section 6(1) Application No. DIRMH/R/2024/61103

Section 6(1) Transaction ID DIRMHR20240000001276

Action Taken by Public Information Officer(PIO)

Answer of P.I.O. Not providing Information in Stipulated Time

Date of PIO Reply ---

Public Information Officer Details

PIO Joint Director A K Shrivastava

Address Public Information Officer Office - Medical and Health Directorate

Pincode 226001

Mobile Number 6386685822

Email add.karmik@gmail.com

Details of First Appeal

Date of First Appeal application under Section 19(1) 08-08-2024

FAA Director Admini Raja Ganpati R

Address First Appellate Authority Office - Medical and Health Directorate

Pincode 226001

Mobile Number 9454455385

Email diradmncamp@gmail.com

FAA Address Details

Answer of First Appellate Authority (FAA) There is no answer

Date of Order ---

Delay Reason NA

Remarks

Relief sought under Section 19(3)- Second Appeal of the Right to Information Act, 2005 Public information officer did not provide the information by not entertaining the RTI application and also First appellate authority did not entertain appeal submitted by the appellant illegally with

Other Supporting Documents

Document-1 Details Supporting document

Document-2 Details Application status

Hearing Option

Hearing Type Offline

Online Hearing Mobile ---

Online Hearing Email ---

Declaration

 I hereby state that the information and particulars given above are true to the best of my knowledge and belief. I also declare that this matter is not previously filed with this commission nor is pending with any Court or tribunal or authority.

Documents Enclosure

Scanned copy of the signed second appeal u/s 19(3) of the Right to Information Act,2005

Document-1

Document-2

Copy of RTI Application under section 6(1)

Copy of First Appeal under section 19(1)

RTI Covering

First Appeal Covering

To

Chief Information Commissioner/ Companion Information Commissioners

7/7A, RTI Bhawan, Vibhuti Khand, Gomti Nagar Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, PIN Code-226010

Details of the appellant-Mohalla Surekapuram colony, Jabalpur Road, Sangmohal post office, District- Mirzapur, Pin code-            231001, State- Uttar Pradesh, Mobile number 7379105911

Details of the respondents-

1-PIO of Public Authority approached- DGMH Karmik Section, Dr. Arvind Kumar Shrivastava, Designation- Joint Director, Phone No- 9415087567 and CUG- 6386685822, Email Id- add.karmik@gmail.com, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, PIN Code-226001

2-Concerned Appellate Authority- DGMH Karmik Section, Dr. Raja Ganpati R (IAS)

Designation-Director Administration, Phone No- 9454455385, Email Id- diradmncamp@gmail.com, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, PIN Code-226001

Prayer- Public information officer did not provide the information by not entertaining the RTI application and also First appellate authority did not entertain appeal submitted by the appellant illegally without considering the pros and cons of the result. Please take action against the public information officer under section 20 of the right to information act 2005 and order disciplinary action against the working of the first appellate authority for withholding the information by not entertaining the first appeal submitted by the appellant.

Short submissions of the appellant are as follows.

1- From the following status of the submitted RTI application by the appellant, it is obvious that in this status no mobile number and name of PIO have been provided causing inconvenience to information seekers in proceeding the matters.

Registration Number- DIRMH/R/2024/61103

Name- Yogi M P Singh Date of Filing- 24/06/2024

Status           REQUEST FORWARDED TO PIO as on 25/06/2024

Details of PIO :- Telephone Number:- , Email Id:- add.karmik@gmail.com

PIO Details  PIO NAME- DGMH Karmik Section

Desinnation- Joint Director

Phone No.   Email Id- add.karmik@gmail.com

2- From the following status of the submitted RTI appeal by the appellant it is obvious that in this status no mobile number and name of FAA have been provided causing inconvenience to information seekers in proceeding the matters.

Registration Number       DIRMH/A/2024/60564

Name            Yogi M P Singh, Date of Filing   08/08/2024

Status           APPEAL FORWARDED TO CONCERNED FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY as on 09/08/2024

Appellate Authority Details :- Telephone Number:- , Email Id:- diradmncamp@gmail.com

FAA Details

FAA NAME   DGMH Karmik Section

Designation            Director Administration

Phone No.   Email Id diradmncamp@gmail.com

3- From the aforementioned status of the online RTI application, it is quite obvious that the appellant submitted the RTI application on 18th June 2024 and this rti communique was transferred to the public information officer on 19th June 2024. It is 30th September 2024 today and no information has been made available by the concerned public information officer to the appellant quite obvious from the status.

4- Right to Information Act 2005 was introduced by government of India to promote transparency and accountability in the working of public authorities and this act was published in 2005 and it is 2024 which means 19 years passed but most unfortunate thing is that public information officers are not providing information within stipulated 30 days which is a mockery of the provisions of the right to information act 2005.

5- Concerned PIO DGMH Karmik Section Designation Joint Director

It is most surprising that a public staff Whose rank is of joint director does not know the prescribed time to provide information to the information seekers is a matter of serious concern and I think that accountable staff of the government must meditate on it.

To ensure transparency and accountability in the government machinery, this act was introduced so that growing corruption in the government machinery could be controlled, but instead of controlling the corruption of government machinery the rampant corruption in the government machinery itself diluted the provisions of right to information act 2005.

6- This matter not only concerns the private practice of a government doctor but also concerns the human rights violation of a vulnerable lady who was mistreated under the bad supervision of a government doctor is a matter of serious concern. The Joint director of the Department of medical and health is procrastinating on such a serious issue.

Most respected sir both public information officer and first appellate authority made the mockery of the provisions of right to information act 2005 so harsh steps must be taken under section 20 of RTI actor 2005 against PIO and disciplinary action against FAA.

Date-03/10/2024                                                Yours sincerely

Yogi M. P. Singh, Mobile number- 7379105911,

Mohalla- Surekapuram colony, Jabalpur Road, District-Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh, PIN code-231001.


Comments