Sadhana Tiwari submitted complaint against S.H.O. Drummond Ganj before UPHRC

 Uttar Pradesh



U.P. Human Rights Commission TC-34 V-1, Vibhuti Khand, Gomti Nagar,, UTTAR PRADESH -120

Sadhana Tiwari,

Surekapuram colony, Jabalpur Road, Mirzapur city MIRZAPUR, UTTAR PRADESH

Dated: 19/08/2024

Dear Sadhana Tiwari,

The Commission has received your complaint and it has assigned diary number as 3613/IN/2024 with the following details: -

Complainant Details

Name: Sadhana Tiwari

Mobile: 6387233091 Email: sadhanamishramzp@gmail.com

Address: Surekapuram colony, Jabalpur Road, Mirzapur city

District: MIRZAPUR State: UTTAR PRADESH

File Uploaded suceesfully ( Deacerfamreg.pdf )

Victim Details

Complainant and victim are the same person.

Incident Details

Incident Place: SHO is not registering FIR Incident Date: 27/11/2023

Incident Category: ABUSE OF POWER

Incident District: MIRZAPUR Incident State: UTTAR PRADESH

Is it filed before any Court / State HRC No

Incident Details: The matter concerns the working of station house officer Drummond Ganj police station under the supervision of superintendent of police district-Mirzapur to register F.I.R. against offenders under sections 466 467 468 420 195 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code who usurped the ancestral land of the applicant by reaping benefit of vulnerability of the applicant.The details of offenders are as follows.1-Dayashankar Mishra S/O Shambhu Saran Mishra, Police station-Drummond Ganj, village- Bhaisod Balay Pahad post-Drummond Ganj, tehsil-Lalganj, development block-Halia, District- Mirzapur Uttar Pradesh.2- Hariprasad Mishra S/O Shambhu Saran Mishra,Police station-Drummond Ganj, village- Bhaisod Balay Pahad post-Drummond Ganj, tehsil-Lalganj, development block-Halia, District- Mirzapur Uttar Pradesh.3-Lekhpal,Lalganj tehsil, 4-Revenue inspector, Lalganj tehsil and 5-Tehsildar, Lalganj tehsil. Which canon law allows cheaters to usurp the property of the minors by reaping the vulnerability of them. Whether the concerned sub inspector will tell the applicant in which law book it has been mentioned that minors have no right in the property of ancestors. The process of inheritance is well defined in the revenue code of the Government of Uttar Pradesh but the facts were concealed and documents were manipulated which are criminal offence and police must take action under the sections of the Indian penal code 1860 as mentioned above by the applicant.The matter concerns usurping of the ancestral land by reaping the vulnerability and immaturity of the applicant does not concern with land dispute but it is criminal offence must be entertained by police to be instrumental in providing justice to applicant. Here ancestral usurped by the brothers of my deceased father by colluding with the Lekhpal, revenue inspector and tahsildar of tehsil Lalganj, district Mirzapur.Please provide justice to the applicant belonging to vulnerable section and setup excellent precedent so that such may not instigate others to destroy the life an adolescent girl whose parents died at tender age. It is crystal clear that it is a matter of land grabbing and criminal conspiracy to usurp the property of the applicant which is a criminal offence and will be treated under criminal procedure code 1973.

Report of police in Uttar Pradesh is never consistent with the submissions of the grievances submitted by the aggrieved due to lack of transparency and accountability in the working of the police. It is expected from the police that they must submit an impartial report on the jansunwai portal but this is not possible because of the incredibility of the police in the state. The job of the police is to control the crime in the state and maintain the law and order but when the first information report of the citizens will not be registered by the police then whether crime will increase or decrease.

Class-I heirs-vi. Daughter of predeceased son. The applicant was class-1 heir in the property of my grandfather who died in 2005 but the property was not inherited in favour of the applicant and the applicant was merely 10 years old at that time. They have cheated my entire property dishonestly by colluding with the staff of Tehsil by reaping the vulnerability of the applicant. The report of the concerned investigation officer is arbitrary and not providing justice to the deprived section. Whether the matter of cheating is entertained by the civil court as being suggested by the concerned investigation officer of the police? All the concerned public staff who supported the offenders committed offence under criminal procedure code and Indian Penal Code must be subjected to the penal proceedings by the police to be instrumental in providing justice to a member of the vulnerable section. Here offenders cheated the property of the applicant by reaping the benefits of vulnerability of the applicant which must be taken into account by the police concerned. Where is the justice for the women and girls in the society?

Whether the rights of women are safe in this largest democracy in the world. Whether the rights of children are safe in this largest democracy in the world. Think about the gravity of the situation a 10 year old girl was deprived of her ancestral property by her relatives by taking in good confidence the staff of the tehsil Lalganj and no action is taken by the concerned staff on the representation. Whether the concerned investigation of the police will provide the provisions of law which says that if the ancestral property of the girl is cheated by her own relatives then when she becomes an adult she will take shelter in the court of law. What is the role of the police in case of cheating of the property by the relatives of a child? It seems that because of corruption in our government machinery our system has failed to safeguard the human rights of children and women which is quite obvious from the frequent representation, and which was closed by the concerned police arbitrarily.


Comments

  1. How can it be justified that in the first appeal circle officer submitted the reply of another RTI application which is a mockery of the provisions of right to Information act 2005?

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Your view points inspire us