Welcome UPICR20240000149
UTTAR PRADESH INFORMATION COMMISSION
Second Appeal under section 19(3) of the Right to Information Act, 2005
Appeal Registration Number - A-20240700485
Appeallent's Particulars
Applied Date : 07/07/2024 11:02:45 AM
Name Yogi M P Singh
Gender Male
State UTTAR PRADESH
District MIRZAPUR
Town/Village मिर्जापुर
Pincode 231001
Mobile Number 7379105911
Email yogimpsingh@gmail.com
Address सुरेकापुरम कॉलोनी जबलपुर रोड मिर्जापुर सिटी
Department
Department NAGAR VIKAS DEPARTMENT (HeadQuarter Office)
Office Local Bodies
Details of Request for obtaining information under section 6(1) of RTI Act, 2005
Date of RTI application under section 6(1) 08-02-2024
Is the Applicant below piverty line? No
Section 6(1) Application No. DIRLB/R/2024/60013
Section 6(1) Transaction ID DIRLBR20240000000017
Action Taken by Public Information Officer(PIO)
Answer of P.I.O. Answer incomplete/unsatisfactory/false/misleading etc.
Date of PIO Reply 03-04-2024
Public Information Officer Details
PIO SUSHEEL CHANDRA GUPTA
Address Public Information Officer Office - Local Bodies
Pincode 226001
Mobile Number 7007086202
Email ulblko.sector7@gmail.com
Details of First Appeal
Date of First Appeal application under Section 19(1) 03-04-2024
FAA Nodal Officer
Address First Appellate Authority Office - Local Bodies
Pincode 226001
Mobile Number 7007086202
Email ulblko.sector7@gmail.com
FAA Address Details
Answer of First Appellate Authority (FAA) There is no answer
Date of Order ---
Remarks
Relief sought under Section 19(3)- Second Appeal of the Right to Information Act, 2005 Public information officer arbitrarily denied the information and First appellate authority First Appellate Authority did not take any action on it illegally without considering the pros and cons of t
Other Supporting Documents
Document-1 Details Document
Document-2 Details appeal status
Hearing Option
Hearing Type Offline
Online Hearing Mobile ---
Online Hearing Email ---
Declaration
I hereby state that the information and particulars given above are true to the best of my knowledge and belief. I also declare that this matter is not previously filed with this commission nor is pending with any Court or tribunal or authority.
Documents Enclosure
Scanned copy of the signed second appeal u/s 19(3) of the Right to Information Act,2005
Document-1
Document-2
Copy of PIO Reply
Copy of RTI Application under section 6(1)
Copy of First Appeal under section 19(1)
Content provided & maintained by Uttar Pradesh Information
To
Chief Information Commissioner/ Companion Information Commissioners
7/7A, RTI Bhawan, Vibhuti Khand, Gomti Nagar Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, PIN Code-226010
Details of the appellant-Mohalla Surekapuram colony , Jabalpur Road, Sangmohal post office, Districts Mirzapur, Pincode 231001,State Uttar Pradesh, Mobile number 7379105911
Details of the respondents-
1-PIO of Public Authority approached- SUSHEEL CHANDRA GUPTA
Designation assist Director (Per)
Phone No 7007086202, Email Id- ulblko.sector7@gmail.com
Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, PIN Code-226001
2-Concerned Appellate Authority Nodal Officer
Phone No Details not provided
Email Id Details not provided
Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, PIN Code-226001
Prayer- Public information officer arbitrarily denied the information and First appellate authority First Appellate Authority did not take any action on it illegally without considering the pros and cons of the result. Please take action against the public information officer under section 20 of the right to information act 2005 and order disciplinary action against the working of the first appellate authority for withholding the information by overlooking the first appeal and keeping itself mute on the denial of information.
Short submissions of the appellant are as follows.
1- Reply of the PIO:- The work of filling the annual movable and immovable property statement by the officers of Uttar Pradesh Civil Services through online medium on Sparrow Portal is not worked and monitored at the directorate level. Hence, the desired information is not held at the Directorate level.
Submission-Sir, please refer to pages 4 and 5 of the PDF documents attached with this appeal. The government order was sent by Dhananjay Shukla, Special Secretary of the Government of Uttar Pradesh on 4th January 2024. This mandate is addressed to the Chairman Revenue Council Uttar Pradesh Lucknow, all Additional Chief Secretary, Principal Secretary, Secretary, Government of Uttar Pradesh, all the heads of departments and chief office heads, Uttar Pradesh all the divisional commissioners of Uttar Pradesh, the District Magistrate of Uttar Pradesh.
2- Submission- Director at the directorate local body Lucknow had to direct subordinates specially provincial civil servants to submit Entire movable and immovable property details on the Sparrow Portal of the government of Uttar Pradesh by using their ID and passwords.
3- Submission- This implies that the Director at the directorate local body Lucknow did not ensure the compliance of the government order sent through the special secretary of the government of Uttar Pradesh Mr Dhananjay Shukla on 4th January 2024.
4- Submission- Here one thing must be noted that the information seeker is not seeking information concerning the declaration of assets but the appellant is seeking information regarding the compliance of the government order and communications exchanged regarding it by the accountable officer of the government.
5- Submission- It is most unfortunate that the public information officer denied the information on the ground that The work of filling the annual movable and immovable property statement by the officers of Uttar Pradesh Civil Services through online medium on Sparrow Portal is not worked and monitored at the directorate level. Hence, the desired information is not held at the Directorate level..
6- Submission- This implies that the director of the Directorate local body Lucknow did not make compliance of the government order by directing the subordinates to submit their both movable and immovable properties on the Sparrow Portal by using their ID and password. This is not the mistake of the fact but it is a mistake of the law and tantamount to indiscipline in performing the public duty. It is not expected from such a senior rank officer who has retained such a highest level of responsibilities.
7-Submission-Think about the ancient monarchies when the people were awarded capital punishment for violating the orders of the Kings but at present such government orders are put into the dustbin.
Whether it is not a failure of the democracy in the country and is not reflecting the anarchy in the working of the government machinery because of such an arrogant working style.
What is the need to amass huge wealth disproportionate to known sources of income because such a step is causing one to escape from following the government order?
This is a humble request of your applicant to you Hon'ble Sir that how can it be justified to withhold public services arbitrarily and promote anarchy, lawlessness, and chaos arbitrarily by making the mockery of law of land? There is need of the hour to take harsh steps against the wrongdoer to win the confidence of citizenry and strengthen the democratic values for healthy and prosperous democracy. For this, your appellant shall ever pray for you, Hon’ble Sir.
Date-07/07/2024 Yours sincerely
Yogi M. P. Singh, Mobile number-7379105911,
Mohalla- Surekapuram colony, Jabalpur Road, District-Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh, PIN code-231001.