P.C.S. in district G.B.N. must disclose their assets voluntarily by 31st January 2024
D.M. Gautam Budh Nagar is not providing information concerning compliance of G.O.
Welcome UPICR20240000149
UTTAR PRADESH INFORMATION COMMISSION
Second Appeal under section 19(3) of the Right to Information Act, 2005
Appeal Registration Number - A-20240701527
Appellant's Particulars
Applied Date : 20/07/2024 12:54:20 PM
Name Yogi M P Singh
Gender Male
State UTTAR PRADESH
District MIRZAPUR
Town/Village मिर्जापुर
Pincode 231001
Mobile Number 7379105911
Email yogimpsingh@gmail.com
Address सुरेकापुरम कॉलोनी जबलपुर रोड मिर्जापुर सिटी
Department
Department ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS DEPARTMENT (District)
Division Meerut
District Gautam Buddha Nagar
Office Administrative Reforms Department, Gautam Buddha Nagar District
Details of Request for obtaining information under section 6(1) of RTI Act, 2005
Date of RTI application under section 6(1) 26-01-2024
Is the Applicant below poverty line? No
Section 6(1) Application No. DMOGN/R/2024/60023
Section 6(1) Transaction ID DMOGNR20240000000034
Action Taken by Public Information Officer (PIO)
Answer of P.I.O. Answer incomplete/unsatisfactory/false/misleading etc.
Date of PIO Reply 06-05-2024
Public Information Officer Details
PIO Nodal Officer ANUJ NEHRA
Address Public Information Officer Office - Administrative Reforms Department, Gautam Buddha Nagar District
Pin code 203202
Mobile Number 9870145599
Email ocrtiocrti@gmail.com
Details of First Appeal
Grounds of first appeal application Not providing Information in Stipulated Time
Date of First Appeal application under Section 19(1) 17-04-2024
FAA Nodal Officer ANUJ NEHRA
Address First Appellate Authority Office - Administrative Reforms Department, Gautam Buddha Nagar District
Pin code 203202
Mobile Number 9870145599
Email ocrtiocrti@gmail.com
FAA Address Details
Answer of First Appellate Authority (FAA) Answer unsatisfactory/false/misleading etc.
Date of Order 18-04-2024
Remarks
Relief sought under Section 19(3)- Second Appeal of the Right to Information Act, 2005 In this case nodal officer is both the public information officer as well as first appellate authority who denied the information arbitrarily and after first appeal same denial was submitted by him o
Other Supporting Documents
Document-1 Details Supporting document
Document-2 Details application status
Hearing Option
Hearing Type Offline
Online Hearing Mobile ---
Online Hearing Email ---
Declaration
I hereby state that the information and particulars given above are true to the best of my knowledge and belief. I also declare that this matter is not previously filed with this commission nor is pending with any Court or tribunal or authority.
Documents Enclosure
Scanned copy of the signed second appeal u/s 19(3) of the Right to Information Act,2005
Document-1
Document-2
Copy of Order
Copy of PIO Reply
Copy of RTI Application under section 6(1)
Copy of First Appeal under section 19(1)
To
Chief Information Commissioner/
Companion Information Commissioners
7/7A, RTI Bhawan, Vibhuti Khand,
Gomti Nagar Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, PIN Code-226010
Details of the appellant-Mohalla
Surekapuram colony, Jabalpur Road, Sangmohal post office, Districts Mirzapur, Pincode 231001, State-Uttar Pradesh, Mobile number 7379105911
Details of the respondents-
1-PIO of Public Authority approached-Nodal
Officer/ANUJ NEHRA
Designation-Nodal Officer
Mobile No -not available
Email Id ocrtiocrti@gmail.com, District-Gautam Buddha Nagar, Pin
Code-203202
2-Concerned Appellate Authority- Nodal Officer/ANUJ NEHRA
Designation-Nodal Officer
Mobile No -not available
Email Id ocrtiocrti@gmail.com, District-Gautam Buddha Nagar, Pin
Code-203202
Prayer- In this case nodal officer is
both the public information officer as well as first appellate authority who
denied the information arbitrarily and after first appeal, same denial was
submitted by him on the RTI Portal of the government of Uttar Pradesh.
Short submissions of the appellant
are as follows.
1-Public information officer denied
information by taking recourse of Remarks: - The department
from whom information sought by you is not available on the portal. Therefore,
you can get information by submitting the application directly to the concerned
department.
2-The matter concerns the working of
public information officer of Public Authority DISTRICT MAGISTRATE OFFICE
GAUTAM BUDH NAGAR. From the following status of the RTI application, it is
quite obvious that the appellant submitted the RTI application on 26th January
2024 and status of the rti application is same as it was received on 26th
January 2024 which means nodal officer did not take any action in the matter or
it may be nodal officer is also the public information officer in the office of
Public Authority DISTRICT MAGISTRATE OFFICE GAUTAM BUDH NAGAR.
3-It is bitter truth that more than
two and half months passed but the concerned public information officer did not
communicate with the appellant as well as not provide any information to the
appellant which is the violation of subsection 1 of section 7 of the right to
information act 2005.
Registration Number DMOGN/R/2024/60023
Name Yogi M P Singh
Date of Filing 26/01/2024
Status RTI REQUEST RECEIVED as on 26/01/2024
Nodal Officer Details
Name BHAIR PAL SINGH
Telephone Number 8303170566
Email-ID ocrtiocrti@gmail.com
4-It is most unfortunate that public
information officer in the office of district Magistrate Gautam Budh Nagar
could not know that the information is provided within stipulated 30 days from
the date of receipt of RTI application in the office of public authority.
5-It is quite obvious that the
appellant is seeking information concerning the compliance of the government
order by the district Magistrate Gautam Budh Nagar but it is most unfortunate
that the public information officer is running away from providing information
on whether the government order compliance was ensured by district Magistrate
Gautam Budh Nagar or not.
6-The appellant is interested in the
information concerning the processing of the compliance of the government order
by the district Magistrate and mechanism adopted by the district magistrate in
order to make the processing transparent and accountable.
7-It is quite obvious that the public
information officer is running away from providing information concerning the
compliance of the government order which means government order has been thrown
into the dustbin by the district Magistrate otherwise what is the problem in
providing information concerning the compliance of the government order by the
district magistrate?
8-Think about the jungle Raj in the
governance of Uttar Pradesh that concerned officers are not maintaining
transparency and accountability in ensuring the compliance of the government
order and government orders are being taken negligently by the senior rank
officers in the state.
This is a humble request of the
appellant to the most respected Sir to direct the public information officer to
provide information to the appellant as well as take penal action against him Under
section 20 of the right to information act 2005 for violating subsection one of
section 7 of the right to information act 2005.
9-Description of information sought
by the appellant are as follows.
1-Provide the name and
designation of the staff who disclosed the assets voluntarily up to 31 January
2024 under the supervision of District Magistrate, district- Gautam Buddha
Nagar.
2- Provide the name and
designation of the staff who did not disclose their assets voluntarily by 31st
January 2024 under the supervision of District Magistrate, district- Gautam
Buddh Nagar.
3- Provide the action taken
by district magistrate, district- Gautam Buddha Nagar regarding the government
order dated 4th January 2024.
4- Provide the copy of the
communications exchanged with the subordinates by the District Magistrate, District
Gautam Buddha Nagar in compliance with the government order concerning
disclosure of assets voluntarily by provincial civil servants of the government
of Uttar Pradesh.
5- Provide the name and
designation of the staff who are processing this government order in the office
of district magistrate, district Gautam Buddha Nagar.
This is a humble request of your
applicant to you Hon'ble Sir that how can it be justified to withhold public
services arbitrarily and promote anarchy, lawlessness, and chaos arbitrarily by
making the mockery of law of land? There is need of the hour to take harsh
steps against the wrongdoer to win the confidence of citizenry and strengthen
the democratic values for healthy and prosperous democracy. For this, your
appellant shall ever pray for you, Hon’ble Sir.
Date-20/07/2024
Yours sincerely.
Yogi M. P. Singh, Mobile
number-7379105911,
Mohalla- Surekapuram colony, Jabalpur
Road, District-Mirzapur, Uttar
Pradesh, PIN code-231001.