Second appeal made against PIO in office of D.M. Lucknow for not providing information of disclosure of assets
UTTAR PRADESH INFORMATION COMMISSION
Second Appeal under section 19(3) of the Right to Information Act, 2005
Appeal Registration Number - A-20240502016
Appeallent's Particulars
Applied Date : 21/05/2024 07:20:13 AM
Name Yogi M P Singh
Gender Male
State UTTAR PRADESH
District MIRZAPUR
Town/Village मिर्जापुर
Pincode 231001
Mobile Number 7379105911
Email yogimpsingh@gmail.com
Address सुरेकापुरम कॉलोनी जबलपुर रोड मिर्जापुर सिटी
Department
Department ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS DEPARTMENT (District)
Division Lucknow
District Lucknow
Tehsil ---
Block ---
Gram Panchayat ---
Office Administrative Reforms Department,Lucknow Distrcit
Details of Request for obtaining information under section 6(1) of RTI Act, 2005
Date of RTI application under section 6(1) 26-01-2024
Is the Applicant below piverty line? No
Section 6(1) Application No. DMOLK/R/2024/60017
Section 6(1) Transaction ID DMOLKR20240000000025
Action Taken by Public Information Officer(PIO)
Answer of P.I.O. Answer incomplete/unsatisfactory/false/misleading etc.
Date of PIO Reply 29-01-2024
Public Information Officer Details
PIO ACM First
Address Public Information Officer Office - Administrative Reforms Department,Lucknow Distrcit
Pincode 226001
Mobile Number 9415005008
Email acm1.lu-up@gov.in
Details of First Appeal
Date of First Appeal application under Section 19(1) 30-01-2024
FAA Nodal officer
Address First Appellate Authority Office - Administrative Reforms Department,Lucknow Distrcit
Pincode 226001
Mobile Number NA
Email admfr.lu-up@gov.in
FAA Address Details
Answer of First Appellate Authority (FAA) Answer unsatisfactory/false/misleading etc.
Date of Order 21-02-2024
Remarks
Relief sought under Section 19(3)- Second Appeal of the Right to Information Act, 2005 Both public information officer and first appellate authority only misled the appellant
Other Supporting Documents
Document-1 Details Supporting document
Document-2 Details ---
Hearing Option
Hearing Type Offline
Online Hearing Mobile ---
Online Hearing Email ---
Declaration
I hereby state that the information and particulars given above are true to the best of my knowledge and belief. I also declare that this matter is not previously filed with this commission nor is pending with any Court or tribunal or authority.
Documents Enclosure
Scanned copy of the signed second appeal u/s 19(3) of the Right to Information Act,2005
Document-1
Copy of Order
Copy of PIO Reply
Copy of RTI Application under section 6(1)
Copy of First Appeal under section 19(1)
To
Chief Information Commissioner/ Companion Information Commissioners
7/7A, RTI Bhawan, Vibhuti Khand, Gomti Nagar Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, PIN Code-226010
Details of the appellant-Mohalla Surekapuram colony, Jabalpur Road, Sangmohal post office, Districts Mirzapur, Pincode 231001, State-Uttar Pradesh, Mobile number 7379105911
Details of the respondents-
1-PIO of Public Authority approached- ACM1
Designation ACM1
Phone No 9415005008
Email Id acm1.lu-up@gov.in, PIN Code-226001
2-Concerned Appellate Authority Nodal Officer
Name ASDO
Email-ID admfr.lu-up@gov.in, PIN Code-226001
Prayer- Public information officer did not Provide any information to the appellant as well as first appellate authority who is the nodal officer of District Lucknow upheld the denial of the information arbitrarily without looking into the prose and cons of the decision.
Short submissions of the appellant are as follows.
1- The reply of the public information officer in the office of District Magistrate Lucknow is as follows.
Reply:- The information sought by you is not correspondent in the office and personal information is not required to be given as per the Right to Information Act-2005. Due to which it is not possible to give information.
2-It seems that the public information officer in the office of district magistrate Lucknow has been habitual to withhold the information from the information seekers which is obvious from his cryptic working style and arbitrary denial of sought information.
3-According to the public information officer whatever information has been sought by the information seeker has not been made correspondence in the office of district Lucknow even when the entire details provided, and documents attached to the RTI application by the appellant.
4- Most respected sir, following is the headline of the government order sent by the Special Secretary Dhananjay Shukla of the government of Uttar Pradesh.
प्रेषक, धनन्जय शुक्ला, विशेष सचिव, उत्तर प्रदेश शासन।
Subject: - Regarding filing of annual movable and immovable property statements by the officers of Uttar Pradesh Civil Services (Executive Branch) through online mode on Sparrow portal.
5-Sir, please refer to pages 4 and 5 of the PDF documents attached with this appeal. The government order was sent by Dhananjay Shukla, Special Secretary of the Government of Uttar Pradesh on 4th January 2024.
This mandate is addressed to the Chairman Revenue Council Uttar Pradesh Lucknow, all Additional Chief Secretary, Principal Secretary, Government of Uttar Pradesh, all the heads of departments and chief office heads, Uttar Pradesh all the divisional commissioners of Uttar Pradesh, the District Magistrate of Uttar Pradesh.
6-It is most unfortunate that the public information officer in the office of district Magistrate Lucknow is so incompetent that he could not understand the contents of the RTI application ipso facto.
7-Here appellant is not seeking information of the property of the public staff but seeking information concerning the compliance of the government order which has to be followed by 31st January 2024 by entire provincial civil servants in the state and district magistrates, commissioners and other departmental heads had to be instrumental in compliance of the government order concerning the disclosure of assets by provincial civil servants.
8-Undoubtedly it is a precarious situation that the public information officer in the office of district Magistrate Lucknow could not understand the RTI application and rejected the application arbitrarily on the flimsy ground which is a mockery of the provisions of right to information act 2005.
The Right to information act 2005 was introduced by the government of India to promote transparency and accountability in the working of the public authorities but because of corruption in the public offices provisions of this act are being violated time and again by the public information officers.
This is a humble request of your applicant to you Hon'ble Sir that how can it be justified to withhold public services arbitrarily and promote anarchy, lawlessness, and chaos arbitrarily by making the mockery of law of land? There is need of the hour to take harsh steps against the wrongdoer to win the confidence of citizenry and strengthen the democratic values for healthy and prosperous democracy. For this, your appellant shall ever pray for you, Hon’ble Sir.
Date-22/05/2024 Yours sincerely.
Yogi M. P. Singh, Mobile number-7379105911,
Mohalla- Surekapuram colony, Jabalpur Road, District-Mirzapur, Uttar
Pradesh, PIN code-231001.
It is quite obvious that district magistrate Lucknow made the mockery government order which is the root cause concerned public information officer is not providing information to the information seeker.
ReplyDeleteEveryone knows that there is complete anarchy in the working of the state government and no Government orders are complied by the staff of the government which is the root cause district magistrate Lucknow is not providing information to the information seeker.
ReplyDeleteSuch practises are quite common in the Government of Uttar Pradesh must be curbed by the government but because of corruption no such things are taking place.
ReplyDelete