Grievance Status for registration number : DCOYA/E/2024/0001315
Grievance Concerns To
Name Of Complainant
Yogi M. P. Singh
Date of Receipt
01/03/2024
Received By Ministry/Department
Corporate Affairs
Grievance Description
Corporate Affairs >> Investors Grievance >> Non-Refund of application money
Complete and Correct name of the company : Facebook India Online Services Pvt. Ltd. DLF Atria Block N, Jacaranda Marg DLF City Phase II, Gurugram – 122002 Haryana India
CIN : 06AABCF5150G1ZZ
State : ROC Delhi
It is quite obvious that the matter concerns the following public authority, but it was incorrectly forwarded to the registrar of Company Telangana which has no jurisdiction in the matter, but this blunder was not taken into account.
DELHI & HARYANA
Sh Pranay Chaturvedi (ROC Delhi)
Contact Details :
011-26235703, 26235708, 011-26235702
rocdotdelhiatmcadotgovdotin
Address : Registrar Of Companies, 4th Floor, IFCI Tower, 61, Nehru Place, New Delhi - 110019
For Physical Verification Of Doc
The following comment was made by the Registrar of Company Telangana in the matter. The complainant was aggrieved by non-refund of balance amount of prepaid amount due to the cancellation of advertisements. It seems that the concerned staff of the Registrar of Company Telangana was incompetent to understand the contents of the grievance.
The submission of the applicant in the matter is that if the company which is registered to ROC Delhi having jurisdiction over DELHI & HARYANA and company had taken prepaid amount and it cancelled the advertisement of the applicant then it had to return the excess amount but it did not pay which is corruption and irregularity in the working of the company and such company which are cheaters may not be allowed to work as company in this largest democracy in the world.
It is quite obvious that this fraud company of the Facebook of India is not following the setup norms which is required to get the licence to run a company on the soil of this country.
This prayer has been made to cancel the licence of this fraud company and the matter must be looked into by the concerned office of the registrar of Company which is located under the jurisdiction of the Sh Pranay Chaturvedi ROC Delhi registrar of company.
How can illegal and fraud activities of Facebook, India be allowed in this largest democracy in the world which is quite obvious from tyranny and arbitrariness of the company in the matter? It is most unfortunate that public staff are running away from matter of corruption.
Grievance Document
Current Status
Under process
Date of Action
01/03/2024
Officer Concerns To
Officer Name
GAURAV (DEPUTY ROC)
Organisation name
ROC Delhi
Contact Address
4th floor, IFCI Tower, 61, Nehru Place,New Delhi
Email Address
roc.delhi@mca.gov.in
Contact Number
01126235703
Grievance Status for registration number : DCOYA/E/2024/0000549
Grievance Concerns To
Name Of Complainant
Yogi M. P. Singh
Date of Receipt
30/01/2024
Received By Ministry/Department
Corporate Affairs
Grievance Description
Corporate Affairs >> Serious Fraud Investigation Organisation >> Allegation against functioning of SFIO officials
It is quite obvious that the matter concerns the following public authority, but it was incorrectly forwarded to the registrar of Company Telangana which has no jurisdiction in the matter, but this blunder was not taken into account. PUNJAB, CHANDIGARH Sh Shyam Sunder (ROC Chandigarh) Contact Details : 0172-2639415/2639416 roc.chandigarh@mca.gov.in Address: Registrar of Companies, Punjab and Chandigarh, 1st Floor, Corporate Bhawan, Plot No.4-B, Sector 27-B, PIN- 160019,Chandigarh. RD : Northern Region The following comment was made by the Registrar of Company Telangana in the matter. The complainant was aggrieved by non-refund of balance amount of prepaid amount due to the cancellation of advertisements. It seems that the concerned staff of the Registrar of Company Telangana was incompetent to understand the contents of the grievance. The submission of the applicant in the matter is that if the company which is registered to Punjab and Chandigarh and company had taken prepaid amount and it cancelled the advertisement of the applicant then it had to return the excess amount but it did not pay which is corruption and irregularity in the working of the company and such company which are cheaters may not be allowed to work as company in this largest democracy in the world. It is quite obvious that this fraud company of the Facebook of India is not following the setup norms which is required to get the licence to run a company on the soil of this country. This prayer has been made to cancel the licence of this fraud company and the matter must be looked into by the concerned office of the registrar of Company which is located under the jurisdiction of the Punjab and Chandigarh registrar of company. How can illegal and fraud activities of Facebook, India be allowed in this largest democracy in the world which is quite obvious from tyranny and arbitrariness of the company in the matter? It is most unfortunate that public staff are running away from matter of corruption.
Grievance Document
Current Status
Case closed
Date of Action
21/02/2024
Remarks
Replied by SFIO--The subject matter does not pertain to SFIO. Therefore, the complainant is advised to approach appropriate authority for the redressal of their grievance.
Rating
1
Poor
Rating Remarks
Replied by SFIO--The subject matter does not pertain to SFIO. Therefore, the complainant is advised to approach appropriate authority for the redressal of their grievance. What is Serious Fraud Investigation Office (SFIO)? Overview: The Supreme Court, while dismissing a petition for quashing a complaint filed by the Serious Fraud Investigation Office (SFIO), has left a crucial question of law open i.e., whether SFIO are police officer(s) under the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. About Serious Fraud Investigation Office (SFIO) It is a corporate fraud investigating agency set up by the Government of India. The SFIO was established on 21st July, 2015, and operates under the Ministry of Corporate Affairs. Section 211 of the Companies Act, 2013, accorded a statutory status to the SFIO. Objective: The core objective of the SFIO is to be an investigative and law enforcement agency to detect and prosecute or recommend to prosecute white-collar frauds or crimes.
Appeal Details
Appeal Number
DCOYA/E/A/24/0000367
Date of Receipt
01/03/2024
Appeal Text
The steep rise in the matters of corruption is only showing the efficiency of the SFIO Only selective efforts always pave the way of corruption such practises must be curbed. Types of Investigations: SFIO will usually take up the following types of cases sent by the Central Government: Complex cases needing investigation across multi-discipline and inter-departmental affairs. Cases with a huge monetary impact on the public. Cases where investigation can lead to the cleaning up of systems and the implementation of changes in laws and procedures. Serious fraud cases sent by the Department of Company Affairs. SFIO can also take up cases on its own only when decided by the Director of the SFIO, and also giving the reasons for taking up the case in writing. Upon assignment of a case to the SFIO, no other investigative agency can proceed with an investigation for any offence under the Act. The Central Government can ask the SFIO to investigate a company in the following cases: When it receives a report from the Registrar or Inspector under Section 208 of the Companies Act 2013. When the company itself passes a special resolution and requests an investigation. Where there is a huge monetary impact on the public or for other large-scale public interest cases. When any Central Government or State Government department makes a request for an investigation.
Current Status
Appeal Received
Officer Concerns To
Officer Name
K. LAKSHMI PRASAD (Joint Director)
Organisation name
Ministry of Corporate Affairs
Contact Address
Kota House, New Delhi
Email Address
klp.prasad@mca.gov.in
Contact Number
01123385285
Comments
Post a Comment
Your view points inspire us