To fix accountability of inspector Kotwali and sub inspector Anil Kumar Rana, Radha Rastogi sought information from Budaun police

Registration Number SSPBD/R/2024/60013

Name Smt Radha Rastogi

Date of Filing 04/02/2024

Status RTI REQUEST RECEIVED as on 04/02/2024

  Nodal Officer Details  

Name SPRA BDN

Telephone Number 9454401021

Email-ID rtidn@gmail.com 

Online RTI Request Form Details

Public Authority Details :-   

* Public Authority SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE OFFICE BUDAUN 

Personal Details of RTI Applicant:-

Registration Number SSPBD/R/2024/60013

Date of Filing 04/02/2024

* Name Smt Radha Rastogi

Gender Male

* Address W/O Vimal Kumar Rastogi , Garhaiya Shahbajpur, Patiyali Sarai

Districts Budaun

Pincode 243601

State Uttar Pradesh

Educational Status Literate

Phone Number Details not provided

Mobile Number +91-9354762733

Email-ID vimalkrastogi1946[at]gmail[dot]com

Citizenship Indian

* Is the Applicant Below Poverty Line? No

RTI Application Details u/s 6(1) :-

((Description of Information sought (up to 500 characters) )

* Description of Information Sought Grievance Status for registration number : GOVUP/E/2024/0000969

Grievance Concerns To Name Of Complainant-Vimal Kumar Rastogi, Date of Receipt-04/01/2024, Received By Ministry/Department-Uttar Pradesh

To curb the misuse of section 151/107/116 of criminal procedure code, the government of Uttar Pradesh in order to comply with the direction of the High court of judicature at Allahabad issued the circular dated 09 September 2021 attached as Page 1 of the attached PDF document. Form the contents of the aforementioned circular, it was directed to entire accountable staff of the department of police that powers provided to police officer under section 151/107/116 of the criminal penal code is discretionary power of police must be used with due caution otherwise pecuniary penalty of Rs.25000 may be imposed on the police if found guilty of the abusing the tools.

How can there be apprehension of a breach of peace because my son who is employed in a company and workplace is Gautam Buddh Nagar Noida? It is quite obvious that police are wreaking vengeance with the applicant because the applicant is submitting a grievance as police are adopting lackadaisical approach to take action against the offenders.

Public information officer in the office of Senior Superintendent of police, district-Budaun must provide the following information to the information seeker point wise as follows.

1-Provide the posting details of sub inspector Anil Kumar Rana including date of joining in the district-Budaun as well as first posting details when he joined the service of the police with last posting details. 

2-Provide the posting details of inspector of police station-Kotwali with name and designation including date of joining in the district-Budaun as well as first posting details when he joined the service of the police with last posting details.

3-Right to reason is an indispensable part of the sound administrative system therefore PIO may provide the reason for unsigned general diary details attached as page 2 of PDF document to this RTI application. 

4-Please provide the name and designation of the executive magistrate before whom this unsigned general diary details was submitted by sub inspector Anil Kumar Rana and the executive magistrate accepted it. 

5-Land under dispute is the registered land in the name of my husband Vimal Kumar Rastogi but police said in reports that it is a matter of partition. Please provide the reason of it. 

6-In sub judice matter in which adjudication is pending before competent court, how can police allow grabbing of land by offenders in the form of new construction ipso facto? Please provide the reason of not registerig the F.I.R. after numerious representations of the husband of the information seeker. 

Public information officer must provide 6-point information to the information seeker within stipulated 30 days as prescribed under subsection 1 of section 7 of the right to information act 2005.

* Concerned PIO Nodal Officer

Designation Details not provided.

Phone No Details not provided.

Email Id Details not provided.

Supporting document ((only pdf up to 1 MB))

Grievance Status for registration number: GOVUP/E/2024/0000969

Grievance Concerns To

Name Of Complainant

Vimal Kumar Rastogi

Date of Receipt

04/01/2024

Received By Ministry/Department

Uttar Pradesh

Grievance Description

The matter concerns the working of the senior superintendent of police District-Budaun and the applicant who is a senior citizen draws the kind attention of the Honourable Sir to matters that needs urgent action.

There are two types of evidence of corruption 1-direct evidence and 2-circumstantial evidence. Undoubtedly there is no direct evidence of corruption of police in the matter but circumstantial evidence itself stating that police provided the full support to the land grabbers which is the root cause the applicant is alleging that there is no impeccable integrity of the concerned police personnel in the matter because of they have adopted lackadaisical and partial approach in dealing with the matter which is quite obvious from there irresponsible and illogical reports submitted by them in dozens of grievances of the applicant on the public grievance portal at the Government of India. Instead of taking action against the offenders under sections Section 441 (Criminal Trespass), Section 425 (Mischief), Section420 (Cheating), 442 (House Trespass), Section 503 (Criminal Intimidation) of the Indian Penal Code, you have misused section 151 107 and 116 of the criminal procedure code which are preventive measures applied against the spirit of circular issued by D.G.P. office in compliance guidelines issued by High court of judicature at Allahabad to prevent misuse of preventive measures and such dereliction will only promote anarchy in the society and promote land grabbers.

Police are justifying the land grabbing in the name partition awaited between the applicant and offenders but factual position is that offenders are grabbing the land which was purchased by the applicant on 19 July 1985 which means 38 years ago quite obvious from scan copy papers of registry executed by registrar Raj Bahadur Saxena between the applicant who is purchaser and Kanhai Lal Sarin S/O Raj Bahadur Sarin who is the seller of the land. Please take a glance of the last five pages of the attached PDF document to the grievance. The police submitted an arbitrary and inconsistent parrot report in the following grievance which is highly objectionable to the applicant. Concerned police may ask offenders to remove cars and other materials including construction work from the land of the applicant purchased from Kanhai Lal Sarin S/O Raj Bahadur Sarin whose measurement is 68 sq metres. The applicant has paid the price of the land and requisite fee to government for obtaining title of the land. How can partition claim of police in report be justified in the land of the applicant which is purchased land of the applicant. Grievance Status for registration number: GOVUP/E/2023/0083523, Grievance Concerns To Name Of Complainant-Vimal Kumar Rastogi, Date of Receipt-16/12/2023, Received By Ministry/Department-Uttar Pradesh

To curb the misuse of section 151/107/116 of criminal procedure code, the government of Uttar Pradesh in order to comply with the direction of the High court of judicature at Allahabad issued the circular dated 09 September 2021 attached as Page 1 of the attached PDF document. Form the contents of the aforementioned circular, it was directed to entire accountable staff of the department of police that powers provided to police officer under section 151/107/116 of the criminal penal code is discretionary power of police must be used with due caution otherwise pecuniary penalty of Rs.25000 may be imposed on the police if found guilty of the abusing the tools.

How can there be apprehension of a breach of peace because my son who is employed in a company and workplace is Gautam Buddh Nagar Noida? It is quite obvious that police are wreaking vengeance with the applicant because the applicant is submitting a grievance as police are adopting lackadaisical approach to take action against the offenders.

Grievance Document

Current Status

Case closed   

Date of Action

25/01/2024

Remarks

अधीनस्थ अधिकारी के स्तर पर निस्तारित श्रीमानजी आवेदक द्वारा दिये गये शिकायती प्रार्थना पत्र के सम्बन्ध में जाँच कर आख्या संलग्न है श्रीमान जी संलग्न शिकायती प्रार्थना पत्र के संबंध में जांच आख्या अवलोकनार्थ प्रेषित है

Reply Document

Rating

1

Poor

Rating Remarks

NotSatisfied

Appeal Details

Appeal Number

Date of Receipt

Appeal Text

Current Status

Officer Concerns To

Officer Name

Shri Bhaskar Pandey (Joint Secretary)

Organisation name

Government of Uttar Pradesh

Contact Address

Chief Minister Secretariat , Room No. 321, U.P. Secretariat, Lucknow

Email Address

bhaskar.12214@gov.in

Contact Number

05222226350

To see the attached document to the online RTI application, please click on the link