Research officer of U.P.S.I.C. arbitrarily rejected 5 more second appeals of Yogi M P Singh reflects anarchy in working

Registration Number UPICM/R/2024/60119

Name Yogi M P Singh

Date of Filing 29/02/2024

Status RTI REQUEST RECEIVED as on 29/02/2024

  Nodal Officer Details  

Name TEJASKAR PANDEY

Telephone Number 05222724941

Email-ID

Online RTI Request Form Details

Public Authority Details :-   

* Public Authority Uttar Pradesh Information Commission  

Personal Details of RTI Applicant:-

Registration Number UPICM/R/2024/60119

Date of Filing 29/02/2024

* Name Yogi M P Singh

Gender Male

* Address Mohalla Surekapuram , Jabalpur Road, Sangmohal post office

Districts Mirzapur

Pincode 231001

State Uttar Pradesh

Educational Status Literate

  Above Graduate

Phone Number Details not provided

Mobile Number +91-7379105911

Email-ID yogimpsingh[at]gmail[dot]com

Citizenship Indian

* Is the Applicant Below Poverty Line ? No

RTI Application Details u/s 6(1) :-

((Description of Information sought (upto 500 characters) )

* Description of Information Sought According to subsection I d of section 4 of the right to information act 2005, it shall be obligatory duty of every public authority to provide the reasons for its decisions to parties concerned. Most respected Supreme Court of India quoted in its various judgments that right to reason is an indispensable part of a sound judicial system and it is not only applicable in the judiciary but for better administration it must be applicable in the administrative system. It is quite obvious that Uttar Pradesh state information commission is a quasi-judicial body.

From the messages sent by the Uttar Pradesh state information commission it is quite obvious that the following second appeals submitted by the appellant were arbitrarily rejected by the research officer of the Uttar Pradesh State Information Commission.

1-Registration number A-20240100181 of the diary number submitted by you to the U.P. Information Commission has been rejected by the Research Officer and forwarded to the Registrar for verification for signature.

Public information officer must provide the reason for rejecting the second appeal by the research officer of the Uttar Pradesh state information commission.

2-Registration number A-20240200085 of the diary number submitted by you to the U.P. Information Commission has been rejected by the Research Officer and forwarded to the Registrar for verification for signature.

Public information officer must provide the reason for rejecting the second appeal by the research officer of the Uttar Pradesh state information commission.

3-Registration number A-20240200151 of the diary number submitted by you to the U.P. Information Commission has been rejected by the Research Officer and forwarded to the Registrar for verification for signature.

Public information officer must provide the reason for rejecting the second appeal by the research officer of the Uttar Pradesh state information commission.

4-Registration number A-20240200173 of the diary number submitted by you to the U.P. Information Commission has been rejected by the Research Officer and forwarded to the Registrar for verification for signature.

Public information officer must provide the reason for rejecting the second appeal by the research officer of the Uttar Pradesh state information commission.5-Registration number A-20240200174 of the diary number submitted by you to the U.P. Information Commission has been rejected by the Research Officer and forwarded to the Registrar for verification for signature.

Public information officer must provide the reason for rejecting the second appeal by the research officer of the Uttar Pradesh state information commission.  

The Right to Information Act 2005 was introduced by the government of India to promote transparency and accountability in working of the public authorities but it seems that such cryptic dealings of the officers like the research officer of Uttar Pradesh State Information Commission are itself hindering blocks in seeking information to the information seekers.

This is a humble request to the public information officer to provide these five-points in formation within stipulated 30 days as prescribed under subsection 1 of section 7 of the right to information act 2005.

This is a humble request to the accountable public staff in the Uttar Pradesh state information commission to overcome this anarchy that originated from arbitrariness in the working of the concerned public staff.

* Concerned PIO Nodal Officer

Designation Details not provided

Phone No Details not provided

Email Id Details not provided

Supporting document ((only pdf upto 1 MB)) Supporting document not provided