PIO L.D.A. Deputy Secretary, Atul Krishna was again directed by FAA to provide information to Dinesh Pratap Singh within 15 days of order
Registration Number LKDPA/A/2024/60008
Name Dinesh Pratap Singh
Date of Filing 28/01/2024
Status APPEAL DISPOSED OF as on 21/02/2024
Reply :- Order attached
View Document
Nodal Officer Details
Name Rekha Doharey
Telephone Number 7081100326
Email-ID ldartionline@gmail.com
Online RTI Appeal Form Details
Public Authority Details :-
* Public Authority LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORIT
Personal Details:-
* Name Dinesh Pratap Singh
Gender Male
* Address Mohalla Surekapuram , Jabalpur Road, Sangmohal post office
Districts Mirzapur
Pincode 231001
State Uttar Pradesh
Educational Status Literate
Phone Number Details not provided
Mobile Number +91-9838919619
Email-ID myogimpsingh[at]gmail[dot]com
Citizenship Indian
* Is the Applicant Below Poverty Line ? No
First Appeal Details u/s 19(1) :-
Registration Number LKDPA/A/2024/60008
Date of Filing 28/01/2024
Concerned Appellate Authority Anil Bhatnagar
Phone No
Email Id
* Ground For Appeal No Response Within the Time Limit
((Description of Information sought (upto 500 characters) )
* Prayer or Relief Sought From the following status, it is quite obvious that the appellant submitted RTI application on 24th October 2023 which was forwarded put the concerned public information officer on 25th October 2023 which means more than 3 months passed but the concerned public information officer did not provide any information sought by the appellant from the public information officer of Lucknow development authority concerning irregularities and corruption in the working of the public authority. Registration Number LKDPA/R/2023/60437, Name Dinesh Pratap Singh, Date of Filing 24/10/2023 Status REQUEST FORWARDED TO PIO as on 25/10/2023, Details of PIO: - Telephone Number: - 9918001893, Email Id:- Note:- You are advised to contact the above-mentioned officer for further details.
Dinesh Pratap Singh S/O Angad Prasad Singh who is the claimant of the plot of the land quite obvious from the order passed by the Lucknow bench of the High court of judicature at Allahabad in the Writ Petition Number 135 HC Year 2006. In the Writ Petition Number 135 HC Year 2006 filed in the Lucknow bench of the High court of Judicature at Allahabad filed by Anuradha Singh also named Guddi also named Aradhana Singh through her mother Beena Singh wife of Brijraj Singh also Beena Singh wife of Netrpal Singh.
Whether in the same matter, to get remedy from various redressal bodies and get public aid by changing the name is not illegal? In the aforementioned writ, Anuradha Singh was directed by the High court of judicature to seek civil remedy from competent authority by filing a title suit.
Public Information Officer in the office of Lucknow Development Authority may provide the following information to the information seeker point wise as follows.
1-L.D.A. may provide the details of title suit filed by multi-named lady Anuradha Singh in the record of L.D.A. Guddi Singh including the designation, name of the public staff who executed it with posting detail.
2-L.D.A. may provide the copy of the order passed by the competent court deciding the title suit of the Anuradha Singh in the compliance of the High court order in the Writ Petition Number 135 HC Year 2006. which is attached to this application in PDF form.
3-L.D.A. may provide the detail of the posting of the staff who executed the registry of plots as told by L.D.A. registry has been executed to allottees, with designation and name so that accountability may be fixed.
4- High Court and Supreme Court are the court of records which means orders passed by such courts are binding on the government departments, parties of the litigation and subordinate courts.
Right to reason is the indispensable part of the sound judicial system and it is not only applicable in judiciary, but it is an indispensable part of the sound administrative system. Please provide the reason for overlooking order and name and resignation of the staff of the Lucknow Development Authority who overlooked the order passed by the Lucknow bench of the high court
Supporting document ((only pdf upto 1 MB))
RTI Application Details u/s 6(1) :-
Registration Number LKDPA/R/2023/60437
Date of Filing 24/10/2023
PIO of Public Authority approached Atul Krishna
Designation Deputy Secretary
Phone No 9918001893
Email Id
PIO Order/Decision Number Details not provided
* PIO Order/Decision Date
It is a mockery of the provisions of right to information act 2005 because public information officer is taking under teeth the direction issued by the first appellate authority in the matter. The most surprising fact is that first appellate authority is not taking any action which must be taken against indisciplined officer of the department for not complying the direction passed by the senior rank officer.
ReplyDeleteThis is a cryptic approach of the first appellate authority of the Lucknow development authority to show his pseudo honesty through such cryptic dealings because he is well apprised of the fact that there is a corruption and public information officer is running away from providing information making failed effort to prove itself honest.
ReplyDeleteलखनऊ विकास प्राधिकरण खुद एक भ्रष्टाचार का गढ है योगी सरकार की स्व घोषित ईमानदारी मात्र छलावा है लखनऊ विकास प्राधिकरण का जन सूचना अधिकारी कोई भी सूचना नहीं देता है किंतु उसे पर प्रदेश सरकार का कोई कंट्रोल नहीं है उत्तर प्रदेश राज्य सूचना आयोग खुद एक भ्रष्टाचार का घर है इसका शोध अधिकारी मनमाने तरीके से द्वितीय अपीलों को रिजेक्ट कर देता है
ReplyDelete