It seems first appeal made in Department of forest is meaningless

Registration Number PCCFO/A/2023/60062

Name Yogi M P Singh

Date of Filing 24/12/2023

Status APPEAL DISPOSED OF as on 21/02/2024

Reply :- APPEAL TRANSFER

View Document

  Nodal Officer Details  

Name MUKESH KUMAR

Telephone Number 05222207951

Email-ID ccfepr@gmail.com 

Online RTI Appeal Form Details

Public Authority Details :-   

* Public Authority Principal Chief Conservator of Forest and HOD  

Personal Details:-

* Name Yogi M P Singh

Gender Male

* Address Mohalla Surekapuram , Jabalpur Road, Sangmohal post office

Districts Mirzapur

Pincode 231001

State Uttar Pradesh

Educational Status Literate

Phone Number Details not provided

Mobile Number +91-7379105911

Email-ID yogimpsingh[at]gmail[dot]com

Citizenship Indian

* Is the Applicant Below Poverty Line ? No

First Appeal Details u/s 19(1) :-

Registration Number PCCFO/A/2023/60062

Date of Filing 24/12/2023

Concerned Appellate Authority SANJEEV KUMAR

Phone No

Email Id ccfadmgaz-up@nic.in

* Ground For Appeal Provided Incomplete, Misleading or False Information

((Description of Information sought (upto 500 characters) )

* Prayer or Relief Sought The brief description of the appeal is as follows. 

1-The applicant sought from you, please provide the list of the regularised personnel range wise in the division Gorakhpur under the above notification issued by the government on 12th September 2016. Have you provided any list to the applicant? The information provided by you, government order issued to regularise the staff and your report is attached to this grievance. Where is the list? You did not provide the list because you know that it will expose the corruption committed by you in regularising the staff in accordance with the government order. 

2- Please provide a copy of the communications exchanged with the government by the office of the Divisional Forest Officer district Gorakhpur regarding the aforementioned notification issued by the government on 12th September 2016. You did not provide any communication to the appellant. This implies that notification is only a showpiece. 

3- If not a single daily wage personnel was regularised under the aforementioned notification issued by the government then providing the reason for it as right to reason is an indispensable part of the sound administrative system. You did not provide any information under this point also because you did not touch the notification. 

4- Please provide the precautionary measure taken by the divisional forest officer Gorakhpur to maintain the transparency and accountability in the process of regularisation of the daily wage personnel under the aforementioned notification. Think about the gravity of the situation. If you are not providing the list of the candidates who were regularised on the basis of notification then how can you provide the transparency measures taken by you? 

5- Please provide the total number of daily wage staff working under the Gorakhpur division of the Department of forest. You did not provide any information under this point also because of mismanagement and irregularities in the working of the Department of Forest in Gorakhpur Division. 

Please direct the divisional forest officer Gorakhpur to provide the information to the appellant instead of misleading him through cryptic baseless facts being provided to conceal the original information because of the fear that corruption will be exposed in the public domain.

Supporting document ((only pdf upto 1 MB))

RTI Application Details u/s 6(1) :-

Registration Number PCCFO/R/2023/60044

Date of Filing 15/10/2023

PIO of Public Authority approached SHREE BRIJESH KUMAR YADAV

Designation AAO

Phone No 9452015883

Email Id pccf-up@nic.in

PIO Order/Decision Number Details not provided

* PIO Order/Decision Date

To see the attached document to the RTI application, please click on the link

Comments

  1. It seems that government in the state of Uttar Pradesh has thrown the right to information act 2005 into a dustbin which is the root cause no officer in the government is complying the provisions of right to information act 2005.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Information act 2005 was introduced by the government of India during the regime of Congress government to promote transparency and accountability in the working of public authorities so that corruption in the working of public authority may be controlled. Currently it is expected that corruption has overshadowed right to information act.

    ReplyDelete
  3. It is quite obvious that divisional forest officer Gorakhpur is not interested in providing information to the information seekers quite obvious from his adamant approach in providing information concerning the matters with wide public interest.

    ReplyDelete
  4. प्रभागीय वन अधिकारी गोरखपुर यदि कोई सूचना नहीं दे रहे हैं दैनिक वेतन भोगियों के नियुक्त के संबंध में तो समझिए बहुत बड़ा घोटाला हुआ है यदि कोई भी प्राधिकरण अपने आप को ईमानदार कहना चाहता है तो उसके कार्यशैली में पारदर्शिता और जवाब देही सुनिश्चित होना चाहिए किंतु यहां पर ऐसा कुछ भी नहीं है

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Your view points inspire us