Executive engineer provided misleading information concerning mismanagement in feeding of information at RTI portal

Your RTI Appeal filed successfully.

Please note down the details of registration.

Registration Number: PUVNL/A/2024/60043

Name :Yogi M P Singh

Date of Filing :24-02-2024

Request filed with :PURVANCHAL VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LIMITED

 Contact Details  

Telephone Number :9453047544

Email-ID :rtipuvvnl@gmail.com

Online RTI Appeal Form Details

Public Authority Details :-  

* Public Authority PURVANCHAL VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LIMITED

Personal Details:-

* Name Yogi M P Singh

Gender Male

* Address Mohalla Surekapuram , Jabalpur Road, Sangmohal post office

Districts Mirzapur

Pincode 231001

State Uttar Pradesh

Educational Status Literate

Phone Number Details not provided

Mobile Number +91-7379105911

Email-ID yogimpsingh[at]gmail[dot]com

Citizenship Indian

* Is the Applicant Below Poverty Line ? No

First Appeal Details u/s 19(1) :-

Registration Number PUVNL/A/2024/60043

Date of Filing 24/02/2024

Concerned Appellate Authority Nodal Officer

Phone No Details not provided.

Email Id Details not provided.

* Ground For Appeal Provided Incomplete, Misleading or False Information

((Description of Information sought (up to 500 characters)

* Prayer or Relief Sought Description of sought information, Description of sought information provided information by public information officer through its communication dated-22 Feb. 2024 uploaded on RTI portal and submissions of the appellant point wise as follows.

Sought information 1- Right to information act 2005 was introduced by the government of India to promote transparency and accountability in the working of public authorities. Right to reason is an indispensable part of the sound administrative system so the public information officer must provide the reason for not updating the name of the public information officer of the electricity distribution division second District Mirzapur.

Sought information 2- Public information officer must provide the reason for not providing the email and official mobile number to the RTI portal which is essential in accordance with the guidelines passed by the Apex Court of India also in compliance with the guidelines of the Department of administrative reform.

Reply of the public information officer regarding point one and two are the same which is as follows.

Description of public information officer was sent by superintending engineer to nodal officer through its later number-1683, dated-25 Sept.2024.

Submission of the appellant- It is quite obvious from point 1 and 2 the appellant has sought two different reasons regarding the non performance of duties by the concerned officers timely and appropriately. Who will compensate the detriments suffered by the information seekers due to non availability of information on the RTI portal because of the dereliction of duty by the concerned accountable staff? 

Sought information 3- Provide the name and designation of the staff who are vested with the power to update the information on the RTI portal of the government of Uttar Pradesh.

Reply of the public information officer- Photo state copy concerning information is annexed.

Submission of the appellant- There is no such annexure.

Sought information 4- Provide the name and designation of the public information officers and first appellate authorities in the Mirzapur Division of the Purvanchal Vidyut Vitaran Nigam Limited.

Reply of the public information officer- Photo state copy concerning information is annexed.

Submission of the appellant- There is no such annexure.

Sought information 5- Provide the executive emails and executive mobile numbers of the public information officers and first appellate authorities in the Mirzapur Division of the Purvanchal Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited. 

Reply of the public information officer- Photo state copy concerning information is annexed.

Submission of the appellant- There is no such annexure.

This is a humble request of the appellant to take action against the public information officer who deliberately denied information and misled the information seeker.

Supporting document ((only pdf up to 1 MB)) Supporting document not provided

RTI Application Details u/s 6(1) :-

Registration Number PUVNL/R/2024/60038

Date of Filing 27/01/2024

PIO of Public Authority approached RAJESH KUMAR( EDD-2 FATAH MRZ)

Designation EE & PIO EDD-2 FATAH MIRZAPUR

Phone No 9450963598

Email Id eddiimirzapur@gmail.com

PIO Order/Decision Number Details not provided

* PIO Order/Decision Date

Registration Number PUVNL/A/2024/60043

Name Yogi M P Singh

Date of Filing 24/02/2024

Status RTI APPEAL RECEIVED as on 24/02/2024

  Nodal Officer Details  

Name SANDEEP KUMAR VERMA

Telephone Number 9453047544

Email-ID rtipuvvnl@gmail.com

Comments

  1. Right to information act was introduced by government of India to promote transparency and accountability in the working of the public authorities so that rampant corruption in the working of public authorities may be curbed, but the factual position is that corruption prevailed in the working of the public authority itself diluted the provisions of right to information act 2005.

    ReplyDelete
  2. For the feeding on the RTI portal, name of public information officer, department of electricity had provided the name of Manoj Kumar Yadav and he had been transferred two years ago but still his name was displaying on the RTI portal of the government which is a mockery of the law.
    Executive Engineer electricity distribution division second Mr Rajesh Kumar is not only providing misleading information to the information seekers also submitting arbitrary and inconsistent reports on the public grievance portal the Government of India as well as on the jansunwai portal up the Government of Uttar Pradesh.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Executive Engineer electricity distribution division second provided misleading information to the information seeker because he knows well that no action will be taken against him for providing misleading information which is the root cause he took under teeth the provisions of right to information act 2005.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Your view points inspire us