Executive engineer provided incomplete and misleading information concerning compensation to farmers in short circuit case

 

Your RTI Appeal filed successfully.

Please note down the details of registration.

Registration Number: PUVNL/A/2024/60040

Name :Yogi M P Singh

Date of Filing :23-02-2024

Request filed with :PURVANCHAL VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LIMITED

 Contact Details  

Telephone Number :9453047544

Email-ID :rtipuvvnl@gmail.com

Online RTI Appeal Form Details

Public Authority Details :-   

* Public Authority PURVANCHAL VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LIMITED   

Personal Details:-

* Name Yogi M P Singh

Gender Male

* Address Mohalla Surekapuram , Jabalpur Road, Sangmohal post office

Districts Mirzapur

Pincode 231001

State Uttar Pradesh

Educational Status Literate

Phone Number Details not provided

Mobile Number +91-7379105911

Email-ID yogimpsingh[at]gmail[dot]com

Citizenship Indian

* Is the Applicant Below Poverty Line ? No

First Appeal Details u/s 19(1) :-

Registration Number PUVNL/A/2024/60040

Date of Filing 23/02/2024

Concerned Appellate Authority Nodal Officer

Phone No Details not provided

Email Id Details not provided

* Ground For Appeal Provided Incomplete,Misleading or False Information

((Description of Information sought (upto 500 characters) )

* Prayer or Relief Sought Sought information, reply of the public information officer and submissions of the appellant are as follows. 

1-If the executive engineer electricity distribution division second sent the communication letter number-7475, dated-20 October 2023 to the sub divisional officer Jangi Road electricity distribution division 2nd for one more inquiry into the matter, then his obligatory duty is to ensure the speedy process in the matter as there is undue delay has been already made because of the procrastination of the concerned staff in the matter. 

Public information officer may provide the enquiry report of the enquiry officer nominated on 20th October 2023 through letter number 7475. Reply of the public information officer- Inquiry report has not been received. 

2-Public information officer may provide the maximum time taken by the inquiry officer to submit the enquiry report as well as how many more enquiries will be ordered in the matter. 

Reply of the public information officer- The information of the future is not possible to provide under the right to information. 

The submission of the appellant- Most respected Sir every inquiry ordered is completed under the due procedure of the law and enquiry must be carried out in the prescribed time under the law and in the case of uncertainty it must be completed as soon as possible.

 Right to information act was introduced by government of India to promote transparency and accountability in the working of public authority. 

It seems that the Department of electricity is governed under the arbitrarily law which is the root cause inquiry carried out under the prescribed procedure of the department does not take place in a time bound manner. 

3-More than two and half years already passed and now the victim wants to ask one question from executive engineer electricity distribution division second Mr Rajesh Kumar that how much additional time will be taken by him in completing the processing of the compensation to provide the victim? 

Reply of the public information officer- After the report of DIRECTORATE ELECTRICAL SAFETY, Government of Uttar Pradesh, Department may proceed for compensation. 

The submission of the appellant-PIO deviated attention from core issues and provided misleading information. 

4-Provide the parameters set by the department of electricity to provide the compensation including processing of the complaints to the victims of short circuit and likewise matter. 

The submission of the appellant-PIO deviated attention from core issues and provided misleading information. 

5- Provide the reason not to make enquiry by the department personnel when the matter of short circuit was reported to the department, quite obvious that the matter is too old. 

The submission of the appellant-PIO deviated attention from core issues and provided misleading information. 

FAA must direct Public information officer to provide information instead of deviating the attention from core issue.

Supporting document ((only pdf upto 1 MB)) Supporting document not provided

RTI Application Details u/s 6(1) :-

Registration Number PUVNL/R/2024/60037

Date of Filing 27/01/2024

PIO of Public Authority approached RAJESH KUMAR( EDD-2 FATAH MRZ)

Designation EE & PIO EDD-2 FATAH MIRZAPUR

Phone No 9450963598

Email Id eddiimirzapur@gmail.com

PIO Order/Decision Number Details not provided

* PIO Order/Decision Date

Registration Number PUVNL/A/2024/60040
Name Yogi M P Singh
Date of Filing 23/02/2024
Status RTI APPEAL RECEIVED as on 23/02/2024
  Nodal Officer Details  
Name SANDEEP KUMAR VERMA
Telephone Number 9453047544
Email-ID rtipuvvnl@gmail.com

Registration Number PUVNL/R/2024/60037

Name Yogi M P Singh

Date of Filing 27/01/2024

Status REQUEST DISPOSED OF as on 22/02/2024

Reply :- letter no. 1142 date 22.02.2024 uploaded

View Document

  Nodal Officer Details  

Name SANDEEP KUMAR VERMA

Telephone Number 9453047544

Email-ID rtipuvvnl@gmail.com

Online RTI Request Form Details

Public Authority Details :-  

* Public Authority PURVANCHAL VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LIMITED   

Personal Details of RTI Applicant:-

Registration Number PUVNL/R/2024/60037

Date of Filing 27/01/2024

* Name Yogi M P Singh

Gender Male

* Address Mohalla Surekapuram , Jabalpur Road, Sangmohal post office

Districts Mirzapur

Pincode 231001

State Uttar Pradesh

Educational Status Literate

  Above Graduate

Phone Number Details not provided

Mobile Number +91-7379105911

Email-ID yogimpsingh[at]gmail[dot]com

Citizenship Indian

* Is the Applicant Below Poverty Line ? No

RTI Application Details u/s 6(1) :-

((Description of Information sought (upto 500 characters) )

* Description of Information Sought An application on behalf of Dayanand Singh S/O Shobhanath Singh village and post Nibi Gaharwar, police station-Vindhyachal, district-Mirzapur, PIN code 231303. Most respected Sir you have closed the following grievance by submitting repeated parrot, arbitrary and inconsistent report in the matter concerning the compensation to the victim whose crops were burnt due to the short-circuit on 21st April 2021 quite obvious from the second, third and fourth page of the attached PDF documents to the grievance which is addressed to the superintending engineer division Mirzapur. 

Public information officer executive engineer electricity distribution division second Mr Rajesh Kumar of district Mirzapur may provide the following information to the information seeker pointwise as follows. 

1-If the executive engineer electricity distribution division second sent the communication letter number-7475, dated-20 October 2023 to the sub divisional officer Jangi Road electricity distribution division 2nd for one more inquiry into the matter, then his obligatory duty is to ensure the speedy process in the matter as there is undue delay has been already made because of the procrastination of the concerned staff in the matter. 

Public information officer may provide the enquiry report of the enquiry officer nominated on 20th October 2023 through letter number 7475. 

2-There must be transparency and accountability in the working of the public authority Uttar Pradesh power corporation limited district Mirzapur in providing public assistance to farmers, but it is not reflecting from the working style of the concerned staff of the department of electricity distribution division second district Mirzapur. Here various tricks are searched by the staff to harass the victim farmers because of the rampant corruption in the local office of the public authority Pradesh power corporation limited which is quite obvious from the cumbersome processing in the department of the matter. 

Public information officer may provide the maximum time taken by the inquiry officer to submit the enquiry report as well as how many more enquiries will be ordered in the matter. 

3-More than two and half years already passed and now the victim wants to ask one question from executed engineer electricity distribution division second Mr Rajesh Kumar that how much additional time will be taken by him in completing the processing of the compensation to provide the victim? 

4-Provide the parameters set by the department of electricity to provide the compensation including processing of the complaints to the victims of short circuit and likewise matter. 

5- Provide the reason not to make enquiry by the department personnel when the matter of short circuit was reported to the department, quite obvious that the matter is too old. 

Public information officer must provide the 5-point information to the information seeker within the stipulated 30 days as prescribed under subsection one of Section 7 of the Right to Information Act 2005.

* Concerned PIO RAJESH KUMAR( EDD-2 FATAH MRZ)

Designation EE & PIO EDD-2 FATAH MIRZAPUR

Phone No 9450963598

Email Id eddiimirzapur@gmail.com

Supporting document ((only pdf up to 1 MB))

Comments

  1. It can never be justified that executive Engineer electricity distribution division second Mr Rajesh Kumar may provide the misleading information to the information seeker but they are doing so to conceal his corruption and justify his illegal stand. They are indulged in corruption directly but wants to show himself honest.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Executive Engineer electricity distribution division second has made the mockery of the provisions of right to information act 2005 and because of rampant corruption in the department excutive engineer electricity distribution division second Rajesh Kumar Prajapati is not providing single information to the information seekers.
    Entire departments are speaking in the same tuning of corruption.

    ReplyDelete
  3. It is quite obvious that excutive engineer electricity distribution division second Mr Rajesh Kumar is only procrastinating on the representations of farmer Dayanand Singh son of Sobhnath Singh. More than century of representations we are submitted by the aggrieved applicant but it is most unfortunate executive Engineer did not take them seriously.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Your view points inspire us