Grievance Status for registration number: GOVUP/E/2023/0083523
Grievance Concerns To
Name Of Complainant
Vimal Kumar Rastogi
Date of Receipt
16/12/2023
Received By Ministry/Department
Uttar Pradesh
Grievance Description
It is quite obvious that S.P. city district-Budaun, Uttar Pradesh Mr. Amit Kishore Srivastav in its report dated 7th September 2023 whatever report has been submitted same parrot report dated 11 December 2023 has been submitted in the following grievance with that report the applicant was not satisfied because that report was inconsistent and arbitrary and submitted by him without taking the perusal after contents of the grievance. For the more details, please take a glance at the attached PDF document to the grievance.
Grievance Status for registration number: GOVUP/E/2023/0077247, Grievance Concerns To Name Of Complainant-Vimal Kumar Rastogi, Date of Receipt-21/11/2023
Received By Ministry/Department-Uttar Pradesh
Which Canon law allows grabbing of the land by the litigant itself after filing litigation before the appropriate court and litigant is privileged and having immunity from the action of the police? Undoubtedly the matter is sub judice but the act of the opposite party is of criminal nature which must be taken into account by the concerned police under the appropriate section of the Indian Penal Code. Consequently F.I.R. must be registered against the opposition party
The matter concerns Budaun police, district-Budaun, Uttar Pradesh. Police is adopting a lackadaisical approach in the matter of land grabbing in which adjudication is pending before the court of law. Police are escaping from the matter on the flimsy ground which will promote the anti-social elements to keep on their illegal activities. There is no fear of police action in the offenders because of lackadaisical approach of police and partial cryptic reports of police on the Jansunwai portal.
Most respected Sir, how can police escape from the matter merely on the ground that the matter is of civil nature. If the police themselves accept that the matter is sub judice in various courts, then which competent court or magistrate provided them permission of construction and other activities in the land whose title is sub judice before the court? How to install a submersible pump in the land and grab it in a cryptic and mysterious way may be justified? Whether the act of the opposite party is not tantamount to house trespass and this land grabbing even when matter is pending before the court is not punishable under the various sections of the Indian Penal Code? Whether the opposite party is not superseding the court order because adjudication is pending before the various Court of Justice. Honourable Sir it is obligatory duty of the police to maintain the status quo of the impugned land but police have failed because of the partial approach in the matter.
In the report submitted by the Superintendent of police Budaun city it is quite obvious that in the concerned matter, the adjudication is pending before the court moreover this litigation has been submitted by the opposite party for seeking justice however opposite party itself having no regard for the adjudication awaited from the respected court of law.
The applicant is making inquiry under Article 51 A of the constitution of India to the senior Superintendent of police district-Budaun under whose supervision this anarchy is taking place.
1-It is quite from the attached reports of the police that information seeker submitted repeated representations before Budaun police, but police did not register first information report in the matter of land grabbing by taking recourse that adjudication is pending in the court regarding the matter.
Please provide the canon law which allows the litigant to grab the land which adjudication is pending in the court of law.
2-Please provide the order of the competent court which allowed Dinesh Kumar Gupta S/O Ram Bahadur Gupta to grab the land of the information seeker.
3-Concerned police must provide the efforts made by it to remove the encroachment made by Dinesh Kumar Gupta S/O Ram Bahadur Gupta in the land of the information seeker.
Grievance Document
Current Status
Grievance received
Date of Action
16/12/2023
Officer Concerns To
Forwarded to
Uttar Pradesh
Officer Name
Shri Bhaskar Pandey (Joint Secretary)
Organisation name
Uttar Pradesh
Contact Address
Chief Minister Secretariat, Room No. 321, U.P. Secretariat, Lucknow
Email Address
bhaskar.12214@gov.in
Contact Number
05222226350
To see the attached document to the grievance, please click on the link
Comments
Post a Comment
Your view points inspire us