Police fabricated Sadhana Tiwari under section 107/116 of Cr.P.C. because she requested to take action in forgery of records of inheritance
Grievance Status for registration number : GOVUP/E/2023/0071285
Grievance Concerns To
Name Of Complainant
Sadhana Tiwari
Date of Receipt
26/10/2023
Received By Ministry/Department
Uttar Pradesh
Grievance Description
The matter concerns working of the superintendent of police District-Mirzapur. The following diseased is the father of the applicant whose address is as follows.
Siya Kant Mishra S/O Shambhusaran Mishra, village- Bhaisod Balay Pahad post-Daramalganj, tehsil-Lalganj, development block-Halia, District- Mirzapur Uttar Pradesh.
The matter concerns forgery in the public records from which the name of the father of the applicant has been eliminated by taking concerned public staff under good faith. There is a need for swift action in the matter with transparency and accountability so that conspirators may be sent behind the bar.
Sub inspector Mr Arvind Kumar Saroj misused section 107 /116 of the criminal procedure code and overlooked guidelines of the High Court of judicature at Allahabad issued to prevent the misuse of section 151, 107 and 116 of the criminal procedure code and government of Uttar Pradesh through its department of home issued circular which is attached to this grievance. It has been categorically directed to the police and the executive magistrate use the discretion before application of such tools available in our criminal procedure code so that fundamental rights of the people may remain intact.
Grievance Status for registration number : GOVUP/E/2023/0065265, Grievance Concerns To Name Of Complainant-Sadhana Tiwari, Date of Receipt-02/10/2023, Received By Ministry/Department-Uttar Pradesh
Subject-For registering First Information Report against the conspirators who hatched conspiracy to exclude the name of my father from the revenue records, family register under the possession of secretary of the village panchayat and cheating the property by colluding with the lekhpal, revenue inspector and tahsildar which was the share of my father.
It is quite obvious that concerned investigation officer submitted arbitrary and inconsistent report to close the above grievance which is a mockery of the law of land and action must be taken against investigation officer for submitting such illogical report.
Currently the applicant is talking about the forgery of the public records which are punishable under section 466, 467, 468, 469,195, 420 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code.
Section 195 in The Indian Penal Code states as follows.
Giving or fabricating false evidence with intent to procure conviction of offence punishable with imprisonment for life or imprisonment.
Section 466 of the Indian Penal Code defines the offense of forgery of a record of a court of justice or of a Registrar of Births, etc
Section 467 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) 1860 pertains to the forgery of valuable security, will, or authority to make or transfer any valuable security, or to receive any money, movable property, or valuable security.
Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code deals with the offence of cheating and dishonestly inducing the delivery of property.
Section 468. Forgery for purpose of cheating. Previous Next
Whoever commits forgery, intending that the document or electronic record forged shall be used for the purpose of cheating.
Section 471 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) deals with the concept of using a forged document or electronic record as genuine.
Offenders must be prosecuted under the above said sections of the Indian Penal Code by the police for their criminal activities inflicted serious injuries to the applicant.
Circular of the department of home passed by them in compliance of the guidelines issued by the High Court of judicature at Allahabad is attached as the first page of the attached PDF documents to the grievance,
Grievance Document
Current Status
Case closed
Date of Action
11/11/2023
Remarks
महोदय,जाँच आख्या संलग्न है श्रीमान जी आख्या सादर सेवा में प्रेषित है रिपोर्ट सादर सेवा मे प्रेषित है
Reply Document
Rating
1
Poor
Rating Remarks
It is quite obvious that concerned investigation officer submitted arbitrary and inconsistent report to close the above grievance which is a mockery of the law of land and action must be taken against investigation officer for submitting such illogical report. Currently the applicant is talking about the forgery of the public records which are punishable under section 466, 467, 468, 469,195, 420 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code. It is most unfortunate that concerned did not take the perusal of the grievance and again submitted an arbitrary and inconsistent report in the matter. Police is not investigating the matter and running away by arbitrarily saying that the matter is of civil nature. Whether the manipulation of the public record is not a criminal offence. To mis deliberately the name of an individual from property documents is forgery of record which is punishable under various provisions of Indian penal code. Please prosecute offenders responsible for forgery of public records.
Appeal Details
Appeal Number
Date of Receipt
Appeal Text
Current Status
Officer Concerns To
Officer Name
Shri Bhaskar Pandey (Joint Secretary)
Organisation name
Government of Uttar Pradesh
Contact Address
Chief Minister Secretariat , Room No. 321, U.P. Secretariat, Lucknow
Email Address
bhaskar.12214@gov.in
Contact Number
05222226350
Grievance Status for registration number : GOVUP/E/2023/0068936
Grievance Concerns To
Name Of Complainant
Sadhana Tiwari
Date of Receipt
15/10/2023
Received By Ministry/Department
Uttar Pradesh
Grievance Description
Grievance Status for registration number : GOVUP/E/2023/0065265
Grievance Concerns To Name Of Complainant-Sadhana Tiwari, Date of Receipt-02/10/2023
Received By Ministry/Department-Uttar Pradesh
Grievance Description-The matter concerns forgery in the public records from which name of the father of the applicant has been eliminated by taking concerned public staff under good faith. There is need of swift action in the matter with transparency and accountability so that conspirators may be sent behind the bar.
To
Superintendent of police district Mirzapur
Uttar Pradesh pin code 231001
Subject-For registering First Information Report against the conspirators who hatched conspiracy to exclude the name of my father from the revenue records, family register under the possession of secretary of the village panchayat and cheating the property by colluding with the lekhpal, revenue inspector and tahsildar which was the share of my father.
The matter concerns the working of the sub divisional magistrate tehsil Lalganj district Mirzapur Uttar Pradesh. The following diseased is the father of the applicant whose address is as follows.
Siya Kant Mishra S/O Shambhusaran Mishra, village- Bhaisod Balay Pahad post-Daramalganj, tehsil-Lalganj, development block-Halia, District- Mirzapur Uttar Pradesh.
This application is under Article 51 A of the constitution of India to seek inquiry regarding the application made by the applicant before the sub divisional magistrate Lalganj dated 20th January 2023 with stamp of Rs.10 verified by the notary for the death certificate of my father Siya Kant Mishra S/O Late Shambhusaran Mishra which is attached as page 4 of the attached PDF documents to the grievance.
Brief description of matter in sequence.
1-Section 466 of the Indian Penal Code defines the offense of forgery of a record of a court of justice or of a Registrar of Births, etc., kept by a public servant. The offence is punishable by imprisonment for up to seven years and a fine.
2-Section 467 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) 1860 pertains to the forgery of valuable security, will, or authority to make or transfer any valuable security, or to receive any money, movable property, or valuable security. The offence is punishable by imprisonment for life or imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to ten years and is also liable to a fine. The offender may face imprisonment for life or imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to ten years. The offender may also be liable to a fine.
3-Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code deals with the offence of cheating and dishonestly inducing the delivery of property.024 The offender who cheats and thereby induces the person deceived to deliver any property to any person, or to make, alter or destroy the whole or any part of a valuable security, or anything which is signed or sealed, and which is capable of being converted into a valuable security, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine.
4-Section 468. Forgery for purpose of cheating. Previous Next
Whoever commits forgery, intending that the 1 document or electronic record forged shall be used for the purpose of cheating, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine.
5-Section 471 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) deals with the concept of using a forged document or electronic record as genuine. Anyone who fraudulently or dishonestly uses a forged document or electronic record as genuine which they know or have a reason to believe is forged will be punished in the same manner as if they had forged the document.14 The maximum punishment for this offence is imprisonment up to 7 years, and it is cognizable, non-bailable, and non-compoundable.
Grievance Document
Current Status
Case closed
Date of Action
11/11/2023
Remarks
महोदय,जाँच आख्या संलग्न है श्रीमान जी आख्या सादर सेवा में प्रेषित है रिपोर्ट सादर सेवा मे प्रेषित है
Reply Document
Rating
1
Poor
Rating Remarks
It is quite obvious that concerned investigation officer submitted arbitrary and inconsistent report to close the above grievance which is a mockery of the law of land and action must be taken against investigation officer for submitting such illogical report. Currently the applicant is talking about the forgery of the public records which are punishable under section 466, 467, 468, 469,195, 420 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code. It is most unfortunate that concerned did not take the perusal of the grievance and again submitted an arbitrary and inconsistent report in the matter. Police is not investigating the matter and running away by arbitrarily saying that the matter is of civil nature. Whether the manipulation of the public record is not a criminal offence. To mis deliberately the name of an individual from property documents is forgery of record which is punishable under various provisions of Indian penal code. Please prosecute offenders responsible for forgery of public records.
Appeal Details
Appeal Number
Date of Receipt
Appeal Text
Current Status
Officer Concerns To
Officer Name
Shri Bhaskar Pandey (Joint Secretary)
Organisation name
Government of Uttar Pradesh
Contact Address
Chief Minister Secretariat , Room No. 321, U.P. Secretariat, Lucknow
Email Address
bhaskar.12214@gov.in
Contact Number
05222226350
Comments
Post a Comment
Your view points inspire us