L.D.A. violated High court order by executing registry without decision of court


Grievance Status for registration number : GOVUP/E/2023/0073122

Grievance Concerns To

Name Of Complainant

Keshav Pratap Singh alias Tantrik K P Singh

Date of Receipt

03/11/2023

Received By Ministry/Department

Uttar Pradesh

Grievance Description

An application under Article 51 A of the constitution of India on behalf of Dinesh Pratap Singh S/O Angad Prasad Singh to make enquiry regarding the set up and findings of committee to look into irregularity in registration of plots and its allocation to beneficiaries. Report submitted by the Tehsildar Vivek Kumar Shukla on 31/05/2022 of L.D.A. is the same parrot report as submitted earlier by various staff of L.D.A. For more details, vide attached document to the grievance.

Grievance Status for registration number : GOVUP/E/2023/0064300

Grievance Concerns To Name Of Complainant-Keshav Pratap Singh alias Tantrik K P Singh

Date of Receipt-28/09/2023, Received By Ministry/Department- Uttar Pradesh

Grievance Description-The matter concerns corruption of Lucknow Development Authority.

Status PARTIES SUMMONED FOR HEARING as on 17/07/2023 , 12:00 PM

OLD BUILDING, FIRST FLOUR, APAR SACHIV CAMP

This implies that Lucknow Development Authority can provide the 3 point information which have sought by the information seeker, to the information seeker. Please take a glance of the attached PDF documents to the grievance in which communication of the Public Information Officer Shraddha Choudhary is also included who did not provide the information by taking the recourse that committee has been set up by the Lucknow Development Authority to make enquiry into the matter.

This R.T.I. communique is submitted by Dinesh Pratap Singh S/O Angad Prasad Singh who is the claimant of the plot of the land quite obvious from the order passed by the Lucknow bench of the High court of judicature at Allahabad in the Writ Petition Number 135 HC Year 2006. In the Writ Petition Number 135 HC Year 2006 filed in the Lucknow bench of the High court of Judicature at Allahabad filed by Anuradha Singh also named Guddi also named Aradhana Singh through her mother Beena Singh wife of Brijraj Singh also Beena Singh wife of Netrpal Singh. Whether in the same matter, to get remedy from various redressal bodies and get public aid by changing the name is not illegal?

In the aforementioned writ, Anuradha Singh was directed by the High court of judicature to seek civil remedy from competent authority by filing a title suit.

1-L.D.A. may provide the detail of title suit filed by multi-named lady Anuradha Singh in the record of L.D.A. Guddi Singh including the designation, name of the public staff who executed it with posting detail.

2-L.D.A. may provide the copy of the order passed by the competent court decided the title suit of the Anuradha Singh in the compliance of the High court order in the Writ Petition Number 135 HC Year 2006.

3-L.D.A. may provide the detail of the posting of the staffs executed the registry of plots to allottees with designation and name so that accountability may be fixed.

Is it not ridiculous that the concerned staff of the Chief Minister office is saying that a report is attached but the factual position is that no report is attached to the grievance on the public grievance portal of the Government of India? Can it be claimed that there is good governance in the state of Uttar Pradesh as claimed by our political Masters time and again during the election before the print and electronic media? Think about the gravity of the situation without attaching the report on the public grievance portal of the Government of India they redressed the grievance. The matter concerns deep-rooted corruption and they are running away from submitting the report on the public grievance portal, quite obvious from their cryptic approach in dealing with the matter. How will corruption be curbed in Uttar Pradesh if the matter concerning the corruption will be put under carpet in such a mysterious and cryptic way?

Grievance Document

Current Status

Grievance received   

Date of Action

03/11/2023

Officer Concerns To

Forwarded to

Uttar Pradesh

Officer Name

Shri Bhaskar Pandey (Joint Secretary)

Organisation name

Uttar Pradesh

Contact Address

Chief Minister Secretariat , Room No. 321, U.P. Secretariat, Lucknow

Email Address

bhaskar.12214@gov.in

Contact Number

05222226350

Comments

  1. Here simple question arises that whether the compliance of the High court order in the Writ Petition Number 135 HC Year 2006 was made by the Lucknow development authority before executing the registry in favour of multi named lady and her relatives.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Where is the rule of law if the order passed by the Lucknow bench of the high court of judicature at Allahabad taken under teeth by the Lucknow Development Authority and it is most unfortunate numerous representations submitted but no one took the cognizance of matter and a committee formed two years ago but what is doing this committee is not being disclosed under right to information act.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Plots allotted for the poor people specially scheduled caste and schedule tribe was given to the general which is an irregularity but Lucknow development authority is overlooking it.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Your view points inspire us