Grievances are closed on the Jansunwai portal of government by submitting arbitrary reports lowering dignity of portal

Grievance Status for registration number : GOVUP/E/2023/0075553

Grievance Concerns To

Name Of Complainant

Keshav Pratap Singh alias Tantrik K P Singh

Date of Receipt

13/11/2023

Received By Ministry/Department

Uttar Pradesh

Grievance Description

The following grievance closed by submitting arbitrary and inconsistent report by the following officer.

Current Status- Case closed, Date of Action-10/11/2023,Officer Concerns To Officer Name-Shri Bhaskar Pandey (Joint Secretary), Organisation name-Government of Uttar Pradesh, Contact Address-Chief Minister Secretariat , Room No. 321, U.P. Secretariat, Lucknow

Grievance Status for registration number : DEPOJ/E/2023/0008869

Grievance Concerns To Name Of Complainant-Keshav Pratap Singh alias Tantrik K P Singh, Date of Receipt-13/10/2023, Received By Ministry/Department-Justice

Grievance Description-An application on behalf of Dinesh Pratap Singh son of Angad Prasad Singh living at Mohalla Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road, District-Mirzapur, PIN Code-231001, State-Uttar Pradesh Mobile number-9838919619.

Why did the application dated 13 October 2019 of Dinesh Pratap Singh not reach the concerned court despite the order passed by the District Judge Lucknow as ordered on 16 October 2019? Here this question arises: who overlooked the order passed by the District Judge Lucknow on 16 October 2019? More than two and half years have passed but the questionnaire sent by Dinesh Pratap Singh still has not reached the concerned court.

Justice Complaint against Judicial Officers

Where is the good governance as claimed by our political masters during the campaign of election in this largest democracy in the world? When the report itself says that the matter concerns the judiciary then it is obligatory duty of the concerned public staff to forward the matter to the concerned judicial officer for the proper redress of the grievance. Where is the rule of law in this largest democracy in the world if the grievances of the people in the state are being forwarded to the other public authority and when they say that it does not concern to them then on the basis of this note the grievance is considered disposed of.

In the report submitted by the sub inspector it has been categorically stated that the matter concerns the working of the judiciary so it must be looked into by the accountable staff in the office of the District Judge Lucknow but instead of sending the grievance of the applicant to the District Judge Lucknow the officer in the office of chief minister closed the grievance arbitrarily without reaching on any logical conclusion. How can it be justified that the applicant may be harassed because of the incompetence of the officer posted in the office of chief minister government of Uttar Pradesh. Whether it reflects the good governance in the state of Uttar Pradesh. In a good governance the grievance may be considered closed only when if it is properly disposed of by the concerned public staff but here it has been closed on the ground that sub inspector belonging to the police station concerned is saying that the matter does not concern with him. It is noticeable that sub inspector also has stated that this matter concerns the working after District Judge Lucknow but it is most unfortunate instead of sending the grievance to the District Judge Lucknow it was considered disposed of reflects mockery of the law of the land. Here it is relevant to quote the Latin proverb justice without force is impotent and force without justice is tyranny.

Grievance Document

Current Status

Grievance received   

Date of Action

13/11/2023

Officer Concerns To

Forwarded to

Uttar Pradesh

Officer Name

Shri Bhaskar Pandey (Joint Secretary)

Organisation name

Uttar Pradesh

Contact Address

Chief Minister Secretariat , Room No. 321, U.P. Secretariat, Lucknow

Email Address

bhaskar.12214@gov.in

Contact Number

05222226350

 Grievance Status for registration number : DEPOJ/E/2023/0008869

Grievance Concerns To

Name Of Complainant

Keshav Pratap Singh alias Tantrik K P Singh

Date of Receipt

13/10/2023

Received By Ministry/Department

Justice

Grievance Description

Justice >> Complaint against Judicial Officers

An application on behalf of Dinesh Pratap Singh son of Angad Prasad Singh living at Mohalla Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road, District-Mirzapur, PIN Code-231001, State-Uttar Pradesh Mobile number-9838919619.

Why did the application dated 13 October 2019 of Dinesh Pratap Singh not reach the concerned court despite the order passed by the District Judge Lucknow as ordered on 16 October 2019? Here this question arises: who overlooked the order passed by the District Judge Lucknow on 16 October 2019? More than two and half years have passed but the questionnaire sent by Dinesh Pratap Singh still has not reached the concerned court. Whether it is not reflecting deep rooted tyranny and arbitrariness in the working of the public authority district court Lucknow?

Grievance Status for registration number : DEPOJ/E/2019/04435 Grievance Concerns To Name Of Complainant Yogi M. P. Singh Date of Receipt 01/12/2019 Received By Ministry/Department Justice

Current Status Case Closed Date of Action 09/12/2019 Remarks The grievance has been forwarded to Registrar General, Allahabad High Court for action, as appropriate.

For more feedback, vide attached document to the grievance.

Most respectfully the applicant wants to draw the kind attention of the Honourable Sir under Article 51 A of the constitution of India to the following submissions as follows.

1-First Honourable Sir may be apprised with the status of the case as follows.

Daily Status Chief Judicial Magistrate In the court of :A.C.J.M. COURT NO.29 CNR Number :UPLK040047752011 Case Number :Cri. Case/4003282/2011

State of Uttar Pradesh versus DINESH PRATAP SINGH Date : 21-03-2022 Business : c Next Purpose : Evidence

Next Hearing Date : 30-05-2022 A.C.J.M. COURT NO.29

2-Sir, open court hearing and independence of judiciary are two essential components of delivery of justice but where is open court hearing if application dated 13 October 2019 of Dinesh Pratap Singh has not reached the concerned court despite the order passed by the Distr

Grievance Document

Current Status

Case closed   

Date of Action

10/11/2023

Remarks

अनुमोदित जाँच आख्या संलग्न है श्रीमान जी जांच आख्या सादर सेवा में प्रेषित है

Reply Document

Rating

1

Poor

Rating Remarks

Where is the good governance as claimed by our political masters during the campaign of election in this largest democracy in the world? When the report itself says that the matter concerns the judiciary then it is obligatory duty of the concerned public staff to forward the matter to the concerned judicial officer for the proper redress of the grievance. Where is the rule of law in this largest democracy in the world if the grievances of the people in the state are being forwarded to the other public authority and when they say that it does not concern to them then on the basis of this note the grievance is considered disposed of.

Appeal Details

Appeal Number

Date of Receipt

Appeal Text-In the report submitted by the sub inspector it has been categorically stated that the matter concerns the working of the judiciary so it must be looked into by the accountable staff in the office of the District Judge Lucknow but instead of sending the grievance of the applicant to the District Judge Lucknow the officer in the office of chief minister closed the grievance arbitrarily without reaching on any logical conclusion. How can it be justified that the applicant may be harassed because of the incompetence of the officer posted in the office of chief minister government of Uttar  Pradesh. Whether it reflects the good governance in the state of Uttar Pradesh. In a good governance the grievance may be considered closed only when if it is properly disposed of by the concerned public staff but here it has been closed on the ground that sub inspector belonging to the police station concerned is saying that the matter does not concern with him. It is noticeable that sub inspector also has stated that this matter concerns the working after District Judge Lucknow but it is most unfortunate instead of sending the grievance to the District Judge Lucknow it was considered disposed of reflects mockery of the law of the land. Here it is relevant to quote the Latin proverb justice without force is impotent and force without justice is tyranny. 

Current Status

Officer Concerns To

Officer Name

Shri Bhaskar Pandey (Joint Secretary)

Organisation name

Government of Uttar Pradesh

Contact Address

Chief Minister Secretariat , Room No. 321, U.P. Secretariat, Lucknow

Email Address

bhaskar.12214@gov.in

Contact Number

05222226350

Reminder(s) / Clarification(s)

Reminder Date

Remarks

13/10/2023

if application dated 13 October 2019 of Dinesh Pratap Singh has not reached the concerned court despite the order passed by the District Judge Lucknow as ordered on 16 October 2019. Whether independence of judiciary delegates the power to a judicial member to defy the suggestion as conveyed on 16 October 2019.

3-Where is accountability in judiciary if representation in the form of questionnaire of Dinesh Pratap Singh still not reached to the concerned court after more than two and half years. Surprisingly the court is collecting evidence and the defender has the right to keep its submissions at any stage of proceedings to overcome injustice made to him.

4- High court of judicature and apex court are court of records, then why is the concerned court running away from the order passed by the Lucknow bench of the High court of judicature at Allahabad?.

The matter concerns the failure of law in the state of Uttar Pradesh. When both administration and court overlooked the grievances concerned with the deep-rooted corruption, then in frustration, door of ministry of law and justice knocked. When Registrar general also overlooked the representation of the applicant forwarded by the ministry of justice, then think about the status of rule of law in the state of Uttar Pradesh. Please forward the matter to registrar general High court of judicature as reminder because to overlook the forwarded can never be in accordance with the framework of the constitution.

Aggrieved Dinesh Pratap Singh ruthlessly expelled from his house by looting belongings of the house holds and other valuables by the opposite party in caucus with the police concerned by making the mockery of the order passed by the Lucknow bench of the High Court of judicature at Allahabad and slapping serious charges under aforementioned sections and many more others not only on the aggrieved applicant but also his wife who expired under trauma and daughter as well.

To see the attached document to the grievance, please click on the link