Date of R.T.I. request is 29 July 2022 before office of DGP Lucknow and C.O. City Prabhat Ray made available it on 19 July 2022 Miracle


 

Your RTI Appeal was filed successfully.

Please note down the details of registration.

Registration Number SPMZR/A/2022/60021

Name Yogi M P Singh

Date of Filing 24-10-2022

The request was filed with the SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE OFFICE MIRZAPUR

 Contact Details  

Telephone Number 9454401105

Email-ID addlspopmzr@gmail.com

Online RTI Appeal Form Details

Public Authority Details :-

   

* Public Authority SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE OFFICE MIRZAPUR

   

Personal Details:-

* Name Yogi M P Singh

Gender Male

* Address Mohalla Surekapuram , Shri Laxmi Narayan Baikunth Mahadev Mandir, Riva Road

Pincode 231001

State Uttar Pradesh

Educational Status Literate

Phone Number Details not provided

Mobile Number +91-7379105911

Email-ID myogimpsingh[at]gmail[dot]com

Citizenship Indian

* Is the Applicant Below Poverty Line ? No

First Appeal Details u/s 19(1) :-

Registration Number SPMZR/A/2022/60021

Date of Filing 24/10/2022

Concerned Appellate Authority Nodal Officer

Phone No Details not provided

Email Id Details not provided

* Ground For Appeal Refused access to Information Requested

((Description of Information sought (upto 500 characters) )

 Prayer or Relief Sought It is quite obvious that the Date of Filing of this RTI request is 29/07/2022 and information was made available by C.O. City Prabhat Ray through a communication dated 19 July 2022 which means his intuition disclosed to him that the information seeker will seek information from the DGP office and he prepared the reply already. Undoubtedly, forest rule has substituted rule of law. As king will be, likewise his subordinates. 

Registration Number DGPOF/R/2022/60600 Name Yogi M P Singh Date of Filing 29/07/2022
Status REQUEST TRANSFERRED TO OTHER PUBLIC AUTHORITY as on 03/08/2022
Details of Public Authority:- ZONE OFFICE POLICE VARANASI.
vide registration number:- ZOPVN/R/2022/80013 respectively.
Note:- Further details will be available on viewing the status of the above-mentioned new request registration number.
Status REQUEST TRANSFERRED TO OTHER PUBLIC AUTHORITY as of 03/08/2022 Details of Public Authority:- SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE OFFICE MIRZAPUR.
vide registration number:- SPMZR/R/2022/80007 respectively.
Note:- Further details will be available on viewing the status of the above-mentioned new request registration number.
It is 24 October 2022 today which implies that the concerned PIO did not provide the information sought in two months and 22 days consequently he/she violated the provision subsection 1 of section 7 of the Right to Information Act 2005. 
PIO in the office of the director general of police Lucknow may provide the following information pointwise as sought by the information seeker at the earliest or within stipulated time as prescribed under subsection 1 of section 7 of the Right to Information Act 2005.

1-Provide the provisions of law /circulars/government orders /office memorandums which enable the superintendent of police Mirzapur to delegate his powers of First Appellate Authority to PIO cum nodal officer against whom appeals are made by the appellants.

2-Provide the provisions of law /circulars/government orders /office memorandums which enable PIO to entertain appeals made against him for cryptic denials of sought information quite obvious from the attached document to the online RTI request.

3-As the supreme monitoring body in the state, the office of DGP may provide a copy of a single appeal submitted by the appellant entertained by the superintendent of police Mirzapur by adopting the logistic approach in the matter under his own signature.

The right to information Act 2005 failed to achieve its objective because of incompetent public personnel and rampant corruption in the government machinery. How will transparency and accountability be ensured in the working of the public authority if there is no transparency and accountability in the dealings of the staff who are accountable for the ratification of the provisions of the Right to information act 2005?

Supporting document ((only pdf up to 1 MB)) Supporting document not provided

RTI Application Details u/s 6(1) :-

Registration Number SPMZR/R/2022/80007

Date of Filing 03/08/2022

PIO of Public Authority approached mahesh singh atri

Designation mirzapur

Phone No 9454401105

Email Id addlspopmzr@gmail.com

PIO Order/Decision Number Details not provided

* PIO Order/Decision Date

Registration Number SPMZR/A/2022/60021

Name Yogi M P Singh

Date of Filing 24/10/2022

Status RTI APPEAL RECEIVED as on 24/10/2022

  Nodal Officer Details  

Name AJAY KUMAR SINGH

Telephone Number 9454401105

Email-ID addlspopmzr@gmail.com

Registration Number SPMZR/R/2022/80007

Name Yogi M P Singh

Date of Filing 03/08/2022

Status REQUEST DISPOSED OF as on 04/08/2022

Reply:- answer to yohi mp singh

View Document

  Nodal Officer Details  

Name AJAY KUMAR SINGH

Telephone Number 9454401105

Email-ID addlspopmzr@gmail.com

Online RTI Request Form Details

Public Authority Details :-

   

* Public Authority SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE OFFICE MIRZAPUR

   

Personal Details of RTI Applicant:-

Registration Number SPMZR/R/2022/80007

Date of Filing 03/08/2022

* Name Yogi M P Singh

Gender Male

* Address Mohalla Surekapuram , Lakshmi Narayan Baikunth Mahadev Mandir, Jabalpur Road

Pincode 231001

State Uttar Pradesh

Educational Status Literate

  Above Graduate

Phone Number Details not provided

Mobile Number +91-7379105911

Email-ID myogimpsingh[at]gmail[dot]com

Citizenship Indian

* Is the Applicant Below Poverty Line ? No

RTI Application Details u/s 6(1) :-

((Description of Information sought (up to 500 characters) )

Description of Information Sought Sir, Government of Uttar Pradesh has nominated additional S.P. Mirzapur as public information officer and superintendent of police Mirzapur as the First Appellate Authoring to deal with the R.T.I. requests and subsequent appeals. It is quite obvious from the working of the superintendent of police Mirzapur, he never entertains the appeals submitted by the appellants. Here additional S.P. Mirzapur does not provide information to information seekers but he directs the assistants to provide information to the information seekers which is illegal because information must be made available to information seekers under the signature of the PIO not APIO because section 20 is only applicable on PIO. Here PIO is also the nodal officer in the office of superintendent of police District-Mirzapur. In the name of nodal officer, how can PIO deal with the appeal of the appellants submitted under subsection 1 of section 19 of the Right to Information Act 2005? Whether superintendent of police District-Mirzapur can delegate his powers of First Appellate Authority to PIO cum nodal officer as done by him. Whether S.P. Mirzapur has not acted contrary to the government by delegating his powers of FAA to PIO cum nodal officer because powers FAA has been granted to him by the government of Uttar Pradesh by issuing proper notification. 

PIO in the office of director general of police Lucknow may provide the following information point wise as sought by the information seeker at the earliest or within stipulated time as prescribed under subsection 1 of section 7 of the Right to Information Act 2005. 

1-Provide the provisions of law /circulars/government orders /office memorandums which enable the superintendent of police Mirzapur to delegate his powers of First Appellate Authority to PIO cum nodal officer against whom appeals are made by the appellants. 

2-Provide the provisions of law /circulars/government orders /office memorandums which enable PIO to entertain appeals made against him for cryptic denials of sought information quite obvious from the attached document to the online RTI request. 

3-As the supreme monitoring body in the state, the office of DGP may provide a copy of a single appeal submitted by the appellant entertained by superintendent of police Mirzapur by adopting logistic approach in the matter under his own signature. 

Right to information Act 2005 is failed to achieve its object because of incompetent public personnel and rampant corruption in the government machinery. How will transparency and accountability be ensured in the working of the public authority if there is no transparency and accountability in the dealings of the staff who are accountable for the ratification of the provisions of the Right to information act 2005?

* Concerned PIO Mahesh Singh Atri

Designation Mirzapur

Phone No 9454401105

Email Id addlspopmzr@gmail.com

Supporting document ((only pdf upto 1 MB))

Comments