Grievance Status for registration number : CBODT/E/2022/26666
Grievance Concerns To
Name Of Complainant
Yogi M. P. Singh
Date of Receipt
31/07/2022
Received By Ministry/Department
Central Board of Direct Taxes (Income Tax)
Grievance Description
Central Board of Direct Taxes (Income Tax) >> Corruption/Malpractices related (VCs, employees) >> Inaction by Income Tax Department
Name and Designation of Officer : Income Tax Officer District Mirzapur
regional office / Office : Region UP (East)
-----------------------
When Dr. Meena Vishwakarma charges Rs.5000 to 7000 in a caesarean delivery which is maximum charge of her maternity centre, then how concerned poor lady was charged Rs.21000 and I.T. Mirzapur upheld it blindly.
Whether this is not a mockery of law of land as being done by the department of Income Tax Government of India. The working style in which concerned staffs, Department of Income Tax of the government of India overlooked the matter of public interest and concealed the cryptic dealing by overlooking contents of the submitted grievance is not a reflection of rampant corruption in the system. Whether public staffs are not acting caucus with their private partners in order to promote wrongdoings causing great damage to public treasury for individual gains.
Whether your aggrieved applicant could be made available GO/CIRCULAR /ACT, WHICH allows transaction on a slip.
Whether Rs.10000.00 is taken on slip without providing any description of charges. Please make available provision of law allows such cryptic dealings and wrongdoers are shielded.
Your aggrieved applicant wants to know under which law of land When more 5000.00 deposited, then also transaction was made on a slip, IT Mirzapur considers it legitimate. Please made available GO/CIRCULAR which allows so to income tax personnel.
When rest of six thousand was paid, then slip was taken and the patient was discharged and no receipt was given. Being top monitoring body, please provide the provision of law which allows such cryptic practice.
Grievance Document
Current Status
Under process
Date of Action
31/07/2022
Officer Concerns To
Officer Name
HARINDER BIR SINGH GILL (Pr. CCIT)
Organisation name
CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX LUCKNOW
Contact Address
Pr. CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, LUCKNOW, 57, RAM TEERATH MARG, PRATYAKSH KAR BHAWAN, LUCKNOW
Email Address
Lucknow.pccit@incometax.gov.in
Contact Number
05222233208
Gmail Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>
When Dr. Meena Vishwakarma charges Rs.5000 to 7000 in a caesarean delivery which is maximum charge of her maternity centre, then how concerned poor lady was charged Rs.21000 and I.T. Mirzapur upheld it blindly.
1 message
Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com> 2 October 2017 at 14:35
To: pmosb <pmosb@pmo.nic.in>, presidentofindia@rb.nic.in, urgent-action <urgent-action@ohchr.org>, supremecourt <supremecourt@nic.in>, cmup <cmup@up.nic.in>, hgovup@up.nic.in, uphrclko <uphrclko@yahoo.co.in>, "csup@up.nic.in" <csup@up.nic.in>, cvc@nic.in, ccit.lucknow@incometax.gov.in, hobaclko@cbi.gov.in, aditadmin.ici.delhi@incometaxindia.gov.in
Whether this is not a mockery of law of land as being done by the department of Income Tax Government of India. The working style in which concerned staffs, Department of Income Tax of the government of India overlooked the matter of public interest and concealed the cryptic dealing by overlooking contents of the submitted grievance is not a reflection of rampant corruption in the system. Whether public staffs are not acting caucus with their private partners in order to promote wrongdoings causing great damage to public treasury for individual gains.
With due respect, your applicant wants to draw the kind attention of the Hon'ble Sir to the following submissions as follows.
1-It is submitted before the Hon'ble Sir that whether your aggrieved applicant could be made available GO/CIRCULAR /ACT, WHICH allows transaction on a slip.
2-It is submitted before the Hon'ble Sir that Whether Rs.10000.00 is taken on slip without providing any description of charges.Please make available provision of law allows such cryptic dealings and wrongdoers are shielded.
3-It is submitted before the Hon'ble Sir that your aggrieved applicant wants to know under which law of land When more 5000.00 deposited, then also transaction was made on a slip, IT Mirzapur considers it legitimate. Please made available GO/CIRCULAR which allows so to income tax personnel.
4-When rest of six thousand was paid, then slip was taken and the patient was discharged and no receipt was given. Being top monitoring body, please provide the provision of law which allows such cryptic practice.
5-Matter concerned with Commissioner of Income Tax, Officer name-GEET MALA MOHANANEY but department procrastinated by sending RTI Communique to various public authorities. Please explain the cause of procrastination. Please take a glance of attached documents with this representation.
This is a humble request of your applicant to you Hon'ble Sir that It can never be justified to overlook the rights of the citizenry by delivering services in an arbitrary manner by floating all set up norms. This is sheer mismanagement which is encouraging wrongdoers to reap the benefit of loopholes in the system and depriving poor citizens of the right to justice. Therefore it is need of the hour to take concrete steps in order to curb grown anarchy in the system. For this, your applicant shall ever pray you, Hon'ble Sir.
Yours sincerely
Yogi M. P. Singh Mobile number-7379105911
Mohalla-Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road District-Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Reflective of rampant corruption in the I.T. Mirzapur.pdf
511K
Whether this is not a mockery of law of land as being done by the department of Income Tax Government of India. The working style in which concerned staffs, Department of Income Tax of the government of India overlooked the matter of public interest and concealed the cryptic dealing by overlooking contents of the submitted grievance is not a reflection of rampant corruption in the system. Whether public staffs are not acting caucus with their private partners in order to promote wrongdoings causing great damage to public treasury for individual gains.
ReplyDelete