If action taken by S.D.M. Sadar was justified and aggrieved was habitual to submit applications




Grievance Status for registration number : GOVUP/E/2022/41092
Grievance Concerns To
Name Of Complainant
Yogi M. P. Singh
Date of Receipt
12/06/2022
Received By Ministry/Department
Uttar Pradesh
Grievance Description
How the continued construction by the Jal Nigam District Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh is justified when the matter is under consideration of Honourable Salil Kumar Rai,J. of High court of Judicature at Allahabad quite obvious from the attached document to the grievance. Whether Law Order situation in the state of Uttar Pradesh has reached Nadir and the government itself has no faith in the state higher judiciary is quite obvious from rapid increase in the pace of construction work by the Jal Nigam at the impugned site. An application under Article 51 A of the constitution of India on behalf of Sachchida Nand Shukla whose land has been grabbed as Jal Nigam by colluding with Tehsil Sadar grabbed land Araji number 326ख of Sachchida Nand Shukla in the name of Araji number 326क and now performing construction work.From the first page of the attached document to the grievance, it is quite obvious that aggrieved Sachchidanand Shukla took shelter in the High court of Judicature at Allahabad on 30 May 2022 subsequently High court registered writ number- 16620 of the year 2022 against government of Uttar Pradesh and three others on 04/06/2022. I think that if the matter is sub judice before the High court of Judicature, then you must wait for the order of the court. Meanwhile Sub divisional magistrate sadar may correct its error by passing appropriate order as required under law. For the more details, vide attached document to the grievance. 
Court No. - 4Case :- WRIT - C No. - 16620 of 2022 Petitioner :- Sachchidanand Shukla Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 OthersCounsel for Petitioner :- Ashutosh Tripathi,Gaurav Tiwari Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.

Following order passed by Honourable Salil Kumar Rai,J.on the request of standing council. 
The Standing Counsel prays for and is granted a week's time to obtain instructions in the matter.
The Standing Counsel shall obtain comprehensive instructions including as to whether the plots were inspected by any Revenue Team and also regarding the map prepared by the concerned Revenue Officer during the measurement of Plot No. 326 Kha.
Put up again as fresh on 17th June, 2022.
Order Date :- 8.6.2022
सच्चिदा नंद शुक्ल की जमीन को तहसील सदर की मिलीभगत से जल निगम  हड़प द्वारा हड़पा जा रहा है  सच्चिदा नंद शुक्ल की अराजी संख्या 326ख की जमीन अराजी नंबर 326क के नाम पर हड़पी जा रही  है और माननीय न्यायमूर्ति श्री सलिल कुमार राय के यहां सुनवाई त्वरित गति से होने के बावजूद योगी सरकार  निर्माण कार्य तेज कर दी  है जैसे न्यापालिका में सरकार का विश्वास ही नहीं है ।
संलग्न दस्तावेज से यह स्पष्ट है कि पीड़ित सच्चिदानंद शुक्ल ने 30 मई 2022 को इलाहाबाद उच्च न्यायालय में केस फाइल की थी, इसके उपरांत उच्च न्यायालय ने उत्तर प्रदेश सरकार और तीन अन्य के खिलाफ वर्ष 2022 की रिट संख्या- 16620 दर्ज की।
मुझे लगता है कि यदि मामला उच्च न्यायालय के न्यायिक में विचाराधीन है, तो आपको न्यायालय के आदेश की प्रतीक्षा करनी चाहिए।
इस बीच एसडीएम सदर कानून के तहत आवश्यक उचित आदेश पारित करके अपनी त्रुटि को सुधार सकते हैं। सच्चिदा नन्द शुक्ल की अराजी संख्या 326ख पर जल निगम द्वारा अराजी क्रमांक 326क के नाम से प्रारम्भ किये गये इस निर्माण कार्य को अविलम्ब रोक कर एसडीएम सदर को सच्चिदा नन्द शुक्ल की अराजी संख्या 326ख भूमि की सीमा निर्धारित करने का निर्देश दिया जाय।
सच्चिदा नन्द शुक्ल द्वारा उक्त प्रकरण 10/09/2021 को एसडीएम सदर जिला मिर्जापुर को भेजा गया ताकि भूमि की सीमा अराजी क्रमांक 326 ख तय की जा सके
लेकिन यह सबसे दुर्भाग्य की बात है कि आराजी क्रमांक 326 क भूमि सरकार की है, जिसे लेखपाल और राजस्व निरीक्षक द्वारा पहले से ही गुप्त और रहस्यमय तरीके से अवैध रूप से बेचा जा चुका है, फलस्वरूप उन्होंने पीड़ित सच्चिदा नंद शुक्ला की भूमि को हड़प कर  अपना बचाव कर रहे  है और इस मामले में एस.डी.एम. सदर की कार्यशैली संदिग्ध और अनियमितता पूर्ण  हैं, जो उनकी शिथिलता और गूढ़ कार्यशैली से स्पष्ट है। मामला उत्तर प्रदेश की धारा 24 के तहत प्रस्तुत अभ्यावेदन से संबंधित है। राजस्व संहिता, 2006, उ.प्र. सच्चिदा नंद शुक्ला द्वारा 2012 का अधिनियम संख्या 8 और सरकार में अराजकता के कारण एसडीएम सदर द्वारा कोई कार्रवाई नहीं की गई।
Grievance Document
Current Status
Case closed
Date of Action
01/07/2022
Remarks
अधीनस्थ अधिकारी के स्तर पर निस्तारित अधीनस्थ अधिकारी के स्तर पर निस्तारित आख्या अपलोड कर सेवा मे सादर अगसारित
Reply Document
Rating
1
Poor
Rating Remarks
Think about the lawlessness and anarchy in the working of the tahsil Sadar अंडर- supervision of the subdivisional magistrate Sadar. Anjaney Shukla Son of Mr Sachhidanand Shukla submitted several grievances on the jansunwai portal but the lekhpal and kanoongo working ine d tahsil Sadar said that you have provided your land for the construction of the Anganwadi. Even office of the sub divisional magistrate Sadar quoted in its report that Anjaneya Shukla has been habitual to submit the grievance on the jansunwai portal. Whether such absurd remarks made by the staff of the tahsil Sadar was justified? Now time has come when the office of chief minister must meditate on it whether the subordinate offices are submitting authenticated reports are grievances submitted by the aggrieved people are authenticated and based on logic. Whether it is justified that public offices may submit false and arbitrary reports on the public grievance portal and on the Jansunwai portal?
Officer Concerns To
Officer Name
Shri Bhaskar Pandey (Joint Secretary)
Organisation name
Government of Uttar Pradesh
Contact Address
Chief Minister Secretariat , Room No. 321, U.P. Secretariat, Lucknow
Email Address
bhaskar.12214@gov.in
Contact Number
05222226350
Grievance Status for registration number : GOVUP/E/2022/44309
Grievance Concerns To
Name Of Complainant
Yogi M. P. Singh
Date of Receipt
19/06/2022
Received By Ministry/Department
Uttar Pradesh
Grievance Description
I think that D.M. Mirzapur must meditate on the order dated 17 June 2006 by Honourable High court of Judicature at Allahabad as Let proper demarcation be done in the proceedings drawn for the purpose by the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Sadar, Mirzapur, who would clearly demarcate Plot Nos. 326ka and 326kha. Let the same be done within three days.Let this order be communicated to the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Sadar, Mirzapur through the District Magistrate, Mirzapur by the Registrar (Compliance), by tomorrow.
Lay as fresh again on 22.06.2022.
Grievance Status for registration number : GOVUP/E/2022/38416 Grievance Concerns To Name Of Complainant Yogi M. P. Singh
Date of Receipt 06/06/2022 Received By Ministry/Department Uttar Pradesh
An application under Article 51 A of the constitution of India on behalf of Sachchida Nand Shukla whose land has been grabbed as Jal Nigam by colluding with Tehsil Sadar grabbed land Araji number 326ख of Sachchida Nand Shukla in the name of Araji number 326क and now performing construction work.
From the first page of the attached document to the grievance, it is quite obvious that aggrieved Sachchidanand Shukla took shelter in the High court of Judicature at Allahabad on 30 May 2022 subsequently High court registered writ number- 16620 of the year 2022 against government of Uttar Pradesh and three others on 04/06/2022. I think that if the matter is sub judice before the High court of Judicature, then you must wait for the order of the court. Meanwhile Sub divisional magistrate sadar may correct its error by passing appropriate order as required under law.
Court No. - 6 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 16620 of 2022 Petitioner :- Sachchidanand Shukla Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Ashutosh Tripathi,Gaurav Tiwari Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble J.J. Munir,J.
The Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Sadar, Mirzapur has submitted
written instructions to the learned Counsel for the State, who
states, on the basis of these, that the revenue team has
inspected the plot, wherein an overhead tank is being constructed.
It has not been clearly stated that the construction is not being
made in Plot No. 326 kha, which belongs to the petitioner.The
tank is being constructed in Plot No. 326ka.
Let proper demarcation be done in the proceedings drawn for
the purpose by the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Sadar, Mirzapur,
who would clearly demarcate Plot Nos. 326ka and 326kha. Let
the same be done within three days.
Lay as fresh again on 22.06.2022.
Let this order be communicated to the Sub-Divisional
Magistrate, Sadar, Mirzapur through the District Magistrate,
Mirzapur by the Registrar (Compliance), by tomorrow.
Order Date :- 17.6.2022
I. Batabyal
Grievance Document
Current Status
Case closed
Date of Action
01/07/2022
Remarks
अधीनस्थ अधिकारी के स्तर पर निस्तारित अधीनस्थ अधिकारी के स्तर पर निस्तारित आख्या अपलोड कर सेवा मे सादर अगसारित
Reply Document
Rating
1
Poor
Rating Remarks
Think about the lawlessness and anarchy in the working of the tahsil Sadar अंडर- supervision of the subdivisional magistrate Sadar. Anjaney Shukla Son of Mr Sachhidanand Shukla submitted several grievances on the jansunwai portal but the lekhpal and kanoongo working ine d tahsil Sadar said that you have provided your land for the construction of the Anganwadi. Even office of the sub divisional magistrate Sadar quoted in its report that Anjaneya Shukla has been habitual to submit the grievance on the jansunwai portal. Whether such absurd remarks made by the staff of the tahsil Sadar was justified? Now time has come when the office of chief minister must meditate on it whether the subordinate offices are submitting authenticated reports are grievances submitted by the aggrieved people are authenticated and based on logic. Whether it is justified that public offices may submit false and arbitrary reports on the public grievance portal and on the Jansunwai portal?
Officer Concerns To
Officer Name
Shri Bhaskar Pandey (Joint Secretary)
Organisation name
Government of Uttar Pradesh
Contact Address
Chief Minister Secretariat , Room No. 321, U.P. Secretariat, Lucknow
Email Address
bhaskar.12214@gov.in
Contact Number
05222226350
Yogi

An anti-corruption crusader. Motive to build a strong society based on the principle of universal brotherhood. Human rights defender and RTI activist.

1 Comments

Your view points inspire us

  1. Think about the lawlessness and anarchy in the working of the tahsil Sadar अंडर- supervision of the subdivisional magistrate Sadar. Anjaney Shukla Son of Mr Sachhidanand Shukla submitted several grievances on the jansunwai portal but the lekhpal and kanoongo working ine d tahsil Sadar said that you have provided your land for the construction of the Anganwadi. Even office of the sub divisional magistrate Sadar quoted in its report that Anjaneya Shukla has been habitual to submit the grievance on the jansunwai portal. Whether such absurd remarks made by the staff of the tahsil Sadar was justified?

    ReplyDelete
Previous Post Next Post