.png)
जनसुनवाई
समन्वित शिकायत निवारण प्रणाली, उत्तर प्रदेश
सन्दर्भ संख्या:- 40019922012382
लाभार्थी का विवरण
नाम Yogi M P Singh पिता/पति का नाम
मोबइल नंबर(१) 9336252631 मोबइल नंबर(२)
आधार कार्ड न. ई-मेल yogimpsingh@gmail.com
पता Mohalla Surkapuram Jabalpur Road District Mirzapur
आवेदन पत्र का ब्यौरा
आवेदन पत्र का संक्षिप्त ब्यौरा Here matter concerns the deep rooted irregularities and corruption prevailed throughout the government machinery and this question arises that whether the enquiry officer appointed under the panchayati Raj act who submitted report after enquiry in the matter can be substituted by an enquiry carried out by the junior rank officers of the block development office. If the gram pradhan suspected the integrity of the team of enquiry officers appointed by the district magistrate then he had to make a complaint initially but when the enquiry had been complete then he had no right to make a complaint against the integrity of the enquiry officers. Undoubtedly it is an effort of the district magistrate district panchayati Raj officer and chief development officer to make an effort to cover the act of corruption under the carpet. There must be transparency and accountability in the working of the public authority so that common people may not raise the fingers on suspicious deeds of public staff.Grievance Status for registration number : GOVUP/E/2021/52960 Grievance Concerns To Name Of Complainant Yogi M. P. Singh Date of Receipt 19/09/2021 Grievance Status for registration number : GOVUP/E/2021/03421 Grievance Concerns To Name Of Complainant Yogi M P Singh Date of Receipt 21/01/2021 Whether the imposed recovery recommended by the joint team of the deputy commissioner MGNREGA and the project director was recovered from the defaulters if not the government must give a reasoned explanation. Undoubtedly such dealings at the district level are full of corruption and it is most surprising that accountable public functionaries in the state are mute spectators of it. WHO SHOULD BE APPOINTED AS INQUIRY OFFICER . The principles of natural justice imply “fair hearing”, “unbiased judgement” and “clear speaking order”. It, therefore, follows that the person to be appointed as Inquiry Officer”:-(i). should not be interested in the subject matter or the inquiry in any manner (ii). Should not be biased (iii). should not be a witness in the proceedings(iv). should not have expressed an opinion about the merits of the case (v). should be sufficiently senior to the charged officer to evoke confidence of all concerned. APPLICATION AGAINST THE APPOINTMENT OF INQUIRY OFFICER Whenever an application alleging bias against the Inquiry Officer is moved by the Charged Officer, the proceedings should be stayed and the application with relevant material should be forwarded to the Revisionary Authority for consideration and passing appropriate orders thereon. Such an application should be moved as soon as the government servants become aware of the bias. Though no hard and fast rule can be laid down regarding the time when an application of bias against the Inquiry Officer should be moved, yet it is advisable that such an application is moved at the earliest, after the appointment of the Inquiry Officer. The reason being that the Government servant cannot be allowed to sit on the fence till the proceedings have progressed sufficiently or have been completed to move such an application if he finds that the decision is going on likely to go against him. श्री मान जी पंचायती राज अधिनियम के तहत जिलाधिकारी द्वारा नामित जिलास्तरीय अधिकारी डिप्टी कमिश्नर मनरेगा और प्रोजेक्ट डायरेक्टर द्वारा जाँच की गयी और उस जांच में विकास खंड छानवे के कर्मचारी अनियमितता के दोषी पाए गए और एक लाख एक हजार छह सौ पंद्रह रुपये वसूली की सिफारिश अधिकारी द्वय द्वारा किया गया किन्तु आज तक वसूली नहीं
संदर्भ दिनांक 05-06-2022 पूर्व सन्दर्भ(यदि कोई है तो) 0,0
विभाग पंचायती राज विभाग शिकायत श्रेणी अन्य प्रकरण
लाभार्थी का विवरण/शिकायत क्षेत्र का
शिकायत क्षेत्र का पता जिला- मिर्ज़ापुर
संदर्भ संख्या : 40019922012382 , दिनांक - 05 Jun 2022 तक की स्थिति
आवेदनकर्ता का विवरण :
शिकायत संख्या:-40019922012382
आवेदक का नाम-Yogi M P Singhविषय-Here matter concerns the deep rooted irregularities and corruption prevailed throughout the government machinery and this question arises that whether the enquiry officer appointed under the panchayati Raj act who submitted report after enquiry in the matter can be substituted by an enquiry carried out by the junior rank officers of the block development office. If the gram pradhan suspected the integrity of the team of enquiry officers appointed by the district magistrate then he had to make a complaint initially but when the enquiry had been complete then he had no right to make a complaint against the integrity of the enquiry officers. Undoubtedly it is an effort of the district magistrate district panchayati Raj officer and chief development officer to make an effort to cover the act of corruption under the carpet. There must be transparency and accountability in the working of the public authority so that common people may not raise the fingers on suspicious deeds of public staff.Grievance Status for registration number : GOVUP/E/2021/52960 Grievance Concerns To Name Of Complainant Yogi M. P. Singh Date of Receipt 19/09/2021 Grievance Status for registration number : GOVUP/E/2021/03421 Grievance Concerns To Name Of Complainant Yogi M P Singh Date of Receipt 21/01/2021 Whether the imposed recovery recommended by the joint team of the deputy commissioner MGNREGA and the project director was recovered from the defaulters if not the government must give a reasoned explanation. Undoubtedly such dealings at the district level are full of corruption and it is most surprising that accountable public functionaries in the state are mute spectators of it. WHO SHOULD BE APPOINTED AS INQUIRY OFFICER . The principles of natural justice imply “fair hearing”, “unbiased judgement” and “clear speaking order”. It, therefore, follows that the person to be appointed as Inquiry Officer”:-(i). should not be interested in the subject matter or the inquiry in any manner (ii). Should not be biased (iii). should not be a witness in the proceedings(iv). should not have expressed an opinion about the merits of the case (v). should be sufficiently senior to the charged officer to evoke confidence of all concerned. APPLICATION AGAINST THE APPOINTMENT OF INQUIRY OFFICER Whenever an application alleging bias against the Inquiry Officer is moved by the Charged Officer, the proceedings should be stayed and the application with relevant material should be forwarded to the Revisionary Authority for consideration and passing appropriate orders thereon. Such an application should be moved as soon as the government servants become aware of the bias. Though no hard and fast rule can be laid down regarding the time when an application of bias against the Inquiry Officer should be moved, yet it is advisable that such an application is moved at the earliest, after the appointment of the Inquiry Officer. The reason being that the Government servant cannot be allowed to sit on the fence till the proceedings have progressed sufficiently or have been completed to move such an application if he finds that the decision is going on likely to go against him. श्री मान जी पंचायती राज अधिनियम के तहत जिलाधिकारी द्वारा नामित जिलास्तरीय अधिकारी डिप्टी कमिश्नर मनरेगा और प्रोजेक्ट डायरेक्टर द्वारा जाँच की गयी और उस जांच में विकास खंड छानवे के कर्मचारी अनियमितता के दोषी पाए गए और एक लाख एक हजार छह सौ पंद्रह रुपये वसूली की सिफारिश अधिकारी द्वय द्वारा किया गया किन्तु आज तक वसूली नहीं
विभाग -पंचायती राज विभागशिकायत श्रेणी -
नियोजित तारीख-20-06-2022शिकायत की स्थिति-
स्तर -जनपद स्तरपद -जिला पंचायत राज अधिकारी
प्राप्त रिमाइंडर-
प्राप्त फीडबैक -दिनांक को फीडबैक:-
फीडबैक की स्थिति -
संलग्नक देखें -Click here
नोट- अंतिम कॉलम में वर्णित सन्दर्भ की स्थिति कॉलम-5 में अंकित अधिकारी के स्तर पर हुयी कार्यवाही दर्शाता है!
अग्रसारित विवरण :
क्र.स. सन्दर्भ का प्रकार आदेश देने वाले अधिकारी प्राप्त/आपत्ति दिनांक नियत दिनांक अधिकारी को प्रेषित आदेश स्थिति
1 अंतरित ऑनलाइन सन्दर्भ 05-06-2022 20-06-2022 जिला पंचायत राज अधिकारी-मिर्ज़ापुर,पंचायती राज विभाग अनमार्क
Here matter concerns the deep rooted irregularities and corruption prevailed throughout the government machinery and this question arises that whether the enquiry officer appointed under the panchayati Raj act who submitted report after enquiry in the matter can be substituted by an enquiry carried out by the junior rank officers of the block development office. If the gram pradhan suspected the integrity of the team of enquiry officers appointed by the district magistrate then he had to make a complaint initially but when the enquiry had been complete then he had no right to make a complaint against the integrity of the enquiry officers.
ReplyDelete