When fixed date to dispose of grievance on Jansunwai portal is 28 May 2022 and today is 29 May 2022, why not disposed of by L.D.A.

 

संदर्भ संख्या : 40015722034058 , दिनांक - 29 May 2022 तक की स्थिति

आवेदनकर्ता का विवरण :

शिकायत संख्या:-40015722034058

आवेदक का नाम-Dinesh Pratap Singhविषय-श्री मान जी संपत्ति अधिकारी ०६ अगस्त २०२१ को श्रद्धा चौधरी तहसीलदार /जनसूचना अधिकारी ०८ अक्टूबर २०२१ को और अब दिनाँक ०७ मार्च २०२२ को नजूल अधिकारी अरविन्द त्रिपाठी द्वारा भी समिति गठन की बात दुहराई गई है जब की प्रश्नगत प्रकरण इस बात से सम्बंधित है क्या निबंधन पूर्व न्यायालय द्वारा पारित आदेश जिसमे अनुराधा /आराधना /गुड्डी को टाइटल बिबाद सक्षम न्यायालय द्वारा हल प्राप्त करने का आदेश दिया था उसका समादर लखनऊ बिकास प्राधिकरण द्वारा किया गया या आदेश भी भरस्टाचार का भेट चढ़ गया और समिति गठित हुए भी नौ महीने से ज्यादा हो गए Grievance Status for registration number : GOVUP/E/2022/10865 Grievance Concerns To Name Of Complainant Yogi M. P. Singh Date of Receipt 09/03/2022 Received By Ministry/Department Uttar Pradesh For more feedback, vide attached document to the grievance. श्री मान जी इस समय लखनऊ विकास प्राधिकरण चाहे जनसूचना के तहत आवेदन हो या शिकायत हो या कोई निवेदन हो हर किसी को इस आधार पर नजरअंदाज कर रही है की मामले में समिति गठित कर दी गयी है किन्तु न तो समिति के सन्दर्भ में कुछ बताएँगे और न ही प्रश्न गत प्रकरण को हल करने का ही प्रयास करेंगे तीन वर्षो से मामले में टाल  मटोल कर रहे है क्या इसी तरह से योगी सरकार भ्र्ष्टाचार रोकती है  The matter concerns deep rooted corruption of L.D.A. and arbitrary denial of a special working officer of L.D.A. to entertain the grievances of Dinesh Pratap Singh S/O Angad Prasad Singh. According to the vice-chairman LDA-THIS MATTER IS NOT RELATED TO LDA but it is the frustration of the poor vice-chairman of LDA. Think about the gravity of the situation that neither you understand English nor hindi and the matter you have been entertaining for more than three years now saying that this matter does not concern LDA. Whether it is not showing your insolence to the applicant and senior rank officers of the chief minister office monitoring the Jansunwai portal? Who did the registry of the impugned land cum plot without examining the papers which were due during the time of registry? They neither had the papers issued by the L.D.A. during the time of registry and still they do not have such papers as originally made available by L.D.A. It is quite obvious that you overlooked the order passed by the Lucknow bench of the High court of judicature at Allahabad and executed the registry arbitrarily because of loose integrity and culture of corruption in the Lucknow Development Authority. Undoubtedly the matter concerns the deep rooted corruption and the concerned staff of the Lucknow development authority are procrastinating on the matter for many years and such reports are the integral part of their corrupt and mysterious dealings. Nearly 1 year has passed till the formation of the committee to take action in the matter but still no action has been taken by the committee. Whether it is not procrastination and showing the ulterior design of the public authority. They themselves are accepting the fact that they have told repeatedly to the complainant that a committee has been formed and they are taking action in the matter but in this way they have passed many years whether it reflects the transparency and accountability in the working of the public authority Lucknow development authority? Whether it reflects the characteristic of an anti corruption government as claimed by the accountable public functionaries of the Government of Uttar Pradesh? Order of High court attached to R.T.I. communiqué and quote is as- It is simply ordered that the respondent number 4 to7 shall open the lock of the staircase so that Smt Anuradha

विभाग -विकास प्राधिकरणशिकायत श्रेणी -

नियोजित तारीख-28-05-2022शिकायत की स्थिति-

स्तर -विकास प्राधिकरणपद -उपाध्यक्ष

प्राप्त रिमाइंडर-

प्राप्त फीडबैक -दिनांक को फीडबैक:-

फीडबैक की स्थिति -

संलग्नक देखें -Click here

नोट- अंतिम कॉलम में वर्णित सन्दर्भ की स्थिति कॉलम-5 में अंकित अधिकारी के स्तर पर हुयी कार्यवाही दर्शाता है!

अग्रसारित विवरण :

क्र.स. सन्दर्भ का प्रकार आदेश देने वाले अधिकारी प्राप्त/आपत्ति दिनांक नियत दिनांक अधिकारी को प्रेषित आदेश स्थिति

1 अंतरित ऑनलाइन सन्दर्भ 13-05-2022 28-05-2022 उपाध्यक्ष-लखनऊ,विकास प्राधिकरण कार्यालय स्तर पर लंबित

Grievance Status for registration number : GOVUP/E/2022/10865

Grievance Concerns To

Name Of Complainant

Yogi M. P. Singh

Date of Receipt

09/03/2022

Received By Ministry/Department

Uttar Pradesh

Grievance Description

श्री मान जी संपत्ति अधिकारी ०६ अगस्त २०२१ को श्रद्धा चौधरी तहसीलदार /जनसूचना अधिकारी ०८ अक्टूबर २०२१ को और अब दिनाँक ०७ मार्च २०२२ को नजूल अधिकारी अरविन्द त्रिपाठी द्वारा भी समिति गठन की बात दुहराई गई है जब की प्रश्नगत प्रकरण इस बात से सम्बंधित है क्या निबंधन पूर्व न्यायालय द्वारा पारित आदेश जिसमे अनुराधा /आराधना /गुड्डी को टाइटल बिबाद सक्षम न्यायालय द्वारा हल प्राप्त करने का आदेश दिया था उसका समादर लखनऊ बिकास प्राधिकरण द्वारा किया गया या आदेश भी भरस्टाचार का भेट चढ़ गया और समिति गठित हुए भी सात महीने से ज्यादा हो गए Grievance Status for registration number : GOVUP/E/2022/07408

Grievance Concerns To Name Of Complainant Yogi M. P. Singh Date of Receipt 10/02/2022 Received By Ministry/Department Uttar Pradesh

श्री मान जी इस समय लखनऊ विकास प्राधिकरण चाहे जनसूचना के तहत आवेदन हो या शिकायत हो या कोई निवेदन हो हर किसी को इस आधार पर नजरअंदाज कर रही है की मामले में समिति गठित कर दी गयी है किन्तु न तो समिति के सन्दर्भ में कुछ बताएँगे और न ही प्रश्न गत प्रकरण को हल करने का ही प्रयास करेंगे तीन वर्षो से मामले में ताल मटोल कर रहे है क्या इसी तरह से योगी सरकार भ्र्ष्टाचार रोकती है

The matter concerns deep rooted corruption of L.D.A. and arbitrary denial of special working officer of L.D.A. to entertain the grievances of Dinesh Pratap Singh S/O Angad Prasad Singh. An application on behalf of Dinesh Pratap Singh under Article 51A of the constitution of India.

According to the vice-chairman LDA-THIS MATTER IS NOT RELATED TO LDA but it is the frustration of the poor vice-chairman of LDA.

Think about the gravity of the situation that neither you understand English nor hindi and the matter you have been entertaining for more than three years now saying that this matter does not concern you. Whether it is not showing your insolence to the applicant and senior rank officers of the chief minister office monitoring the Jansunwai portal? Who did the registry of the impugned land cum plot without examining the papers which were due during the time of registry? They neither had the papers issued by the L.D.A. during the time of registry and still they do not have such papers as originally made available by L.D.A. It is quite obvious that you overlooked the order passed by the Lucknow bench of the High court of judicature at Allahabad and executed the registry arbitrarily because of loose integrity and culture of corruption in the Lucknow Development Authority.

It is quite obvious that Lucknow development authority again ran away from the real issue of corruption through its apparent reply I that in the matter committee has been set up and findings of the committee will be final in the matter but when findings will be completed by the committee they are not disclosing near about 6 months passed in the matter when the committee had been set up by the Lucknow development authority. Think about the gravity of the situation that the order passed by the Lucknow bench of the high court of judicature at Allahabad was overlooked by the Lucknow development authority even after the objection of Dinesh Pratap Singh. Without deciding the title suit, the registry of the impugned land by overlooking the order of the high court reflects rampant corruption in the working . Still our chief minister yogi adityanath is claiming to provide good governance which is transparent and accountable to the people in the state of uttar pradesh.

Order of High court attached to R.T.I. communiqué and quote is as- It is simply ordered that the respondent number 4 to7 shall open the lock of the staircase so that Smt Anuradha Singh the petitioner may come out of the house and take the proper and appropriate remedy in the competent court and after that, she may have the liberty to go anywhere. Applicant wants to draw the kind attention of the respondent number First who is Secretary of home department, civil secretariat, Government of Uttar Pradesh and respondent number second who is senior superintendent of police Lucknow as well as the station house officer police station Ashiyana

Grievance Document

Current Status

Case closed   

Date of Action

05/04/2022

Remarks

PLEASE SEE THE ATTACHMENT.

Reply Document

Rating

1

Poor

Rating Remarks

Undoubtedly the matter concerns the deep rooted corruption and the concerned staff of the Lucknow development authority are procrastinating on the matter for many years and such reports are the integral part of their corrupt and mysterious dealings. Near about 1 year is passed till the formation of the committee to take action in the matter but still no action has been taken by the committee. Whether it is not procrastination and showing the ulterior design of the public authority. They themselves are accepting the fact that they have told repeatedly to the complainant that committee has been formed and they are taking action in the matter but in this way they have passed many years whether it reflects the transparency and accountability in the working of the public authority Lucknow development authority? Whether it reflects the characteristic of anti corruption government as claimed by the accountable public functionaries of the Government of Uttar Pradesh?

Officer Concerns To

Officer Name

Shri Bhaskar Pandey (Joint Secretary)

Organisation name

Government of Uttar Pradesh

Contact Address

Chief Minister Secretariat , Room No. 321, U.P. Secretariat, Lucknow

Email Address

bhaskar.12214@gov.in

Contact Number

05222226350