If district administration had to install C.C.T.V. Camera at the Shastri bridge, why had they removed it? To facilitate illegal collection

Corruption of R.T.O. Mirzapur in full swing but order passed by UPHCR in the matter on 8 April 2021 for D.M. Mirzapur proved infutile

Grievance Status for registration number : GOVUP/E/2022/32442

Grievance Concerns To

Name Of Complainant

Yogi M. P. Singh

Date of Receipt

19/05/2022

Received By Ministry/Department

Uttar Pradesh

Grievance Description

The matter concerns case number-20075 (63) /2020-21 dated 08/04/2021 coram of member Justice K.P. Singh in the Uttar Pradesh Human Rights Commission. Order passed is as follows.

I have perused the allegations made in the complaint of the complainant Yogi M. P. Singh dated 04 October 2020.

No useful purpose would be served in keeping the present complaint pending. Keeping in view the nature of allegations made in complaint it would be appropriate to send a copy of the complaint to the district magistrate Mirzapur who shall look into the matter and do the needful in accordance with the law at his end under the intimation of this commission as early as possible.

With the above order the complaint is finally disposed of. This order was signed by member Justice K.P. Singh in the Uttar Pradesh Human Rights Commission on 08/04/2021.

It is most surprising that no action was taken by the district magistrate Mirzapur on the aforementioned communication cum order as aforementioned.

For more feedback, vide attached document to the grievance.

C.C.T.V. Camera was already installed but it was removed by concerned staff to facilitate illegal collection through extortions from heavy and light vehicles.

Undoubtedly they escaped from enquiry but when their inactivity is proved fatal, then enquiry must be carried out in a transparent and accountable manner that who removed the installed C.C.T.V. Cameras if concerned are subordinates, then under whom order and why F.I.R. was not lodged in the matter despite the demand from the public side quite obvious from the following representation?

वसूली के आरोप सारहीन है सामान्य है २०० ओवरलोड ट्रको में १८ पर कारवाही का दावा पर वह दावा भी गलत क्यों की आकडे नौ पर ही कार्यवाही पुष्ट कर रहे है सोचिये बारगेनिंग नही तो और क्या एक तरफ अपनी दामन बचाने के लिए पुलिस कप्तान जिला मजिस्ट्रेट सब का नाम ले रहे है और क्लोज्ड सर्किट कैमरा किसने हटाया कन्नी काट रहे है अब तीनो लोगो के अलावा उस कैमरा को कौन हटा सकता है यदि पब्लिक हटाती तो प्रथम सूचना रिपोर्ट दर्ज हो चुकी होती विडियो फुटेज का साक्ष्य मिटाने के लिए इतना बड़ा खेल खेला गया और वसूली कितनी बड़ी है वह तो मीडिया चीख चीख कर बता रही है

Here this question arises if the district administration Mirzapur had to install the C.C.T.V. Camera on the site, why, they removed it from the site two years ago? Whether it is not the reflection of the deep rooted corruption in the government machinery? Today they are worried about it because Shastri Bridge has been damaged because of their carelessness. If they had taken timely action, on my representations, then this bridge did not damage and government and public did not face the risk to travel on a damaged bridge which may cause havoc at any time. Sequence to fill the pocket should never break whatever prices may be redeemed by the public.

Grievance Document

Current Status

Grievance received   

Date of Action

19/05/2022

Officer Concerns To

Forwarded to

Uttar Pradesh

Officer Name

Shri Bhaskar Pandey (Joint Secretary)

Organisation name

Uttar Pradesh

Contact Address

Chief Minister Secretariat , Room No. 321, U.P. Secretariat, Lucknow

Email Address

bhaskar.12214@gov.in

Contact Number

05222226350