The matter concerns working of district judge is resolved by assistant police commissioner Dr. Archana Singh in government of U.P.

 

Grievance Status for registration number : GOVUP/E/2022/10014

Grievance Concerns To

Name Of Complainant

Yogi M. P. Singh

Date of Receipt

02/03/2022

Received By Ministry/Department

Uttar Pradesh

Grievance Description

The matter concerns the lawlessness and anarchy in the office of the district judge Lucknow where rule of law is always overlooked by the accountable public functionaries. Following appeal submitted before the district judge Lucknow was delivered by the department of post on 28 Jan 2022 and today is 02 March 2022. Which means 30 days passed but district judge Lucknow did not take any action in the matter consequently violated Subsection 1 of section 19 of the Right to Information Act 2005.

Subsection 1 of section 19 of the Right to Information Act 2005 states as

Any person who, does not receive a decision within the time specified in

sub-section (1) or clause (a) of sub-section (3) of section 7, or is aggrieved by a decision of the Central

Public Information Officer or State Public Information Officer, as the case may be, may within thirty days

from the expiry of such period or from the receipt of such a decision prefer an appeal to such officer who

is senior in rank to the Central Public Information Officer or State Public Information Officer as the case

may be, in each public authority:

Provided that such officer may admit the appeal after the expiry of the period of thirty days if he or

she is satisfied that the appellant was prevented by sufficient cause from filing the appeal in time.

An appeal under subsection 1 of section 19 of the Right to Information Act 2005 against the denial of information from point 1 to 3 by the central public information officer / Additional district Judge through its representative / agent Human Rights Defender Yogi M. P. Singh/ Mahesh Pratap Singh S/O Rajendra Pratap Singh whose Aadhar card is attached to this appeal as page 8 of the attached annexures.

To

District Judge Lucknow

ADDRESS:- District & Sessions Court Lucknow

Kaisarbagh P.S.-Wazeerganj

Lucknow-226001 (Uttar Pradesh) India

Prayer-This appeal is filed by the appellant being aggrieved with the denial of information in the R.T.I. No. -49 /2021 of the appellant Dinesh Pratap Singh S/O Angad Prasad Singh submitted on 18 Nov 2021 ipso facto obvious from the attached document.

Speed post tracking and other detail of the appeal submitted before district judge Lucknow under Subsection 1 of section 19 of the Right to Information Act 2005 is attached as PDF document to this grievance.

I pray before the Honourable Sir order dated 07-03-2006 passed by Justice B.B. Agarwal of Lucknow bench of the High court of judicature at Allahabad was bypassed by the Lucknow Development Authority and carried out execution of the registry and also bypassed by Home secretary, commissioner of police Lucknow and Station officer police station Ashiana Lucknow as respondent number 1, 2 and 3. by grabbing the land and house and slapping serious charges on the appellant and his family members and now the same blunder is being committed by your subordinate court bypassing order dated 07-03-2006 passed by Justice B.B. Agarwal of Lucknow bench of the High court of judicature at Allahabad.

I pray before the Honourable Sir order dated 07-03-2006 passed by Justice B.B. Agarwal of Lucknow bench of the High court of judicature at Allahabad It is simply ordered that the respondent number 4 to7 shall open the lock of the staircase so that Smt Anuradha Singh the petitioner may come out of the house and take the proper and appropriate remedy in the competent court and after that, she may have the liberty to go anywhere. Respondnt1-Secretary Dept. of home 2-Police commissioner Lucknow 3-SHO police station -Ashiana,

Moreover, Honourable Justice in its order said that the raised matter is civil and amenable by filing a title suit before the court or authority.

Grievance Document

Current Status

Case closed   

Date of Action

05/04/2022

Remarks

अनुमोदित आख्या अवलोकनार्थ सादर प्रेषित है अनुमोदित श्रीमान आख्या सादर सेवा में प्रेषित है aakhya sadar sewa me presit hai प्रकरण की जाँच आख्या सादर अवलोकनार्थ प्रेषित है श्रीमान जी रिपोर्ट सादर सेवा में संलग्न है श्रीमान जी आख्या सादर सेवा मे प्रेषित है श्रीमान जी , आख्या सादर सेवा मेें प्रेषित है aakhya sadar sewa me presit hai janch ahakhya salgan hi

Reply Document

Rating

1

Poor

Rating Remarks

The matter concerns the district judge Lucknow and he has taken the decision on the submitted first appeal under subsection one of section 19 of The right to information act 2005 and what it is most unfortunate that chief minister office did not take proper action in the matter. It is quite obvious that district judge took the decision by taking the perusal of the contents of the appeal and passed the appropriate order and he apprised the applicant that his office forwarded the matter to the concerned court now it was duty of the concern court to take the decision on the matter but where that application is missing no one knows but it has been confirmed that matter is not concerning with the negligence of the office of the district judge Lucknow but it is concerned with negligence of the court concerned. It is quite obvious that after 2 and half years of dedicated struggle of the applicant truth came to the light otherwise what was the result a layman can tell. Everyone knows that

Officer Concerns To

Officer Name

Shri Arun Kumar Dube (Joint Secretary)

Organisation name

Government of Uttar Pradesh

Contact Address

Chief Minister Secretariat U.P. Secretariat, Lucknow

Email Address

sushil7769@gmail.com

Contact Number

05222215127

Reminder(s) / Clarification(s)

Reminder Date

Remarks

01/04/2022

The matter concerns the lawlessness and anarchy in the office of the district judge Lucknow where rule of law is always overlooked by the accountable public functionaries.

Whether District Magistrate and police can overcome the anarchy of the district court Lucknow?

If not, how the grievance concerning District judge Lucknow may be transferred to District Magistrate Lucknow?

Whether chief minister office was frightened in forwarding the grievance of the applicant to District Judge because of the contempt proceedings?

क्र.स. सन्दर्भ का प्रकार आदेश देने वाले अधिकारी आदेश/आपत्ति दिनांक आदेश/आपत्ति आख्या देने वाले अधिकारी आख्या दिनांक आख्या स्थिति संलगनक

1 अंतरित लोक शिकायत अनुभाग -3(, मुख्यमंत्री कार्यालय ) 03-03-2022 कृपया शीघ्र नियमानुसार कार्यवाही किये जाने की अपेक्षा की गई है। जिलाधिकारी-लखनऊ, 28-03-2022 अनुमोदित निस्तारित

2 आख्या जिलाधिकारी ( ) 06-03-2022 आवश्यक कार्यवाही करने का कष्ट करें एवं आख्या प्रेषित करें पुलिस आयुक्त-लखनऊ 25-03-2022 आख्या अवलोकनार्थ सादर प्रेषित है अनुमोदित । निस्तारित

3 आख्या पुलिस आयुक्त (पुलिस ) 07-03-2022 आवश्यक कार्यवाही करने का कष्ट करें एवं आख्या प्रेषित करें अपर पुलिस उपायुक्त-पश्चिमी जोन लखनऊ 24-03-2022 श्रीमान आख्या सादर सेवा में प्रेषित है। निस्तारित

4 आख्या अपर पुलिस उपायुक्त (पुलिस ) 11-03-2022 आवश्यक कार्यवाही करने का कष्ट करें एवं आख्या प्रेषित करें क्षेत्राधिकारी / सहायक पुलिस आयुक्त-क्षेत्राधिकारी चौक ,जनपद-लखनऊ 21-03-2022 aakhya sadar sewa me presit hai निस्तारित

5 आख्या अपर पुलिस उपायुक्त (पुलिस ) 21-03-2022 कृपया सही आख्या प्रेषित करें। क्षेत्राधिकारी / सहायक पुलिस आयुक्त-क्षेत्राधिकारी चौक ,जनपद-लखनऊ 21-03-2022 aakhya sadar sewa me presit hai अस्वीकृत

6 आख्या अपर पुलिस उपायुक्त (पुलिस ) 11-03-2022 आवश्यक कार्यवाही करने का कष्ट करें एवं आख्या प्रेषित करें क्षेत्राधिकारी / सहायक पुलिस आयुक्त-क्षेत्राधिकारी बाज़ार खाला ,जनपद-लखनऊ 18-03-2022 प्रकरण की जाँच आख्या सादर अवलोकनार्थ प्रेषित है । निस्तारित

7 आख्या क्षेत्राधिकारी / सहायक पुलिस आयुक्त (पुलिस ) 12-03-2022 नियमनुसार आवश्यक कार्यवाही कर