Gmail Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>
Sub divisional Magistrate Sadar violated subsction 1 of section 19 of the Right to Information Act 2005.
1 message
Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com> 11 March 2022 at 17:29
To: adm.lr.mi-up@gov.in, dmmir <dmmir@nic.in>, commmir@nic.in, "sec. sic" <sec.sic@up.nic.in>, cmup <cmup@up.nic.in>, hgovup <hgovup@up.nic.in>, pmosb <pmosb@pmo.nic.in>, presidentofindia <presidentofindia@rb.nic.in>, supremecourt <supremecourt@nic.in>, urgent-action <urgent-action@ohchr.org>
An application cum appeal under subsection 3 of the section 19 of the Right to Information Act 2005 for violating subsection 1 of section 19 of the Right to Information Act 2005 by Sub divisional Magistrate Sadar ipso facto.
आज देश बर्बादी के कगार पर इसलिए है कि जो जिम्मेदार है वे सब ईमानदारी की एक्टिंग करते है और निरीह जनता से सच छुपाते है यदि बचाना है तो वास्तव में ईमानदारी से काम करना होगा पावर संबिधान की रक्षा के लिए दिया गया है न की जेब भरने के लिए गिने चुने ईमानदारों को झूठे मुकदमो में फसा कर अपनी तिजोरिया भरी जा रही है जनता को इतना पंगु बना दिया गया है की उसकी सोचने समझने की शक्ति ख़त्म हो चुकी है पुनर्जागरण की आवश्यकता है
Registration Number DMOMR/A/2021/60058
Name Yogi M P Singh
Date of Filing 23/10/2021
Today is 11 March 2022 which means more than four months passed and First Appellate Authority did not take any action on the appeal implies lawlessness and anarchy in the working of the public authority.
With due respect, the applicant invites the kind attention of the Honourable Sir to the following submissions as follows.
1-I pray before the Honourable Sir that 51A. Fundamental duties It shall be the duty of every citizen of India (a) to abide by the Constitution and respect its ideals and institutions, the National Flag and the National Anthem;(h) to develop the scientific temper, humanism and the spirit of inquiry and reform;
(i) to safeguard public property and to abjure violence;
(j) to strive towards excellence in all spheres of individual and collective activity so that the nation constantly rises to higher levels of endeavour and achievement.
2-It is submitted before the Honourable Sir that Subsction 1 of section 19 of the Right to Information Act 2005 states as followed.
Any person who, does not receive a decision within the time specified in
sub-section (1) or clause (a) of sub-section (3) of section 7, or is aggrieved by a decision of the Central
Public Information Officer or State Public Information Officer, as the case may be, may within thirty days
from the expiry of such period or from the receipt of such a decision prefer an appeal to such officer who
is senior in rank to the Central Public Information Officer or State Public Information Officer as the case
may be, in each public authority:
Provided that such officer may admit the appeal after the expiry of the period of thirty days if he or
she is satisfied that the appellant was prevented by sufficient cause from filing the appeal in time.
3-I pray before the Honourable Sir that according to subsection 3 of section 19 of the Right to Information Act 2005-
A second appeal against the decision under sub-section (1) shall lie within ninety days from the
date on which the decision should have been made or was actually received, with the Central Information
Commission or the State Information Commission:
Provided that the Central Information Commission or the State Information Commission, as the case
may be, may admit the appeal after the expiry of the period of ninety days if it is satisfied that the
appellant was prevented by sufficient cause from filing the appeal in time.
4-It is submitted before the Honourable Sir that already more than four months passed and no decision taken by the First Appellate Authority Sub divisional Magistrate Sadar District-Mirzapur.
5-I pray before the Honourable Sir that following is the status of the first appeal submitted by the appellant online on the portal of the government of Uttar Pradesh.
Registration Number DMOMR/A/2021/60058
Name Yogi M P Singh
Date of Filing 23/10/2021
Status APPEAL FORWARDED TO CONCERNED FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY as on 16/11/2021
Appellate Authority Details :- Telephone Number:- 9454416810, Email Id:-
Nodal Officer Details
Telephone Number 9454416808
Email-ID
6-It is submitted before the Honourable Sir that following is the first appeal submitted by the appellant online on the portal of the government of Uttar Pradesh.
Online RTI Appeal Form Details
Public Authority Details :-
* Public Authority DISTRICT MAGISTRATE OFFICE MIRZAPUR
Personal Details:-
* Name Yogi M P Singh
Gender Male
* Address Mohalla Surekapuram , Jabalpur Road, Sangmohal post office
Pincode 231001
State Uttar Pradesh
Educational Status Literate
Phone Number Details not provided
Mobile Number +91-7379105911
Email-ID yogimpsingh[at]gmail[dot]com
Citizenship Indian
* Is the Applicant Below Poverty Line ? No
First Appeal Details u/s 19(1) :-
Registration Number DMOMR/A/2021/60058
Date of Filing 23/10/2021
Concerned Appellate Authority Chandra Bhanu Singh
Phone No 9454416810
Email Id
* Ground For Appeal Refused access to Information Requested
((Description of Information sought (upto 500 characters) )
* Prayer or Relief Sought The Court of sub divisional Magistrate performs quasi judicial work and information sought by the information seeker is available in the office of the Subdivisional Magistrate which is being withheld by him because of rampant corruption in his working ipso facto. I have not sought any opinion or consent but sought information which must be available and accessible to aggrieved Sugun Singh whose behalf of this information is being sought. You failed to understand the contents of a representation because of your incompetence. What is information Information is any material in any form. It includes records, documents, memos, e-mails, opinions, advices, press releases, circulars, orders, logbooks, contracts, reports, papers, samples, models, data material held in any electronic form. It also includes information relating to any private body which can be accessed by the public authority under any law for the time being in force. PIO may provide the following information pointwise as sought to the information seeker. 1-Provide the detail of the sub judice matter of the Sugun Singh concerned with partition which adjudication is pending in the court of sub divisional magistrate sadar. 2-Provide the petition /case number and year of the sub judice matter as revealed in the report of the aforementioned grievance. 3-Provide the name and designation of the office clerk who processed the case paper book of Sugun Singh. 4-Provide the copy if any direction issued by the Sub divisional magistrate sadar to either of the parties in the matter.
Supporting document ((only pdf upto 1 MB))
RTI Application Details u/s 6(1) :-
Registration Number DMOMR/R/2021/60071
Date of Filing 13/10/2021
PIO of Public Authority approached Sunil Kumar
Designation Tehsildar
Phone No
Email Id
PIO Order/Decision Number Details not provided
* PIO Order/Decision Date
7-I pray before the Honourable Sir that for more feedback regarding sought information, please visit on the following link
Sugun Singh sought information from S.D.M. Sadar regarding the sub judice matter of partition as adjudication is pending in SDM Court
This is a humble request of your applicant to you, Hon’ble Sir, how can it be justified to withhold public services arbitrarily and promote anarchy, lawlessness and chaos arbitrarily by making the mockery of law of land? There is need of the hour to take harsh steps against the wrongdoer to win the confidence of citizenry and strengthen the democratic values for healthy and prosperous democracy. For this, your applicant shall ever pray for you, Hon’ble Sir.
Date-11/03/2022 Yours sincerely
Yogi M. P. Singh, Mobile number-7379105911,
Mohalla- Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road, District-Mirzapur, Uttar
Pradesh, Pin code-231001.
Tags:
SDM-Sadar-RTI
Registration Number DMOMR/A/2021/60058
ReplyDeleteName Yogi M P Singh
Date of Filing 23/10/2021
Today is 11 March 2022 which means more than four months passed and First Appellate Authority did not take any action on the appeal implies lawlessness and anarchy in the working of the public authority.
The Lawlessness and anarchy on the part of sub divisional magistrate Sadar who has made the mockery of the provisions of the right to information act 2005 quite obvious from the contents of the post and lackadaisical approach of the sub divisional magistrate to entertain the the appeal submitted under subsection 1 of section 19 of the right to information act 2005.
ReplyDelete