Chief minister office forwarded matter concerning assistant labour commissioner Mirzapur to D.M. Prayagraj and disposed arbitrarily

 

Event Details For : EU438132188INCurrent Status : ITEM DELIVERED Item Delivered [To: BEAT NO 20 (Addressee) ]

Date Time Office Event

16/02/2022 10:39:58 Mirzapur HO (Beat Number:20) ITEM DELIVERED Item Delivered [To: BEAT NO 20 (Addressee) ]

Event Details For : EU438132191INCurrent Status : ITEM DELIVERED Item Delivered [To: BEAT NO 20 (Addressee) ]

Date Time Office Event

16/02/2022 10:39:58 Mirzapur HO (Beat Number:20) ITEM DELIVERED Item Delivered [To: BEAT NO 20 (Addressee) ]

Grievance Status for registration number : GOVUP/E/2022/08782

Grievance Concerns To

Name Of Complainant

Yogi M. P. Singh

Date of Receipt

20/02/2022

Received By Ministry/Department

Uttar Pradesh

Grievance Description

An application under article 51 A of the constitution of India to overcome lawlessness and anarchy on behalf of Sudarshan Maurya. Whether a matter concerning deep irregularity can be bypassed on the flimsy ground that the matter is amenable before quasi-judicial court It is dead certain that the chief minister office has supervisory power over the function of the lower judiciary along with the administrative control of the High court of judicature at Allahabad and function of quasi-judicial staff comes under the ambit of the Government of Uttar Pradesh directly. Here an aggrieved applicant submitted against the arbitrary issue of notices to parties without considering the pros and cons of the matter and overlooking its jurisdiction consequently concerned assistant labour commissioner crossed the boundary of its powers delegated by the government. Which is subject to the government to keep its vigilant eyes over such lawlessness and anarchy and obligatory duty of the citizens to bring such matters to government. Government ought to order an inquiry which must be carried out in a transparent and accountable manner. To neglect the matter only promotes law breakers in the society.

In the court of Assistant Labour Commissioner District-Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh Payment of Wages Act, 1936 Case number-P.W./01/2022 Prayer-Notice issued through letter number- 78-80 dated 27-01-2022 against Sudarshan Maurya S/O Brijlal Maurya and Sandeep Maurya S/O Brijlal Maurya is ultra vires to Payment of Wages Act, 1936 therefore liable to be quashed because based on the concealed and false facts of the case. More details are attached to this representation. Object of the Payment of Wages Act, 1936 The Payment of Wages Act regulates the payment of wages to certain classes of persons employed in industry and its importance cannot be under-estimated. The Act guarantees payment of wages on time and without any deductions except those authorised under the Act. The Act provides for the responsibility for payment of wages, fixation of wage period, time and mode of payment of wages, permissible deduction as also casts upon the employer a duty to seek the approval of the Government for the acts and permission for which fines may be imposed by him and also sealing of the fines, and also for a machinery to hear and decide complaints regarding the deduction from wages or in delay in payment of wages, penalty for malicious and vexatious claims. The Act does not apply to persons whose wage is Rs. 24,000/- or more per month. The Act also provides to the effect that a worker cannot contract out of any right conferred upon him under the Act. This implies that Payment of Wages Act, 1936 deals with the dispute between employer and employees but not between a contractor and a common man who had given contract to construct house to contractor Yakoob Ansari S/O Siddik Mia who is plaintiff number 1 in the aforementioned plaint. Yakoob Ali Ansari S/O Siddik Mia itself accepted in the complaint dated 07 June 2021 that he used to take contracts of the construction of houses. This implies that he is a contractor and others i.e. from plaintiff number 3 to 6 are the workers employed by contractor Yakoob Ali Ansari S/O Siddik Mia. We notice receivers Sudarshan Maurya S/O Brijlal Maurya and Sandeep Maurya S/O Brijlal Maurya do not know plaintiff number 3 to 6. Hon'ble Sir may be pleased to take the perusal of annexure 1. Sudarshan Maurya S/O Brijlal Maurya is the defendant 1 served the notice to Yakoob Ali Ansari S/O Mohammad Siddik Mia and his son Farook Ansari S/O Yakoob Ansari to pay detriment occurred to defendant Rs.803885.00 because of the dereliction of the contractor. Aforementioned still not compensated the loss but trying to deviate from real issue through aforementioned notice. Sir that executive officer municipality Mirzapur city submitted the aforementioned report under his sign on 09-09-2021 bearing letter number 210 , for more feedback, vide attached document.

Grievance Document

Current Status

Under process   

Date of Action

20/02/2022

Officer Concerns To

Officer Name

Shri Arun Kumar Dube (Joint Secretary)

Organisation name

Uttar Pradesh

Contact Address

Chief Minister Secretariat U.P. Secretariat, Lucknow

Email Address

sushil7769@gmail.com

Contact Number

05222215127

Reminder(s) / Clarification(s)

Reminder Date

Remarks

27/03/2022

It is quite obvious that the matter concerns the working of the labour commissioner Mirzapur but it was sent to D.M. Prayagraj arbitrarily in cryptic manner. Vide संदर्भ संख्या : 60000220024134 , दिनांक - 27 Mar 2022 तक की स्थिति

आवेदनकर्ता का विवरण :

शिकायत संख्या:-60000220024134

1 अंतरित लोक शिकायत अनुभाग -3(, मुख्यमंत्री कार्यालय ) 21-02-2022 कृपया शीघ्र नियमानुसार कार्यवाही किये जाने की अपेक्षा की गई है। जिलाधिकारी-प्रयागराज , 25-03-2022 अधीनस्थ अधिकारी के स्तर पर निस्तारित निक्षेपित

2 अंतरित जिलाधिकारी ( ) 24-03-2022 आवश्यक कार्यवाही करने का कष्ट करें एवं आख्या प्रेषित करें वरिष्ठ /पुलिस अधीक्षक-प्रयागराज ,पुलिस 25-03-2022 प्रकरण का संबंध जनपद मिर्जापुर से है। निस्तारित

संदर्भ संख्या : 60000220024134 , दिनांक - 27 Mar 2022 तक की स्थिति

आवेदनकर्ता का विवरण :

शिकायत संख्या:-60000220024134

आवेदक का नाम-Yogi M. P. Singhविषय-An application under article 51 A of the constitution of India to overcome lawlessness and anarchy on behalf of Sudarshan Maurya. Whether a matter concerning deep irregularity can be bypassed on the flimsy ground that the matter is amenable before quasi-judicial court It is dead certain that the chief minister office has supervisory power over the function of the lower judiciary along with the administrative control of the High court of judicature at Allahabad and function of quasi-judicial staff comes under the ambit of the Government of Uttar Pradesh directly. Here an aggrieved applicant submitted against the arbitrary issue of notices to parties without considering the pros and cons of the matter and overlooking its jurisdiction consequently concerned assistant labour commissioner crossed the boundary of its powers delegated by the government. Which is subject to the government to keep its vigilant eyes over such lawlessness and anarchy and obligatory duty of the citizens to bring such matters to government. Government ought to order an inquiry which must be carried out in a transparent and accountable manner. To neglect the matter only promotes law breakers in the society. In the court of Assistant Labour Commissioner District-Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh Payment of Wages Act, 1936 Case number-P.W./01/2022 Prayer-Notice issued through letter number- 78-80 dated 27-01-2022 against Sudarshan Maurya S/O Brijlal Maurya and Sandeep Maurya S/O Brijlal Maurya is ultra vires to Payment of Wages Act, 1936 therefore liable to be quashed because based on the concealed and false facts of the case. More details are attached to this representation. Object of the Payment of Wages Act, 1936 The Payment of Wages Act regulates the payment of wages to certain classes of persons employed in industry and its importance cannot be under-estimated. The Act guarantees payment of wages on time and without any deductions except those authorised under the Act. The Act provides for the responsibility for payment of wages, fixation of wage period, time and mode of payment of wages, permissible deduction as also casts upon the employer a duty to seek the approval of the Government for the acts and permission for which fines may be imposed by him and also sealing of the fines, and also for a machinery to hear and decide complaints regarding the deduction from wages or in delay in payment of wages, penalty for malicious and vexatious claims. The Act does not apply to persons whose wage is Rs. 24,000/- or more per month. The Act also provides to the effect that a worker cannot contract out of any right conferred upon him under the Act. This implies that Payment of Wages Act, 1936 deals with the dispute between employer and employees but not between a contractor and a common man who had given contract to construct house to contractor Yakoob Ansari S/O Siddik Mia who is plaintiff number 1 in the aforementioned plaint. Yakoob Ali Ansari S/O Siddik Mia itself accepted in the complaint dated 07 June 2021 that he used to take contracts of the construction of houses. This implies that he is a contractor and others i.e. from plaintiff number 3 to 6 are the workers employed by contractor Yakoob Ali Ansari S/O Siddik Mia. We notice receivers Sudarshan Maurya S/O Brijlal Maurya and Sandeep Maurya S/O Brijlal Maurya do not know plaintiff number 3 to 6. Hon'ble Sir may be pleased to take the perusal of annexure 1. Sudarshan Maurya S/O Brijlal Maurya is the defendant 1 served the notice to Yakoob Ali Ansari S/O Mohammad Siddik Mia and his son Farook Ansari S/O Yakoob Ansari to pay detriment occurred to defendant Rs.803885.00 because of the dereliction of the contractor. Aforementioned still not compensated the loss but trying to deviate from real issue through aforementioned notice. Sir that executive officer municipality Mirzapur city submitted the aforementioned report under his sign on 09-09-2021 bearing letter number 210 , for more feedback, vide attached document.

विभाग -शिकायत श्रेणी -

नियोजित तारीख-08-03-2022शिकायत की स्थिति-

स्तर -जनपद स्तरपद -जिलाधिकारी

प्राप्त रिमाइंडर-

प्राप्त फीडबैक -दिनांक को फीडबैक:-

फीडबैक की स्थिति -

संलग्नक देखें -Click here

नोट- अंतिम कॉलम में वर्णित सन्दर्भ की स्थिति कॉलम-5 में अंकित अधिकारी के स्तर पर हुयी कार्यवाही दर्शाता है!

अधीनस्थ द्वारा प्राप्त आख्या :

क्र.स. सन्दर्भ का प्रकार आदेश देने वाले अधिकारी आदेश/आपत्ति दिनांक आदेश/आपत्ति आख्या देने वाले अधिकारी आख्या दिनांक आख्या स्थिति संलगनक

1 अंतरित लोक शिकायत अनुभाग -3(, मुख्यमंत्री कार्यालय ) 21-02-2022 कृपया शीघ्र नियमानुसार कार्यवाही किये जाने की अपेक्षा की गई है। जिलाधिकारी-प्रयागराज , 25-03-2022 अधीनस्थ अधिकारी के स्तर पर निस्तारित निक्षेपित

2 अंतरित जिलाधिकारी ( ) 24-03-2022 आवश्यक कार्यवाही करने का कष्ट करें एवं आख्या प्रेषित करें वरिष्ठ /पुलिस अधीक्षक-प्रयागराज ,पुलिस 25-03-2022 प्रकरण का संबंध जनपद मिर्जापुर से है। निस्तारित