Think about anarchy that PIO and FAA is same public staff consequently in the appeal PIO attached the same report to dispose of appeal

 



Registration Number SPMZR/A/2021/60029

Name Sudarshan Maurya

Date of Filing 21/12/2021

Status APPEAL DISPOSED OF as on 04/01/2022

Reply :- answer to surdashan

View Document

  Nodal Officer Details  

Telephone Number 9454401105

Email-ID addlspopmzr@gmail.com

Online RTI Appeal Form Details

Public Authority Details :-

   

* Public Authority SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE OFFICE MIRZAPUR

   

Personal Details:-

* Name Sudarshan Maurya

Gender Male

* Address Sohta Ka Adda , Jungi Road, Mirzapur city

Pincode 231001

State Uttar Pradesh

Educational Status Literate

Phone Number -9455024500

Mobile Number +91-9455024500

Email-ID yogimpsingh[at]gmail[dot]com

Citizenship Indian

* Is the Applicant Below Poverty Line ? No

First Appeal Details u/s 19(1) :-

Registration Number SPMZR/A/2021/60029

Date of Filing 21/12/2021

Concerned Appellate Authority AJAY KUMAR SINGH

Phone No 05442252578

Email Id spmzr-up@nic.in

* Ground For Appeal Refused access to Information Requested

((Description of Information sought (upto 500 characters) )

* Prayer or Relief Sought Uttar Pradesh Shasan Prashasnik Sudhar Anubhag-2 NOTIFICATION No. 544/43-2-2015-Su.Aa.Ni. 2015(1)2015 Lucknow: Dated 03 December, 2015 which is known as UTTAR PRADESH RIGHT TO INFORMATION RULES, 2015According to point 3 subsection 2 b of section 4 states as follows.Any request for obtaining information under the Act should fulfil thefollowing conditions:The information sought should not involve providing answers to hypothetical questions. 

Sought information is 

1-Registration Number SPMZR/R/2021/60029 Name Sudarshan Maurya Date of Filing 03/08/2021, you had to provide reason of not attaching the reply of APIO sent in the matter to information seeker on the RTI portal therefore information seeker sought reason required under subsection 1 d of section 4 of R.T.I. Act 2005.of government of Uttar Pradesh providing facilities to information seekers online in easy way as accomplishment of government. Now you have arbitrarily attached aforementioned denial dated 01-Dec-2021 on 13/12/2021 while factual position is that you have provided different reply to the information seeker earlier and did not attach that reply actually made in the matter. Whether police department will run with such arbitrariness and tyranny. The matter will be taken up before commission as PIO/Nodal officer  took under teeth provisions of RTI Act 2005 ipso facto. 

2-Whether police has not fabricated the information seeker under section 107/116 without any solid reason with sole aim to harass the information seeker. Every just work has reason and unjust work is without reason. 

3-Whether police concerned not requested city magistrate to nominate technical expert to look into matter as police was not so expert. Whether it is imagination of the information seeker. 

4-Report of the Executive Engineer municipality Mirzapur city dated-09-09-2021 is the imagination of the information seeker. When police had not to take any action in the matter then why it troubled city engineer, executive officer Municipality Mirzapur or expected that they will also speak the language of wrongdoer contractor like police. 

Supporting document ((only pdf upto 1 MB)) Supporting document not provided

RTI Application Details u/s 6(1) :-

Registration Number SPMZR/R/2021/60049

Date of Filing 06/11/2021

PIO of Public Authority approached mahesh singh atri

Designation mirzapur

Phone No 9454401105

Email Id addlspopmzr@gmail.com

PIO Order/Decision Number Details not provided

* PIO Order/Decision Date

Comments

  1. Report of the Executive Engineer municipality Mirzapur city dated-09-09-2021 is the imagination of the information seeker. When police had not to take any action in the matter then why it troubled city engineer, executive officer Municipality Mirzapur or expected that they will also speak the language of wrongdoer contractor like police.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Whether it is justified that public information officer in the office of superintendent of police overlook the information which has been sought by the the the information seeker under right to information act concerning with the working of the police and they are not providing information to conceal the corruption in the department of police.

    ReplyDelete
  3. It reflects deep-rooted corruption in the working of the police which has support of the senior rank personnel of the department.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Your view points inspire us