Appellate Authority SATISH SINGH - ADD. SEC. VNS is an incompetent additional secretary quite obvious from his indiscretion
Name Yogi M P Singh
Date of Filing 02/01/2022
Status APPEAL DISPOSED OF as on 18/02/2022
Reply :- please find the attachment.
View Document
Nodal Officer Details
Telephone Number 05322623820
Email-ID upmsp@rediffmail.com
Online RTI Appeal Form Details
Public Authority Details :-
* Public Authority Madhyamik Shiksha Parishad
Personal Details:-
* Name Yogi M P Singh
Gender Male
* Address Mohalla Surekapuram , Lakshmi Narayan Baikunth Mahadev Mandir, Jabalpur Road
Pincode 231001
State Uttar Pradesh
Educational Status Literate
Phone Number Details not provided
Mobile Number +91-7379105911
Email-ID myogimpsingh[at]gmail[dot]com
Citizenship Indian
* Is the Applicant Below Poverty Line ? No
First Appeal Details u/s 19(1) :-
Registration Number DPMSP/A/2022/60001
Date of Filing 02/01/2022
Concerned Appellate Authority SATISH SINGH - ADD. SEC. VNS
Phone No
Email Id
* Ground For Appeal Refused access to Information Requested
((Description of Information sought (upto 500 characters) )
* Prayer or Relief Sought PIO cryptically denied the sought information to avoid accountability of the concerned public functionaries. Here applicant has sought five point information which must be provided to information seeker point wise as sought by information seeker. For your convenience, you may take the perusal of the five point information sought by information seeker to provide information seeker. You have not provided single point information in prescribed format as required under law. The matter concerns deep rooted corruption so in order to fix the accountability of the concerned, PIO may provide the sought information.
Concerned PIO may provide the following information to the information seeker.
1-Provide the name and designation of the staffs who processed the aforementioned complaint of the information seeker.
2-Provide the name and designation of the staffs who processed the aforementioned complaint of the aggrieved applicant Suraj Kumar Yadav.
3-Government of Uttar Pradesh specially chief minister office fixed 09-08-2021 to dispose of the aforementioned grievance but according to status dated 23 Sep 2021 which means still pending. Please provide the details of any action taken against the indisplined staff overlooking a fixed date by monitoring body chief minister office if no action is taken, then provide a reason for promoting such undisciplined staff.
4-Please provide the posting details of the staffs who processed the aforementioned complaint of the information seeker.
5-Please provide information available under subsection 1 b of section 4 as voluntarily disclosed by the public authority.
Supporting document ((only pdf upto 1 MB)) Supporting document not provided
RTI Application Details u/s 6(1) :-
Registration Number DPMSP/R/2021/60446
Date of Filing 23/09/2021
PIO of Public Authority approached REG. OFFICE VARANASI
Designation DEPT. SECRETARY
Phone No
Email Id rovaranasi@gmail.com
PIO Order/Decision Number Details not provided
* PIO Order/Decision Date
Government of Uttar Pradesh specially chief minister office fixed 09-08-2021 to dispose of the aforementioned grievance but according to status dated 23 Sep 2021 which means still pending. Please provide the details of any action taken against the indisplined staff overlooking a fixed date by monitoring body chief minister office if no action is taken, then provide a reason for promoting such undisciplined staff.
ReplyDeleteFrom the post it is quite obvious that there is rampant corruption in the working of the additional secretary posted in the the regional office Varanasi of the Uttar Pradesh board of High school and intermediate which is not expected in the regime of Yogi Adityanath government. Think about the credibility of the additional secretary it seems that he is incompetent for the post because he could not understand the contents of the post and blindly supported the illegal stand of the public information officer. Which is the mockery of the right to information act 2005.
ReplyDeleteHere appellant has sought five point information but because of rampant corruption in the office of additional secretary, regional office Varanasi, of intermediate and High school board of Uttar Pradesh, they did not provide any information ipso facto obvious.
ReplyDelete