Office of principal chief conservator Lucknow forwarded the appeal to chief conservator Gorakhpur as D.F.O. Gorakhpur misled only

 


Registration Number PCCFO/A/2021/60026

Name Yogi M P Singh

Date of Filing 22/12/2021

Status APPEAL DISPOSED OF as on 06/01/2022

Reply :- APPEAL TRANSFER

View Document

  Nodal Officer Details  

Telephone Number 9450024393

Email-ID pccf-up@nic.in

Online RTI Appeal Form Details

Public Authority Details :-

   

* Public Authority Principal Chief Conservator of Forest and HOD

   

Personal Details of Appellant:-

Request Registration Number PCCFO/R/2021/60019

Request Registration Date 09/10/2021

* Name Yogi M P Singh

Gender Male

* Address Mohalla Surekapuram , Lakshmi Narayan Baikunth Mahadev Mandir, Jabalpur Road

Pincode 231001

Country India

State Uttar Pradesh

Status Details not provided

Educational Status Literate

Phone Number Details not provided

Mobile Number +91-7379105911

Email-ID myogimpsingh[at]gmail[dot]com

Appeal Details :-

Citizenship Indian

* Is the Applicant Below Poverty Line ? No

* Ground For Appeal Provided Incomplete,Misleading or False Information

* PIO of Public Authority approached Shree Anil Kumar Srivastava

PIO Order/Decision Number Details not provided

* PIO Order/Decision Date

((Description of Information sought (upto 500 characters) )

* Prayer or Relief Sought Available information from point 1 to 3 is misleading 

1- Information is related to 18 divisional forest officers to whom clarification notices have been sent by the Principal Chief Forest Conservator Office Lucknow on behalf of the government, such a big action in which the divisional officer Gorakhpur himself is in the dock, what information can he give, that is, it The information itself is expedient to be Forest given by the Public Information Officer, Principal Chief and Guardian Office, Lucknow. 

2-Revered  Sir circular  was asked from you by the applicant, on the basis of which  letter addressed to the Divisional Forest Officer, Gorakhpur, which was written by the  Area  Officer, but the action was taken by the Chief Conservator, Gorakhpur. Whether he had the additional charge of Divisional Forest officer Gorakhpur or has been directed to him by any order or. It is a jungle raj that the chief conservator is working arbitrarily and the circular issued in this regard has not been made available. 

3-In the third point, the appellant has demanded that order / circular, which gives the Divisional Forest Officer, Gorakhpur the right to file the letter written by the Area Forest Officer Baki without any action, but they want to hide their wrongdoings by giving roundabout/ confusive answers. If this is not a jungle rule then what is it? 

Details are available in PDF attachment.बर्बाद गुलिस्ता करने को जब एक ही उल्लू काफी था यहा हर साख पे उल्लू बैठा है अंजामे गुलिस्ता क्या होगा

Supporting document ((only pdf upto 1 MB))

Beerbhadra Singh

To write blogs and applications for the deprived sections who can not raise their voices to stop their human rights violations by corrupt bureaucrats and executives.

1 Comments

Your view points inspire us

  1. In the third point, the appellant has demanded that order / circular, which gives the Divisional Forest Officer, Gorakhpur the right to file the letter written by the Area Forest Officer Baki without any action, but they want to hide their wrongdoings by giving roundabout/ confusive answers. If this is not a jungle rule then what is it?

    ReplyDelete
Previous Post Next Post