(iv) If a person makes an application to a public authority for some information which is the concern of a public authority under any State Government or the Union Territory Administration, the Central Public Information Officer (CPIO) of the public authority receiving the application should inform the applicant that the information may be had from the concerned State Government UT Administration. Application, in such a case, need not be transferred to the State Government UT Administration.
Following is the Hindi translation of the manipulated office memorandum provided by the First Appellate Authority who tried to mislead the information seeker by substituting CPIO by PIO and unnecessarily including Uttar Pradesh.
It is quite obvious that office memorandum of the ministry of personnel and training is for the CPIOs of the central government but it is reflecting insolence of the incompetent of the First Appellate Authority who made failed attempt to mislead the information seeker.
Please refer to DOPT OM no. 10/2/2008-IR dated 12/06/2008, जिसमें यह स्पष्ट किया गया है कि यदि कोई व्यक्ति किसी राज्य सरकार या केंद्र शासित प्रदेश प्रशासन के तहत किसी सार्वजनिक प्राधिकरण से संबंधित किसी जानकारी के लिए किसी सार्वजनिक प्राधिकरण को आवेदन करता है, तो प्राप्त करने वाले लोक प्राधिकरण के केंद्रीय लोक सूचना अधिकारी (पीआईओ) आवेदन में आवेदक को सूचित किया जाना चाहिए कि सूचना संबंधित राज्य सरकार/संघ राज्य क्षेत्र प्रशासन से प्राप्त की जा सकती है। ऐसे मामले में आवेदन को राज्य सरकार/संघ राज्य क्षेत्र प्रशासन को स्थानांतरित करने की आवश्यकता नहीं है। इसके अलावा, पोर्टल के होम पेज पर दिए गए निर्देश स्पष्ट रूप से इंगित करते हैं। कृपया इस पोर्टल के माध्यम से सरकार सहित राज्य सरकारों के तहत सार्वजनिक प्राधिकरणों के लिए आरटीआई आवेदन दाखिल न करें। उत्तर प्रदेश की। यदि दायर किया जाता है, तो आवेदन राशि की वापसी के बिना, वापस कर दिया जाएगा। तदनुसार, आपका आरटीआई आवेदन, जो किसी भी राज्य सरकार के तहत एक सार्वजनिक प्राधिकरण की चिंता है, इसके साथ वापस किया जाता है। आप इसे राज्य सरकार के तहत संबंधित सार्वजनिक प्राधिकरण के समक्ष दायर कर सकते हैं।
Registration Number DPLAW/A/2022/60002
Name Yogi M P Singh
Date of Filing 16/01/2022
Status FIRST APPEAL APPLICATION RETURNED TO APPLICANT as on 17/01/2022
Remarks :- Please refer to DOPT OM no. 10/2/2008-IR dated 12/06/2008, wherein it has been clarified that If a person makes an application to a public authority for some information which is the concern of a public authority under any State Government or the Union Territory Administration, the Central Public Information Officer (PIO) of the public authority receiving the application should inform the applicant that the information may be had from the concerned State Government/UT Administration. Application, in such a case, need not be transferred to the State Government/UT Administration. Moreover, the instructions on the home page of the portal clearly indicate viz. Please do not file RTI applications through this portal for the public authorities under the State Governments, including Govt. of Uttar Pradesh. If filed, the application would be returned, without refund of amount. Accordingly, your RTI application, which is the concern of a public authority under any State Government, is returned herewith. You may file the same before the concerned public authority under the State Government.
Nodal Officer Details
Telephone Number 9454412484
Email-ID santlal10266@gmail.com
Online RTI Appeal Form Details
Public Authority Details :-
* Public Authority Law Department
Personal Details of Appellant:-
Request Registration Number DPLAW/R/2021/60107
Request Registration Date 04/10/2021
* Name Yogi M P Singh
Gender Male
* Address Mohalla Surekapuram , Lakshmi Narayan Baikunth Mahadev Mandir, Jabalpur Road
Pincode 231001
Country India
State Uttar Pradesh
Status Details not provided
Educational Status Literate
Phone Number Details not provided
Mobile Number +91-7379105911
Email-ID myogimpsingh[at]gmail[dot]com
Appeal Details :-
Citizenship Indian
* Is the Applicant Below Poverty Line ? No
* Ground For Appeal No Response Within the Time Limit
* PIO of Public Authority approached Nodal Officer
PIO Order/Decision Number Details not provided
* PIO Order/Decision Date
((Description of Information sought (upto 500 characters) )
* Prayer or Relief Sought Following information sought from public information officer unfortunately he did not provide information still after undue delay. Corruption has a direct impact on the validity of human rights, largely because of two reasons. On one side, corruption deprives societies of important resources that could be used for basic needs, such as public health, education, infrastructure, or security. On the other hand, corruption has direct damaging consequences in general on the functioning of state institutions, and in particular on the administration of justice. Corruption decreases public trust in justice and weakens the capacity of judicial systems to guarantee the protection of human rights, and it affects the tasks and duties of the judges, prosecutors, lawyers, and other legal professionals. By seeking impunity, corruption has a devastating effect on the judicial system as a whole. One of the goals of human rights is to fight corruption and its implications on the administration of justice, as is to act against corruption through an independent and strong administration of justice.
PIO may provide the following information to the information seeker point wise as sought.
1-Department of justice may provide the initiatives of the government of Uttar Pradesh undertaken by it to overcome the growing corruption in the state judiciary as law order can not be maintained through a derailed judiciary in the state for the last five years.
2-Please provide the statistics of the government of taking action against the wrongdoer judicial members against whom action taken by the Government of Uttar Pradesh on the complaints of allegations of corruption of the last five years.
3-Please provide the name name and designation of judicial members against whom the government of Uttar Pradesh took action in the last five years on the complaints of allegations of corruption.
4-Please provide the statistics of the complaints of allegations of corruption received against the judicial members in the state and how many of them entertained and how many of them culminated into action against the corrupt judicial members for the last five years in the state of Uttar Pradesh.
Supporting document ((only pdf upto 1 MB))
Following is the Hindi translation of the manipulated office memorandum provided by the First Appellate Authority who tried to mislead the information seeker by substituting CPIO by PIO and unnecessarily including Uttar Pradesh.
ReplyDeleteIt is quite obvious that office memorandum of the ministry of personnel and training is for the CPIOs of the central government but it is reflecting insolence of the incompetent of the First Appellate Authority who made failed attempt to mislead the information seeker.