Widow Sugun Singh submitted first appeal against sub divisional officer for not providing information under RTI Act 2005





Your RTI Appeal filed successfully.

Please note down the details of registration.

Registration Number DMOMR/A/2021/60072

Name Sugun Singh

Date of Filing 30-12-2021

Request filed with DISTRICT MAGISTRATE OFFICE MIRZAPUR

 Contact Details  

Telephone Number 9454416808

Email-ID adm.lr.mi-up@gov.in

Online RTI Appeal Form Details

Public Authority Details :-

   

* Public Authority DISTRICT MAGISTRATE OFFICE MIRZAPUR

   

Personal Details of Appellant:-

Request Registration Number DMOMR/R/2021/60059

Request Registration Date 08/09/2021

* Name Sugun Singh

Gender Male

* Address Village Babura , Post Babura, Police station Vindhyachal

Pincode 231307

Country India

State Uttar Pradesh

Status Details not provided

Educational Status Illiterate

Phone Number Details not provided

Mobile Number +91-9649237054

Email-ID myogimpsingh[at]gmail[dot]com

Appeal Details :-

Citizenship Indian

* Is the Applicant Below Poverty Line ? No

* Ground For Appeal Refused access to Information Requested

* PIO of Public Authority approached Sunil Kumar

PIO Order/Decision Number Details not provided

* PIO Order/Decision Date

((Description of Information sought (upto 500 characters) )

* Prayer or Relief Sought Reason for Rejection :- Rule 4(2)(a).Uttar Pradesh Shasan Prashasnik Sudhar Anubhag-2 NOTIFICATION No. 544/43-2-2015-Su.Aa.Ni. 2015(1)2015 Lucknow: Dated 03 December, 2015 According to subsection 2 a of section 4 of UTTAR PRADESH RIGHT TO INFORMATION RULES, 2015,  Any request for obtaining information under the Act should fulfil the following conditions: The information sought should be a part of the record held by or under the control of the public authority concerned. Herewith applicant has sought information under four points but you denied information arbitrarily by taking recourse of  subsection 2 a of section 4 of UTTAR PRADESH RIGHT TO INFORMATION RULES, 2015.Representation dated-20/06/2021 submitted under section 116 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, U.P. Act No. 8 of 2012 Last Updated 30th March 2021 with request for immediate action. Aforementioned representation received in the office of the S.D.M. Sadar on 21/06/2021 quite obvious from the attached speed tracking from the website of the department of post. Whether the aforementioned post received by your office is not a part of your record. It seems that only those communications are part of records in your office in which bribes are taken by the staff, otherwise other posts received by your office are thrown into the dustbin. 

Supporting document ((only pdf upto 1 MB))

Registration Number DMOMR/A/2021/60072

Name Sugun Singh

Date of Filing 30/12/2021

Status RTI APPEAL RECEIVED as on 30/12/2021

  Nodal Officer Details  

Telephone Number 9454416808

Email-ID adm.lr.mi-up@gov.in

Registration Number DMOMR/R/2021/60059

Name Sugun Singh

Date of Filing 08/09/2021

Status REQUEST REJECTED as on 11/10/2021

Reason for Rejection :- Rule 4(2)(a).

Remarks:-

  Nodal Officer Details  

Telephone Number 9454416808

Email-ID adm.lr.mi-up@gov.in

Online RTI Request Form Details

Public Authority Details :-

   

* Public Authority DISTRICT MAGISTRATE OFFICE MIRZAPUR

   

Personal Details of RTI Applicant:-

Registration Number DMOMR/R/2021/60059

Date of Filing 08/09/2021

* Name Sugun Singh

Gender Male

* Address Village Babura , Post Babura, Police station Vindhyachal

Pincode 231307

Country India

State Uttar Pradesh

Status Details not provided

Educational Status Illiterate

Phone Number Details not provided

Mobile Number +91-9649237054

Email-ID myogimpsingh[at]gmail[dot]com

Request Details :-

Citizenship Indian

* Is the Applicant Below Poverty Line ? No

((Description of Information sought (upto 500 characters) )

* Description of Information Sought An application under subsection 1 of section  6 of the Right  to Information Act 2005 to know the status of the representation dated-20/06/2021 submitted under section 116 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, U.P. Act No. 8 of 2012 Last Updated 30th March 2021 with request for immediate action. Aforementioned representation received in the office of the S.D.M. Sadar on 21/06/2021 quite obvious from the attached speed tracking from the website of the department of post. I pray before the Honourable Sir that entire land which is in the side of road is under the possession of Ashok Kumar Singh alias Angad Singh and widow is unable to reach the land arbitrarily provided by the Ashok Kumar Singh alias Angad Singh as her share who is the eldest son of Surujoo Singh as aforementioned. As stated above his sons are of criminal nature so time and his sons assault the applicant and her sons whenever we go to the piece of land provided by them arbitrarily as our share and Vindhyachal police says that matter concerns the department of revenue so take reprieve from the Tahsil sadar under the law of land. 

SDM sadar who is also the public information officer of his department may provide the following information to the applicant cum information seeker point wise as follows.

1-S.D.M. Sadar may provide the current status of the aforementioned case submitted under revenue code 2006 which detail is attached to this RTI request. 

2-Please provide the name and designation of the public staff in the office of the SDM sadar processing the aforementioned case. 

3-Please provide the reason as required under subsection 1 d of section 4 of the Right to Information Act 2005 if SDM sadar did not take any action as due procedure was followed by the applicant and appropriate fee was paid. 

4-Also provide the detail of the posting of the S.D.M. Sadar and Tahsildar Sadar  in the district Mirzapur. 

* Concerned PIO Sunil Kumar

Supporting document ((only pdf upto 1 MB))

Comments

  1. 1-S.D.M. Sadar may provide the current status of the aforementioned case submitted under revenue code 2006 which detail is attached to this RTI request.

    2-Please provide the name and designation of the public staff in the office of the SDM sadar processing the aforementioned case.

    3-Please provide the reason as required under subsection 1 d of section 4 of the Right to Information Act 2005 if SDM sadar did not take any action as due procedure was followed by the applicant and appropriate fee was paid.

    4-Also provide the detail of the posting of the S.D.M. Sadar and Tahsildar Sadar in the district Mirzapur.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Your view points inspire us