PIO in the office of commissioner of police Lucknow made the mockery of provisions of R.T.I. Act 2005 ipso facto Dinesh Pratap Singh





Registration Number PCLKO/R/2021/60280

Name Yogi M P Singh

Date of Filing 04/10/2021

Status REQUEST DISPOSED OF as on 26/11/2021

Reply :- please find the attachment.

View Document

  Nodal Officer Details  

Telephone Number 9454401089

Email-ID jansuchanalko@gmail.com

Online RTI Request Form Details

Public Authority Details :-

   

* Public Authority POLICE COMMISSIONER OFFICE LUCKNOW

   

Personal Details of RTI Applicant:-

Registration Number PCLKO/R/2021/60280

Date of Filing 04/10/2021

* Name Yogi M P Singh

Gender Male

* Address Mohalla Surekapuram , Lakshmi Narayan Baikunth Mahadev Mandir , Jabalpur Road

Pincode 231001

Country India

State Uttar Pradesh

Status Details not provided

Educational Status Literate

  Above Graduate

Phone Number Details not provided

Mobile Number +91-7379105911

Email-ID myogimpsingh[at]gmail[dot]com

Request Details :-

Citizenship Indian

* Is the Applicant Below Poverty Line ? No

((Description of Information sought (upto 500 characters) )

* Description of Information Sought An application under subsection 1 of section 6 of the Right to Information Act 2005 on behalf of Dinesh Pratap Singh S/O Angad Prasad Singh. The matter concerns communication dated 25/09/2021 sent by PIO/ Additional Police Commissioner main office commissionerate Lucknow letter number- व -475/05 (356 औ )/21 received today by Dinesh Pratap Singh S/O Angad Prasad Singh contained report of Dr. Archana Singh Assistant police commissioner Cantt Lucknow as enclosure. Both communication as aforementioned and its enclosure attached herewith. According to enclosure Letter number-एस टी /ए सी पी (सी)-21 (136) /2021 Dated- 22-Sept-2021, Sub inspector Satish Kumar Gupta Police station -Ashiana through its report dated-18/09/2021 provided feedback like possession of house uptill 2009 was vested to Dinesh Pratap Singh S/O Angad Prasad Singh thereafter Aradhana Singh not Anuradha Singh filed petition before court to direct police to lodge FIR under subsection 3 of section 156 of the criminal penal code. Subsequently police registered FIR under sections -448,406, 420,394,467,468 and 471of Indian Penal Code against Dinesh Pratap Singh S/O Angad Prasad Singh and his daughter and wife. Moreover Dinesh Pratap Singh S/O Angad Prasad Singh was detained and sent behind the bar. 

PIO/ Additional Police Commissioner may provide the following information point wise as sought.

 1-Since the applicant always submits online RTI request so PIO may provide the registration detail of the RTI request. 

2-PIO may provide the sought information detail submitted by Dinesh Pratap Singh S/O Angad Prasad Singh inviting aforementioned information 

3-If the information sought online, then PIO may provide reason of not submitting this information on the online portal of the Government of Uttar Pradesh as required under subsection 1 d of section 4 of the Right to Information Act 2005. 

Sir I have sought information but you are running away cryptically through such bogus reports only promoting corruption which is root cause corruption is touching sky in the department of police in the government of Uttar Pradesh. I may expose the Lucknow police on this matter if police commissioner Lucknow may arrange cross examination by summoning all concerned.

* Concerned PIO AJAY KUMAR

Supporting document ((only pdf upto 1 MB))

Comments

  1. Dinesh Pratap Singh S/O Angad Prasad Singh thereafter Aradhana Singh not Anuradha Singh filed petition before court to direct police to lodge FIR under subsection 3 of section 156 of the criminal penal code. Subsequently police registered FIR under sections -448,406, 420,394,467,468 and 471of Indian Penal Code against Dinesh Pratap Singh S/O Angad Prasad Singh and his daughter and wife. Moreover Dinesh Pratap Singh S/O Angad Prasad Singh was detained and sent behind the bar.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Your view points inspire us