Divisional forest officer and office of chief conservator did not provide information even after two months by taking under teeth PCCF
Please note down the details of registration.
Registration Number PCCFO/A/2021/60025
Name Yogi M P Singh
Date of Filing 17-12-2021
Request filed with Principal Chief Conservator of Forest and HOD
Contact Details
Telephone Number 9450024393
Email-ID pccf-up@nic.in
Registration Number PCCFO/A/2021/60025
Name Yogi M P Singh
Date of Filing 17/12/2021
Status RTI APPEAL RECEIVED as on 17/12/2021
Nodal Officer Details
Telephone Number 9450024393
Email-ID pccf-up@nic.in
Online RTI Appeal Form Details
Public Authority Details :-
* Public Authority Principal Chief Conservator of Forest and HOD
Personal Details of Appellant:-
Request Registration Number PCCFO/R/2021/60021
Request Registration Date 11/10/2021
* Name Yogi M P Singh
Gender Male
* Address Mohalla Surekapuram , Lakshmi Narayan Baikunth Mahadev Mandir, Jabalpur Road
Pincode 231001
Country India
State Uttar Pradesh
Status Details not provided
Educational Status Literate
Phone Number Details not provided
Mobile Number +91-7379105911
Email-ID myogimpsingh[at]gmail[dot]com
Appeal Details :-
Citizenship Indian
* Is the Applicant Below Poverty Line ? No
* Ground For Appeal No Response Within the Time Limit
* PIO of Public Authority approached Shree Anil Kumar Srivastava
PIO Order/Decision Number Details not provided
* PIO Order/Decision Date
((Description of Information sought (upto 500 characters) )
* Prayer or Relief Sought Registration Number PCCFO/R/2021/60021 Name Yogi M P Singh Date of Filing 11/10/2021 It is quite obvious that more than two months passed and concerned did not provide information to information seeker.
Sought information is
PIO in the office of principal chief conservator may provide the following information point wise as sought by the information seeker.
1-Posting details of entire class 2 employees in the office of D.F.O. and Chief conservator Gorakhpur including date of joining in Gorakhpur zone.
2-Posting details of entire class 3 employees in the office of D.F.O. and Chief conservator Gorakhpur including date of joining in Gorakhpur zone.
3-Posting details of entire class 4 employees in the office of D.F.O. and Chief conservator Gorakhpur including date of joining in Gorakhpur zone.
4-You may also provide the table rotation carried out by HOD in regard to sought information under point 1 and 2.
This point must be noted that the concerned officer directed by the office of principal chief conservator to provide information did not communicate even in the matter. Information under point 1 is also available in the office of principal chief conservator.
Supporting document ((only pdf upto 1 MB)) Supporting document not provided
Registration Number PCCFO/R/2021/60021
Name Yogi M P Singh
Date of Filing 11/10/2021
Status REQUEST DISPOSED OF as on 07/12/2021
Reply :- Your RTI application will be transferred to DFO Gorakhpur
View Document
Nodal Officer Details
Telephone Number 9450024393
Email-ID pccf-up@nic.in
Online RTI Request Form Details
Public Authority Details :-
* Public Authority Principal Chief Conservator of Forest and HOD
Personal Details of RTI Applicant:-
Registration Number PCCFO/R/2021/60021
Date of Filing 11/10/2021
* Name Yogi M P Singh
Gender Male
* Address Mohalla Surekapuram , Lakshmi Narayan Baikunth Mahadev Mandir, Jabalpur Road
Pincode 231001
Country India
State Uttar Pradesh
Status Details not provided
Educational Status Literate
Phone Number Details not provided
Mobile Number +91-7379105911
Email-ID myogimpsingh[at]gmail[dot]com
Request Details :-
Citizenship Indian
* Is the Applicant Below Poverty Line ? No
((Description of Information sought (upto 500 characters) )
* Description of Information Sought An application under Article 51 A of the constitution of India to make enquiry regarding the implementation and ramification of the excellent transfer policy of Government of Uttar Pradesh in Gorakhpur zone of the department of forest. Transfer policy of the government is attached herewith. Undoubtedly the new transfer policy of the government was excellent but after four and half years of incumbency, the government must evaluate it. The matter concerns the office of the divisional forest officer Gorakhpur and the office of chief conservator Gorakhpur in which mockery of the transfer policy of Government of Uttar Pradesh has been made by the concerned accountable staff.The matter concerns the transfer and posting of class 1, class 2, class 3 and class 4 staff in the department of forest Gorakhpur zone especially in the office DFO and chief conservator Gorakhpur of the Government of Uttar Pradesh. Undoubtedly transfer and posting in the government has taken a form of industry despite efforts of the government of Uttar Pradesh to curb it publically. नई तबादला नीति में एक जिले में तीन वर्ष व एक मंडल में सात साल पूरे करने वाले समूह क एवं ख के स्थानांतरण का प्रावधान किया गया है मंडलीय कार्यालयों व विभागाध्यक्ष कार्यालयों में की गई तैनाती की अवधि को मंडल में निर्धारित सात वर्ष की अवधि में शामिल नहीं माना जाएगा। पिछली सरकार में जहां तबादलों की सीमा अधिकतम दस प्रतिशत थी, वहीं भाजपा सरकार ने इसे बीस प्रतिशत कर दिया है PIO in the office of principal chief conservator may provide the following information point wise as sought by the information seeker.1-Posting details of entire class 2 employees in the office of D.F.O. and Chief conservator Gorakhpur including date of joining in Gorakhpur zone.2-Posting details of entire class 3 employees in the office of D.F.O. and Chief conservator Gorakhpur including date of joining in Gorakhpur zone. 3-Posting details of entire class 4 employees in the office of D.F.O. and Chief conservator Gorakhpur including date of joining in Gorakhpur zone. 4-You may also provide the table rotation carried out by HOD in regard to sought information under point 1 and 2.
* Concerned PIO Shree Anil Kumar Srivastava
Supporting document ((only pdf upto 1 MB))
You may also provide the table rotation carried out by HOD in regard to sought information under point 1 and 2.
ReplyDeleteThis point must be noted that the concerned officer directed by the office of principal chief conservator to provide information did not communicate even in the matter. Information under point 1 is also available in the office of principal chief conservator.